Putin declares ‘all of Ukraine is ours' in latest blow to peace talks - and hints at nuclear threat

Vladimir Putin has declared that 'all of Ukraine is ours' in one of his most hardline comments on the country since Donald Trump took power.
In recent months the Russian president has danced around involvement in peace talks - without making any firm commitments - and even suggested he would be prepared to meet with Ukraine's Volodymyr Zekelensky.
But during a Q&A session at an investment event in St Petersburg, Putin was asked about his end goal in the protracted war in Ukraine, which is nearing the three-and-a-half year mark.
"I have said many times that I consider the Russian and Ukrainian people to be one nation. In this sense, all of Ukraine is ours,' Putin said according to Sky News' Moscow correspondent.
"There is an old rule. 'Where a Russian soldier sets foot, that is ours'." An audience of Russian politicians and other business figures responded to the president's words with applause.
Russian troops continue to push forward in eastern areas of Ukraine, concentrating the bulk of its attacks in the Donetsk region. On Saturday, the Russian defence ministry said it had captured another village, the settlement of Zaporizhzhya.
Putin appeared to later threaten the use of nuclear weapons on Ukraine - and promised 'catastrophic' consequences for his enemy if they were to use the dirty bomb in its defence against Russia. Kyiv has always denied it would use a dirty bomb - a device containing radioactive material alongside explosives.
"This would be a colossal mistake on the part of those whom we call neo-Nazis on the territory of today's Ukraine. It could be their last mistake,' Putin said.
"We always respond and respond in kind. Therefore, our response will be very tough."
During nearly three years of war while the Biden administration was in power, Moscow's sabre-rattling about the use of nuclear weapons was a regular occurrence.
The US president has now appeared to take a backseat in the Ukraine crisis and shifted his attention to the Middle East instead, where Iran and Israel are embroiled in a bloody air conflict.
Earlier this week, Washington disbanded a working group tasked with finding ways to pressure Russia into having peace talks with Ukraine, according to a report.
Efforts from the inter-agency working group came to a screeching halt when members realized Trump was not interested in taking a tougher stance with Moscow, three US officials told Reuters.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Telegraph

