‘We have listened': Revised workers compensation reform in NSW passes milestone, challenges remain
Controversial reforms to workers compensation in NSW which brought unions to the steps of Parliament House have passed the first major milestone.
A revised version of the proposed plan to reform workers compensation was introduced to parliament on Tuesday by Industrial Relations Minister Sophie Cotsis.
The initial proposal faced fierce backlash when it was unveiled earlier this month from unions and industry groups who slammed many of its provisions, including a 31 per cent threshold for damages for permanent impairment from psychological injury.
A requirement that someone seeking damages from psychological injury due to sexual or racial harassment or bullying require a court or tribunal finding was removed.
The Minns state government hopes the proposal will instil a 'culture of prevention' in the workers compensation scheme, while also securing it financially for years to come.
Treasurer Daniel Moohkey told an inquiry into the proposal earlier this month he would no longer be authorising payments to the Treasury managed Fund, the state's self-insurer, into which billions of dollars had been poured by successive governments.
Introducing the Bill, Ms Cotsis said that until now 'psychological injury has been left largely undefined in the Workers Compensation Act'.
'The Bill introduces new definitions for psychological injuries to make sure workers and employers have certainty on what the scheme protects,' she said.
'Clear definitions will mean less time spent on disputes and more time on prevention.'
Ms Cotsis revealed the government would establish a tripartite review – which had been pushed for by Unions NSW – to review and monitor the changes and 'to help guard against unintended consequences'.
'The review will be run by a panel of experts, with at least one expert recommended from Unions NSW, Business NSW and the NSW government,' who will also determine its terms of reference, Ms Cotsis said.
Ms Cotsis outlined the changes to the Bill parliament on Tuesday.
'The relevant event that caused the injury must have a real and direct connection with employment,' she said.
'Real and direct connection does not necessarily mean the relevant event has to occur in the physical workplace.
'New evidentiary requirements will support insurers to make objective and timely decisions in relation to claims.
'Relevant events include, but are not limited to, bullying, sexual harassment and indictable criminal conduct, including threats of violence and assault.'
Ms Cotsis said the intent was to target workers compensation toward events and behaviours, and preserved 'in no uncertain times' compensation for PTSD caused by trauma or exposure to traumatic events.
She defended the 'objective test' for bullying, excessive work demands, and racial or sexual harassment claims as 'reducing the reliance on the worker's perception', and said the Bill would provide employers with certainty around what is acceptable in the workplace.
'Interpersonal conflict and work stress are typical and reasonably expected to occur on almost a daily basis in all modern workplace,' she said.
'In contrast, bullying, excessive work demands, racial harassment or sexual harassment unacceptable in any workplace and should never be expected.
'The Bill amends the employer defences to psychological injury claims that were the result of reasonable management action.'
Psychological claims for bullying or harassment would also be expedited under the Bill, including if there is a dispute to the claim.
Addressing concerns about the 31 per cent WPI threshold, Ms Cotsis said 'we are listening' and that there would be a 'stepped transition'.
The Bill will not apply to coal miners or frontline service workers, including police and paramedics, save for a few of the amendments.
Unions pushback against workers compensation reform
Unions NSW and a range of other unions, including the NSW Nurses and Midwives Association and the NSW Teachers Federation, rallied outside of parliament on Monday morning in opposition to the reforms, which they said was being rushed through.
Industry groups, including in the legal and sports physiotherapy sectors, as well as activist groups have also voiced opposition to the Bill, with Australians for Mental Health on Tuesday pleading with the government to 'slow down' the proposed reforms.
'We welcome the revisions the government has made. It shows our policymakers are listening, but still requiring someone to be so unwell that they can barely function before receiving the long-term support they need is alarming,' chief executive Chris Gambian said.
'We agree the current workers compensation system is unsustainable, but overhauling it so quickly could take away vital support for the likes of first responders, teachers, nurses and social workers; people who are exposed to traumatic experiences every day.'
