How the Iran-Israel conflict could destabilize Pakistan – DW – 06/18/2025
The Israel-Iran conflict could trigger new security and economic challenges for Pakistan, which is already grappling with militancy, separatism and economic instability.
The escalating Israel-Iran conflict has far-reaching security, geopolitical and economic implications for Iran's southeastern neighbor, Pakistan.
Iran shares a 909-kilometer (560-mile) border with Pakistan's restive Balochistan province, where officials announced on Monday that all formal border crossings with Iran had closed for an indefinite period amid intensifying strikes between Israel and Iran.
The crossings at Taftan and Gabd-Rimdan in southwest Balochistan remain open for nationals seeking to return home. Hundreds of Pakistanis living in Iran arrived at the Taftan border crossing on Wednesday as they make their way back home to Pakistan.
Pakistan's army chief, Field Marshal Asim Munir, is expected to meet US President Donald Trump later on Wednesday during his official visit to Washington. The meeting is deemed siginficant in the light of the ongoing Iran-Israel conflict.
Pakistan's relationship with Iran
The relationship between predominantly Sunni Pakistan and Shiite-majority Iran has been complex, with the cross-border region affected by attacks from Baloch separatists who are fighting a war of independence against the Pakistani state.
The Balochistan Liberation Army (BLA) says Pakistan's central government is unfairly exploiting the region's natural resources.
The BLA has for decades launched attacks against the government, armed forces and Chinese interests in the region.
Pakistan: 'Security state' on the rise amid regional tension
To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video
The Israel-Iran war marks a dangerous turning point not only for Middle East geopolitics, but for Pakistan, according to US-based Pakistan analyst Raza Rumi, who told DW that "the implications are [anything but] distant."
"As a country with close ties to key Gulf allies and a complex relationship with Iran, Pakistan will be under pressure to maintain neutrality while safeguarding its strategic interests," Rumi added.
As fighting between Israel and Iran entered its sixth day on Wednesday, the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) announced that they were attacking Tehran, Iran's capital, fueling fears of an all-out war in the region.
Increasing conflict and a potential collapse of Tehran could have serious security implications for Pakistan. Separatist attacks in Balochistan could impact Pakistan's border security and internal stability — challenging its already strained security apparatus.
"There is the thorny issue of the Baloch region [in Iran] and a collapse in Tehran could trigger autonomy claims which will embolden the Baloch in Pakistan. Iran and Pakistan have been at loggerheads over this issue in the past," Ghaffar Hussain, a London-based security, expert told DW.
For analyst Rumi, "Islamabad would have to bolster border surveillance and work carefully in balancing law enforcement with diplomatic sensitivity toward Tehran."
"A war on the western border [with Iran] is problematic for Pakistan, especially its restive Balochistan province," said Muhammad Shoaib, an assistant professor at Quaid-i-Azam University.
Shoaib added that any change to the status quo will be troublesome and a weakened regime would also "present a security challenge."
German outcry over Merz's remark on Israel's 'dirty work'
To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video
Economic impacts
The escalating conflict between Israel and Iran has renewed focus on security in the Strait of Hormuz — a strategic waterway between Oman and Iran that connects the Persian Gulf with the Gulf of Oman and the Arabian Sea.
A wider conflict in the Middle East, especially around the Strait of Hormuz, could disrupt global oil supplies and drive prices higher, said Rumi.
"Like the rest of the world, Pakistan would be severely impacted, and the war could risk major disruption of oil flows through the Strait of Hormuz, which could lead to soaring global energy prices," said Rumi, who noted that Pakistan is already grappling with inflation, currency depreciation and energy shortages.
As a result of the war, rising fuel costs could disrupt markets and key sectors, such as electricity generation, transportation and agriculture, deepening the fiscal crisis and putting further strain on vulnerable households.
"Whether or not Iran has the ability to block the strait of Hormuz remains to be seen … but this would embroil the entire region including GCC nations," asserted Hussain.
Shoaib, however, feels that the "Iranian conflict, in particular, will impact Balochistan province where a significant chunk of population is [engaged in] informal trade of oil and other commodities."
Sectarian tensions
According to Rumi, Pakistan — a predominantly Sunni Muslim country where Shiite Muslims make up about 15% of the population — could face a potential spillover of sectarian tensions and the country may see renewed propaganda, targeted violence, and proxy activities.
"If the war narrative is infused with religious symbolism and sectarian rhetoric, it could be dangerous," Rumi said.
Quadriga - Iran Nuclear Deal: Forever Delayed?
