Nation building and social dialogue for a just transition
To achieve this transition, we must engage in robust, meaningful, and inclusive social dialogue, ensuring that the transition is fair, equitable, and beneficial for all South Africans – a Just Transition.
Image: Armand Hough/Independent Newspapers
Every year, Freedom Day enables us to reflect on and pay tribute to the day South Africa initiated an irreversible transition grounded in the principles of inclusivity, equality, and justice through the country's first democratic elections.
That momentous occasion 31 years ago elected 490 able South Africans to constitute the Constitutional Assembly and entrusted them with the responsivity of drafting our democratic Constitution which would serve as the supreme law and a blueprint for a just and equal society.
Transitions have long been a part of South Africa's journey, and now, the crucial shift toward a low-carbon future presents an extraordinary opportunity to transform our nation.
The transition is not just an environmental necessity to ward off the climate crisis; it is a pivotal moment for nation-building that we cannot afford to overlook.
To achieve this transition, we must engage in robust, meaningful, and inclusive social dialogue, ensuring that the transition is fair, equitable, and beneficial for all South Africans – a Just Transition.
The concept of nation-building has deep roots in South Africa. Emerging from a negotiated settlement that ended years of oppression and systemic exclusion, our nation appreciates the significant role of social dialogue in fostering transformation.
Our Constitution was drafted through a process characterised by transparency and inclusivity, initiating the largest public participation effort in South Africa's history.
This foundational document was developed through social dialogue, supported by combined investments from the government, the private sector, and the international community, all standing in solidarity with South Africa's journey towards becoming a sovereign democratic state.
Today, we face new challenges, and social dialogue must be leveraged to navigate the complexities of transitioning from a fossil fuel-dependent economy to one that is sustainable and climate-resilient.
The just transition presents us with an opportunity to deepen our nation-building efforts, guided by the Constitution and the Just Transition Framework.
The Just Transition Framework identifies procedural justice as one of the key principles underpinning the transition to a low-carbon future, emphasising inclusive social dialogue and ensuring that affected groups actively participate in transition decisions.
Effective nation-building through social dialogue necessitates inclusive participation. Historically disadvantaged and vulnerable communities, often marginalised in national debates, must have meaningful seats at the table.
Their voices should not merely be consulted but they must actively shape the decisions that directly impact their futures.
Such inclusive dialogue ensures co-creation and legitimacy, fosters mutual trust, and promotes collective ownership of the outcomes, creating a foundation for societal cohesion in transition.
Social dialogue extends beyond structured forums to broader societal engagements, embracing educational initiatives, public awareness campaigns, and community-level dialogues.
This expansive approach helps demystify the complexities of the just transition, making the dialogue accessible to all South Africans and fostering a widespread culture of environmental consciousness and social solidarity.
We must meet people where they are for meaningful and sustained dialogue.
Tailoring our engagements and outreach to the realities of different communities—geographically, culturally, linguistically, and digitally—so that no one is left out of the conversation.
The Presidential Climate Commission (PCC) has adopted an expansive, inclusive, and meaningful approach in their social dialogues for their work programmes and also in the development of the Just Transition Framework, which serves as the blueprint for guiding South Africa's transition to a low-carbon future.
What is impactful about this approach is that dialogue it is not a once-off engagement, but rather a considered and continuous one.
The PCC does and must continue to work collaboratively with other stakeholders such as government, business, labour, youth, and civil society in leading and promoting social dialogue for the just transition.
The private sector holds substantial responsibilities in the nation-building process.
Businesses must actively engage in dialogue, recognising that sustainable practices are no longer optional but integral to their operational resilience and long-term profitability.
Through genuine participation in social dialogue, businesses can collaborate with labour and communities to innovate sustainable solutions, invest in local economic diversification, and contribute positively to social stability.
Labour unions, integral actors in South Africa's historical social compacts, likewise play a critical role in advocating for workers' interests while engaging in dialogue aimed at shaping just transition strategies.
Labour's active involvement ensures that the transition does not exacerbate inequality but instead promote decent work, fair wages, and improved conditions, preserving dignity and economic stability for workers and their families.
Government, tasked with the stewardship of national interests, must facilitate and sustain these dialogues transparently and inclusively, ensuring that commitments translate into tangible policy actions. Transparent governance builds trust, mitigates potential conflicts, and enhances accountability.
Freedom Day is a powerful declaration.
It reminds us that it is the responsibility of every individual and sector of society to build a thriving democracy.
