Jeff Bezos's Washinton Post Plans to Add Random Opinion Writers Edited by AI
Given how artificial intelligence's pitfalls dominate the daily news cycle, you'd think that the media industry would take a cautionary approach to AI. Yeah, think again. In an effort to boost readership, the Washington Post plans to expand its opinion section to include newbie writers who will be guided by artificial intelligence.
Since April, the Post has worked on scaling an initiative to bring new voices to the paper. Multiple people confirmed with the New York Times that the program, dubbed Ripple, involves publishing established Substack writers and nonprofessionals. On the surface, it sounds similar to previous contributor models utilized (not necessarily successfully) by the Huffington Post and Forbes.
The biggest difference is that the Post won't guide new writers with a human. That's way too basic. Instead, the outlet will use Ember, an AI coach, to oversee the process. Per the Times, its current prototypes include a 'story strength' tracker and a sidebar laying out basic components like 'early thesis', 'supporting points,' and 'memorable ending'. It also features a live assistant to deliver writing prompts and help shape content.
Each article, which will be published outside of the Post's usual paywall, will still be reviewed by a human before it goes live. Per the Times, Ember will begin testing this fall. But why test it at all? We've seen this exact same scenario play out before. Just two years ago, CNET came under fire after publishing AI-guided articles with barely any disclosure. Although editor-in-chief Connie Guglielmo later stated that each story was 'reviewed, fact-checked and edited by an editor with topical expertise', Futurism broke down how one of the articles highlighted by Guglielmo was riddled with errors.
The Post has struggled to successfully adapt to the ever-changing media landscape. Last year, it launched a new subscription model in an attempt to boost revenue after losing $77 million. But a fancy subscription model can't save you if you're led by dickheads. In January, the Post laid off about 4 percent of its workforce in an effort to recoup losses. Just a month later, owner Jeff Bezos' controversial overhaul of the opinion section (which prompted opinion editor David Shipley to immediately resign) cost the outlet over 75,000 digital subscribers.
Artificial intelligence could potentially be useful for journalism. Currently, the Times uses it to shift through large databases and recommend articles. Except Ember is being given a much more significant role. And given that journalists at multiple outlets, including the Atlantic and Politico, are pushing back against AI, the Post's entire plan seems especially ridiculous. But hey, what the hell do we know?
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
TechCrunch
18 minutes ago
- TechCrunch
Deezer starts labeling AI-generated music to tackle streaming fraud
Deezer announced on Friday that it will start labeling albums that include AI-generated tracks as part of its efforts to combat streaming fraud. The company reports that about 18% of the music uploaded each day — more than 20,000 tracks — is now fully AI-generated. Although most of these tracks don't go viral, Deezer says around 70% of their streams are fake and that they are designed to earn royalties fraudulently. To combat this, AI-generated tracks on Deezer are now clearly tagged. These tracks also won't appear in editorial playlists or algorithm-based recommendations, and fraudulent streams are being filtered out of royalty payments. The company says the new labels will be a game changer in helping listeners determine the difference between human-created music and AI content. Image Credits:Deezer Deezer notes that for now, AI-only songs make up just 0.5% of all streams on its platform, but that the trend is growing fast. 'We've detected a significant uptick in delivery of AI-generated music only in the past few months and we see no sign of it slowing down. It's an industry-wide issue, and we are committed to leading the way in increasing transparency by helping music fans identify which albums include AI music,' said Deezer CEO Alexis Lanternier in a press release. 'AI is not inherently good or bad, but we believe a responsible and transparent approach is key to building trust with our users and the music industry,' he continued. 'We are also clear in our commitment to safeguarding the rights of artists and songwriters at a time where copyright law is being put into question in favor of training AI models.' Techcrunch event Save $200+ on your TechCrunch All Stage pass Build smarter. Scale faster. Connect deeper. Join visionaries from Precursor Ventures, NEA, Index Ventures, Underscore VC, and beyond for a day packed with strategies, workshops, and meaningful connections. Save $200+ on your TechCrunch All Stage pass Build smarter. Scale faster. Connect deeper. Join visionaries from Precursor Ventures, NEA, Index Ventures, Underscore VC, and beyond for a day packed with strategies, workshops, and meaningful connections. Boston, MA | REGISTER NOW The move comes as Universal Music Group, Warner Music Group, and Sony Music Entertainment are reportedly in talks to license their work to AI startups Udio and Suno. The startups are being sued by the record companies for copyright infringement, and any deal would help to settle lawsuits between them, Bloomberg reported earlier this month.
