Maono PD300X microphone review
What do you look for in the best microphones? It's not really revolutionary of me to say that I look for a mic that sounds good. Anything that can make me sound professional is good enough for me — no matter the cost.
So when I found the $89 Maono PD300X, I was intrigued. A professional-quality podcasting mic for just $89? Sign me up. The mic had a lot of promises to live up to, like 'breakthrough audio performance' and '6 major upgrades' as described by the brand.
However, the PD300X sounds acceptable, and that's it. No, it's not bad, and yes, it would fly in an amateur podcast. But is it good enough to go head-to-head with industry leaders like Rode and Shure? Unfortunately, the answer is no. But it could be a good backup option in a pinch. I'll go through the major details in this Maono PD300X review.
Price
From $89 / £99
Connectivity
XLR, USB-C
Max SPL
135dB
Audio resolution
192KHz/24-bit
Frequency response
40Hz - 16KHz
Microphone type
Dynamic
Polar pattern
Cardioid
Weight
12.3 ounces
Dimensions
13.8x 13.8 x 7.8 inches
Colors
Black, white, pale pink
The Maono PD300X microphone is available in various different kits. Just the microphone itself is $99 from Maono and in the U.K. the PD300X is £91.
With the boom arm, it's $89 from Amazon U.S. and in the U.K. it's £99 on Amazon. With the desktop stand, it's $129 from Amazon U.S. and an utterly baffling £231 from Amazon U.K., but direct from Maono this goes down to £113.
While the mic is pretty affordable by itself ($89), if you don't already have a desktop stand or boom arm, it becomes less of a good deal.
The Shure MV6 is one of my favorite beginner-friendly mics. At just $20 pricier than the desktop stand PD300X ($149 for mic and stand), the MV6 is my go-to recommendation for beginners. If you're just starting out, whether that be podcasting, streaming, or content creation, I would skip the PD300X and go straight for the big guns with the MV6.
The Maono PD300X looks like any other microphone. It comes in black, white, or pink, but I tested the black version. I do really like the pink shade; it looks like it would be right at home in a cosy Twitch streamer's office (my favorite type of streamer). The muff is very thick and soft, but that doesn't necessarily equate to adept pop reduction, as you'll hear later.
At just 2.4 inches in diameter, it's a pretty small mic, too. The PD300X has a dynamic capsule, which means it's better suited to a non-treated (soundproofed) environment when compared to a condenser microphone. Dynamic mics tend to record a softer vocal style than condenser mics, which are crisper and clearer and better for music or seriously high-quality recordings.
For streamers, content creators and the like, a dynamic mic will be more than enough. I've tested other dynamic mics like the Shure MV6 (mentioned earlier), Shure MV7+, and the Shure MV7i. Dynamic mics tend to have a warmer sound so are better suited for podcasting.
As with dynamic mics (for the most part), the PD300X is foolproof. Simply plug a USB-C cable into your laptop, open your recording software (I use Audacity), and you're good to go. Right out of the box, the mic is ready to use so you don't necessarily need the companion software.
If you do have the companion software — which I'll discuss in full in the 'App' section below — then you'll be able to customize the on-mic multipurpose button. While it has a mute icon, this button can be configured to control ambient noise reduction, mic point, and headphone point.
A long press will initiate any of the aforementioned settings. I found it worked best with noise gate, but that's a whole other discussion I'll get into in the 'Features' section below. A short press will mute or unmute the microphone.
It's a little annoying that this button doesn't light up when activated or deactivated, so there's no way of knowing if it's turned on or not without having the companion software. There's also no red light when the mic is muted, just a rainbow light when it's picking up sound.
First I'll discuss connectivity. The PD300X is a plug-and-play mic, so it's beyond simple to set up. Simply plug in the USB-C cable (provided) into your laptop, or plug in the XLR cable (not provided) into your audio interface. Then it's good to go. It's worth noting that the app features obviously don't work with XLR connection, just USB-C into a computer.
In terms of features, I can't lie: I'm pretty disappointed. There's Noise Gate, which is effectively an ambient noise reduction. Noise gate works by stopping signals below a certain threshold; imagine a door that only lets people in below a certain height.
It's configured to 25 dB out of the box, but it can be adjusted up to 90 dB. I'll go through the audio recordings in the 'sound quality' section below, but I'll just say that it doesn't exactly work as well as I'd like it to.