Imagine a South Africa where everyone reaps the rewards of freedom, has their basic needs met, and voices heard. Together, through open dialogue and decisive action, the just transition will be a powerful catalyst for nation-building, a nation where no one is left behind.
Mbali Baduza, Presidential Climate Commissioner and CEO of We the People South Africa (an initiative of Constitution Hill Trust) and Zimasa Vazi, Senior Manager: Stakeholder Engagement, PCC Secretariat.
Mbali Baduza, Presidential Climate Commissioner and CEO of We the People South Africa (an initiative of Constitution Hill Trust).
Image: Supplied.
Zimasa Vazi, Senior Manager: Stakeholder Engagement, PCC Secretariat.
Image: Supplied.
BUSINESS REPORT
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
IOL News
6 hours ago
- IOL News
Thirst for Justice: Billions wasted as taps run dry
Residents resort to fetching water, pushing buckets home on trolleys due to the ongoing water shortage in their area. With the committee vowing to recall the DWS for a deeper probe into water boards, South Africa's water catastrophe has reached a breaking point. Image: Oupa Mokoena/Independent Newspapers THE water crisis in South Africa is not looming — it's already here, fueled by systemic failures, corruption, and a dangerous blame game between national and local government. This sinking reality dominated the Standing Committee on Public Accounts (Scopa) hearing, where the Department of Water and Sanitation (DWS) faced an intense interrogation over its financial mismanagement, R25 billion in unpaid municipal debts, and the collapse of basic service delivery. Minister Pemmy Majodina, making her debut Scopa appearance under the seventh administration, delivered a rather sobering admission: 'There is no crisis in bulk water supply — but at household level, the system is collapsing.' The root cause? A staggering 105 of the country's 144 municipalities are chronically underperforming, leaving millions without reliable water despite South Africa's dams operating at 98% capacity. The Minister was quick to deflect accountability, citing the constitutional division of powers. 'Whenever there's no water in a village, the DWS is blamed. But reticulation is a local government function,' she said. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Next Stay Close ✕ Yet the data presented by her department painted a damning picture of the consequences: Municipalities owe water boards R25bn, pushing critical entities such as Amatola, Lepelle, and Vaal Central to the brink of insolvency. Meanwhile, the DWS achieved just 70% of its performance targets despite spending 99.8% of its R21.4bn budget — a disparity Deputy Minister David Mahlobo attributed to 'multi-year infrastructure projects'. Corruption remains a festering wound. Over the past five years, the Department investigated 446 misconduct allegations, with 326 substantiated. Cases have been referred to the Directorate for Priority Crime Investigation (DPCI – alias Hawks) and the SA Police Service (SAPS), but convictions remain elusive. The SIU's ongoing probes reveal even darker rot: R4.7bn squandered on the 'War on Leaks' programme, which deployed untrained youth to fix municipal leaks — a function outside the DWS's mandate. Another R17.9 million was paid to a consulting firm with 'no evidence of work performed', while 'water tanker mafias' sabotage infrastructure to profit from emergency contracts. The hearing turned incendiary when MK Party MP Khethukuthula Madlala confronted the DWS over its inertia. 'If the government waits for formal complaints while people are being shot, we've failed,' he said. Minister Majodina conceded the grim reality: communities are too terrified to report extortion and vandalism, fearing violent retaliation. 'We share the frustration, but our hands are tied,' she admitted, highlighting the limitations of a system that requires sworn affidavits to act against criminal networks. The Auditor-General's findings further eroded confidence. The DWS has received three consecutive unqualified audits with 'material misstatements', while 37 procurement deviations, including a water-saving campaign that ballooned to R4.4bn, double its budget, exposed glaring financial controls. The Water Trading Entity (WTE) is owed R18bn, with debtors now taking 573 days to pay, up from 451 days last year. The collapse of water boards emerged as a national security threat. While Rand Water and Umngeni were praised as 'world-class', entities like Amatola and Magalies are buckling under municipal debt and governance chaos. Vaal Central's potential failure would paralyse the Free State and Northern Cape. Court battles rage as defiant municipalities — some owing billions, 'take the DWS to court after receiving debt letters'. The DA's Peter Atkinson delivered a warning: 'At R12bn a year, it will take 40 years to fix water infrastructure.' The DWS's own estimates confirm R400bn is needed just for the worst-performing municipalities, excluding metros. While the Department touted public-private partnerships as a solution, Deputy Minister Mahlobo acknowledged a brutal truth: 'Investors won't touch bankrupt municipalities.' The EFF's Veronica Mente's closing remarks cut to the heart of the crisis. 'Thirty years into democracy, flushing a toilet is still a luxury,' she said, demanding that the DWS take over municipal water functions. 'This isn't just failure — it's betrayal.' As the hearing adjourned, Scopa Chairperson Sizwe Zibi fired a parting shot: 'It's still your problem to solve. I'm sorry.' With the committee vowing to recall the DWS for a deeper probe into water boards, South Africa's water catastrophe has reached a breaking point — and millions are left waiting for a government that cannot, or will not, act. Get the real story on the go: Follow the Sunday Independent on WhatsApp.
