Where can Indian fans watch FIFA Club World Cup 2025?
By Aman Shukla Published on June 14, 2025, 16:35 IST
The FIFA Club World Cup 2025 is set to be a thrilling spectacle, featuring 32 top-tier football clubs from around the globe, including stars like Lionel Messi, Kylian Mbappé, and Jude Bellingham. Scheduled from June 15 to July 13, 2025, in the United States, this revamped tournament promises high-intensity matches in a World Cup-style format. For Indian football fans, catching every moment live is a priority. Here's your complete guide to watching the FIFA Club World Cup 2025 in India. Live Streaming Options for FIFA Club World Cup 2025 in India
Indian fans have multiple options to stream the FIFA Club World Cup 2025 live, ensuring you don't miss a single goal. Here are the primary platforms: 1. FanCode
FanCode has secured the digital broadcasting rights for the FIFA Club World Cup 2025 in India. The platform will stream all 63 matches live, making it a go-to choice for comprehensive coverage. 2. DAZN
DAZN, FIFA's official global streaming partner, will broadcast all FIFA Club World Cup 2025 matches for free worldwide. This historic deal makes the tournament highly accessible to Indian fans. TV Broadcast Options in India
For fans who prefer watching on television, Eurosport India, linked to WBD India, has acquired the TV broadcast rights for the FIFA Club World Cup 2025. However, Eurosport will air only select matches, not the entire tournament.
Ahmedabad Plane Crash
Aman Shukla is a post-graduate in mass communication . A media enthusiast who has a strong hold on communication ,content writing and copy writing. Aman is currently working as journalist at BusinessUpturn.com
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Times
2 hours ago
- New York Times
Forget the football – this is why the Club World Cup really matters
FIFA gave its 32 competing teams a billion reasons to take a revamped Club World Cup seriously when announcing its monstrous prize pot back in March. Each and every club had appetites sharpened by the announcement of a $1billion fund in March, with the lucky winner potentially walking away with up to $125million for less than a month's work. Advertisement The short-term gains have been there for all to see — $2m just for a group game win — yet it is the intangibles, a promise of commercial growth in a largely untapped market, that also ensures no participating club is dismissive of the opportunity presenting itself in the United States. The empty seats at many stadiums, and patchy quality of the football, may have sparked some barbed comments in more established football territories, but to the clubs involved, this is a brand-building moment and a chance to either entrench positions in the market or to spark growth. The European Club Association, which has 11 of its members playing in the U.S., are among those who champion the positives that jar with the ongoing workload concerns of players' unions. 'The ECA has been supportive of this tournament from the beginning,' said the organisation's chairman, Nasser Al-Khelaifi, also president of Paris Saint-Germain — one of the competing teams — on the eve of the tournament in Miami. 'We believe that the FIFA Club World Cup will become a landmark competition and can deliver real benefits for all clubs.' Or, in other words, the chance to swell their coffers. Strip it all back and the Club World Cup in its latest iteration is another money-making exercise for its most high-profile participants. A pre-season tour gilded and rebadged; an introduction to new audiences with cheques banked along the way. FIFA has issued soundbites from players and managers talking up the chance to create history by lifting silverware, but executives will inevitably be viewing it through a different prism for now. One where balance sheets build and their brand finds ballast. 'I know first-hand that the clubs competing in the Club World Cup are hugely supportive of it. They see it as a major opportunity,' Phil Carling, head of football at the marketing agency Octagon and formerly the Football Association's commercial director, tells The Athletic. Advertisement 'It probably goes back for the last 10 years, but at the moment, the scramble to capture, retain and, ideally, monetise international fans is particularly fierce. 'Any platform, like the Club World Cup, that gives you exposure in the right prestigious environment — and even better if you win it — is your opportunity to capture those fans and use that as an equity to build wealth through your commercial programmes. 'Talent follows money, eyeballs follow talent, and money follows eyeballs. Put that together and it helps to understand the commercial model for elite sport.' The revamped Club World Cup, spanning close to a month, is that new chance for clubs to sell themselves. It might lack the prestige and rewards of UEFA's Champions League, but FIFA's summertime competition has the potential to bring layered financial hits. Merchandise can be sold and social media followers gained on the back of exploits in the U.S. 'We can take a sniffy view of this because of long-held legacy attitudes about football and what is valuable in football,' explains Tim Crow, an experienced sports marketing advisor. 