an hour ago

• Telegraph

The best outcome from the Iran conflict? Peace between Armenia and Azerbaijan

Two major conflicts – Ukraine and Iran – are creating seismic upheaval in the tightly meshed world of post-Cold War alliances around the world. The biggest losers in this lethal game of musical chairs will likely be smaller nations who can no longer rely on the protection and patronage of greater powers whose priorities have been radically realigned. The immediate result is a panicked race to seek new partners, a desperate rush of diplomatic blind dating in which those newly exposed smaller countries have very few cards to play other than to make painful concessions. This week's meeting between President Recep Tayyip Erdogan of Turkey and Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan of Armenia – the first ever official bi-lateral visit between the heads of these two countries is a case in point. Armenia has for decades turned its back on two of its immediate neighbours – Turkey and its ally Azerbaijan, with closed frontiers and no diplomatic relations. That has only been possible because of Yerevan's ability to depend on two other major regional powers – Iran to the south and Russia to the north. Those alliances created a confidence which translated into a fatal overreach when Armenia, three decades ago, invaded Azerbaijan and occupied a fifth of the Azerbaijani territory of Karabakh, forcibly expelling some 800,000 Azerbaijanis and establishing a mono-ethnic Armenian state. For a generation, Azerbaijan's attempts to regain its territory through negotiation and diplomacy, despite resounding support for their sovereign rights over Karabakh from the UN Security Council, came to nothing. Russia, the former colonial power, could always be relied on to preserve the frozen conflict in ways which maintained Moscow's grip on its 'near abroad'. Then came 2020. In that year cross-border tit for tat between the two neighbours became a full-blown 44-day conflict, with Azerbaijan liberating much of Armenian-occupied territory. In 2023 what was not returned three years earlier was finally secured by Azerbaijan. To Yerevan's utter dismay, in both 2020 and 2023 its long-standing patron and formal military ally in the Kremlin was nowhere to be seen. Russia's Western imperial ambitions had exhausted its ability to maintain its old role of Caucasian puppet master to the south. Armenia was left to sink or swim. Azerbaijan's combat victories, cemented with a ceasefire but still today without a peace treaty, can be read as definitive proof that Russia had left the stage as far as Armenia was concerned. That might have led Pashinyan to seek urgent reconciliation with Turkey. Instead, Yerevan doubled down on its relationship with its one remaining regional protector, Iran. Arguably he had no option: decades of virulent anti-Turkish domestic and international rhetoric would probably have made any pro-Ankara realignment fatal to his own government at that point. And why risk alienating your one remaining powerful friend, Iran, by reaching out to its long-standing opponent Turkey? Just as the Ukraine war provoked one crisis for Armenia, the Iran war has provoked a second. But this time Iran's troubles and dramatically exposed weakness, with the Islamic Republic itself now friendless in a world where its ally Assad has fallen and the leverage of its proxy Houthi, Hezbollah and Hamas militias has been decimated, have left Yerevan not with one but with zero dependable allies. Even Armenia's ability to call on its once powerful diaspora lobby groups in the US and France is no longer a realistic strategy in today's climate, given the deeply problematic Iran connection. This is the sequence of events which has left Armenia with literally nowhere to turn but Ankara. Pashinyan, an intelligent politician who has shown some ability to negotiate within the desperately narrow space afforded by the tensions of geopolitical reality and domestic nationalist opinion, will need every ounce of skill to emerge from the current talks with a result which has both substance and domestic credibility. For now, concessions – if he is wise to take them – are his best card. Turkey will not contemplate normalisation of still less supportive friendship with Armenia unless Yerevan formally commits to a peace deal with Azerbaijan. The country's President Ilham Aliyev has long maintained such a peace deal needs to entail a rewriting of the Armenian constitution to remove extra-territorial claims on Azerbaijan's internationally recognised sovereign territory, the establishment of a formal right to return of Azerbaijanis expelled from Armenia during the break-up of the Soviet Union, and agreement on a land corridor through Armenia (would earn huge income) enabling Azerbaijan and countries from Asia the swiftest land route to Europe. Some in Armenia will see these as too painful to concede. Wiser heads will see them for what they are: economic and diplomatic opportunities to move forward after over three decades of conflict. If Pashinyan can take this unpalatable medicine – and if by some miracle he can sell it to his electorate, Armenia stands to benefit. A chance of establishing new partnerships with more reliable neighbours, the enormous benefits of regional economic and energy integration after decades of impoverished isolation, a chance in fact for normalisation, peace and prosperity. The alternative is too foolhardy to contemplate.

Daily Mirror

an hour ago

• Daily Mirror

Vladimir Putin given stark 'on the verge' warning by top minister

Russia's economy could be 'on the verge' of a recession, according to one of the top officials in Vladimir Putin's Kremlin - Russia's economy remains on a war footing Vladimir Putin received a stark warning from one of his own ministers as Russia's economy remains on a war footing. The Russian Economy Minister Maxim Reshetnikov said that Russia 's economy is 'on the verge' of transitioning to a recession. 'We have a cooling stage,' Reshetnikov said at the St. Petersburg International Economic Forum, calling the numbers bedding his comments like looking at a 'rearview mirror'. He said: 'According to current business perceptions, we are already, it seems, on the verge of a transition to a recession.' ‌ ‌ Reshetnikov said that a recession was not inevitable and would depend on decisions taken by the Kremlin. Putin, in a speech at the forum, mentioned the recession warnings but emphasised that 'it mustn't be allowed'. Putin said Russia has managed to curb inflation and ease its reliance on energy exports. He pointed out that manufacturing industries have posted steady growth, allowing the country to reduce its reliance on oil and gas exports. 'The perception of Russian economy as based on raw materials and dependent on hydrocarbons exports have clearly become outdated,' Putin said, adding that the economy grew by 1.5 percent in the first four months of 2025 and inflation has dropped from double digits to 9.6 percent. Putin has used the annual forum to highlight Russia's economic prowess and encourage foreign investment, but Western executives have shunned it after Moscow sent troops into Ukraine in 2022, leaving it to business leaders from Asia, Africa and Latin America. The economy, hit with a slew of Western sanctions, has so far outperformed predictions. High defence spending has propelled growth and kept unemployment low despite fuelling inflation. Large recruiting bonuses for military enlistees and death benefits for those killed in Ukraine also have put more income into the country's poorer regions. But over the long term, inflation and a lack of foreign investments pose threats to the economy. ‌ Economists have warned of mounting pressure on the economy and the likelihood it would stagnate due to lack of investment in sectors other than the military. Putin said the growth of military industries helped develop new technologies that have become available to the civilian sector. He vowed to continue military modernisation, relying on lessons learned during the fighting in Ukraine. 'We will raise the capability of the Russian armed forces, modernize military infrastructure and equip the troops with cutting-edge equipment,' Putin said. But Russian Central Bank Governor Elvira Nabiullina said that the factors that had helped Russia with sustained growth could no longer be relied upon. On June 19, The Moscow Times said that Nabiullina said Russia had been growing on the back of 'free resources'. This includes its bank reserves, liquid assets in the country's wealth fund, industry and labour. Such resources are now reaching their limit, Nabiullina said. 'We grew for two years at a fairly high pace because free resources were activated," she said. "We need to understand that many of those resources have truly been exhausted."

