Republicans believe they can flip this seat in a Florida blue bastion. Here's why
Here's an email that a few years ago wouldn't have landed in a journalist's inbox:
'Over the weekend, chaos erupted in the streets of Los Angeles... While law enforcement struggled to restore order, out of touch Democrat Jared Moskowitz remained silent.'
What makes it notable isn't the topic of the email, or the fact that Moskowitz isn't from California. It's who sent it: the National Republican Congressional Committee, an organization dedicated to electing Republicans to the House. The NRCC has put Moskowitz, a two-term Democratic congressman from Parkland, on its target list of seats Republicans want to flip in 2026.
Moskowitz represents District 23, covering Fort Lauderdale and northern Broward County as well as a swath of southern Palm Beach County, an area that's traditionally been represented by Democrats. Moskowitz didn't face a strong Republican opponent in the last two elections and national Republicans didn't pay much attention to him until now. But the GOP believes it can win this congressional seat, potentially attracting national attention and money next year.
Whether Republicans can actually pull this off remains to be seen, but, more importantly, the focus on Moskowitz's district signals the changing political landscape of Florida and how emboldened the GOP feels.
While Miami-Dade County flipped red last year in the presidential election, flipping Broward still seems unlikely given Democrats' 240,000-plus voter-registration advantage over Republicans in the county. But President Donald Trump made inroads there in 2024, making local elections closer than they would have been in the past. Picking up individual seats in Broward no longer looks like a far-fetched proposition for the GOP.
Still, defeating Moskowitz wouldn't be easy. He's seen as a pragmatic moderate — he served as Florida's director of emergency management in Republican Gov. Ron DeSantis' administration. He's a good fundraiser. In a district with a large Jewish constituency, Moskowitz, who's Jewish himself, has been a staunch defender of Israel and spoken up against antisemitism. At the same time, there are signs that he might have angered some of the Democratic Party base. As WLRN reported, Moskowitz's name was booed by a crowd of about 450 activists when it was announced that he wouldn't be attending an April town hall hosted by the activist group Hope and Action Indivisible.
Moskowitz's victories in 2022 and 2024 had the smallest margins of any congressional races in Florida. He defeated Republican Joe Kaufman by less than 5 percentage points last year. His district leans Democratic but not by as large of a margin — about 6% as of October 2024 — as other nearby districts. While Joe Biden carried District 23 by a 13.2-percentage-point margin, Kamala Harris barely won it with a margin of 1.9 points, according to an analysis by The Downballot.
Moskowitz's own campaign has called his 2026 reelection bid 'one of the most competitive in the country' in fundraising emails, the Sun Sentinel reported. The Herald Editorial Board reached out to his office but did not hear back.
The NRCC has sent out news releases and has run digital ads attacking Moskowitz, but will the organization actually spend money to defeat him? The answer to that question will probably rest on whether his GOP opponent is able to raise money and show they are credible.
So far, George Moraitis, a Broward County attorney and former state representative, is considered to be the Republican front-runner in the race. In his first four weeks as a candidate, he raised $152,369, almost as much as Moskowitz did in the first three months of the year, the Sentinel reported. But Moraitis still has a long way to go given that competitive congressional races can cost millions.
And there's the Trump factor. With the party in the White House normally losing House seats in midterms, the results of next year's elections will also depend on how the president is doing. Will his tariff war cause a recession, or will his popularity bounce back ahead of next November?
There are many unknowns in the race for District 23, but this much seems clear: The repercussions of Florida's the rightward shift will likely continue, and even Democratic strongholds might not get spared.
