Populist leader suggests ahead of NATO summit that Slovakia might be better off neutral
BRATISLAVA, Slovakia (AP) — Slovakia's populist Prime Minister Robert Fico suggested Tuesday that his country might be better off neutral as he and other officials prepared for a NATO summit next week.
Fico made the remarks before heading into a meeting with political party leaders and President Peter Pellegrini to discuss proposals to increase defense spending to meet targets that the alliance is moving toward. Fico accused Western leaders of being 'warmongers' who enable weapons profiteering in their support of Ukraine.
'Neutrality would be very beneficial for Slovakia,' he said, adding that, 'Unfortunately, such a decision is not in my hands.' Fico's comments suggested a withdrawal from NATO, but when pressed by reporters to elaborate he declined to comment.
Fico would not have the authority to pull Slovakia out of the alliance, which could be prompted by a referendum and would require action by Parliament. A broad spectrum of politicians rejected the notion in reaction to his comments.
NATO meets for a summit in the Netherlands on June 24-25, where the allies are due to agree a new defense spending target in line with demands by U.S. President Donald Trump.
The aim is to increase the spending to 3.5% of GDP for core defense spending on tanks, warplanes, air defense, missiles and hiring extra troops. A further 1.5% would be spent on things like roads, bridges, ports and airfields.
Slovakia, a NATO member since 2004, currently spends 2%.
Pellegrini and most Slovakian politicians, from the government and the opposition, dismissed Fico's suggestion to become neutral. The president said that Slovakia will stay united with its allies on the spending issue at the summit.
Fico's views on Russia's war on Ukraine differ sharply from most other European leaders. He opposes any military aid for Ukraine, lashed out at EU sanctions on Russia and vowed to block Ukraine from joining NATO.
Unlike many Western politicians, Fico has not visited Kyiv since the start of the Russian full-scale invasion more than three years ago.
His government has faced vocal protests against its pro-Russian stance and other policies.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Associated Press
41 minutes ago
- Associated Press
Trump says Gabbard was 'wrong' about Iran and Israeli strikes could be 'very hard to stop'
WASHINGTON (AP) — President Donald Trump said Friday that his director of national intelligence, Tulsi Gabbard, was 'wrong' when she previously said that the U.S. believed Iran wasn't building a nuclear weapon, and he suggested that it would be 'very hard to stop' Israel's strikes on Iran in order to negotiate a possible ceasefire. Trump has recently taken a more aggressive public stance toward Tehran as he's sought more time to weigh whether to attack Iran by striking its well-defended Fordo uranium enrichment facility. Buried under a mountain, the facility is believed to be out of the reach of all but America's 'bunker-buster' bombs. After landing in New Jersey for an evening fundraiser for his super political action committee, Trump was asked about Gabbard's comments to Congress in March that U.S. spy agencies believed that Iran wasn't working on nuclear warheads. The president responded, 'Well then, my intelligence community is wrong. Who in the intelligence community said that?' Informed that it had been Gabbard, Trump said, 'She's wrong.' In a subsequent post on X, Gabbard said her testimony was taken out of context 'as a way to manufacture division.' 'America has intelligence that Iran is at the point that it can produce a nuclear weapon within weeks to months, if they decide to finalize the assembly,' she wrote. 'President Trump has been clear that can't happen, and I agree.' Still, disavowing Gabbard's previous assessment came a day after the White House said Trump would decide within two weeks whether the U.S. military would get directly involved in the conflict between Israel and Iran. It said seeking additional time was 'based on the fact that there's a substantial chance of negotiations that may or may not take place with Iran in the near future.' But on Friday, Trump himself seemed to cast doubts on the possibility of talks leading to a pause in fighting between Israel and Iran. He said that, while he might support a ceasefire, Israel's strikes on Iran could be 'very hard to stop.' Asked about Iran suggesting that, if the U.S. was serious about furthering negotiations, it could call on Israel to stop its strikes, Trump responded, 'I think it's very hard to make that request right now.' 'If somebody is winning, it's a little bit harder to do than if somebody is losing,' Trump said. 