The Independent

2 hours ago

• The Independent

Iran warns US involvement in Israeli attacks would be ‘very dangerous'

US involvement in attacks on Iran would be 'very, very dangerous', Tehran's foreign minister has warned as Donald Trump continues to mull over whether to support Israeli strikes. Abbas Araghchi British, French and German counterparts. Donald Trump's sabre-rattling over potential strikes on Iran came to a head earlier this week when he said he 'may' authorise an attack, before later setting himself a two-week deadline to make the decision. In the strongest suggestion yet that Trump is prepared to authorise strikes in the near future, The Times reports that American B-2 stealth bombers have moved from their base in Missouri and are bound for a military base in the Indian Ocean. These are the warplanes which can deliver the US military's advanced 'bunker busting' bombs, capable of striking the Iranian nuclear targets buried deep underground. With an apparent two-week grace period before US strikes, Tehran has the chance to push for further nuclear negotiations with Washington, which came to a halt when Israeli strikes last week sparked a deadly air conflict which has killed hundreds in Iran and dozens in Israel. But Iran 'cannot' join further nuclear negotiations with the US while the Iranian people are 'under bombardment', Mr Araghchi said on Saturday, adding that Tehran stands 'absolutely ready for a negotiated solution for our nuclear programme'. American military involvement "would be very unfortunate', Mr Araghchi said. At least 430 people have been killed in Iran already since the conflict began last Friday, when Israel issued a wave of strikes across Iranian nuclear sites and on the capital city of Tehran. In Israel, 24 people have been killed by Iran's retaliatory strikes, including in Tel Aviv. Israel says it has killed dozens of Iranian military commanders and nuclear scientists linked to Tehran's nuclear programme and its powerful Revolutionary Guard Corps. On Saturday, the IDF said it had killed two commanders of Iran's Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) who it claimed were closely linked with arming Hamas and other militant groups in the region. One of the commanders, Saeed Izadi, led the Palestine Corps of the overseas arm, or Quds Force, foreign minister Israel Katz said in a statement. He has been described as a veteran figure in Iran's military operations. The Quds Force built up a network of Arab allies known as the Axis of Resistance, establishing Hezbollah in Lebanon in 1982 and supporting the Palestinian militant Islamist group Hamas in the Gaza Strip. The military later said that it killed a second commander of the Guards' overseas arm. The commander of the Quds Force's Weapons Transfer Unit (Unit 190) in the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, Behnam Shahriyari, was killed by the Israeli air force in an overnight strike against his vehicle, the IDF said. Shahriyari "worked for years to arm various terrorist organisations in order to directly advance the Iranian regime's plan to destroy the State of Israel', the IDF claimed. Israel itself suffered no overnight casualties on Saturday, after a significantly lower level of Iranian attacks involved only five missiles, down from 23 the day before. The IRGC is yet to confirm the deaths.