Click here to send the letter.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Boston Globe
an hour ago
- Boston Globe
After US strikes on Iran, a narrow path to diplomacy
Advertisement Now, Iran has a choice to make. The country may be a theocratic autocracy, but it is not monolithic in its thinking or the conclusions its senior officials reach. That means that while the Supreme Leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, will ultimately decide Iran's next steps, there is almost certainly a significant debate happening within the country. Iran has two principal options. If the regime ultimately concludes that it has to try to restore some amount of deterrence, even if that means it puts the regime at risk of survival, Iran could choose a robust response that escalates into a broader conflict with the United States in the region. The same would be true if the regime already thought it was at risk from continuing Israeli strikes or internal pressures by hardliners who are frustrated over Iran's poor performance during the war. Advertisement To do so, Iran could leverage some or all of its diminished but not destroyed capabilities. That could include targeting US forces and military assets at bases throughout the region, aiming to inflict maximum casualties and damage. It could also include leveraging Shia militias in Iraq to attack US personnel and interests. Another option would be to close the Strait of Hormuz — a critical chokepoint through which one-fifth of global oil and one-quarter of liquified natural gas passes through daily. And it could conduct asymmetric terrorist attacks against Israel, Jewish, or US targets around the world. Any one of these actions — let alone a combination — would likely compel a US response. But if the regime does not believe it's in imminent danger of collapse and recognizes the reality that its survival is far more likely dependent on being pragmatic in its reaction, then Tehran could seek to undertake a limited and narrow response that would be a powerful signal of Iran's desire to deescalate the situation and might produce an off-ramp to the conflict. Despite the threatening tone of President Trump's post on Truth Social that 'ANY RETALIATION BY IRAN AGAINST THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA WILL BE MET WITH FORCE FAR GREATER THAN WHAT WAS WITNESSED TONIGHT,' it would be naïve to think that Iran is not going to respond at all, despite some limited historical precedent. In 1988, Iranian Supreme Leader Ayatollah Khomeini's famously accepted the 'poison chalice,' as he called it, of the United Nations Security Council Resolution 598 that ended the Iran-Iraq war. But that decision came after eight years of war — and this is not the late 1980s. Iran's nuclear, ballistic missile, and proxy strategies that took decades to build have largely collapsed in a short 15 months. And even if some Iranian leaders were inclined to capitulate to US demands, doing so would almost certainly risk undermining the current leadership's credibility, which could set the stage for it to be ousted by more hardline leaders. Advertisement Given that Saturday's attack was directly on the Iranian homeland, Tehran is likely to believe that its response will have to be bigger than its response to the killing of Major General Qasem Soleimani, head of Iran's Quds Force, in January 2020. A missile attack on US personnel stationed at Al Asad airbase in Iraq resulted in multiple injuries of US service members, but no one was killed. An Iranian response, however, can be bigger in scope than in intensity. Attacking more targets but with the same goal of not killing US service members would allow regime leadership to boast to the Iranian population that it struck a critical blow against the United States, defending itself and the country, while not prompting the United States to undertake the kind of lethal attacks the US public would demand if Iran killed multiple Americans. There is still risk in this course of action — not intending to cause death or serious injury won't matter to the United States if it happens by accident. But if Iran avoids killing US service members, Trump could decline to respond and instead downplay the attack. But for Iran, which seems to wrongly but sincerely view the United States as being secretly behind most if not all Israeli actions, it will be critical that the conflict not only end with the United States but with Israel, as well. Trump should work to make that happen. His leverage has never been greater with Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu of Israel. The United States succeeded in striking the Fordo nuclear site that Israel seemingly couldn't — at least not via a higher risk mission, such as inserting ground forces. And while Israel's desire for regime change is more ambiguous now, Jerusalem's original two goals are clear: destroy or meaningfully set back Iran's nuclear and ballistic missile programs. Advertisement The strike has clearly set back Iran's nuclear weapons ambitions, though to what extent may take weeks or longer to assess. Some reporting indicates that there was unusual activity at the Fordo site before the US strike that could be an indication that Iran moved much of its highly enriched uranium from the site. And Rafael Grossi, the director of the International Atomic Energy Agency, has warned that it is unclear where all Iran's centrifuges are located. A few hundred advanced machines combined with highly enriched uranium and Iran could quickly enrich to weapons grade at a secret facility with a small footprint. Which is why diplomacy is still critical. Just as the United States should use its leverage with Israel to end its war with Iran, it should also use the now very credible military threat as leverage with Iran. The Trump administration needs to redouble its backchannel diplomacy using every legitimate intermediary — the Norwegians, Omanis, and Swiss all come to mind — to ensure the message is accurately conveyed that the United States is ready to continue diplomacy. Advertisement But Washington should be clear that if Iran is found to be engaging in nuclear enrichment or weaponization at a secret nuclear site, the United States will not hesitate to strike it again. In doing so, it can seek from Iran a real and verifiable diplomatic agreement that prevents Iranian enrichment but provides access to civilian nuclear power in Iran through the type of consortium that was under consideration before the war started. The US strike at Fordo significantly set back the potential for Iran to develop a working nuclear weapon. Now diplomacy is required to permanently eliminate it and avoid a broader war.