'But there's a new generation of fans to be won and that's really the key battleground. It's not about whether the traditional fan is won over, it's a question of whether new fans are won over.' Commercial revenue is the income stream where clubs are most emphatically the masters of their own destiny, and in the modern era, it continues to take on huge significance. Deloitte's annual Money League report, a ranking of the richest clubs in football, found that its top 20 generated £4.2bn of commercial income in 2023-24, which amounted to 44 per cent of the collective turnover. Of the top 10 clubs, only Arsenal had commercial revenues that were eclipsed by either broadcast or matchday income. Advertisement At football's capitalist edge, the scramble is on to secure international fans with money to spend. It is why Manchester United will head to New Jersey, Chicago and Atlanta next month after a post-season trip to the Far East. Arsenal have their own preparatory plans in Singapore and Hong Kong, while Liverpool and Barcelona are both travelling to Japan, among other countries. The suspicion is that Ruben Amorim, Mikel Arteta, Arne Slot and Hansi Flick will all be glad of the rest currently being afforded to their players, but the commercial departments of those teams tasked with raising profiles and enhancing brands and with targets to meet, will quietly be lamenting not being part of the Club World Cup. 'All of the big Premier League clubs not part of this will be wishing they were,' says Carling, who previously headed up Arsenal's first commercial team in the 1990s. 'There wouldn't be a board that got a call from FIFA to step in six months ago who would turn it down. They would've hired a rowing boat to get over the Atlantic. 'The prize money is one thing, but the prestige and where it positions you as a club, as an entity within world football, is very important. I doubt the players and coaching staff will be weeping that they're not involved, but being part of this is huge for the clubs that are going.' PSG's Al-Khelaifi is not the only prominent figure pleased to be spending much of the footballing summer in the U.S. Manchester City chief executive Ferran Soriano said his club was 'very excited' to be one of the 32 involved. 'I think it's something that was very much needed,' he told reporters this week following their opening game against Wydad AC in Philadelphia on Tuesday. Real Madrid's Florentino Perez was even more ebullient. 'It's a beautiful competition and I'm sure it will be a huge success,' he told DAZN. 'We've come here with great enthusiasm.' Advertisement The comments have the feel of people at a party telling those stuck at home of the fun they are missing, but there is substance to the propaganda. Every elite club remains locked in a battle to grow its brand and the bigger that gets, the more revenues can be generated. Real Madrid, Europe's most successful club, are widely considered to have built the strongest brand in football and in 2023-24, that was reflected in commercial revenues of £410m. 'There are three angles on how clubs can grow their brand (through the Club World Cup),' says Hugo Hensley, head of sports services at Brand Finance. 'One is global. You're going to have global exposure. But that really matters for the big brands that actually can monetise that rate, clubs like Real Madrid. They need to have that to maintain the prestige as being the best in the world. 'There's also local exposure. It's going to be brilliant for the Middle Eastern club who can say we're on this really prestigious stage and build engagement locally. 'And then there's exposure to the U.S. You get that very valuable market that all of these brands are hoping will be monetisable either now, or as a long-term brand growth prospect.' The location of this Club World Cup, played out over 11 host cities in the U.S., has undeniably added appeal to its participants. There might be huge numbers of locals who care little for its presence this summer, but the biggest European clubs concluded long ago that it was the market with the greatest potential to tap. There are, literally, millions without footballing club loyalties. FIFA ran a quiz on their website earlier this week underlining as much, inviting users to answer a series of questions that would help determine the club they should be backing at the tournament. 'If you asked most Premier League clubs to list the top three markets they'd like FIFA to take this to, the U.S. would certainly be in there,' says Crow. 'It's a giant economy. Forty cents in every dollar spent on sports marketing around the world emanates from the U.S. It makes a lot of sense to go there and try to tap into that engine. For big European clubs, they have been steadily working away at the American market for a long time.' Carling is in agreement. 'It is a $20trillion market and the richest domestic market in the world,' he says. 'Therefore, the consumers might be smaller in number, but their economic weight is much heavier than, say, India or China, where clubs used to feel they should be targeting. 'The pivot towards the U.S. is becoming very important in a lot of clubs' strategies. There are fans in the States who haven't made up their minds on who they should follow and here's an opportunity to capture those fans. And economically significant fans. You'll have those people then potentially going out to buy merchandise, follow the team in the future and subscribe to digital channels. More importantly, they'll be interested in brands that are associated with those clubs.' Advertisement The Club World Cup remains a tournament of unknowns as the group stages reach their deciding moments in the coming days. No one, not even FIFA president Gianni Infantino, can predict where his pet project will be 10 years from now and whether it has confounded the scepticism. Will winning the final in New Jersey on July 13 really count for much beyond the windfall awaiting the victors? Only time will tell, but there is a reason that Manchester City, Real Madrid, PSG and more are all desperate to find out. This Club World Cup, for all its detractors, is a big step towards more.
