Lahore Qalandars' Viral PSL Win Celebration Has An Unexpected Indian Twist

When the Lahore Qalandars lifted the Pakistan Super League (PSL) trophy, they knew they had made history. But it wasn't just the victory that had them jumping with joy - it was the unexpected reward that followed: Shiny new iPhones handed out to the team, including a 24-karat gold-plated iPhone 16 Pro for captain Shaheen Shah Afridi. The locker room erupted in celebration, with star pacer Haris Rauf joking, "No brother, this is unfair!" in response to Shaheen's exclusive prize.
पाकिस्तान की क्रिकेट लीग PSL का फ़ाइनल Lahore Qalandars ने जीत लिया है। और पाकिस्तानी क्रिकेटर को iphone 📱 दिया जाएगा तो देखो कैसे खुस हो रहे 🤣🤣 #PSLFinal #Pakistan #psl #lahore pic.twitter.com/os9AbacPtc
— sanki_kemar (@AnkitSingh94068) May 30, 2025
The video, now viral across Twitter and Instagram, showcases a moment of pure sporting joy - but behind the glittering devices lies a story that connects straight to India's booming manufacturing landscape.
Apple has quietly but significantly shifted a large chunk of its production operations to India over the past few years. The iPhone 16 series - including the luxury Pro models - are now being manufactured at Foxconn and Tata-run plants in Tamil Nadu and Karnataka, as part of Apple's broader strategy to diversify beyond China.
So yes, it's entirely possible (and probable) that the devices sparking joy in a Pakistani dressing room were built in India.
It's a symbolic twist in the tale - one where India, often locked in regional sporting rivalries, is now becoming a key global tech supplier, even behind the scenes of its neighbour's cricketing celebrations.
What was once purely a US-China manufacturing story has taken a distinct South Asian turn, with India quietly powering the gadgets that players across borders now celebrate.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Indian Express

6 hours ago

• Indian Express

From the Opinions Editor: India needs a well thought out trade strategy, but first it needs a China strategy