There's also a choice of vocal tones. Unlike Shure's MotivMix app, there's no 'Light' 'Dark' or 'Bright' vocal tones that essentially increase and decrease mids and treble. Instead, the vocal tones are named 'Podcasting', 'Recording', 'Gaming', and 'Original'.
'Podcasting' (you can hear the recording below) made my voice feel very cold and devoid of any 'humanness.' I almost sounded like a bored robot. 'Recording' and 'Gaming' suffered from much of the same languor. I switched these EQs off and recorded all of the below clips with the 'Original' EQ setting as, honestly, the presets did my voice no favors.
You can, however, adjust EQ manually on a 10-band setting. If you want to make yourself sound deeper, for example, you can easily accomplish that on the app. I just think the presets are very poor and made me sound bored to death.
As far as companion apps go, the Maono Link app (Windows and Mac) is pretty simple. MotivMix (Shure) and GG/Sonar (SteelSeries) have loads more settings and helpful preset features. Sure, you can accomplish similar EQs with the manual settings, but it takes a lot more fiddling with. MotivMix and Sonar are excellent as soon as you download them.
This is the homepage of Link. As you can see, it's very straightforward, with options to control headphone volume, mic button management, and customize noise gate. One thing you may have noticed is the lack of a digital pop filter. This proved a major issue in testing, which I'll discuss in the 'Audio quality' section below.
As discussed earlier, the EQ presets aren't worth bothering with, so I don't really consider them a majorly impressive feature of the app.
While I don't think the PD300X sounds bad, it doesn't sound as good as other microphones at similar price points. The TLDR is this: if you don't want to spend a lot of money but still want a great beginner-friendly microphone, just get the Shure MV6. It doesn't have an XLR port, but I don't think you'll be able to tell the difference. It's beyond easy to use.
Alright, now that's out of the way, I'll discuss the PD300X in detail. Here's a clip of the microphone in action.
As you can hear from the recording, the microphone sounds fine, but that's it. The recording is clear, but there's a definite tendency to peak (when recording, the levels in Audacity were showing between the optimal -12 and -6), and the pops are quite harsh. Even so, in a pinch, this would do a decent job. It just wouldn't do as good a job as the Shure MV6.
As per all my microphone reviews, I put the Maono PD300X through a series of standardized tests. I tested its performance with plosives, fricatives, the difference with and without noise gate, and there's an example recording of the 'Podcasting' vocal EQ here.
Here you can listen to the PD300X with some sibilant tongue twisters.
I think the mic did pretty well at minimizing hissing, although there's no specific setting for that in the mic or the Link app. Overall, I'd say it performed well with sibilant sounds.
To test the plosive recording, I used classic tongue twisters to really put the PD300X through its paces.
As you can hear from the recording above, the mic didn't perform very well. Every time I say a 'p' or 'b' sound, the mic pops, which would result in an unsavory listening experience for the audience. Unless you're confident of being less inclined to pop sounds than the average person, you would have to ensure perfect mic etiquette with the PD300X.
There's no explicit ambient noise reducer in the Link app — it's just noise gate, which effectively reduces sounds at a specific threshold. At default, this is set to 25dB in Link, but goes all the way to 90dB. I tested it at 25, 30, 50, and 90 decibels.
I found that this didn't really reduce ambient sound in the way I wanted it to — it just blocked off ambient noise between my words, which resulted in clippy, awkward recording. Take a listen.
Yes — there's no difference between pre-and-post- noise gate activation. I tested this at 25, 30, 50, and 90 decibel settings, and it just started sounding worse and worse. I'm not sure this feature is very adept at minimizing ambient noise.
As a result, I'd recommend avoiding this feature, and using this mic only in a quiet room like a production studio or at home.
I tested out the EQ with the recording below. As you can hear, my voice is very flat, and sounds almost lazy, although I was speaking in my normal voice here. The EQ minimized tones in the bottom half of the frequency range and boosted a little in the treble.
Considering I sound my best with Shure's proprietary 'Dark' vocal tone (which increases lower mids), I'm not surprised that this setting didn't really do me any favors. However, this was a similar story with all of Maono's vocal EQ settings, so I ended up just switching them all off.
The bottom line is that the Maono PD300X sounds fine, but not great. Can you get better vocal clarity and warmth at similar price points? Yes. I would either go with the pricier Shure MV6 or the similarly priced condenser mic NZXT Capsule Elite.