Washington Post
18 minutes ago
- Washington Post
Trump calls for special prosecutor to investigate 2020 election, reviving longstanding grievance
WASHINGTON — President Donald Trump on Friday called for the appointment of a special prosecutor to investigate the 2020 election won by Democrat Joe Biden, repeating his baseless claim that the contest was marred by widespread fraud. 'Biden was grossly incompetent, and the 2020 election was a total FRAUD!' Trump said in a social media post in which he also sought to favorably contrast his immigration enforcement approach with that of the former president. 'The evidence is MASSIVE and OVERWHELMING. A Special Prosecutor must be appointed. This cannot be allowed to happen again in the United States of America! Let the work begin!'
Yahoo
20 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Could the "Next Nvidia Stock" Actually Be... Nvidia Stock?
There seems at least a solid probability that Nvidia stock still has not just good or even great but amazing growth potential left. Year-over-year earnings growth solidly in the double-digit percentages and a reasonable stock valuation should be all that's needed to keep Nvidia investors very happy. 10 stocks we like better than Nvidia › Many articles have been written over the last year or so about "the next Nvidia (NASDAQ: NVDA) stock," which refers to a stock that has the potential to post incredibly strong gains over at least the medium term, just like the artificial intelligence (AI) chip leader has done. With the risk of sounding like I've lost my mind, I think there's a good case to be made that "the next Nvidia stock" could actually be Nvidia stock. In other words, there seems at least a solid probability that Nvidia stock still has not just good or even great but amazing growth potential left. Think of it as "Nvidia the superstar stock 2.0." I say "at the risk of sounding like I've lost my mind" because I understand the law of large numbers strongly works against my thesis. This "law" basically means that the larger a company becomes, the more difficult it becomes to continue to grow revenue and earnings at a strong pace on a year-over-year percentage basis. And year-over-year earnings (and cash flow) growth is what largely powers stock prices higher. Nvidia is massive. It has a market cap of $3.55 trillion, as of June 18, making it the world's second most valuable publicly traded company, trailing Microsoft by just a sliver. Moreover, Nvidia management expects the company to generate revenue of $45 billion in its fiscal second quarter, which equates to an annual revenue run rate of $180 billion. To be clear -- I think it's highly unlikely that Nvidia will ever again be able to pump out a long consecutive string of year-over-year quarterly earnings growth in the very high double-digit to triple-digit percentages. But I don't think it has to do that in order to deliver stellar returns to investors for some time. Year-over-year earnings growth solidly in the double-digits plus a reasonable stock valuation should be all that's needed to keep investors very happy. What makes me have confidence in the "reasonable valuation" bit? Currently, Nvidia stock's valuation is reasonable by just about every measure, but that has not always been true. (For reference, it's trading at 25.4 times Wall Street's projected forward earnings per share, or EPS, as of June 18. That's an attractive valuation for a company that analysts expect will grow EPS at an average annual rate of 30% over the next five years.) The main reason I think the valuation will likely remain relatively reasonable (at least much of the time) for a while circles back to that law of large numbers. Wall Street analysts and many investors are well aware of this phenomenon, and I think most folks in both those groups will tend to continue to significantly underestimate Nvidia's future earnings growth potential due to thoughts like these: An investor and analyst thought: It's so massive, there's no way it can keep growing earnings much. An investor thought: After its massive run-up, I've missed my chance to buy Nvidia stock. (How many of us thought that about, say, Amazon many years ago, only to be proven wrong?) Consistent beliefs like these will help keep Nvidia stock's valuation reasonable in part because Wall Street analysts are going to tend to be too conservative in their estimates, in my view. Moreover, some investors will probably feel that Wall Street is being too liberal in their estimates because they themselves feel cautious given Nvidia's humongous size. Yes, this caution among many investors would likely slow down Nvidia stock's rise, but that's better than the stock frequently shooting up to unsustainable levels, only to plunge back down to Earth, in my opinion. This topic could be several articles, so here's just a brief list. 1. The company's now-annual cadence of launching new graphics processing unit (GPU) architectures for its products for its AI-accelerated data center, gaming, and other market platforms. Blackwell is its current architecture. 2. The approach of the widespread legalization of autonomous vehicles. Nvidia's GPUs will be the "brains" inside many of these vehicles. 3. The approach of the era of humanoid robots. Nvidia's GPUs will be the "brains" inside many of these robots. 4. The company will stay ahead of the innovation pack by entering emerging new technologies via organic growth and acquisitions. An example here is quantum computing, in which I think Nvidia will be increasingly involved. Before you buy stock in Nvidia, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and Nvidia wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $659,171!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $891,722!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 995% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 172% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join . See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of June 9, 2025 John Mackey, former CEO of Whole Foods Market, an Amazon subsidiary, is a member of The Motley Fool's board of directors. Beth McKenna has positions in Nvidia. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Amazon, Microsoft, and Nvidia. The Motley Fool recommends the following options: long January 2026 $395 calls on Microsoft and short January 2026 $405 calls on Microsoft. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. Could the "Next Nvidia Stock" Actually Be... Nvidia Stock? was originally published by The Motley Fool Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