New York Times
3 hours ago
- New York Times
How Brazil won the 1958 World Cup: A sleeping coach, tactical tweaks and 17-year-old Pele
This is the fifth in a series on The Athletic looking back at the winners of each men's World Cup. The previous four articles have looked at Uruguay in 1930, Italy in 1934 and Italy again in 1938, before Uruguay won it for a second time in 1950. West Germany followed in 1954 — what about Brazil? It feels strange that it's taken until the sixth edition of this series to feature the most successful nation in World Cup history, Brazil, who probably should have won the 1950 tournament on home soil. Going into the World Cup in 1958, they were considered the favourites, although there were concerns about whether they would cope with the unfamiliar surroundings of Sweden. At this point, the two World Cups played in South America had been won by sides from that continent, and the three in Europe followed suit. Advertisement But Brazil were probably more prepared than any other side in the tournament, investing heavily in an extensive backroom staff at a time when other nations were content with a manager, an assistant and a physio. They toured Europe before to allow them to become accustomed to the climate. Like all great sides, they mixed good organisation with top-class individuals. This Brazil side featured players who were not simply among the most dominant individuals at the tournament, but some of the most famous individuals in 20th-century football: Mario Zagallo, Garrincha and Pele. Vicente Feola is a curious figure. He was clearly a hugely experienced manager, having taken charge of Sao Paolo on 532 occasions, more than anyone else, over six separate spells. He had been Brazil's assistant for the fateful loss in the 1950 'final'. But Feola is often considered to have lacked authority and delegated too much, and was sometimes accused of — literally — falling asleep in the dugout. Clearly, Brazil were ahead of their time in terms of their off-field expertise. Their backroom staff is generally considered to have included a team supervisor, a fitness coach, a doctor, a dentist and a psychologist. The latter came in for most scrutiny, and appears to have indulged in some tests which made the players uncomfortable, including asking them all to draw 'a picture of a man' and then reporting to Feola on which players might make good partnerships. Still, it seems likely that he, and the others, played a role in Brazil's success. Feola, meanwhile, was in charge at a time when Brazil made a significant tactical shift to a four-man defence, and he trusted in Pele when others insisted he was too young for a World Cup. There were reports that the players took charge after a couple of games and insisted on changes to the starting XI, wrote Brian Glanville in his book, The History of the World Cup, although these suggestions are denied by members of Feola's coaching staff. Feola's reputation was harmed by his second spell in charge, for Brazil's disastrous 1966 tournament. But he deserves more credit than he is generally given for the 1958 success. Brazil's popularisation of 4-2-4 was so innovative that it changed how people referred to formations. Whereas other sides had broadly shifted towards a roughly similar shape, systems had never been referred to in terms of 'numbers'. They were considered in terms of letters ('WM') or shapes (the pyramid). Advertisement But now things became more technical: four defenders, two midfielders, four attackers. Some had concerns that Brazil were light in midfield, but their players were good enough to compensate for this perceived shortcoming. 'The most outstanding feature of the World Cup was provided by the confirmation of a new concept which might easily be called the 'fourth back' style,' wrote John Camkin in his book simply entitled World Cup 1958. 'The full-backs stayed wide on the touchlines and the centre-half and one wing-half, completely defensive, constantly guarded the middle … Brazil's success may well spread the 'fourth back' style into wider use.' Brazil were notable for their use of width. In fielding Zagallo and Garrincha, they had a proper winger on either flank — even if Zagallo was a bit more workmanlike — with the use of four defenders allowing two to overlap, at this stage a relatively unfamiliar concept given defenders were accustomed to playing in a back three. Notably, there were several changes to the starting XI throughout the tournament. Initially, Feola omitted Garrincha because he did not appreciate his lack of defensive effort, and so fielded the more disciplined Joel, until the players lobbied for Garrincha's inclusion