To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video
Edited by: Keith Walker
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
DW
2 hours ago
- DW
Are Jordan and Saudi Arabia defending Israel? – DW – 06/21/2025
Jordan shot down Iranian missiles and drones crossing overhead and Saudi Arabia likely allowed Israel to use its airspace to do so. That's despite both expressing opposition to Israel's attacks on Iran in public. The 21 Arab and Muslim-majority countries made it clear where they stood in the Iran-Israel conflict. In a statement published earlier this week, they expressed their "categorical rejection and condemnation of Israel's recent attacks on the Islamic Republic of Iran," which started on June 13. The countries spoke of the need to halt "Israeli hostilities against Iran" and expressed "great concern regarding this dangerous escalation, which threatens to have serious consequences on the peace and stability of the entire region." The signatories included both Jordan and Saudi Arabia. But their stated opposition to Israel's attacks on Iran has not prevented them from intervening in the conflict, at least indirectly. Jordan, for example, has shot down missiles flying from Iran towards Israel. The Jordanian military confirmed they had done this in a statement, explaining that missiles and drones could have fallen onto Jordan, "including in populated areas, causing casualties." As with any other sovereign state, missiles or other unauthorized objects crossing a country's airspace are often deemed violations of either domestic or international law. The Saudi Arabians have not issued a similar statement, but experts say it's likely they've allowed Israel to shoot missiles down in their airspace and may have cooperated on surveillance too. But just as it has done in the recent past, this kind of military action could cause domestic tensions. Among the people of both nations, there is a historical antipathy towards Israel based on past wars and conflicts. That's especially true for Jordan, where at least one in five locals, including the country's queen, are of Palestinian descent. It's difficult for Jordan's government to justify shooting down Iranian missiles headed for Israel, which is why the explanation of self-defense was given. "This message — 'we are only defending ourselves' — is being repeated on all channels," says Edmund Ratka, head of the Konrad Adenauer Foundation's office in Amman, Jordan. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Ratka says this is also due to the Jordanian political scene at the moment. In April, the country's government banned the country's largest political opposition movement, the Muslim Brotherhood, over connections to an alleged plot to destabilize the country. "The [ban] seems carefully calibrated and intended to stem rising popular support for the [Muslim brotherhood] movement as the kingdom navigates a difficult regional backdrop," Neil Quilliam, an associate fellow with British think tank Chatham House's Middle East and North Africa program, wrote at the time, as well as "undermine its growing appeal among a population incensed by Israel's war in Gaza." This makes it all the more important for the Jordanian government to make sure that taking down Iranian missiles is not seen as solidarity with Israel, says Stefan Lukas, founder of the Germany-based consultancy, Middle East Minds. "Still, the decision [to do so] further escalates tensions," he told DW. There's no way Jordan wants to be seen as defending Israel, Ratka confirms, "Because the Jordanian people largely perceive Israel as the aggressor." But, he adds, they feel the same about Iran, too. "We regularly conduct surveys in Jordan, and for years, they've shown there isn't much sympathy for Iran in Jordan," Ratka noted. "Because Iran is seen as a state that repeatedly interferes in Arab affairs with the intent to destabilize." Jordan also has other reasons for shooting down the Iranian missiles, Lukas says. Jordan can't directly oppose the US, he says, referring to a 2021 defense cooperation agreement between the US and Jordan, which allows US forces, vehicles and aircraft to enter and move around Jordan freely. Jordan "is far too dependent on the US and, to some extent, on Israel too — both financially and in terms of security policy." It's a difficult argument for the Jordanians to make. If they were that concerned about protecting domestic airspace, then the government would have to protest the presence of Israeli forces overhead, too. As Ratka points out, though, Israel hasn't violated Jordanian airspace with its attacks on Iran. "So the Jordanian leadership can, with some justification, claim it would combat any airspace violation," he says. "Even if, in fact, it's only fighting the Iranians." Saudi Arabia is also in a tricky spot. It signed the same declaration as 20 other Arab and Muslim-majority countries did, and even before that, had referred to Iran as a "brotherly nation" in a statement condemning Israeli attacks on the nation of around 92 million. The use of the word "brotherly" was seen as noteworthy by analysts because it's usually reserved for fellow Arab-majority countries, whereas the Iranians are mostly Persians. But beyond the official rhetoric, Saudi Arabia is pursuing a completely different course, Lukas says. "Unofficially, Saudi Arabia is participating in the action against Iran," he confirms. There's security cooperation between the Saudis and Israelis, Lukas states. "Saudi Arabia provides radar data and tolerates [airspace] access by Israeli aircraft, especially in the northern part of the country where Iranian missiles primarily fly through. We've seen that Saudi Arabia is actually very accommodating to Israel." Saudi Arabia also depends heavily on the US for security, especially during years of antipathy toward Iran. Although the two nations recently reconciled, their relationship is still delicate. Saudi Arabia would likely turn to the US for protection when in doubt.