At the same time, the NSW government will also propose sweeping changes to workplace health and safety.
Among the proposed changes are plans to empower the NSW Industrial Relations Commission to issue 'stop-bullying' orders as well as the Tribunal's ability to resolve industrial disputes, give new powers and manpower to SafeWork NSW – in particular, around compliance – and codify workplace accountability and codes of practise.
The changes come after an $344m package from the state government and were welcomed by Ms Cotsis as a way to 'further strength the Industrial Relations Commission's ability to resolve disputes and to now resolve issues arising from Work Health and Safety legislation.
'It proposes major reform particularly around gender equality. The elimination of workplace bullying and sexual harassment are new key objectives of the IR Act.
'Workplace bullying causes serious harm to worker health and organisations. According to the Productivity Commission, bullying is estimated to cost up to $36bn annually in Australia.
'The amendments establish a 'one-stop shop' for handling complaints through the IRC and enhance its powers to resolve disputes and support injured workers' return to work.
'This legislation follows the passing of laws in 2023 which restored the independent industrial umpire, creating the structure needed to deliver meaningful improvements to the working lives of hundreds and thousands of workers in the state.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
ABC News
18 minutes ago
- ABC News
Noosa on a green mission as businesses and council voluntarily ban single-use coffee cups
The Queensland beachside town of Noosa has voted to phase out disposable coffee cups in the region despite the council lacking the power to enforce a ban. Noosa Shire Council this week adopted a plan to encourage a voluntary, industry-led transition away from single-use cups and remove them from council headquarters. A rubbish audit in 2023 found coffee cups accounted for about 20 per cent of litter items in bins at Noosa Main Beach. Many of these cups are lined with plastic and cannot be recycled. Councillor Amelia Lorentson brought the motion to Thursday's council meeting saying it was important for the council to lead by example to reduce landfill. She said she was inspired to raise the issue following the recent Noosa Eat and Drink Festival. "No-one had anything except reusable cups," she said. The event was organised by businessman Ben Clarke whose Noosa cafe supports transitioning away from single-use, plastic coffee cups. "He's leading the charge. It's voluntary and it's industry-led," Cr Lorenston said. "We're just enabling these sorts of programs where the industry shows other cafe operators how to transition out of coffee cups." The motion passed four votes to three and the council believed it to be the first such initiative in Queensland. In December, the small town of Bermagui on the NSW South Coast adopted a similar approach. The majority of cafes there have joined forces to eliminate disposable coffee cups from their businesses. Customers who do not have their own vessels pay a $3 deposit for a recycled reusable cup. That deposit is refundable at any of the other participating cafes. Some Noosa councillors questioned the relevance of trying to stop cafes from using disposable cups when the council lacked the authority to force businesses to adopt the measure. Councillor Tom Wegener said that the motion did not have the "meat and bones" to make a difference. Cr Lorenston respectfully disagreed. "There are coffee shops that are already doing this," she said. Cr Lorenston said the volume of plastic and litter at Noosa Beach following ex-tropical cyclone Alfred inspired the motion. "The motion was about empowering and encouraging businesses," she said. "The responsibility lies with all of us residents and also our visitors. "I've got my little keep-cup coffee cup that sits in the car all the time." Griffith University consumer behaviour expert Graeme Hughes said the success of the initiative would depend on its simplicity and the buy-in from local businesses. "It does necessitate those cafes to support this," he said. "If there's any friction in that process consumers are not going to be happy and find other solutions. "If there was an early incentive of a 50 cent reduction in your morning coffee that's a win-win scenario." Dr Hughes said the reusable cups were "quite trendy" a few years ago and the movement needed a "reinvigoration".