Daily Maverick
8 hours ago
- Daily Maverick
As Constitutional Court turns 30, Ramaphosa vows support for judicial independence
President Cyril Ramaphosa joined dignitaries and judicial leaders at Constitutional Hill to honour the court's legacy of championing rights and shaping democracy, on the 30th anniversary of South Africa's (SA's) Constitutional Court. When former President Nelson Mandela opened the doors of the Constitutional Court for the first time on 14 February 1995, he reminded the founding bench of their duty, saying: 'Yours is the most noble task that could fall to any legal person. In the last resort, the guarantee of the fundamental rights and freedoms for which we have fought so hard lies in your hands. We look to you to honour the Constitution and the people it represents.'' On Friday, 20 June 2025, President Cyril Ramaphosa, members of the government, former and current chief justices, and dignitaries from around the world, gathered at Constitutional Hill. To commemorate 30 years since the establishment of the apex court and each landmark judgment which pushed SA closer to turning the Constitution into a living document. Delivering his keynote address, Ramaphosa said that since ConCourt was established, it has handed down judgments that have had a profound impact on the law in SA, including the abolishment of the death penalty in 1995, the 2002 right to health care and access to HIV/Aids treatment, the 2004 right of access to social security by permanent residents, among many others. While Ramaphosa praised the ConCourt for its meaningful work over the last 30 years, remaining unshaken when embroiled in political pressure and controversies, the president acknowledged that 'the advancement of socio-economic rights is not as far as we wish it to be, particularly with respect to housing and basic services'. Referencing the landmark Grootboom judgment, in which Irene Grootboom and her family's right to access adequate housing was affirmed by the ConCourt, Ramaphosa said it was a blight on SA's hard-won democracy that Grootboom died without her dream of a decent house being fulfilled. 'Deepening respect for constitutionalism across all sectors must start with the state. 'We must acknowledge the troubling irony of lauding the Constitutional Court's progressive judgments on one hand, especially on socio-economic rights, with the reality that the state apparatus has in many of these cases had to be compelled by this very court to fulfil its obligations,' said the president. 'Our people should not have to resort to litigation to have their rights realised, and this is the paramount consideration.' More support Ramaphosa said the state had on many occasions failed to support the court adequately and vowed that this would change. To this end, Ramaphosa vowed that the government would increase its support to the judiciary to ensure that it could execute its duties independently, effectively and with dignity. 'Government must and will provide a range of institutional, infrastructure, financial, administrative, and legal support. The support is crucial to maintaining judicial independence, which is a cornerstone of democracy and the rule of law,' he said. The challenges faced by ConCourt are well documented, especially concerning finalising matters against targets. The Constitutional Court Review found that over the years, the court's workload had increased significantly, which has led to longer processing times for judgments. The government is working to solve this. Ramaphosa said that funding for the ConCourt was mentioned for the first time in Finance Minister Enoch Godongwana's recent Budget speech, with money being allocated to enhance access to justice and improve court services. 'We reaffirm our commitment to providing all the necessary support to our courts as they administer justice. At our meeting with the judiciary recently, we committed to taking steps to advance the independence of the judiciary and the future of our courts' administration,' he said. Speaking to journalists at the sidelines of the commemoration, Chief Justice Mandisa Maya, who is leading the commemoration, said Ramaphosa's announcement was a long time coming. 'We are quite happy, naturally, about this development,' said Maya. 'It was understood that the rendering of the judiciary to be fully independent would happen in two stages, the first one starting in 2013. It was anticipated that the finalisation of the process would be put into place soon thereafter, but it has dragged and dragged for well over a decade. It's never too late to do the right thing, here we are now, and moves are afoot,' Chief Justice Maya said. Targeting full judicial independence Maya said that the judiciary is in a hurry to finally obtain full judicial independence, jokingly adding that they would not allow the president and his team to delay the process any further. Standing next to Maya, Ramaphosa said that a joint committee had been appointed to work on the modalities, and everything that needs to be in place to ensure that the judiciary can execute its role without any hindrance. 'Its own independence as an entity has always been secured, it's just been the support that it needs from government that we are now putting in place,' Ramaphosa said. DM