If you need a decent microphone in a pinch, then the Maono PD300X might be good enough for you. However, I think it's fair to assume that if you're reading microphone reviews, you're not looking for something you can get in a pinch — you're taking your time, weighing up your options and looking for a reliable, long-term mic.
With that in mind, I'd recommend the Shure MV6 over this. The MV6 is a fantastic little mic — it's just as easy to use as the PD300X and sounds phenomenal. If you've got a little more to spend, I'd also recommend the Shure MV7+ and the Shure MV7i (which is a mic and interface in one).
If you're a streamer, then the NZXT Capsule Elite or the SteelSeries Alias Pro will both be fantastic options at similarly budget-friendly price points. Both mics have all the features of the PD300X and more. The long and short of it is: there are better mics for just a few extra bucks.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
7 hours ago
- Yahoo
Google AI is worse at Pokemon than I was when I was 5 – taking 800 hours to beat the Elite 4 and having a breakdown when its HP got low
When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission. If you're someone who thinks AI is almost ready to take over the world, I have some good or bad (depending on your stance on things) news for you: Google's Gemini 2.5 Pro took over 800 hours to beat the 29-year-old children's game Pokemon Blue. There's a Twitch account called Gemini_Plays_Pokemon, a pale imitation of the incredible Twitch Plays Pokemon account that started this trend. First things first: how long did it take the AI to actually complete the game? Well, it was a staggering 813 hours. I feel like you could hit buttons randomly and beat the game faster than that. After some tweaks by the creator of this Twitch channel, the AI managed to halve its time to a still outrageous 406.5 hours. That is actually dead on half the time, which is interesting mathematically but still far too long to beat a game you can win with an overleveled Venusaur. Additionally, as spotted by our friends at PC Gamer, Google DeepMind reported on the Twitch account, and something unusual happens whenever its Pokemon get low on health or power points (PP). Whenever one or both of these conditions are met, "model performance appears to correlate with a qualitatively observable degradation in the model's reasoning capability – for instance, completely forgetting to use the pathfinder tool in stretches of gameplay while this condition persists." This, combined with the AI mistakenly thinking it was playing FireRed and LeafGreen and would need to find the Tea to progress, are part of the reasons it took so long to finish. Honestly, AI just isn't very good at playing Pokemon. Someone else made Claude Plays Pokemon, and that AI spent hours trying to get out of Cerulean city because it kept jumping down a ledge to talk to an NPC it had already spoken to dozens of times. So, these AIs aren't able to beat a game that we could when we barely knew our times tables. Let's not worry about them taking our jobs any time soon. In the meantime, check out the best Pokemon games of all time.
Tom's Guide
3 days ago
- Tom's Guide
I took some of my best photos with the Canon EOS R5 Mark II — and it's currently at its lowest ever price
As part of my job as reviews writer at Tom's Guide, I get to test some of the best mirrorless cameras, whether they're for beginners, enthusiasts or professionals. If it's a high-speed camera with a solid burst rate, I always put it through its paces by photographing animals and birds — and if you're on the lookout for a camera that can withstand anything, the Canon EOS R5 Mark II is the one for you. However, there's no sugarcoating it: the EOS R5 Mark II is an expensive camera. Its body alone costs $4,299 / £3,799, and I haven't seen it get a major price drop... until today. Right now, you can save $500 at Amazon U.S. or £238 at Amazon U.K.. If you're a pro photographer and are looking to upgrade, I'd snap (pun fully intended) this deal up immediately. The Canon EOS R5 Mark II improves on its predecessor by introducing a 45MP Stacked sensor that captures lots of detail for extreme cropping. Its intelligent autofocus system with auto subject-detection quickly locks on to animal and human faces and eyes, as well as vehicles. It's built well and handles sublimely, and its 30fps burst shooting and 8.5-stops of IBIS make capturing action effortless. The EOS R5 Mark II is capable of withstanding anything you throw at it. Fully weather-sealed and protected against dust and rain, you can use it in virtually any environmental setting — indoors and outdoors. It's sublime to handle thanks to the sculpted grip, and it never feels too bulky to carry around your neck. Brits, rejoice! The EOS R5 Mark II is discounted in the U.K. too. Bad news is that it isn't as big a discount as the one being offered to the Americans. At Amazon U.K., you can save £238... which isn't a lot but it's something. But of course, the EOS R5 Mark II's prowess lies in its imaging capabilities. Featuring a 45MP Stacked CMOS sensor which enables speedier readouts to minimize rolling shutter distortions, it takes stunning photos with beautiful color science. 