Where is the tolerant, friendly and open US of my college days?
It was an ordinary day. I was having lunch in the cafeteria at my college in the United States when a round of applause suddenly broke out. Before I realised what had happened, TVs were switched on and the news showed the local government announcing that same-sex marriage had been recognised in the state of Iowa. Students jumped on the table, cheering and waving rainbow flags.
It would have seemed strange to me only a few years earlier. In the autumn of 2006, when I first arrived in the US aged 17, I knew little about the outside world and my impression of the country was based on
hit TV shows like Friends and Prison Break.
My college sought to prepare international students and reduce the culture shock after their arrival. We were asked to attend a week-long orientation, where we saw a play about
sexual harassment , met a panel of LGBTQ campus activists and discussed self-governance.
They touched on topics I had never heard about. Some people know at a very young age that they are attracted to people of the same gender. Classmates from other countries shared stories of how they grew up. One friend from Africa had never flown in a plane before this trip to the US.
This level of communication continued for the next four years, on both sides. I was invited to give a talk about China to local townspeople, and I learned about American society as well. Then senator Barack Obama visited on a campaign trip and later became the
first black US president , something new for American society as well as for me.
I still have fond memories of my years in the US, of people patiently listening to my viewpoints and respecting my rights. This is why I felt sad when reading about the Trump administration's attacks on international students, including efforts to ban Harvard University from
admitting any foreign students
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
South China Morning Post
2 hours ago
- South China Morning Post
What does a Taiwanese commander's appearance at US drill mean for future military ties?
The appearance of a senior Taiwanese officer at a military exercise in Alaska has attracted widespread attention on the island, where many see it as a signal that there may be closer defence cooperation with the United States in future. Analysts said the move also suggested the US would stick to its security commitments despite US President Donald Trump's transactional approach towards Washington's allies in the region. The exercise, Red Flag Alaska 25-2, is one of the US Air Force's largest annual air combat drills designed to sharpen coordination between regional allies. This year's edition, conducted over two weeks from June 12, brings together 1,500 personnel and 70 aircraft from the US, Japan, South Korea, the Philippines and other countries. Taiwan did not take part in the drills, but Major General Wu Chia-hsing, head of the air force's flight training division, joined the exercise as an observer. A photograph released by the Pentagon-supported Defence Visual Information Distribution Service (DVIDS) showed Wu in a suite standing alongside uniformed senior officers in front of two F-22 stealth fighters and a C-17 transport aircraft at Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson in Alaska.
South China Morning Post
6 hours ago
- South China Morning Post
US B-2 bombers moving to Guam amid Israel-Iran tensions
The United States is moving B-2 bombers to the Pacific island of Guam, two US officials said on Saturday, as US President Donald Trump weighs whether the United States should take part in Israel's strikes against Iran. It was unclear whether the bomber deployment is tied to Middle East tensions. Speculation about a potential US strike has focused on the B-2s, which would be needed to drop 30,000-pound (1,360kg) GBU-57 Massive Ordnance Penetrators – so-called 'bunker busters' – if Trump decided to target Iran's heavily fortified underground uranium enrichment site at Fordow. Israel, which is seeking to destroy Iran's nuclear capabilities, does not have such weapons. The officials, speaking on the condition of anonymity, declined to disclose any further details. One official said no forward orders had been given yet to move the bombers beyond Guam. They did not say how many B-2 bombers were being moved. 04:26 Trump says US 'may' or 'may not' strike Iran as Tehran rejects call to surrender Trump says US 'may' or 'may not' strike Iran as Tehran rejects call to surrender The Pentagon did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
South China Morning Post
9 hours ago
- South China Morning Post
How much of a future does Elon Musk really have in US politics?
Convinced that his vision for the future of artificial intelligence was superior to that of OpenAI head Sam Altman and former Google chief executive Larry Page, Elon Musk cut ties with Page and parted ways with OpenAI, which he helped found in 2015. That same decisive belief in himself has famously spilled into politics. After spending nearly US$300 million in Donald Trump's 2024 campaign and working unofficially in the White House for months, Musk clashed publicly with the US president over a spending bill, which he called a ' disgusting abomination '. In the heat of the dispute, he floated the idea earlier this month of forming a third party to fix what he sees as a broken electoral system. 'Is it time to create a new political party in America that actually represents the 80% in the middle?,' he asked his 230 million followers on X, the social media platform he owns. Around 80 per cent of respondents voted yes. Musk reacted by sharing a potential name: 'the American Party'. But does the tech titan really have a future in politics? In a 2023 biography by Walter Isaacson, Musk himself admitted that he had a 'habit of biting off more than I can chew'. His younger brother Kimbal, who sits on the boards of Tesla and SpaceX, both Musk companies, described his sibling as a 'drama magnet'. A leader in industries capable of determining a nation's future economic success, Musk in the past year seemed determined to inject drama into politics, both in the US and abroad.