and he came into the side for Brazil's third game, a 2-0 win over the Soviet Union. That was Pele's first game of the competition, although his absence had been because of a knee injury. Within the first three minutes of that contest, Garrincha and Pele had hit the post, and Vava had opened the scoring. Brazil were a different side. Feola started the tournament with a front two of Jose Altafini and Dida, then tried Altafini and Vava, and ended up playing Vava and Pele. There was a crucial change in midfield midway through the tournament, with Zito — a defensive-minded, positionally solid anchorman — coming in for the more adventurous Dino. As with so many other Brazilian sides, using a reliable holding player allowed the attackers to shine. And for the final, right-back Djalma Santos — a rare survivor from the 1954 side — came in for his first start of the tournament, to keep Swedish left winger Lennart Skoglund quiet. Brazil popularised beautiful football — and astute tactical tinkering. He may have missed the opening two matches, and various others had excellent tournaments too, but the star was 17-year-old Pele. No one else in football history has been on this level at the age of 17 — the closest is possibly Lamine Yamal with Barcelona and Spain. Feola trusted in Pele despite the fact he was unfit for the start of the tournament. He was already being spoken about as the best footballer Brazil had produced, and he dominated proceedings from his first start against the Soviet Union. He looked decades ahead of his time: incredibly athletic, smooth when bringing the ball under control, brilliant at leaping for headers and a selfless team player. After that instant impact against the Soviets, Pele scored the only goal in the surprisingly tense 1-0 quarter-final victory over Wales with a classic piece of control and a calm finish, which he later said was the most important goal of his career. Then came a hat-trick in the 5-2 semi-final win over France, and two more in the final. This was the first of his three World Cup victories, something no other man has matched. Brazil were nervous going into the final. They had collapsed in 1950, which was considered so disastrous that they changed the colour of their shirts, from white and black to yellow. But now they faced Sweden, who wore yellow, so Brazil had to change to blue. Furthermore, stormy weather in Stockholm meant the muddy pitch would favour the hosts' more pragmatic style. And when Nils Liedholm opened the scoring within five minutes, Brazil might have panicked. Advertisement But half an hour later, they had turned the game around — and done so with two near-identical goals. Both involved Garrincha, the gloriously unpredictable right-winger who bamboozled opposition left-backs throughout the tournament, in part because of his unusually misshapen legs. Here, the victim was Sven Axbom. Twice Garrincha dribbled past him on the outside. Twice he crossed low into the six-yard box. And twice Vava was on hand to score. Brazil were 2-1 up by half-time, and in the second half they were almost completely dominant. Pele made it 3-1, then Zagallo put the game to bed with Brazil's fourth after his initial corner was not cleared. Sweden got one back, but Pele's brilliant, off-balance looped header — a little reminiscent of Lionel Messi's in the 2009 Champions League final for Barcelona against Manchester United — made it 5-2. The Times' report read that Sweden were 'bewildered by a brand of football craft beyond the understanding of many'. It remains the World Cup final with the most goals, despite decent efforts from the last two, which have both featured six. Pele's first (of two) in the final was a truly wonderful piece of skill. Collecting a cross on his chest, he not merely managed to control the ball under pressure from centre-back Sigge Parling, he also managed to beat Bengt Gustavsson, by popping the ball over his head. Gustavsson desperately tried to bring down Pele with a knee-high challenge, but Pele soldiered on and provided a neat dipping volley to score. 'I could say that I thought about it, but I'd be lying,' Pele later said. 