News.com.au
an hour ago
- News.com.au
‘Should not be punished': Queensland decries GST carve up
Cash-strapped state governments are looking west with envy as Western Australia pulls in its large slice of the GST carve up despite the healthiest books in the country. Resource-rich WA posted a $2.5bn operating surplus on Thursday – it's seventh budget surplus in a row. From Friday it is set to receive its share of the GST pool of 75 cents in the dollar, despite its strong revenue stream from its resources sector. State premiers and treasurers have been agitating for changes to the GST distribution, since the final figures were announced in March, and ahead of the funds formally being dished out on Friday. WA is still enjoying the windfalls of a 2018 GST deal struck under previous Coalition government by then-treasurer Scott Morrison and backed in by the Albanese government, where WA is guaranteed 75 cents of every dollar paid in GST. Without this benchmark, WA would have received as little as 18 cents back. The WA Premier and Treasurer credited their economic management for this week's operating surplus and healthy debt forecasts. Iron ore prices are hovering at $US95 while the state government has done its forecasting with an expectation of $US72 a tonne. But every state and territory except WA has been posting deficits since the 75 cent distribution reforms in 2018. The Queensland Treasurer feels short-changed, as strong coal royalties pad the state coffers. Victoria and NSW's slices of the GST pie are set to expand while Queensland's portion gets a trim. 'This money belongs to Queenslanders and we should not be punished because of our support for industries that underpin our national wealth,' state Treasurer David Janetzki said. The impending Queensland state budget, to be delivered on Tuesday, will show the effects of a dip in coal prices after an $8.8bn royalties windfall during the past four years. Despite the Sunshine State's royalty take coming down, Queensland's GST payout this year falls by $1.1bn to $16.5bn. In a speech to the National Press Club on Wednesday, federal Treasurer Jim Chalmers, who has historically opposed raising the GST rate, left the door slightly open to raising it from 10 per cent – the amount the excise has remained for the past 25 years. 'I've, for a decade or more, had a view about the GST,' he told The Conversation. 'I repeated that view at the Press Club because I thought that was the honest thing to do, but what I'm going to genuinely try and do, whether it's in this policy area or in other policy areas, is to not limit what people might bring to the table.' This year, Queensland is the only state or territory getting less than previous years, while every other jurisdiction is getting more. Victoria is set to become a net-recipient of the GST pool for the first time as well. 'It used to be the case that our friends in Victoria would help us shoulder the burden in supporting all the other states,' NSW Treasurer Daniel Mookhey said last month. 'Victoria is now a recipient state, to quite a large degree, $1.07 (per dollar taxed) is what they're getting. 'I'm going to continue to speak out, particularly about the fact that NSW is now carrying the federation when it comes to GST distribution.' The Northern Territory receives $5.15 for every dollar it contributes, far and away the largest return. Despite having the second largest population, Victoria receives the largest portion of the total pool, getting 27.5 per cent; with a $3.6bn year-on-year increase this time around.