TimesLIVE
16 hours ago
- TimesLIVE
CRL chair's claims against its executive director are 'defamatory', Forsa says
Freedom of Religion South Africa (Forsa) has strongly denied what it termed false and defamatory allegations made by chairperson of the CRL Rights Commission Thoko Mkhwanazi-Xaluva on Thursday. During a media briefing convened by the commission, Mkhwanazi-Xaluva alleged Forsa and its executive director Michael Swain had accused her, Cheryl Zondi and/or the Cheryl Zondi Foundation of receiving R1.5m from the National Lotteries Commission. Zondi was a witness in the rape trial of Nigerian televangelist Timothy Omotoso. Forsa said this donation was reported widely in the media. It said a press release from the National Lotteries Commission of December 13 2018 stated the Cheryl Zondi Foundation had partnered with the Izimvo 447 NPC and received R1.5m to aid their work for those exploited in sacred spaces. 'Neither Michael Swain, nor Forsa, has ever alleged financial misconduct of any kind. Such claims are false and wholly without any factual basis at all,' the organisation said in a statement. Forsa said it was disappointed that Mkhwanazi-Xaluva did not first seek clarity or engage with it before making public accusations and threatening legal action. 'Her subsequent laying of criminal charges against Michael Swain and Forsa is seen as vexatious and unfounded. It appears to be a personally motivated attack designed to intimidate and deter Forsa (or others) from opposing the chair's agenda to push again for state regulation of religion.' Forsa said it reserved all legal rights in its response to this matter and was considering appropriate legal remedies in response to these false and harmful allegations. 'These include a formal demand for retraction as well as amending its extant damages claim for defamation.' Forsa said it was not against any person or institution, including Mkhwanazi-Xaluva or the commission. 'On the contrary, Forsa supports all of its legitimate and constitutional objectives. However, our singular focus is the protection and advancement of religious freedom and related constitutional rights in South Africa.' Forsa said a letter from more than 20 senior religious leaders representing about 12-million South Africans was sent to President Cyril Ramaphosa in 2019, raising several concerns, including that Mkhwanazi-Xaluva simultaneously served as CRL chairperson and deputy chair of the Cheryl Zondi Foundation. The commission was a Chapter 9 institution, created to be independent and impartial, accountable only to parliament, Forsa said. 'Thus, its chair must avoid bias, preferential treatment and dual loyalties. Arguably, this includes keeping clear boundaries when interacting with organisations, especially advocacy organisations, linked to matters before the commission.' Forsa said under Mkhwanazi-Xaluva's leadership at the time, the CRL strongly pushed for state regulation of religion. 'A wide diversity of faith communities strongly opposed the CRL's proposal. The 'conflict of interest' concern arose because the CRL chair cited the Omotoso case as a high-profile example to justify the CRL's proposed regulation model (via peer review councils, licensing of religious leaders, etc).' Her appointment as the deputy chair of the Cheryl Zondi Foundation, therefore, created a strong impression of an overlap of interest and influence. 'On the one hand, the chair of the CRL is tasked with impartial interaction with faith communities, constitutional compliance, and safeguarding diverse religious rights. Acting as deputy chair of the Cheryl Zondi Foundation is an advocacy-aligned — not neutral — position.' This raised legitimate concerns about a conflict of interest on the part of the chairperson, Forsa said. 'It must be stressed that this in no way raises any concern or casts any suspicion on Cheryl Zondi or the Cheryl Zondi Foundation.' Since being reappointed, Mkhwanazi-Xaluva has continued promoting proposals for state regulation of religion, including the introduction of peer review mechanisms, Forsa said. It said it had consistently opposed this course of action, repeatedly warning that state regulation of religion was unnecessary, unconstitutional, unworkable and unaffordable. 'In Forsa's public education efforts to point out the dangers to religious freedom of state regulation of religion, we gave the historical background to the current context. One part of this extensive presentation referenced the 2019 letter to the president in good faith and with full transparency.' Forsa said the 2019 letter did not accuse Mkhwanazi-Xaluva of theft or corruption of any kind and did not contain any accusations against Zondi or the Cheryl Zondi Foundation at all.
