Now more than ever South Africa needs to practise fiscal prudence
To paraphrase Ronald Reagan, 'this time is different' are the four most dangerous words in economics. And yet, in a recent op-ed for Business Day, Ziyanda Stuurman invokes precisely this logic. She argues that while 'budget cuts have become conventional wisdom in South Africa in the past decade… we are no longer living in conventional times.'
Surely however, it is exactly during turbulent and unpredictable economic conditions such as those we are living through that — particularly for emerging markets like South Africa — fiscal discipline becomes more critical, not less?
Stuurman makes an impassioned plea to the National Treasury to break from economic orthodoxy and embrace the principles of Modern Monetary Theory (MMT) — essentially, spend freely in the hope that growth and welfare dividends will follow. However, her central claim — that countries across Africa like Kenya are successfully applying this approach — is not only misleading, but is also just wrong.
Across the continent, governments are conversely tightening their belts in response to severe economic pressure. In the past week alone, Kenya, Mozambique and Botswana have all announced plans to reduce spending. Ghana made similar announcements in March.
The reason for these draconian cuts to expenditures is the darkening economic outlook. Kenya, for example, has announced austerity programmes to drastically shrink its budget deficit by June 2026 as it negotiates a new bailout programme with the International Monetary Fund. The government intends to make 'substantial revisions' to its previously expansionary budget of 4.3-trillion shillings ($33-billion), in an effort to drastically cut its deficit. Clouding it all is a gloomy growth outlook, with the economy expanding in 2024 by 4.7%, its slowest since the pandemic.
'The cabinet has resolved to implement significant budget realignments in line with the government's policy of fiscal consolidation and commitment to living within its means,' read a statement from the Kenyan presidency.
Post-election unrest
In Mozambique, post-election unrest and a slump in the price of coal, the nation's biggest export, have led to job losses and a financing crunch. The government slashed its 2025 budget by 9%, approving a 512.75-billion meticais ($8bn) spending plan, down from 567.86-billion in 2024. Yet, the budget deficit is still expected to reach 8.2% of GDP. With debt servicing and a ballooning state wage bill consuming state resources, Mozambique faces mounting fiscal strain amid political instability and falling growth projections. The worst election-related protests the country has yet seen — after opposition presidential candidate Venâncio Mondlane disputed the October election outcome that placed him second — have also hit growth and revenues, exacerbating the situation.
Meanwhile Botswana — the world's leading diamond exporter by value — is suffering from a prolonged drop in global demand for the gems. It previously relied on precious stones for most of its exports and about a third of its fiscal revenue. Collapsing diamond demand has led to dwindling government revenue streams and reserves, with its budget deficit projected to widen to 9% of GDP. The country is also forecasting a 3% economic contraction this year.
Compounding Africa's challenges is a shifting global environment. The abrupt end of billions in dollars in aid and a major reordering of global trade under US President Donald Trump are already having ripple effects. Reduced demand for key commodities and diminished preferential access to the US market will worsen the economic downturn for many of Africa's poorest countries, precisely when they need it least.
It is with this backdrop that South Africa's Finance Minister Enoch Godongwana last week calmed a months-long political crisis that had threatened the stability of its governing coalition, presenting a fiscally cautious Budget that won praise from lawmakers and investors alike.
In his third stab at getting the Budget signed off by Parliament, Godongwana announced cuts to spending, lowered growth forecasts, and acknowledged a slightly higher debt peak than before.
Markets cheered the Budget. Despite the fraught meeting between presidents Cyril Ramaphosa and Donald Trump in the White House that happened to be on the same day, the rand surged toward its sixth consecutive weekly advance, hitting a five-month high against the dollar on Friday. It is now trading at well under R18 to the greenback, which has seen general weakness against major currencies. South African bonds have also barely moved this year, shrugging off the volatility incurred by the debates over the Budget. The 10-year yield is under 10.5%, its lowest since February (bond yields move inversely to prices).
Instead of using this moment to supposedly question economic orthodoxy, we should commend the National Treasury and coalition government for their firm stance on either raising taxes or cutting expenditure.
As previously argued in this column, any worsening of the outlook for the US economy will have major repercussions on emerging markets such as South Africa. Aid cuts and higher tariffs will hurt, regardless of whatever kind of slightly improved deal may be forthcoming from the meetings in the White House.