45 megapixels also give you room for extreme cropping. Canon has also perfected the EOS R5 Mark II's autofocus system. With auto subject detection, the camera quickly locks on to animals, birds, humans, vehicles, you name it. In my testing, the camera took mere milliseconds to focus on the subject regardless of how many times I switched between, say, humans and vehicles. It even locked on to a slightly obscured squirrel which even my own eyes could not see! A picture is worth a thousand words, of course, so you can browse through the sample gallery above and see just how gorgeous they are. The EOS R5 Mark II has a stacked feature set and you can read all about it in my full review. Its in-camera upscaling (powered by AI) for images shot as JPEG/HEIF is a highlight. It enhances resolution by 4x, extrapolating the image's EXIF data, creating stills up to 180MP from the original 45MP image. You can upscale either one image or a series of burst shots, and it's one feature that can revolutionize how you photograph subjects. The EOS R5 Mark II is our pick for the best full frame mirrorless camera for a plethora of reasons. It's super straightforward to use with a well-laid out control scheme, its autofocus system gives you little to complain about, and it takes ridiculously good photos. If I were you, I'd save $500 at Amazon U.S. or £238 at Amazon U.K. right now — that's the lowest I've seen the camera drop to!
Tom's Guide
3 days ago
- Tom's Guide
My favorite Bluetooth speaker just crashed to its lowest ever price — the EarFun UBoom L is just $49 right now
When I'm using one of the best Bluetooth speakers, nothing makes me happier than feeling the bass in my jaw or in my temples. I want earth-shattering bass that makes me concerned for the walls in my rental. I want it to be so rich that I feel like it's calling me poor. I want it to feel deeper than the pseudo-feelings I had as a Tumblr emo girlie. My poetic musings aside... I love testing wireless speakers and putting them through their paces to determine whether they're good value for money. I have a couple speakers at home but the one I (and my partner) use the most is the EarFun UBoom L — and right now, it's down to its lowest ever price as it's discounted by 38% at Amazon U.S. and 13% at Amazon U.K. The EarFun UBoom L offers big sound on a budget. This portable speaker produces powerful bass, clear vocals and well-balanced sound across a range of genres. With a dedicated outdoor mode and an IP67 resistance rating, the speaker can soundtrack pool parties and hikes, it's got great battery life, and the customizable EQ via the user-friendly companion app works really well. Even at its retail price of $79 / £79, the UBoom L easily warrants a recommendation. It provides big sound on a budget, and it's highly portable so you can take it anywhere you like. Adding to that is the UBoom L's IP67 rating, which means it's waterproof down to 3 feet and fully dustproof. Trust me, I use this speaker in the shower nearly everyday, and I've even submerged it in a sink full of water just to show off to my friends — and it has always come out unscathed. Now, onto the sound quality... Utilizing the brand's "JumboBass technology," the UBoom L delivers powerful bass thanks to its passive bass radiators on each side working in conjunction with the 55mm drivers. When you play a bass-heavy track, you can see the side radiators vibrate and, like I mentioned up top, you can feel the bass in your soul (depending on how far you are from the speaker, of course). Residents of the rainy British isles will be pleased to hear that the EarFun UBoom L is discounted here too... although not by much. It's down to £69 from its retail price of £79 but even though you aren't saving as much as the Americans, it's still worth the investment. One thing I really like about this speaker as that basslines never feel overpowering. They have an oomph with a lovely warmth to them, so you can really appreciate each note that the bassist is plucking. Even at high volumes, music remains free of distortion, making the UBoom L the ideal speaker for soundtracking social gatherings. Vocals sound just as good, if not better, and there's plenty of detail in every track to be enjoyed and appreciate. I often hook it up to my laptop too when I'm watching a horror or thriller movie, and the speaker creates an eerie soundscape. For a small, portable speaker, I'm always taken aback by how powerful the UBoom L sounds. If you want a rugged speaker that doesn't cut any corners, I'd recommend saving $30 at Amazon U.S. or £10 at Amazon U.K. You can thank me later.