'It was a spur-of-the-moment reaction, quick thinking. After I controlled it, I was going to hit it, but I managed to think quickly and changed. That was one of the strengths in my life, and in my football, my improvisation, to change at the last second.' But it's interesting to read reports from Brazil's semi-final win over France, which mention how often he enjoyed knocking the ball over the head of defenders. It was one of those rare goals that was brilliant, but typical of the player's style. At full time, the Brazil players paraded a flag on their lap of honour. But it was the flag of hosts Sweden, rather than their own. Having wilted under the pressure on home soil eight years beforehand, Brazil loved their month in the calm surroundings of Sweden. They stayed in a small lakeside town named Hindas, close to Gothenburg, and spent their evenings fishing and enjoying the late sunsets. Advertisement Sweden's hosting of the tournament was considered the best yet, and the host nation's decision to abandon their opposition to foreign-based professionals playing for the national side (which had cost them qualification for World Cup 1954) meant they enjoyed a surprise run to the final. Brazil's decision to parade the Swedish flag was a recognition of their efforts as hosts and defeated finalists, and produced a standing ovation from the supporters in Stockholm. 'By the respective standards of the two countries, Sweden's triumph was at least as great as Brazil's,' wrote Camkin in his aforementioned book. With the perceived injustice of West Germany's win over Hungary in 1954 still fresh in the minds, this was a popular victory. 'There was no doubt this time that the best, immeasurably the finest, team had won,' wrote Glanville in The History of the World Cup. It often feels like tournament-winning sides play their best football in the group stage against weaker opposition, before becoming tighter and more cautious in the knockout phase. But Brazil became better and better, largely because of the line-up changes. Having started with four clean sheets in four games — 3-0 v Austria, 0-0 v England (the first goalless draw in World Cup history), 2-0 v Soviet Union and 1-0 v Wales — they then thrashed France and Sweden 5-2 with scintillating attacking performances. Although the 1970 winners are often hailed as the greatest World Cup side, it's generally agreed that they lacked a solid defence. In 1958, Brazil had no obvious shortcomings. (Illustration: Eamonn Dalton / The Athletic; Thibaud MORITZ / AFP, David Ramos, Jeroen van den Berg/Soccrates, Mattia Ozbot – Inter/Inter /Getty Images)
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
FIFA's Gianni Infantino says soccer will be ‘No. 1 sport' in U.S., urges promotion, relegation
NEW YORK — FIFA president Gianni Infantino says soccer has the potential to soon be the 'No. 1 sport here in America,' and that reaching this goal is one of FIFA's top priorities. There are just a few things the sport should consider first, Infantino said, such as exploring the introduction of promotion and relegation in American soccer. Advertisement Infantino made these bold statements in a wide-ranging fireside chat with Fox Sports' Jordan Schultz at Fanatics Fest on Sunday afternoon in New York City, before heading across the Hudson River to catch a Club World Cup match at nearby MetLife Stadium. In 'three to four, maximum five years,' Infantino said, 'it will be top, top, top. One of the top leagues in the world, for sure. And I can tell you why — because now I'm here.' That's a fast timeline based on recent data. A 2025 poll conducted by S&P Global that garnered 2,501 responses found 14 percent of surveyed 'internet adults' watch soccer, the seventh-highest figure behind the traditional 'big four' sports — baseball, basketball, football and hockey — as well as both the Winter and Summer Olympics. Of those who do watch, 76 percent said they watched men's international soccer (World Cup, Olympics), 50 percent watch women's international soccer, and 55 percent already watch MLS. As for in-person gross, Two Circles' annual review of attendance ranks soccer as the fourth most-attended sport at 8 percent of 292 million attendees in 2024. Though that gives it a narrow edge over hockey, itself at 7 percent, soccer significantly trails the share held by baseball (35 percent), basketball (22 percent) and football (20 percent). The other 8 percent includes other sports. Advertisement Infantino, who lives in Miami, spoke at length about his vision for soccer in America. Aside from suggesting the nixing of the long-criticized 'pay to play' model for youth soccer, which Infantino called 'a problem here in America,' he also hinted that introducing promotion and relegation could help bring more excitement to the sport. His remarks came after Schultz asked Infantino about Wrexham's wild success in recent years, going from the subject of a Netflix series to three straight league promotions. 'This is one of the beauties of promotion and relegation,' Infantino said. 'So, in soccer, unlike any other sport, surprises are happening, and the little one can beat the big one, right? And this rarely, rarely happens in other sports, 90 percent of the time, the stronger one wins. In soccer, it's 70 percent of the time. 