Dear Express Reader Over the past 11 years, the Narendra Modi government has taken several steps to shore up the economic momentum, and put the country on a higher growth trajectory. But, despite its efforts to ensure macroeconomic stability, revive private sector investments and boost household consumption, growth has been less than spectacular. Between 2014-15 and 2024-25, the economy grew at an average of just 6.2 per cent. Now, in its third term, whether pushed by Donald Trump's tariff war or the imperatives of growth, the government is making a determined effort to sew up trade agreements, hoping they will help embed the country into global supply chains, catalyse exports, and push up growth. A trade deal has been struck with the UK, and talks are proceeding with the US and the EU, with many of the issues that have previously held back these agreements being either resolved or sidestepped. These agreements will ensure greater market access and bring down tariffs, improving competitiveness of exports. But the question is: Will these trade deals be enough? Can they alone facilitate India's deep integration with global supply chains? Can the country emerge as a major production hub without integrating more closely with the supply chains that run through South and East Asia which form a vital part of global production systems? The case of Apple is instructive. The dramatic scaling up of the Apple ecosystem in the country — the company has recently said that iPhones sold in the US market will be mostly sourced from India — is a remarkable development. It is a consequence of both the government's production linked incentive scheme and the firm wanting to diversify its production bases away from China. Now, Apple provides a supplier list — a list that represents 98 per cent of the company's direct spend for materials, manufacturing and assembly of its products worldwide. This would include suppliers not only those involved in the production of the iPhone but also in other Apple products. As per this list, in 2023, 156 of the company's suppliers had manufacturing locations in China, 42 suppliers were located in Japan, 35 in Vietnam and 33 in South Korea, and 14 in India. Two years later the numbers would have changed slightly — as per a recent report there are now more than 20 component suppliers in India — but, they would still point towards the centrality of South and East Asia, and China in particular, to the global production system — a fact that cannot be ignored. If India wants to be a part of the production chain of other Apple products and grab a greater share of the value addition in the production process, it would need the smooth flow of components/materials into the country and more component manufacturers to be located here. And therein lies India's conundrum. What is India's China strategy? Should the country also be a part of RCEP (Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership) and CPTPP (Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership)? In 2019, India chose not to be part of RCEP — the trade agreement that spans China, Japan, South Korea, Australia, New Zealand and the 10 ASEAN member states (Brunei, Cambodia, Indonesia, Laos, Malaysia, Myanmar, Philippines, Singapore, Thailand, and Vietnam). The decision to not join was in large part attributed to concerns over China. But the trade relationship with China has only deepened since. And that is the reality, contrary to the desire of reducing the dependence on China. In 2018-19, before India withdrew from RCEP, its trade deficit with China stood at $53.5 billion. By 2024-25, it had surged to $99.2 billion, without RCEP. India, though, is not alone. Even as the US has tried to reduce its reliance on China, its deficit with the country, though it has declined in recent years, stood at a staggering $295 billion in 2024. And this does not account for rerouting of exports through other countries. But, it's not just about companies like Apple. The issue around rare earth minerals — used in a range of sectors such as smartphones, TVs, EV cars, solar panels and jet engines — underlines China's centrality to the global production system. This reality cannot be wished away. China accounts for 90 per cent of global processing of rare earths. With the country placing restrictions on its exports, EV manufacturers in India have reportedly sought the government's intervention in the matter. If these supplies continue to be restricted, India's EV push, and thus its efforts in shifting towards a cleaner vehicle fleet, risk being affected. And that won't be the only sector that is likely to be impacted. There are some reports which suggest that the government has raised the issue of export curbs on rare earth minerals and magnets with China. But it's not just India. Even the US has been affected. In fact, one of the key aspects of the US-China agreement that was announced by Donald Trump is the upfront export of full magnets, and any necessary rare earths by China. It is difficult to see companies move their production to India on the scale that is needed for the country to emerge as a manufacturing powerhouse unless they can be sure of stable trade relations, of supply chains working smoothly, of the seamless movement of components/personnel from other jurisdictions. India needs a well thought out trade strategy. The lack of clarity partly explains the sluggish pace of investments in the country by domestic as well as foreign firms — both of whom seem to be more inclined to invest in other jurisdictions presumably because the risk-return matrix is not as favourable in India. A clear strategy should give these firms the confidence needed to invest in the country. Take care, Ishan

India.com

8 hours ago

• India.com

Most expensive iPhone is made for just Rs 42000 but Apple sells it for Rs 1.32 lakh due to...

iPhone price in India New Delhi: American tech giant Apple sells its iPhones in various models at premium prices, but did you know that the actual manufacturing cost of these devices is significantly lower? Last year, the most expensive models were iPhone 16 series and iPhone 16 Pro Max. But have you ever wondered how much it actually costs to make this phone that sells for lakhs? In this article, we will tell you the cost of making these handsets. When the actual cost is so low, you might wonder why Apple charges more than double the price from customers. Today, we're going to tell you about the manufacturing cost of the iPhone 16 Pro Max. In fact, shortly after this phone was launched last year, a report was released revealing details about its manufacturing cost. Manufacturing Cost of iPhone 16 Pro Max The Bill of Materials (BOM) cost of the iPhone 16 Pro Max is USD 485 (approximately Rs 41,992 or Rs 42,000), according to market research firm TD Cowen. The report also stated that this is slightly higher than the cost of the iPhone 15 Pro Max, which was USD 453 (around ₹39,222). Why does a phone made for Rs 41,000 sell for over a lakh? It's important to note that the BOM only includes the cost of raw materials and assembly. The final retail price also factors in expenses like software development, marketing, and logistics, which significantly increase the overall cost. Currently, the 256GB variant of the iPhone 16 Pro Max is being sold on Flipkart for Rs 1,32,900. Check Key Details Here: The higher cost of the iPhone 16 Pro Max compared to the iPhone 15 Pro Max is due to the upgraded hardware components used in the handset. The display and rear camera system of the iPhone 16 Pro Max are the two most expensive parts, costing around ₹6,700. In comparison, these parts in the iPhone 15 Pro Max cost Rs 6,300 and Rs 5,900 respectively. The introduction of new LPDDR5X RAM technology has also added to the total cost With the RAM in the iPhone 16 Pro Max priced at Rs 1,400, whereas the older LPDDR5 RAM in the iPhone 15 Pro Max cost only Rs 1,000. The A18 Pro chipset and storage in the iPhone 16 Pro Max cost Rs 3,400 and Rs 1,900 respectively. Even after accounting for logistics and software development, Apple maintains a healthy gross margin and earns a significant profit on each model of the iPhone 16 Pro Max.

