
Are Ibn Khaldun's ideas still relevant for countries like Pakistan?
The writer is an academic and researcher. He is also the author of Development, Poverty, and Power in Pakistan, available from Routledge
Listen to article
The dangerous skirmish with our hostile larger neighbour has sparked a rare moment of national solidarity within Pakistan — a welcome feeling given the immense political polarisation we have been experiencing in recent years. However, major ethnic, regional and socio-economic rifts remain a dominant feature within Pakistani society, and it would be wishful thinking to assume that these serious problems will melt away just because we scored an apparent short-term win over India.
Carving out a new nation from colonial India, using the two-nation theory which aimed to unite diverse ethnic groups using a common religious identity, was an impressive feat. Yet, the way this rationale was operationalised through a hurried partition plan resulted in a truncated nation separated by nearly 1000 miles. A sizeable number of Muslims remained in India fearing displacement and believing that the transnational nature of their faith did not necessitate residing in a separate nation.
Those who migrated to the eastern wing of Pakistan also soon discovered that a shared religious identity was not an excuse to continue tolerating hegemony by more powerful ethnic groups. The traumatic separation of Bengalis from the rest of Pakistan did not result in other ethnic groups overcoming their differences either. Not only the Balochs or Pathans, but also the Sindhis and Saraikis have their own reasons for feeling disgruntled in the sort of Pakistan we have managed to create over these past several decades.
Ethnic disgruntlement is not the only problem corroding a common sense of national identity. Sectarianism and the extremist violence resulting from it remain another source of perpetual consternation.
One cannot oversimplify the root causes of such ruptures and blame the Punjabis as the cause of all discord. The proxy contestation between the Soviets and the US, alongside rivalries within the Muslim world, has certainly exacerbated religious tensions in Pakistan. Suspected Indian support to militants and insurgents has added fuel to the fire.
However, while these external factors exacerbated societal rifts, they cannot be blamed for creating them out of thin air. The way our post-colonial establishment has relied on top-down, patronage-based and unrepresentative models of governance must shoulder much of the blame for the glaring social tensions evident in our midst today.
Perhaps it is time for our leaders and decision-makers to revisit some of the ideas put forth by thinkers closer to our own cultural roots.
For instance, the work of a 14th century seminal Muslim sociologist, Ibn Khaldun, still offers relevant insights for addressing the growing polarisation in our contemporary society. Ibn Khaldun's concept of asabiyyah, or social cohesion, is particularly worthy of greater attention. Asabiyyah helps unite people and can foster solidarity through shared values which, in turn, remains essential for effective governance and the overall stability of any state.
The essence of Ibn Khaldun's ideas proposes a humanist and participatory approach to governance, wherein the well-being of a given society is a paramount goal. He aptly noted how inequality leads to social fragmentation and instability, and warned about the dangers of relying solely on military strength.
Ibn Khaldun certainly offers a more compelling basis for national building than the warped ideologies put forth by populist and divisive leaders who suppress dissenting voices to build hierarchical systems allowing accumulation by the few at the cost of marginalising the many. Even if the traditional characteristics identified by Ibn Khaldun to enable cohesion may be less relevant in our increasingly complex world of fluid identities, the notion of asabiyyah can be reinterpreted to prioritise universal values such as freedom, social justice and respect for differences.