'You have these surprises. You have these fairy tales of teams. … This is something you can bring in this American culture as well, where you don't have the concept of promotion and relegation, and there's something interesting that I think has to be explored.' Advertisement A Cinderella story like Wrexham's, as Infantino suggested, is something that in American soccer simply hasn't happened thanks to the absence of promotion and relegation in the men's American soccer landscape. That's something that could soon change, though, with United Soccer League owners in March voting to implement the system into their leagues. Their decision challenges the tradition of Major League Soccer, which has never implemented a relegation system that's common in soccer leagues across the world. Nevertheless, Infantino's remarks show ambition to enact what would be a seismic change to how professional men's soccer has operated in the United States. The current system launched in the 1990s, when, as a condition of being awarded the hosting rights for the men's World Cup in 1994, U.S. Soccer vowed to launch a sustainable first-division league: Major League Soccer. Since its debut season in 1996, MLS has operated as a closed single-entity circuit in which all owners have vested interests in their collective success in tandem rather than each club looking out for its own interests. The approach allowed MLS to succeed where its glitzy predecessor, the NASL, failed, stability and parity, while accepting the league couldn't thrive with haves and have-nots at varying levels of operational success. Like MLS, NASL did not implement relegation. The compromises made in this format are undeniable. Few leagues around the world can match the strictness of MLS' rules and regulations, which limit how teams can spend across their entire roster and force teams to focus their expenditures on only a handful of leading players regardless of their age or pedigree. The devotion to competitive balance also keeps clubs from being able to outspend their rivals to gain an on-field edge, instead having to be crafty and work within a borderline labyrinthine set of roster rules. Advertisement As the sport's popularity has continued to spike over the past decade or more, American and Canadian fans have looked to other leagues beyond their MLS markets and taken interest in the sport's more open structure. A 2016 study by Deloitte of 'over 1,000 U.S. soccer fans,' commissioned by the owner of lower-division club Miami FC, found that 88 percent of domestic respondents 'believe (the) introduction of promotion and relegation would be beneficial for club soccer in the USA.' In that spirit, the USL — which has operated among the United States' lower divisions since 2011 — introduced an audacious aim to bring promotion and relegation to the U.S., announcing earlier this year it hoped to debut a new circuit at a first-division level to make a three-tier open system as soon as 2027. As currently designed, such a venture would not involve MLS, the nation's top league. In a sit-down interview with in 2023, MLS commissioner Don Garber left the door open for the league to one day consider adopting a promotion and relegation model. 'I don't see any reason why, at the right time, if we're able to accommodate it as it relates to schedule and players and the ecosystem of MLS, why we couldn't have more teams in the future,' Garber said at the time. 'But this is an example of — life is a long time. We do not need to expand. We expand so that we can build our fan base. We build our fan base, which drives revenue, we drive revenue and we can invest that money back into the sport.' Advertisement Ultimately, it will be up to MLS' owners — who come to decisions through votes held by the board of governors, taking cues from various committees among its membership — to determine whether it wants to finally move forward with opening the system. has reached out to MLS for comment on Infantino's remarks. Infantino's remarks aren't the first sign that MLS might need to embrace the winds of change — far from it, in fact. However, this latest in a seemingly endless series of major summer tournaments has shown that leagues beyond Europe's elite can contend at the highest levels if set up for success. Though both the Seattle Sounders and Los Angeles have been competitive in their Club World Cup matches, both teams enter the final group stage match without a single point. This article originally appeared in The Athletic. MLS, Soccer, International Football, NWSL 2025 The Athletic Media Company
