Boycott Calls Trigger Over 2,000 Travel Cancellations To Turkey, Azerbaijan; Bookings Decline

Last Updated:
Boycott Turkey, Azerbaijan: Though this accounts for less than 5% of travel bookings to the two countries, travel sentiment is shifting rapidly amid geopolitical tensions.
Boycott Turkey, Azerbaijan: Amid rising calls to boycott Turkey and Azerbaijan, Indian travellers are cancelling trips to these countries to prioritise national interest, with travel platforms reporting over 2,000 cancellations in just a few days, according to a report by Moneycontrol. The sentiment shift comes in the wake of the two countries' unfavourable stance towards India amid the border tension with Pakistan.
Indian travellers are pressing pause on non-essential travel to Turkey and Azerbaijan, as tensions rise over their stance towards India on geopolitical matters. The slogan 'nation first" has resonated widely across social media and beyond, translating into tangible travel decisions.
According to Moneycontrol, a senior airline official said, 'We have received around 2,000 cancellations and rescheduling requests in the last week for travel to Istanbul and Baku over the next three months."
Though this accounts for less than 5 per cent of all travel bookings to the two countries as of now, travel sentiment is shifting rapidly amid geopolitical tensions.
Booking Trends Show a Sharp Turn
According to the report, travel companies are witnessing a wave of cancellations:
Cleartrip reported a 260% surge in cancellations over the past week.
Yatra has seen over 50% of holiday packages cancelled to Turkey and Azerbaijan since May 7.
'In solidarity with the nation and in the interest of standing together during this time, we urge everyone to defer all non-essential travel to Turkey and Azerbaijan," Cleartrip said.
MakeMyTrip stated on May 14, 'We stand in solidarity with our nation and out of deep respect for our armed forces. We strongly support this sentiment and advise against all non-essential travel to Azerbaijan and Turkey." The company has discontinued all promotions and offers for the two countries.
According to the report, Rikant Pittie, CEO and co-founder of EaseMyTrip, also confirmed a dip in sentiment, 'Many potential travellers are now opting to delay their trips… This shift reflects a growing sense of awareness and prudence among Indian tourists in the light of the ongoing geopolitical situation."
The platform has recorded 22% cancellations for Turkey and 30% for Azerbaijan.
Flights Still Operational – But with Fewer Enquiries
Despite the rising cancellations, no direct flights between India and Turkey or Azerbaijan have been cancelled yet, according to flight tracking platform Flightradar24.
IndiGo continues to operate two daily flights to Istanbul from Delhi and Mumbai.
Turkish Airlines runs daily flights to Delhi and Mumbai and a weekly flight to Chennai.
IndiGo also operates the only direct service between Delhi and Baku.
However, demand is falling. Govind Gaur, CEO and founder of travel platform WanderOn, said, 'Most Indian travellers with existing bookings to Turkey and Azerbaijan are cancelling their plans and have requested a refund or to reschedule to other destinations."
Travel Industry Voices Echo National Mood
Several industry stakeholders have joined the call to boycott these destinations. The Karnataka State Travel Operators Association and various travel entrepreneurs across India have said that despite the two countries benefiting over Rs 1,200 crore annually from Indian tourism, 'no business is above our nation's security and dignity."
Hari Ganapathy, co-founder of Pickyourtrail, which has suspended bookings to Turkey and Azerbaijan, said: 'Some Indian tourists are enquiring about travel to Turkey and Azerbaijan but we are responding to them with suggestions to other safer destinations."
Financial Hit for Turkey and Azerbaijan
India is one of the largest outbound travel markets for both countries, second only to China in terms of growth potential.
Over 2.7 lakh Indian tourists visited Turkey in 2024, up 20.7% from 2023.
Azerbaijan welcomed about 2.43 lakh Indians in 2024, a jump from 60,731 in 2022.
Indian tourists spend Rs 1–1.25 lakh per trip in Azerbaijan and Rs 2.9–3.35 lakh in Turkey.
According to the report, Rikant Pittie said, 'Trips to Turkey and Azerbaijan often involve high-value segments such as destination weddings, luxury holidays, and corporate retreats. The financial impact of Indian tourism is considerable."
He warned of a broader impact across the tourism ecosystem, adding, 'A decline in travel from India is likely to have a considerable effect across various parts of the tourism ecosystem in both countries."
Gaur added, 'The sudden drop in Indian tourists will impact their revenue streams, especially in sectors like luxury travel, weddings, and MICE (Meetings, Incentives, Conferences, and Exhibitions)."
Shift in Travel Preferences
With Turkey and Azerbaijan falling out of favour, Indian travellers are looking elsewhere. Southeast Asian countries are becoming preferred alternatives.
According to Sabina Chopra, COO and co-founder of Yatra, 'Southeast Asian countries such as Thailand, Vietnam, Malaysia, Singapore, and Indonesia have emerged as the preferred choices due to their affordability, ease of travel, and diverse experiences."
Georgia is also gaining traction, with Indian tourists showing interest in Tbilisi and Stepantsminda for their scenic charm and easier visa processes.
Ganapathy added, 'Some Indian travellers are switching to safer destinations like Morocco and Cambodia, which continue to see strong interest due to their accessibility and safety for Indians."
Watch India Pakistan Breaking News on CNN News18. Stay updated with all the latest business news, including market trends, stock updates, tax, IPO, banking finance, real estate, savings and investments. Get in-depth analysis, expert opinions, and real-time updates—only on News18. Also Download the News18 App to stay updated!
tags :
azerbaijan boycott turkey
Location :
New Delhi, India, India
First Published:
May 15, 2025, 12:37 IST
News business Boycott Calls Trigger Over 2,000 Travel Cancellations To Turkey, Azerbaijan; Bookings Decline