The National Treasury and indeed the South African Reserve Bank are right that this is a time for maximum prudence and caution. Sadly, beset with State Capture and energy crises, South Africa did not make the most of the amenable conditions for emerging markets over the past few years. Yet, that is not an argument to jettison the sensible economic policy that has been the one thing keeping South Africa from going the way of Venezuela and Zimbabwe over the past few decades.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
eNCA
20 hours ago
- eNCA
World Bank and IMF climate snub 'worrying', says COP29 presidency
BONN - The hosts of the most recent UN climate talks are worried international lenders are retreating from their commitments to help boost funding for developing countries' response to global warming. Major development banks have agreed to boost climate spending and are seen as crucial in the effort to dramatically increase finance to help poorer countries build resilience to impacts and invest in renewable energy. But anxiety has grown as the Trump administration has slashed foreign aid and discouraged US-based development lenders such as the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund from focussing on climate finance. Developing nations, excluding China, will need an estimated $1.3 trillion a year by 2035 in financial assistance to transition to renewable energy and climate-proof their economies from increasing weather extremes. Nowhere near this amount has been committed. At last year's UN COP29 summit in Azerbaijan, rich nations agreed to increase climate finance to $300 billion a year by 2035, an amount decried as woefully inadequate. Azerbaijan and Brazil, which is hosting this year's COP30 conference, have launched an initiative to reduce the shortfall, with the expectation of "significant" contributions from international lenders. But so far only two -- the African Development Bank and the Inter-American Development Bank -- have responded to a call to engage the initiative with ideas, said COP29 president Mukhtar Babayev. "We call on their shareholders to urgently help us to address these concerns," he told climate negotiators at a high-level summit in the German city of Bonn this week. "We fear that a complex and volatile global environment is distracting" many of those expected to play a big role in bridging the climate finance gap, he added. - A 'worrisome trend' - His team travelled to Washington in April for the IMF and World Bank's spring meetings hoping to find the same enthusiasm for climate lending they had encountered a year earlier. But instead they found institutions "very much reluctant now to talk about climate at all", said Azerbaijan's top climate negotiator Yalchin Rafiyev. This was a "worrisome trend", he said, given expectations these lenders would extend the finance needed in the absence of other sources. "They're very much needed," he said. The World Bank is directing 45 percent of its total lending to climate, as part of an action plan in place until June 2026, with the public portion of that spilt 50/50 between emissions reductions and building resilience. The United States, the World Bank's biggest shareholder, has pushed in a different direction. On the sidelines of the April spring meetings, US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent urged the bank to focus on "dependable technologies" rather than "distortionary climate finance targets." This could mean investing in gas and other fossil fuel-based energy production, he said. Under the Paris Agreement, wealthy developed countries -- those most responsible for global warming to date -- are obliged to pay climate finance to poorer nations. Other countries, most notably China, make voluntary contributions. - Money matters - Finance is a source of long-running tensions at UN climate negotiations. Donors have consistently failed to deliver on past finance pledges, and have committed well below what experts agree developing nations need to cope with the climate crisis. The issue flared up again this week in Bonn, with nations at odds over whether to debate financial commitments from rich countries during the formal meetings. European nations have also pared back their foreign aid spending in recent months, raising fears that budgets for climate finance could also face a haircut. At COP29, multilateral development banks (MDBs) led by the World Bank Group estimated they could provide $120 billion annually in climate financing to low and middle income countries, and mobilise another $65 billion from the private sector by 2030. Their estimate for high income countries was $50 billion, with another $65 billion mobilised from the private sector. Rob Moore, of policy think tank E3G, said these lenders are the largest providers of international public finance to developing countries. "Whilst they are facing difficult political headwinds in some quarters, they would be doing both themselves and their clients a disservice by disengaging on climate change," he said. The World Bank in particular has done "a huge amount of work" to align its lending with global climate goals. "If they choose to step back this would be at their own detriment, and other banks like the regionally based MDBs would likely play a bigger role in shaping the economy of the future," he said. The World Bank declined to comment on the record.
The South African
a day ago
- The South African
Tensions grow between SASSA and the National Treasury
SASSA and the National Treasury were at loggerheads this week in Parliament. New SASSA CEO Themba Matlou, who's barely been in the job permanently for two months, had to answer to the Parliament portfolio committee on social development. At the centre of tensions between SASSA and the National Treasury are conditions attached to the R265-billion budget allocation. On one hand, you have the High Court ruling back in January 2025 that said SASSA was being 'deliberately exclusionary.' And now you have the National Treasury wanting to see have SASSA is reviewing, suspending and cancelling grants to keep the budget in check … It's a little farfetched to expect SASSA SRD R370 applicants to have a smartphone and data for monthly verifications. Image: File Unfortunately, this puts the South African Social Security Agency in a highly compromised position. If it doesn't actively exclude grant recipients, the National Treasury will say conditions to its budget allocation are not being met. However, after the High Court ruling earlier this year, civil society is watching closely to see how the agency 'increases grant inclusivity.' As such, SASSA CEO Themba Matlou told the committee this week that its new review process for social grants will comply with the National Treasury's requirements. The first necessity is a quarterly report, due at the end of July, that proves the number of grants reviewed, suspended, cancelled and money saved by the agency. Meanwhile, it's the elderly who suffer and must travel to SASSA offices to have their identity verified. Image: File Key to the agreement between SASSA and the National Treasury is the agency must improve its income, biometric and governmental verification systems. Meanwhile, it's overtly clear that these new digital processes are impacting poor beneficiaries who don't have access to smartphones and data. Nevertheless, when the National Treasury allocated R265 billion budget to SASSA, it had the following provisos. 'SASSA must introduce bank income checks on grants. It must conduct large-scale database checks at least twice a year. It must finalise agreements with SARS and NSFAS to verify beneficiaries' income. And it must intensify biometric checks on suspicious applications,' reports GroundUp . SASSA's first report is due to the National Treasury next month. Image: File As a result, these reviews have already started being implemented. Specifically, Child Support, Old-Age, Disability and Care Dependency grants were flagged for undisclosed income and alternative forms of identification. Instead of the usual three-month review period, affected individuals had their grants withheld until they completed in-person verification at a SASSA office. However, Matlou and SASSA has come under fire over these latest verification policies. And he told Parliament he is aware of the frustration. 'Through beneficiary education, we emphasise that citizens have a responsibility to assist the government to save money. And beneficiaries need to notify SASSA when their financial circumstances have changed,' explained Matlou. Furthermore, the agency says it will start rolling out service kiosks at offices to help clients with remote biometric identity verification. 'The goal is to make biometrics compulsory for all SASSA applicants, whether you are trying to access the social assistance programme with or without identification,' concluded Matlou. Let us know by leaving a comment below, or send a WhatsApp to 060 011 021 1. Subscribe to The South African website's newsletters and follow us on WhatsApp, Facebook, X and Bluesky for the latest news.