DW
9 hours ago
- DW
Will India step in to mediate amid Iran-Israel escalation? – DW – 06/21/2025
With close ties to both Israel and Iran and as a self-proclaimed leader of the Global South, could Delhi help end the current conflict? DW's security podcast Global Eyes takes a look. With close ties to both Iran and Israel, India has the opportunity to mediate between the two as their confrontation continues and risks further geopolitical escalation. Delhi has increasingly sought out Israeli military technology but also long maintained good relations with Tehran for energy and other economic reasons. As a self-proclaimed leader of the Global South, will India step out of its traditional role of avoiding any strong position? Khinvraj Jangid, Director of the Jindal Center for Israel Studies in Delhi and Nicolas Blarel, a researcher on Indian foreign policy at Leiden University in the Netherlands, join the hosts of DW's security podcast, Global Eyes, to examine India's ties to both Israel and Iran. Should Delhi step up or stay on the sidelines?
Int'l Business Times
15 hours ago
- Int'l Business Times
Tech-fueled Misinformation Distorts Iran-Israel Fighting
AI deepfakes, video game footage passed off as real combat, and chatbot-generated falsehoods -- such tech-enabled misinformation is distorting the Israel-Iran conflict, fueling a war of narratives across social media. The information warfare unfolding alongside ground combat -- sparked by Israel's strikes on Iran's nuclear facilities and military leadership -- underscores a digital crisis in the age of rapidly advancing AI tools that have blurred the lines between truth and fabrication. The surge in wartime misinformation has exposed an urgent need for stronger detection tools, experts say, as major tech platforms have largely weakened safeguards by scaling back content moderation and reducing reliance on human fact-checkers. After Iran struck Israel with barrages of missiles last week, AI-generated videos falsely claimed to show damage inflicted on Tel Aviv and Ben Gurion Airport. The videos were widely shared across Facebook, Instagram and X. Using a reverse image search, AFP's fact-checkers found that the clips were originally posted by a TikTok account that produces AI-generated content. There has been a "surge in generative AI misinformation, specifically related to the Iran-Israel conflict," Ken Jon Miyachi, founder of the Austin-based firm BitMindAI, told AFP. "These tools are being leveraged to manipulate public perception, often amplifying divisive or misleading narratives with unprecedented scale and sophistication." GetReal Security, a US company focused on detecting manipulated media including AI deepfakes, also identified a wave of fabricated videos related to the Israel-Iran conflict. The company linked the visually compelling videos -- depicting apocalyptic scenes of war-damaged Israeli aircraft and buildings as well as Iranian missiles mounted on a trailer -- to Google's Veo 3 AI generator, known for hyper-realistic visuals. The Veo watermark is visible at the bottom of an online video posted by the news outlet Tehran Times, which claims to show "the moment an Iranian missile" struck Tel Aviv. "It is no surprise that as generative-AI tools continue to improve in photo-realism, they are being misused to spread misinformation and sow confusion," said Hany Farid, the co-founder of GetReal Security and a professor at the University of California, Berkeley. Farid offered one tip to spot such deepfakes: the Veo 3 videos were normally eight seconds in length or a combination of clips of a similar duration. "This eight-second limit obviously doesn't prove a video is fake, but should be a good reason to give you pause and fact-check before you re-share," he said. The falsehoods are not confined to social media. Disinformation watchdog NewsGuard has identified 51 websites that have advanced more than a dozen false claims -- ranging from AI-generated photos purporting to show mass destruction in Tel Aviv to fabricated reports of Iran capturing Israeli pilots. Sources spreading these false narratives include Iranian military-linked Telegram channels and state media sources affiliated with the Islamic Republic of Iran Broadcasting (IRIB), sanctioned by the US Treasury Department, NewsGuard said. "We're seeing a flood of false claims and ordinary Iranians appear to be the core targeted audience," McKenzie Sadeghi, a researcher with NewsGuard, told AFP. Sadeghi described Iranian citizens as "trapped in a sealed information environment," where state media outlets dominate in a chaotic attempt to "control the narrative." Iran itself claimed to be a victim of tech manipulation, with local media reporting that Israel briefly hacked a state television broadcast, airing footage of women's protests and urging people to take to the streets. Adding to the information chaos were online clips lifted from war-themed video games. AFP's fact-checkers identified one such clip posted on X, which falsely claimed to show an Israeli jet being shot down by Iran. The footage bore striking similarities to the military simulation game Arma 3. Israel's military has rejected Iranian media reports claiming its fighter jets were downed over Iran as "fake news." Chatbots such as xAI's Grok, which online users are increasingly turning to for instant fact-checking, falsely identified some of the manipulated visuals as real, researchers said. "This highlights a broader crisis in today's online information landscape: the erosion of trust in digital content," BitMindAI's Miyachi said. "There is an urgent need for better detection tools, media literacy, and platform accountability to safeguard the integrity of public discourse."
