I don't get it: why can't Iran be allowed to have nuclear weapons?

The truth is that the arguments used to justify these weapons at Faslane is spurious. The world was fortunate that the Cuban crisis and the anti-nuclear campaigning throughout the world in the 1960s led to the UN Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty in 1968. This was of critical importance at the time, otherwise we might now have 40 nuclear weapons states rather than nine. There was other progress later on nuclear testing, on reductions in warhead numbers, on better inter-state communications but we are now in a situation of rapid technological competition to see who can destroy the world faster. No political leaders of substance in the nuclear states show any interest in moving the world back from this spiral.
By not imposing an economic, military and cultural boycott on the aggressor state, Israel, as we have done on Russia, western hypocrisy has sent a message to many states who must be thinking why shouldn't we have nuclear weapons too since you have them and tell us it keeps you safe. Until it doesn't.
Isobel Lindsay, Biggar.
Read more letters
Nuclear energy is essential
J Pountain (Letters, June 16) asks a question regarding nuclear and renewable energy and refers to Rebecca McQuillan's article ('Should Scotland blindly follow England down the nuclear power path?', The Herald, June 16). Your correspondent's main question was understanding how hydro power and nuclear power are equivalent in how they supply electricity to the grid? The answer is, they are not equivalent.
Pumped hydro along with wind and solar energy provide intermittent supplies which require back-up from gas-fired generation and nuclear as base load. More recently more pumped hydro and battery farms are being built to back-up intermittent renewable sources of energy but these will only provide short periods, hours or half day, and total back-up is needed from gas fired plants and nuclear plants. These will provide the greatest amount of back-up along with some inter-connector supply from Europe.
The Grid is a Great Britain electricity supply and it is now recognised that nuclear energy is essential for security of supply, keeping the price of electricity as low as possible and playing a big part in achieving net zero in the energy sector. The Scottish Government would do well to reconsider its objection to nuclear energy. Nuclear plants have been designed in the past to provide base load but new plants can be designed to provide flexible output similar to gas-fired plants and which they could eventually replace. The solution to the energy crisis requires an engineering solution, not a political one.
Charles Scott, Edinburgh.
Beware threat to our liberty
Neil Cowan of Amnesty International writes that the blind acceptance of live facial recognition systems by the state will violate our individual rights to privacy, freedom of movement, expression and lawful assembly ("We need to guard against the rise of mass surveillance", The Herald, June16). Of course it will. That is what the state wants – control. But Mr Cowan didn't go far enough in outlining the threats to our civil liberties.
In his astonishingly prescient 1969 novel, Stand on Zanzibar, John Brunner predicted that an algorithm-driven worldwide surveillance system would track every citizen at all times using the power of "intelligent computers" as he called them then, or AI, as we seem to be calling them today. Artificial, certainly, but intelligent? No, not now and not ever. They are machines and however sophisticated the programs which drive them, they can only follow instructions which humans give them.
To trust our civil liberties to the people who write these instructions is madness. There will come a time when it will be argued by governments and the IT billionaires that we would all be safer if we were chipped like our dogs and cats and that time is coming sooner than you might think. Our mobile phones and everything we do on them is already tracked.
Who you are, where you are and what you are doing and why, is nobody's business but your own, unless it can be proved, by corroborated evidence, that you are breaking the law.
Are you prepared to give up that freedom to further the profits of Musk, Bezos and Zuckerberg, or the political aims of Trump, Farage and the Chinese Communist Party?
AJ Clarence, Prestwick.
A handle on Walter Scott
In saying that Handel was first and foremost an opera composer Linda Hoskins (Letters, June 14) shows that she has kept abreast of musicological matters.The conductor Christopher Hogwood has remarked on the belated heightened awareness of the quality of Handel's operas.
Yet his former immense popularity derived mainly from his oratorios, harpsichord suites etc, and how do these compare with Bach's?
Regarding the question of the true worth of Scott's novels, it would be interesting to know what proportion of the reading public actually read Scott back in the days of his putative popularity. I can't prove it, but suspect that even in the 19th century, if anyone mentioned such names as Dandie Dinmont, Lucy Ashon, James Deans etc, almost any Scot would be prompted to think of paddle steamers rather than characters in Waverley novels.
Robin Dow, Rothesay.
• To add to the defence of Scott by Linda Hoskins, Sir Walter has the distinction that his novels influenced more operas than any other author.
Robert F Gibson, Milngavie.
Sir Walter Scott (Image: National Galleries of Scotland/Getty)
Unexpected tonic for sales of Cola
Congratulations to Aldi: you report that its own-brand gin from Scotland has just been named the world's best ("Aldi's gin named best in the world", The Herald, June 14). I see its name is Còmhla, Gaelic for "Together". There is a danger, though, that this could be mispronounced as "Cola". Being sent to the shops to stock up with supplies could have unfortunate consequences.
Gilbert MacKay, Newton Mearns.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