IOL News
a day ago
- IOL News
One step off the greylist, but who's watching the watchdogs?
The announcement from the FATF Plenary in Strasbourg, France, marked a significant milestone for South Africa's beleaguered financial sector. Image: Ron AI BY ALL accounts, South Africa has come a long way since February 2023, when it was placed on the Financial Action Task Force (FATF) greylist over concerns about weak enforcement mechanisms and a lack of political will to combat high-level corruption. Now, nearly two years down the line, the country is on the cusp of delisting after 'substantially completed' all 22 action items set out by the global watchdog. The announcement from the FATF Plenary in Strasbourg, France, marked a significant milestone for South Africa's beleaguered financial sector. The country now awaits an on-site verification visit — a final step before potential delisting at the next FATF Plenary in October 2025. 'This is not just about ticking boxes,' National Treasury said in a recently released statement. 'This is about rebuilding institutions hollowed out during years of state capture, and restoring credibility to our financial systems.' Yet while the technical progress has been lauded internationally, domestic critics warn that celebration may be premature — and that complacency could unravel everything. South Africa's greylisting in 2023 was more than a reputational blow; it was a financial reckoning. Banks faced higher correspondent banking costs, foreign investment slowed, and businesses were forced to navigate an increasingly complex and costly regulatory environment. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Next Stay Close ✕ The legacy of state capture — under which law enforcement agencies were deliberately weakened — made the path to compliance long and arduous. But according to the FATF's latest communiqué: 'South Africa has demonstrated a sustained increase in investigations and prosecutions of serious and complex money laundering and the full range of terror financing activities in line with its risk profile.' That turnaround, according to officials, was only possible due to the relentless work of key institutions such as the Directorate for Priority Crime Investigation (DPCI — alias Hawks), the State Security Agency (SSA), and the National Prosecuting Authority (NPA). 'Without their commitment, we would still be floundering,' read the Treasury statement. 'These are the same institutions that were targeted during the Zuma era. To see them rise again is nothing short of remarkable.' The FATF has confirmed that South Africa has met the technical requirements for delisting, but the final verdict rests with the FATF Africa Joint Group, which is set to conduct an on-site visit prior to the October 2025 Plenary. 'The Joint Group will verify that implementation of AML/CFT reforms has begun and is being sustained, and that the necessary political commitment remains in place to sustain implementation in the future,' stated the FATF on June 13. National Treasury confirmed that preparations for the visit were already underway. While Treasury paints a picture of institutional renewal, opposition parties remain deeply skeptical. The DA, now part of the Government of National Unity (GNU), has cautiously welcomed the FATF's upgrade of South Africa's progress but issued a warning against any complacency that could derail the country's full removal. 'While this is an important step, the DA cautions the NPA and our financial regulators against complacency,' DA Deputy Spokesperson on Finance Wendy Alexander said in a statement. 'Exiting the greylist remains subject to a site visit by the FATF ahead of the body's next plenary in October.' Alexander stressed that further delays would only deepen the damage. 'The longer South Africa stays on the greylist, the harder it will be for our banks to do business both domestically and internationally,' she warned, adding that a one-off effort would not be enough. 'Exiting and staying off the greylist requires not once-off window dressing, but sustained change and implementation.' South Africa shares the spotlight with several African nations making strides against financial crime. Mali and Tanzania have been officially delisted from the FATF greylist, while Nigeria, Mozambique, and Burkina Faso were also recognised for having substantially completed their respective action plans.