If our leaders can honestly embrace such ideas, we may move closer to actualising the notion of Pakistan, which is supposed to be an acronym representing all the regions that comprise this nation.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Business Recorder
3 hours ago
- Business Recorder
Taxing solar panels to backfire as Pakistan needs time to bolster manufacturing: Experts
Energy experts believe that the imposition of General Sales Tax (GST) on the import of solar panels, regardless of the final tax rate decided by the federal government, will not slow down Pakistan's accelerating transition to renewable energy. Moreover, contrary to the government's assumption that the imposition of GST would promote domestic industry, experts argue that the move would backfire as the local industry remains underdeveloped and is presently unable to meet the market demand. The remarks were made by clean energy experts, industrialists, climate activists, and renewable energy traders during a webinar titled 'Taxing the Sun: Will Solar Still Shine in Pakistan?', jointly organised by Energy Update and Pakistan Solar Association (PSA). During the webinar, participants examined the federal government's recent budgetary proposal to impose GST on solar panels. The government in its federal budget proposed to impose an 18% GST on solar panels imported. This sparked considerable debate; however, after consultations, the government decided to lower the rate to 10%. Waqas Moosa, PSA Chairman, highlighted that the decade from 2020 to 2030 has been globally recognised as a pivotal era for transitioning to clean energy. He indicated that Pakistani consumers would persist in embracing solar energy to power their homes and businesses, regardless of the added cost from GST. Moosa, however, cautioned that Pakistan's local industry is not yet sufficiently developed to meet the growing demand for advanced solar panels in adequate quantity. 'As such, relying solely on local production at this stage could risk stalling progress.' Moosa strongly criticised the proposal to tax imported solar panels, calling it a serious setback to Pakistan's efforts in combating the climate crisis. 'Whether or not a tax is implemented', he said, 'Domestic consumers will continue shifting to solar energy due to persistent power shortages and unaffordable electricity tariffs from the national grid.' Muhammad Zakar Ali, CEO of Inverex Solar Energy, also echoed similar sentiments. He said that the vast majority of electricity users in Pakistan will continue to transition away from grid-supplied electricity, regardless of tax implications. Ali argued that Pakistan needs a minimum of 18-24 months to establish a viable local industry capable of producing clean energy equipment at scale. Imposing a tax prematurely could deter both domestic and international investors, he warned. He further noted that high electricity tariffs for industrial users could discourage investment in solar panel manufacturing plants. Ali, however, remained optimistic that prospective Chinese investors would soon launch joint ventures with Pakistani industrialists to set up such facilities. The Inverex CEO explained that establishing local solar panel manufacturing plants could lead to the development of five supporting vendor industries, significantly boosting the clean energy supply chain in Pakistan. Pakistan's solar surge lifts it into rarefied 25% club Dr Khalid Waleed, Research Associate at the Sustainable Development Policy Institute (SDPI), believed that the surge in rooftop solar installations in urban centres presents an opportunity for Pakistan to earn carbon credits on the global climate finance market. During the webinar, Tanveer Barry, Former Vice President Karachi Chamber of Commerce and Industry (KCCI), pointed out that while Pakistan's installed electricity generation capacity exceeds 45,000 megawatts (MW), only around 27,000 MW are currently deliverable to end-users due to outdated and overburdened transmission infrastructure. Barry also highlighted the immense untapped potential for solar energy adoption among off-grid rural households and agricultural communities across the country.


Business Recorder
4 hours ago
- Business Recorder
EU and Pakistan hold talks on global, regional peace and strategic stability
The EU and Pakistan engaged on Friday in a comprehensive exchange of views on issues related to international and regional peace, security, and strategic stability. The fifth round of the Pakistan -European Union Dialogue on Non-Proliferation and Disarmament was convened in Islamabad on 12 June, said the Foreign Office (FO) in a press release today. Ambassador Tahir Andrabi, Additional Foreign Secretary for Arms Control, Disarmament, and International Security (ACDIS), led the Pakistani delegation, while Ambassador Stephan Klement, EU Special Envoy for Non-Proliferation and Disarmament, headed the European Union delegation, added the press release. The two sides discussed various dimensions of disarmament and non-proliferation, 'with particular reference to the agenda of the UN General Assembly's First Committee, the Conference on Disarmament and various International Disarmament Conventions, including the Biological Weapons Convention (BWC), the Chemical Weapons Convention (CWC)'. EU-Pakistan Forum put on hold 'In addition, the Dialogue reviewed recent trends in export controls and assessed the implications of Emerging Technologies on global security,' said the FO. The Pakistan–EU Dialogue on Non-Proliferation and Disarmament is an integral part of the broader engagement between the European Union and Pakistan. The FO said that the two sides recognized it as a vital platform for constructive engagement on security and stability and on arms control, disarmament, and non-proliferation issues.