SBS Australia
an hour ago
- SBS Australia
Australia's social media ban is approaching, but questions remain over whether it will work
April Willis says young people need a seat at the table for figuring out how to implement the teen social media ban. Source: SBS News / Ash Minchin Like many, April Willis has been using social media since her early teens. As she grew up on the platforms, she says she didn't immediately understand the impact it was having on her. She says that in hindsight, though, she can see that a lot of her "behaviours" and "the content and interactions" she had on social media platforms were "definitely not great" for her mental health. But the now 22-year-old ReachOut youth advocate says she doesn't think a ban would have stopped her. "I think the hard truth is that a lot of us are thinking, 'I would've found a way around it', as I'm sure many young people will." Whether she actually would have is one of the many questions experts are wondering six months out from the implementation of Australia's social media ban for those under the age of 16. And as of 11 December this year, social media companies will be required to take "reasonable steps" to prevent Australian children and teenagers under 16 from using their platforms. A government-commissioned trial into the potential technologies used to assess the ages of users presented their preliminary findings on Friday. Their key finding was that "age assurance can be done in Australia and can be private, robust and effective". "The preliminary findings indicate that there are no significant technological barriers preventing the deployment of effective age assurance systems in Australia," project director Tony Allen said in a statement. "These solutions are technically feasible, can be integrated flexibly into existing services, and can support the safety and rights of children online." With details about the accuracy of the technologies tested left for later release, experts are wary of the trial's initial claim. Daniel Angus is a professor of digital communication at the Queensland University of Technology and the director of its Digital Media Research Centre. "One of the key concerns that we have is how the industry often will inflate their accuracy and the utility of these approaches when we know that there are still significant issues when it comes to both gender and also racial biases, but also the general lack of efficacy of these approaches," he said. According to the Department of Communications, a government-commissioned report from the Social Research Centre found nearly nine in 10 adults were supportive of age assurance measures. Only two of those 10 had heard of at least one potential method to check a person's age online. 'This research shows Australians widely support our world-leading age restrictions on social media for under 16s and have strong expectations of platforms when it comes to data protection and security," Communications Minister Anika Wells said in a statement. Angus says the general public has not been adequately informed about the likely impacts of these technologies. "I think Australians are in for a very rude shock when this actually perhaps, gets implemented, and they all of a sudden are being forced to hand over [their] data to access services that they've freely been able to access up to this point," he said. "It's absolutely everything you would expect to find in the midst of a moral panic where people have been sucked along with this idea that, 'Yeah, this thing is really, really bad and we need to prevent it,' but have not stopped to think critically about this, and then not been properly informed about the fullness of that risk." John Pane, chair of digital rights organisation Electronic Frontiers Australia (EFA), is a member of the stakeholder advisory board for the trial. He says the EFA has "concerns about the rollout of this technology because it's not simply about restricting access to social media platforms for children 15 and under". "It requires all adults who participate in the online environment, who wish to access social media platforms to either have their age authenticated or establish their identity as a means of, or part of that age authentication. "So from our perspective, it's the Trojan horse for getting people to get used to providing more and more credentials online." Amid these concerns, some remain supportive of the ban, including Kirra Pendergast, another member of the stakeholder advisory board. "Initially, I was only against the ban purely because of the technical workarounds that are possible for some kids who are more technical than others," she said. "But after having lots of conversations with parents in particular, it became abundantly clear that the ban was making parents have a conversation that we've needed to have for a very, very long time." Pendergast is the founder of Safe on Social, an online safety advisory group for schools and businesses, and chief digital safety strategist at the global Ctrl+Shft Coalition. "I get contacted almost every single day by parents that are struggling with this," the cybersecurity expert said. "They don't know how to say no." Pendergast said parents and educators would have "a lot more time to get it right". "It's like all aspects of technical security, cybersecurity, and cyber safety. It's never ever going to be 100 per cent. This is never going to be the silver bullet. "It's a really, really good start because, again, it sparked all of the conversations that we needed to have at every level of society." Professor Tama Leaver, an internet studies academic at Curtin University and the chief investigator in the ARC Centre of Excellence for the Digital Child, says the ban responds to a "very real fear that parents have that social media is an unknown space". "If this is world-leading, we need to be quite clear on what the legislation is actually doing." He warned that the implementation of the policy may not address all the issues that have been discussed. "Some harms, for example, such as cyberbullying, were very much touted as one of the big problems to be solved," he said. "There is nothing in this legislation that addresses cyberbullying meaningfully at all. "This at best addresses algorithmic amplification … of young people's experiences of social media, but … we expect from what's been said already that most messaging apps are exempt from this legislation. "So, the spaces where we imagine cyberbullying is most likely to happen are not being touched by this legislation at all." Leaver was a signatory on an open letter from more than 140 academics and civil society organisations against the ban. "If the rest of the world is watching Australia and hoping that this might be a blueprint, we're going to have an awful lot of work to do in the next few months to actually have a blueprint to practically do this rather than simply aspire to giving parents some reassurance," he said.