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

India Gazette

33 minutes ago

• India Gazette

Chennai-bound IndiGo flight issued 'fuel mayday' call, diverted to Bengaluru: Sources

New Delhi [India], June 22 (ANI): An IndiGo flight (6E 6764) from Guwahati to Chennai was forced to divert to Bengaluru after the pilot issued a 'fuel mayday' call due to insufficient fuel in the plane, sources said on Saturday. According to sources, the incident occurred on Thursday. The pilot did not get clearance to land in Chennai due to congestion at the airport. 'The diversion occurred because of congestion at Chennai airport, which prevented the aircraft from landing there in time. Passengers were on board during the emergency reroute,' they said. 'The flight landed safely in Bengaluru at 8:15 PM. During the refuelling process, passengers were provided refreshments, and their baggage was offloaded. Due to Flight Duty Time Limitations (FDTL), the airline had to arrange for a fresh crew,' sources said, adding that the flight subsequently departed for Chennai at 10:24 PM. Earlier on Tuesday, June 17, an Indigo flight from Muscat to Kochi, and further to Delhi, was diverted to Nagpur due to security concerns. According to the airline, the flight 6E1272, travelling from Muscat to Kochi, while continuing as flight 6E2706 from Kochi to Delhi, was rerouted to Nagpur on Tuesday due to a security issue. The plane landed safely at Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar International Airport in Nagpur, and all passengers were safely disembarked. 'We confirm receiving a security concern pertaining to IndiGo flight 6E1272 flying from Muscat to Kochi when the aircraft was operating its subsequent sector from Kochi to Delhi as 6E2706 on 17 June 2025. Following protocol, the relevant authorities were immediately informed, and the aircraft was diverted to Nagpur,' an airline spokesperson said. (ANI)