'But we're ready, willing and able, and we've been speaking to Iran, and we'll see what happens.' The president later added, 'It's very hard to stop when you look at it.' 'Israel's doing well in terms of war. And, I think, you would say that Iran is doing less well. It's a little bit hard to get somebody to stop,' Trump said. Trump campaigned on decrying 'endless wars' and has vowed to be an international peacemaker. That's led some, even among conservatives, to point to Trump's past criticism of the U.S. invasion of Iraq beginning in 2003 as being at odds with his more aggressive stance toward Iran now. Trump suggested the two situations were very different, though. 'There were no weapons of mass destruction. I never thought there were. And that was somewhat pre-nuclear. You know, it was, it was a nuclear age, but nothing like it is today,' Trump said of his past criticism of the administration of President George W. Bush. He added of Iran's current nuclear program, 'It looked like I'm right about the material that they've gathered already. It's a tremendous amount of material.' Trump also cast doubts on Iran's developing nuclear capabilities for civilian pursuits, like power generation. 'You're sitting on one of the largest oil piles anywhere in the world,' he said. 'It's a little bit hard to see why you'd need that.' ____
CBS News
41 minutes ago
- CBS News
Andrew Cuomo, Jim McGreevey and Anthony Weiner are all running for office again. Is 2025 the year of the political comeback?
Are voters forgiving, and are they willing to elect people who may have left office under a cloud? This year, Andrew Cuomo, Jim McGreevey and Anthony Weiner are all trying to make a comeback. Cuomo resigned as governor of New York following allegations of sexual harassment. McGreevey left the New Jersey governor's mansion following public acknowledgement of homosexuality and an extramarital affair. Weiner resigned from Congress in a sexting scandal. All three are back running for office this year, so-called "boomerang candidates," coming back for a second bite at the political apple. Cuomo is running in the New York City mayoral primary, Weiner is running for City Council, and McGreevey is seeking to become mayor of Jersey City. "Voters can vote based on whatever they want" They are running based on their experience, telling voters they have it what it takes in these difficult political times. "I can't speak for anyone else, but I'm running for the City Council. Arguably, the most qualified person ever to run for this office," Weiner said. "If people want to talk about my history, or they want to talk about something they know about my private life, that's fine. Voters can vote based on whatever they want." "I don't even think necessarily they have to forget, but the have to forgive. They have to say, alright, you, for whatever reason, made a bad decision, ABC, but overall, we think you're competent, we think you're experienced, we think you're committed to the well being of the city, and we're going to trust you," McGreevey said. "I think New Yorkers are forgiving people" Political experts think they each have a shot, especially because voters all across the nation sent President Trump back to the White House despite his conviction in the Stormy Daniels case. "I think New Yorkers are forgiving people, and they're willing to give someone a second chance," law professor and political analyst J.C. Polanco said. Polanco says the members of the boomerang group is coming back because public service and the spotlight are hard to give up. "I mean, it's just addictive, and there's no way you get it out of your system. And remember, in politics, timing and your name identification matters," Polanco said. "To some degree, candidates don't get to choose what voters care about. And if someone knows something about me that they don't like, and they say, I'll never vote for Weiner, so be it. But a lot more people are saying to me, You know what? We need someone with guts and someone with experience. This is kind of that moment," Weiner said. Cuomo and Weiner will find out Tuesday if voters are in a forgiving mood. McGreevey has no primary, so he'll have to wait until November.
Bloomberg
41 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
Trump Says Spain Has to Pay as NATO Seeks Deal on Spending
By Updated on Save NATO allies are pressing Spain to sign on to a stepped-up defense spending target and end a holdout that US President Donald Trump portrayed as unacceptable. Ahead of a North Atlantic Treaty Organization summit starting Tuesday that Trump is scheduled to attend, Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sanchez is the only leader who's outright opposed to the proposal to raise outlays to 5% of gross domestic product.