an hour ago
Trump admin live updates: Trump to meet with national security team on Monday
The president has warned Iran not to retaliate after Saturday's U.S. strikes. President Donald Trump on Sunday pushed Republicans to get behind his taxation bill that will fund his agenda as the self-imposed Fourth of July deadline approaches. "Great unity in the Republican Party, perhaps unity like we have never seen before. Now let's get the Great, Big, Beautiful Bill done," Trump wrote on social media. Trump addressed the nation on Saturday night after the U.S. carried out airstrikes on Iran's nuclear facility, which he called "a spectacular military success." 9 minutes ago Trump to meet with national security team on Monday President Donald Trump is scheduled to host a closed meeting with his national security team on Monday as the administration prepares for possible Iranian retaliation following this weekend's U.S. attacks on Tehran's nuclear network. The meeting will take place in the Oval Office at 1 p.m. ET, according to the president's public schedule. -ABC News Michelle Stoddart After Iran strike, Trump sets sights on his 'big, beautiful bill' Following the U.S. military strike on Iran, Trump publicly praised what he called "great unity" within the Republican Party and shifted his focus to the administration's next legislative priority. 'Great unity in the Republican Party, perhaps unity like we have never seen before. Now let's get the Great, Big, Beautiful Bill done,' Trump wrote on social media. 'Our Country is doing GREAT. MAGA!' The post was the president's first public comment since his address to the nation about the Iran attack on Saturday evening. The administration is aiming to pass the president's tax legislation ahead of the self-imposed July Fourth deadline. -ABC News' Kelsey Walsh
Boston Globe
2 hours ago
- Boston Globe
Alarm raised over increase in antisemitism
Advertisement There has been too much silence and indifference for far too long, which enables and emboldens this harmful hate and abuse. It's time for real support and solidarity and a rejection of the civic inertia that has left Jewish people unsafe, marginalized, and threatened in Massachusetts, New England, and across the country. Get The Gavel A weekly SCOTUS explainer newsletter by columnist Kimberly Atkins Stohr. Enter Email Sign Up Noam Schimmel Framingham The writer is a lecturer in global studies at the University of California, Berkeley. Israel's punishing campaign in Gaza has to be taken into account In a Voice of America Advertisement Samantha Joseph's op-ed does allude to the 'elevated threat' to the Jewish community that the FBI links to the ongoing Israel-Hamas conflict. Regrettably, though, Joseph fails to acknowledge that in the 21 months since Hamas's brutal killings and kidnappings of Oct. 7, 2023, the Israeli government's grossly disproportionate punishment levied against the people of Gaza — a relentless assault viewed by many international legal scholars and human rights organizations as amounting to a genocide — has likely triggered the recent awful attacks on Jews. All of which tells us that Israel's ending the carnage in Gaza is what's desperately needed — for the people of Gaza, for the remaining hostages, and, frankly, for Jews everywhere. Michael Felsen Jamaica Plain BDS movement is a gray area between antisemitism, criticism of Israel Samantha Joseph is right to decry antisemitic violence perpetrated by supporters of Palestinian rights. No matter how one feels about Israel's attacks on Palestinians (and now Iranians), that does not justify attacks on American Jews. We all need to draw a sharp line between criticism of the government of Israel and antisemitism. However, later in her op-ed, Joseph blurs this line by calling the Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions movement against Israel antisemitic. This movement is precisely an attempt to impose financial and reputational consequences on Israel for its treatment of Palestinians. Contrary to to the claims of the movement's critics, it has nothing to do with antisemitism. Ken Olum Sharon