South Wales Argus

38 minutes ago

• South Wales Argus

Two Middle East-related protests to be held in central London on Saturday

A protest organised by groups under the Palestine Coalition banner will gather in Russell Square from 12pm, before marching to Whitehall via Aldwych and the Strand for an assembly outside Downing Street. Former Scottish First Minister Humza Yousaf, former Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn and musician Paloma Faith are among those set to give speeches at the assembly. Meanwhile, a static counter-protest organised by pro-Israeli group Stop The Hate will be held at the same time just north of Waterloo Bridge at the junction with the Strand. The group said it would meet at the location from 12.30pm onwards. Police have set out conditions for the first protest under the Public Order Act which demands that any person taking part in the procession must remain within Russell Square ahead of the protest and must not deviate from its specified route. Demonstrators must then stay in a specified part of Whitehall for the assembly, which must finish by 5.30pm, the force said. The Palestine Coalition is comprised of a number of different groups, including the Palestine Solidarity Campaign (PSC) and Stop The War. Stop The War said in an advertisement for the event on its website: 'Israel's attacks on Gaza and the West Bank are intensifying. Their starvation policy continues. And now Israel attacks on Iran seem intended to lead us into a full-scale war in the Middle East. 'The UK Government has at last accepted that Israel's actions in Gaza are unconscionable. Now they must act – words are not enough.' Discussions are ongoing regarding possible conditions for the Stop The Hate protest, the Met said. In a post on X, Stop The Hate said: 'Our families in Israel are under attack: standing bravely in the face of threats and ballistic missiles, whilst the people of Iran are bravely facing down their totalitarian government — now it's our turn to stand proudly in solidarity with them.' The demonstrations come after reports on Friday that the Home Secretary will ban Palestine Action after the group vandalised two aircraft at RAF Brize Norton. Yvette Cooper has decided to proscribe the group, making it a criminal offence to belong to or support Palestine Action, after footage posted online showed two people inside the RAF base, with one appearing to spray paint into an aircraft's jet engine. PSC described the move on social media as 'outrageous', while the Campaign Against Antisemitism welcomed the news, saying: 'Nobody should be surprised that those who vandalised Jewish premises with impunity have now been emboldened to sabotage RAF jets.'