Mint

an hour ago

• Mint

When diversification backfires: Four Indian companies walking a fine line

Diversification is a well-worn corporate strategy. Done right, it can help companies de-risk operations, tap new revenue streams, and create lasting shareholder value. Done poorly, it can distract management, strain capital, and ultimately erode core businesses—a phenomenon legendary investor Peter Lynch once dubbed "diworsification." Several marquee Indian companies are now testing that fine line between smart expansion and costly distraction. Grasim's recent move into paints, UltraTech's foray into cables and wires, and IndiGo's venture into hotels have raised eyebrows. But in each case, there's a strategic logic: Grasim and UltraTech can leverage their existing cement distribution networks, while IndiGo's established travel brand can extend naturally into hospitality. Others, however, have ventured into businesses far afield from their core competencies—often with damaging results. Read this | Company Outsider: The Gensol-BluSmart fiasco shows the dangers of reckless diversification Here are four listed Indian companies that show how overextension can strain even established businesses. Unitech: Diversification derailed the core By the early 2000s, Unitech had cemented its position among India's top real estate developers, with residential complexes, commercial projects, and amusement parks sprawled across more than 14,500 acres. Following India's 2005 liberalization of foreign investment in real estate, Unitech drew substantial foreign interest and saw its stock soar by 3000% in a year. Flush with cash, the company ventured into telecom in 2007. But the global financial crisis hit its real estate business hard, and the telecom bet proved disastrous. The venture saddled Unitech with crippling debt. The 2G spectrum scandal that followed led to cancelled licences, criminal charges against its promoters, and the forced sale of its telecom operations. At its peak, the company owed ₹8,000 crore in debt. The collapse spilled into its core real estate business: stalled projects, mounting client complaints, regulatory interventions, and severe brand erosion. Though Unitech has since pivoted back to real estate, it faces a long road to recovery from the debt burden, reputational damage, and years lost chasing an ill-fated diversification. OK Play India: Stretching to thin OK Play began as a manufacturer of water tanks, but over time expanded into a disparate set of businesses: toys, auto components, delivery boxes, mannequins, and electric three-wheelers. Management has cited plastic as the common thread—but the reality has been less convincing. The company struggled to leverage any synergies between these businesses, failing to transfer brand strength, manufacturing capabilities, or distribution scale across segments. Its core toy business continues to drive most of its revenues, while newer ventures have mostly added losses and distraction. Despite management's stated goal of doubling toy revenues annually and targeting 15-20% growth in other segments, its history of losses casts doubt on such projections. Recent expansions into home décor and air purifiers only raise further concerns. For OK Play, focus on profitable segments rather than new distractions appears critical. Patanjali Foods: Early signs of overreach Investor favourite Patanjali Foods, once an edible oil company, has successfully transformed into a broader FMCG player by acquiring foods and home & personal care businesses from its parent. Today, it ranks as India's third-largest FMCG company by revenue. However, while it has climbed the revenue ranks, profitability remains a weak spot. Revenues have also been vulnerable to volatile edible oil prices. The growing contribution of higher-margin segments has eased some of those concerns, and after several years of underperformance, the stock has been outperforming since June 2023. But recent moves have raised concerns that Patanjali may be drifting into 'diworsification." Its investment in wind power generation has already resulted in intermittent losses. Even if that can be justified as captive green energy for its core operations, its more recent forays into construction and infrastructure with KBC Global, and insurance with Magma General Insurance, mark clear departures from its core strengths. How management navigates these ventures remains to be seen. Balmer Lawrie: Overdiversification hits PSUs too Established in the pre-independence era, Balmer Lawrie is now a central PSU under the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas, classified as a Miniratna-I company. As the company itself puts it, there is scarcely a business it hasn't ventured into. It has ventured into tea, shipping, insurance, banking, and manufacturing over the years. Today, it operates across eight strategic businesses spanning manufacturing and services. Its manufacturing portfolio includes industrial packaging, greases and lubricants, and chemicals, alongside refinery and oil field services. While some of these businesses are adjacent, the company's sprawling portfolio suggests an overextension of its operating focus. Read this | How ITC and BAT's divergent diversification strategies flipped the narrative In its travel vertical, Balmer Lawrie offers services ranging from travel planning, ticketing, forex, and hotel bookings to visa processing and travel insurance. It also runs logistics operations, including cold chain logistics and door-to-door freight forwarding. While logistics contributes a fifth of the company's revenues, its subsidiary, Visakhapatnam Port Logistics Park, has been a drag on profitability. The travel vertical has limited revenue contribution, with a bulk of the business still being driven by industrial packaging, and greases and lubricants. Result? Distractions from multiple fronts have kept profits volatile. When diversification Becomes diworsification Diversification isn't inherently negative. Expanding into upstream or downstream segments can lower costs, while entering adjacent businesses can help de-risk operations and cushion against business-cycle or seasonal fluctuations. Also read | Why some Indian companies are paying dividends despite posting losses The real concern arises when companies venture into industries entirely unrelated to their core strengths. Done well, such moves can mark the early stages of building a diversified conglomerate—as seen with Reliance Industries Ltd or ITC Ltd. But execution is critical, and professionally managed firms are better equipped to navigate the risks. Even then, conglomerates often trade at a discount, with the whole valued less than the sum of their parts. If a company has proven its strength in its core business, investors may be willing to back unrelated diversification—Patanjali Foods being one example. But when companies already struggling at the core venture into unrelated businesses, they risk spreading themselves too thin. Bull markets may temporarily lift such stocks on a wave of optimism, but when sentiment cools and fundamentals reassert themselves, these weaknesses are quickly exposed. For more such analyses, read Profit Pulse. Ananya Roy is the founder of Credibull Capital, a Sebi-registered investment adviser. X: @ananyaroycfa Disclosure: The author does not hold shares of the companies discussed. The views expressed are for informational purposes only and should not be considered investment advice. Readers are encouraged to conduct their own research and consult a financial professional before making any investment decisions.