First Post

8 hours ago

• First Post

Australian pacer Sean Abbott narrates harrowing escape from Pakistan: 'Quite traumatic to be honest'

Abbott, who represented Quetta Gladiators in the 10th season of the Pakistan Super League, was among the overseas cricketers who boarded a chartered flight from PAF Air Base Nur Khan in Rawalpindi hours before it was struck by Indian armed forces. read more Australian pacer Sean Abbott did not return to Pakistan for the remaining matches of the Pakistan Super League, where he was playing for the Quetta Gladiators, after India and Pakistan agreed to end hostilities last month. Reuters Australian pacer Sean Abbott opened up on his harrowing escape from Pakistan last month after the 10th season of the Pakistan Super League was suspended due to an armed conflict against India. Abbott did not fly back to the country for the remaining matches of the season after the week-long suspension, but insists he would 'love to go back to Pakistan'. Abbott, who represented Quetta Gladiators this PSL season, was among the overseas players and members of the broadcast crew who boarded a chartered flight out of PAF Base Nur Khan in Rawalpindi hours before it was struck by the Indian armed forces . STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD 'Shocking. I found it quite traumatic to be honest. It was different for everyone. I don't think it really sunk in for a few guys. Once our phones started pinging when we landed in Dubai as to what was happening since we left, it was pretty full on,' Abbott was quoted by as saying ahead of a training session in Barbados, where Australia face West Indies in the first of three Tests starting Wednesday. 'But the PSL itself was a great experience. The locals, I got to experience the Pakistan culture which was quite cool. I haven't really had the chance to do that before. And a lovely bunch of lads, and a pretty good tournament. But not the way I wanted to finish,' added the 33-year-old pacer. 'Hopefully that sort of thing doesn't happen again' Abbott was not among the handful of overseas cricketers, including compatriot and Karachi Kings captain David Warner, returning to Pakistan after New Delhi and Islamabad agreed to a ceasefire following the United States' intervention. The seamer, however, hoped to return to Pakistan someday, though wishing he would not have to encounter such a situation again. 'I'd love to go back to Pakistan. Hopefully that sort of thing doesn't happen again. It's probably not something I want to experience again in terms of what was going when I left. But it was a fun tournament. 'Obviously with all the security reasons, all the teams were based at the same hotel, so lots of friends as part of the overseas contingent so it was good fun,' he added. The four-day military standoff between India and Pakistan took place days after a terror attack in Jammu and Kashmir's Pahalgam which led to the deaths of 26 individuals, a majority of them tourists. India came up with a military response named ' Operation Sindoor ' in which it targeted terror camps in Pakistan as well as Pakistan Occupied Kashmir (PoK). STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD It was after Pakistan responded with shelling and drone attacks at civilian areas along border towns on the Indian side that New Delhi escalated their military response, targeting the country's radar and air defence systems before destroying air bases belonging to the Pakistan Air Force. The four-day conflict had also put the 18th season of the Indian Premier League, which was eventually won by Royal Challengers Bengaluru, on a four-day pause.