Scottish Sun

an hour ago

• Scottish Sun

Major update on benefit claimed by thousands of Scots

The consultation carried out after the move was announced last December received 260 responses CHECK IT OUT Major update on benefit claimed by thousands of Scots Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window) Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) NATS ministers ploughed on with plans to scrap the two-child cap despite finding overwhelming opposition among Scots. Three-quarters of responses to a Scottish Government consultation on the move were against axing the limit. Sign up for Scottish Sun newsletter Sign up 1 Three-quarters of responses to a Scottish Gov consultation on the move were against axing the limit Credit: Alamy And ministers were repeatedly told parents should not have more kids than they can afford. But despite the findings, SNP ministers this week said they would press ahead with the £155million-a-year plan from next March. Scottish Conservative social security spokesman Alexander Stewart said the consultation responses 'show how out of touch the SNP are with the ordinary Scots who pick up the tab for the Nationalists' ballooning benefits bill'. He said: 'The vast majority of the public back the two-child cap because it strikes the right balance. 'Social security payments must be fair both to people who are struggling and to taxpayers who have to weigh up their own finances when deciding how many children to have.' The consultation carried out after the move was announced last December received 260 responses. Of these, 190 said the SNP should keep the cap. They were predominantly individuals, while the minority who backed the plan were mostly charities and anti-poverty organisations. One said: 'Having children is a financial choice - it is not for the taxpayer to pay for people's choice to have more children.' Another said 'taxpayers should not be responsible for bringing up children' and 'if you can't afford them, don't have them'. Angela Rayner says lifting 2-child benefit cap not 'silver bullet' for ending poverty after demanding cuts for millions One respondent said the policy was not about helping children but 'about the SNP helping themselves in next year's election', while another said the Nats were 'addicted to benefits' and saw them as 'a great vote booster'. An 'easy read' summary of the consulation, published today, added that 'some people said mitigating the two-child cap might encourage people to have bigger families' or 'make people rely more on benefits and not work'. The Scottish Government is currently spending around £1.3 billion more on benefits than would have been spent in Scotland if devolution of welfare hadn't taken place, due to additional spending decisions, and is forecast to be spending £2.1 billion more by 2029-30. The minority that supported scrapping the cap mostly worked in organisations that work with impoverished families. They highlighted the plight of families struggling to fee their children and the traumatic impact of the 'rape clause' the allows women to claim for addtional children if they were impregnated without consent. Lifting the two-child cap is forecast to cost £155million next year, rising to £194million in 2029-30. Polling in 2023 suggested just one in three Scots think the two-child benefits cap should be axed. The rule was backed by 50 per cent of over-16s, according to YouGov. Only 32 per cent said it should be abolished, with 19 per cent of people unsure. The policy applies to benefits including Child Tax Credit and Universal Credit, and stops parents from claiming for a third or additional child born after April 2017. It does not apply to Child Benefit. Scottish Social Justice Secretary Shirley-Anne Somerville told MSPs this week that the two-child cap 'punishes people for having children'. She said: 'The Scottish Government will deliver the effective scrapping of the two-child cap when Labour has failed to do so.'

Glasgow Times

an hour ago

• Glasgow Times

Two Middle East-related protests to be held in central London on Saturday

A protest organised by groups under the Palestine Coalition banner will gather in Russell Square from 12pm, before marching to Whitehall via Aldwych and the Strand for an assembly outside Downing Street. Former Scottish First Minister Humza Yousaf, former Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn and musician Paloma Faith are among those set to give speeches at the assembly. Meanwhile, a static counter-protest organised by pro-Israeli group Stop The Hate will be held at the same time just north of Waterloo Bridge at the junction with the Strand. The group said it would meet at the location from 12.30pm onwards. Police have set out conditions for the first protest under the Public Order Act which demands that any person taking part in the procession must remain within Russell Square ahead of the protest and must not deviate from its specified route. Demonstrators must then stay in a specified part of Whitehall for the assembly, which must finish by 5.30pm, the force said. The Palestine Coalition is comprised of a number of different groups, including the Palestine Solidarity Campaign (PSC) and Stop The War. Stop The War said in an advertisement for the event on its website: 'Israel's attacks on Gaza and the West Bank are intensifying. Their starvation policy continues. And now Israel attacks on Iran seem intended to lead us into a full-scale war in the Middle East. 'The UK Government has at last accepted that Israel's actions in Gaza are unconscionable. Now they must act – words are not enough.' Discussions are ongoing regarding possible conditions for the Stop The Hate protest, the Met said. In a post on X, Stop The Hate said: 'Our families in Israel are under attack: standing bravely in the face of threats and ballistic missiles, whilst the people of Iran are bravely facing down their totalitarian government — now it's our turn to stand proudly in solidarity with them.' The demonstrations come after reports on Friday that the Home Secretary will ban Palestine Action after the group vandalised two aircraft at RAF Brize Norton. Yvette Cooper has decided to proscribe the group, making it a criminal offence to belong to or support Palestine Action, after footage posted online showed two people inside the RAF base, with one appearing to spray paint into an aircraft's jet engine. PSC described the move on social media as 'outrageous', while the Campaign Against Antisemitism welcomed the news, saying: 'Nobody should be surprised that those who vandalised Jewish premises with impunity have now been emboldened to sabotage RAF jets.'