Business Recorder
9 hours ago
- Business Recorder
Beyond poverty alleviation: crafting a comprehensive social policy for all
Social policy, whether taken as a sectoral policy or as a policy of issues depending upon the specifics of the relevant scholarship, inevitably lies at the core of political discourse and at many a time plays a decisive role as a determinant of success or failure of political parties contesting against each other in much of the developed world. During Musharraf's time period, as Pakistan was experiencing somewhat significant economic growth, even though for a variety of reasons, the general public anticipated generous spending on social welfare. However, it is noteworthy that since Pakistan did not have and even today it does not have a comprehensive and well-rounded social policy, the efforts in the direction of ensuring social welfare remained largely scattered and did not bear the much-desired results. Although a free market, which was the story back in the days of Musharraf, aids government in efficient delivery of public services since much of the same are outsourced to the private sector such as employment opportunities and etc., however, it acts as a double-edged sword also as reflected in increasing inequalities in the society. In such circumstances, the government needs to formulate a policy that is capable of mitigating the social inequalities while clearly defining the scope and range of public service delivery at government's end. A sound social policy has an overarching nature and has the elements namely, a clear definition of what social services a government aspires to deliver; the choices concerning those services; the range of those services and most importantly how the government is going to fund them. The housing policy of Pakistan, for an instance, aims at upgrading the existing housing societies in the country while engaging in capacity building of the marginalized sections of the society besides curtailing malpractices, inefficiencies, institutional weaknesses and mafia assaults adding to the miseries of Pakistani have-nots (National Housing Policy, 2001, p. 5). The national education policy is focused on reducing the number of out of school children alongside introducing a uniform education standard, bettering the education quality as well as imparting training for educators and school administrators (National Education Policy Framework, 2018, p. 7). Similarly, the national health vision targets increasing the access and affordability of healthcare services across the board especially for women and children as it promises to fulfill its global health responsibilities and adopting a universal healthcare model (National Health Vision Pakistan 2016-25). A critical analysis of these three policies reveals that none of these has any remotest linkage with a social policy with elements pertaining to definition of services, their range and funding sources. Therefore, Pakistan needs to reinvigorate its existing policies so as to chalk out a plan for devising a viable social policy containing all the elements mentioned before. Moreover, a social policy should not revolve just around the idea of poverty reduction rather it should focus on a more general conception of improving the standard of living across the board which includes entertaining the middle class as well. In Pakistani context, the social policy does not have to start from scratch. A new and broader vision can rather gel together the existing initiatives while addressing the institutional weaknesses and inabilities alongside the issues of financial embezzlement and governance which incapacitate the programmes to deliver on their goals. Governments, across the globe, follow different mechanisms when it comes to public service delivery. Some pay directly, in cash, to the people fulfilling the eligibility criteria for such stipends and patronage while others just improve the system and process of service delivery depending upon the nature of services and funding sources available. Historically, Pakistan has been all- a financier as well as social service provider, which is a persistent burden on Pakistan's financial resources. As a low-income country, Pakistan for sure does not fall in the category of the countries having the capability of adopting a welfare state model since Pakistan has a resource-scarce national treasury and a huge population. Dr Sania Nishtar, former Special Assistant to the Prime Minister on Poverty Alleviation and Social Safety, gives a plan as to how can a viable social policy be devised as per Pakistani dynamics. She suggests formulating an overarching and comprehensive social policy clearly outlining the objectives, range and funding sources for various social services which the government plans to offer to the general public; building on the initiatives already underway, and acting as redistributor (besides as a regulator depending upon the need of the hour). Even though it is in the greater public interest that the government outsources public service delivery to private entities to a larger extent, however, such outsourcing must not be confused with privatization rather the government must remain cognizant of the progress being made too. Furthermore, the partner in such cases does not necessarily have to be a private enterprise instead it can be the local government itself. As far as funding sources are concerned, various avenues can be explored such as raising equity funds as well as private and semi-government channels like Trust for Voluntary Organization and Pakistan Institute of Philanthropy. All that Pakistan needs to do is to revisit its utopian ideals and rationalize its aspirations for bringing about a magnanimous social change. A change that results in an improved standard of living of its citizens taking on a pragmatic and real-time approach jotting down the existing initiatives and defining their scope and range clearly while taking care of the sustainability factor. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025