Hindustan Times

2 hours ago

• Hindustan Times

FATF flags Pak case to sound global weapons funding alarm

A new report by the global financial crimes watchdog has cited India's seizure of equipment with military use bound for Pakistan in 2020 as evidence of widespread failures in preventing weapons proliferation financing, a problem that poses significant threats to world security and the integrity of the international financial system. FATF flags Pak case to sound global weapons funding alarm The Financial Action Task Force (FATF) report, published late on Friday, found that 84% of assessed countries demonstrated inadequate controls despite what FATF described as the 'grave threat' posed by such activities. The report featured a case study detailing how Indian customs authorities in 2020 intercepted dual-use items that were mis-declared as medical equipment but were actually destined for Pakistan's ballistic missile programme. 'Indian custom authorities seized an Asian-flagged ship bound for Pakistan. During an investigation, Indian authorities confirmed that documents mis-declared the shipment's dual-use items,' the FATF report titled Complex Proliferation Financing and Sanctions Evasion Schemes stated. The items were listed as autoclaves, which are 'used for sensitive high energy materials and for insulation and chemical coating of missile motors.' A senior Indian government official described the study as 'the most comprehensive and updated survey of risks related to proliferation financing,' noting that it identifies Pakistan alongside North Korea and Iran as countries where proliferation financing risks 'are inherent.' The FATF categorised the incident as 'non-declaration of dual use goods under the prescribed export laws of the exporting country.' Though the report did not name the exporting country, the ship was intercepted in Indian waters while travelling from China's Jiangyin port to Pakistan's Karachi port, as reported by Indian media, including HT, at the time. What was not reported till now, and referenced in the FATF report, is the link of the shipment to Pakistan's National Development Complex, a defence and aerospace agency under the Pakistan government. 'The Bill of Lading of the seized cargo provided evidence of the link between the importer and the National Development Complex, which is involved in the development of long-range ballistic missiles,' the report stated. Officials said the timing strengthens India's position as it prepares to oppose the World Bank's $20 billion lending commitment to Pakistan over 10 years. India will oppose development funding to Pakistan at the World Bank's upcoming meetings, one of these people said, asking not to be named. 'India is not against multilateral agencies such as the IMF and World Bank extending financial support for the development of the people of Pakistan. However, there is ample evidence that these development funds are diverted by Islamabad from development projects to arm purchase and terror funding,' said one of these officials, asking not to be named. In May, finance minister Nirmala Sitharaman contacted IMF leadership directly, presenting evidence of Pakistan's alleged misuse of development funds for military purchases. Despite India's intervention, the IMF executive board approved a $1.4 billion loan for Pakistan under climate resilience funding, though it later imposed 11 strict conditions following New Delhi's objections. 'Pakistan is unlikely to meet those conditions and thus it would not be able to avail the IMF funding,' the official added. Citing data available with multilateral agencies, this official explained: 'Pakistan spends on average around 18% of its general budget on 'defence affairs and services', while even the conflict-affected countries spend on average far less (10-14% of their general budget expenditure). Further, Pakistan's arms imports increased dramatically from 1980 to 2023 by over 20% on average in the years when it received IMF disbursements in comparison to years when it did not receive the same'. A second official said the latest report very nearly 'clubs Pakistan with rogue countries like North Korea.' 'This report will help India in pushing it for placing Pakistan in the grey list again.' The report also comes days after FATF condemned the April 22 Pahalgam terror attack, saying it could not have occurred without means to move funds between terrorist supporters, which Indian officials described as a positive step in New Delhi's renewed attempts to put Pakistan back on the grey list. The FATF report highlighted significant vulnerabilities across the global financial system in countering the financing of weapons of mass destruction. It revealed that only 16% of countries worldwide have demonstrated effective implementation of UN sanctions designed to prevent weapons of mass destruction financing. The report cited North Korea as 'the most significant actor' in proliferation financing — having 'generated billions of dollars through cyberattacks targeting virtual asset-related companies, such as the theft of USD 1.5 billion from ByBit in February 2025,' according to the FBI. The report identified four primary methods used to evade sanctions: employing intermediaries, concealing beneficial ownership, exploiting virtual assets and manipulating shipping sectors. In the 2020 incident, the merchant vessel Da Cui Yun, sailing under Hong Kong flag, was stopped by India's customs department at Kandla port in Gujarat on February 3 for wrongly declaring an autoclave as an 'industrial dryer.' An autoclave -- a device that uses high-pressure steam and heat to sterilise materials -- is used in hospitals for sterilising medical equipment, but also helps in the manufacture of specialised materials for missile components under controlled high-pressure and temperature conditions. The interception was following an intelligence tip-off, and experts from the Defence Research and Development Organisation, including nuclear scientists, examined the 18x4-metre autoclave and determined it was dual-use equipment that could serve civilian or military purposes. The vessel was allowed to leave after the autoclave was seized. Reports suggested the Da Cui Yun had made multiple voyages from China to Karachi via Indian ports carrying machinery. The report underscores that 'unless both the public and private sectors urgently bolster technical compliance and effectiveness, those seeking to finance WMD proliferation will continue to exploit weaknesses in existing controls.'