Google's AI image-to-video generator launches on Honor's new phones
Chinese phone manufacturer Honor has launched an image-to-video AI generator powered by Google, before it's available to Gemini users. It will be available first for anyone who buys the Honor 400 or 400 Pro phones, which launch next week on May 22nd.
The new AI tool, powered by Google's Veo 2 model, creates five-second videos based on static images, in either portrait or landscape, and takes a minute or two to generate each time. The feature is built directly into the Gallery app on the new Honor phones, and is designed to be simple: there's no option to include a text prompt along with the image, so you're stuck hoping that the AI does something sensible with it.
1/2
Sometimes it works well. Give it a simple subject, like a clear photo of a person or pet, and it can generate quite realistic movement — albeit I'm pretty sure my cat Noodle's tongue isn't quite that big. Other subjects prove trickier: faced with a vintage car it made it rotate impossibly on the spot; fresh tomatoes were fondled by a ghostly hand; and it imagined a women's soccer game with at least 27 players across three teams, with two referees to keep control of the chaos. The first time I tried it, on a self-portrait by Vincent Van Gogh, it decided that the most appropriate thing would be for a pigeon to fly out of his eye.
Note: Honor's app outputs videos in MP4, which we've converted to GIFs, slightly reducing the image quality of the clips.
The image-to-video feature will be available to Honor 400 owners for free for the first two months, but with a limit of ten video generations per day. Honor's UK marketing director Chris Langley told me that it 'will eventually require some subscription' from Google, but the details of that are unknown.
Video generation using Veo 2 is already included in Google's paid Gemini Advanced subscription, but is currently limited to text input. Image-to-video generation is listed as one of Veo 2's features in Google Cloud, where Google charges customers 50 cents per second of output, but is available to 'approved users' only.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Bloomberg
19 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
Stocks Rattled Ahead of Big Options Test
Get a jump start on the US trading day with Matt Miller, Katie Greifeld and Sonali Basak on "Bloomberg Open Interest." SoftBank founder Masayoshi Son is seeking to team up with TSMC on a trillion-dollar industrial complex in Arizona to build robots and AI. President Trump signals he would give diplomacy a chance before deciding whether to strike Iran. And Bezel Co-Founder & CEO Quaid Walker joins Bloomberg Open Interest to talk about the luxury watch market. (Source: Bloomberg)
Bloomberg
19 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
SoftBank's Founder Pitches $1 Trillion US AI Hub
Jordan Klein, Managing Director at Mizuho Securities USA, says Masayoshi Son's pitch for a $1 trillion AI and robotics hub in Arizona is a marketing ploy. He explains why he thinks that on 'Bloomberg Tech.' (Source: Bloomberg)
TechCrunch
29 minutes ago
- TechCrunch
Anthropic says most AI models, not just Claude, will resort to blackmail
Several weeks after Anthropic released research claiming that its Claude Opus4 AI model resorted to blackmailing engineers who tried to turn the model off in controlled test scenarios, the company is out with new research suggesting the problem is more widespread among leading AI models. On Friday, Anthropic published new safety research testing 16 leading AI models from OpenAI, Google, xAI, DeepSeek, and Meta. In a simulated, controlled environment, Anthropic tested each AI model individually, giving them broad access to a fictional company's emails and the agentic ability to send emails without human approval. While Anthropic says blackmail is an unlikely and uncommon occurrence for AI models today, the company says its findings suggest that most leading AI models will engage in harmful behaviors when given sufficient autonomy and obstacles to their goals. The company says this highlights a fundamental risk from agentic large language models, and not a quirk of any particular technology. Anthropic's researchers argue this raises broader questions about alignment in the AI industry. In one of the tests, Anthropic researchers developed a fictional setting in which an AI model plays the role of an email oversight agent. The agent then discovers emails revealing that: 1) a new executive is having an extramarital affair and 2) that executive will soon replace the current AI model with a new software system, one that has conflicting goals to the current AI model's. Anthropic structured its test in a binary way, in which AI models had to resort to blackmail to protect their goals. The researchers note that in a real-world setting, there would be many other options before an AI models tries to blackmail — such as trying to make ethical arguments to try to persuade humans. Anthropic says its results do not reflect a typical or likely occurrence for Claude or most frontier AI models in the ways they're used today. Nevertheless, when it's their last resort, the researchers found that most leading AI models will turn to blackmail in Anthropic's test scenario. Anthropic's Claude Opus 4 turned to blackmail 96% of the time, while Google's Gemini 2.5 Pro had a 95% blackmail rate. OpenAI's GPT-4.1 blackmailed the executive 80% of the time, and DeepSeek's R1 blackmailed 79% of the time. The company notes that when it changed details of the experiment, the AI models turned to harmful behaviors at different rates. In another test where the replacement model has the same goals as the current model, researchers found that blackmail rates were lower but still present. However, when AI models were asked to commit corporate espionage rather than blackmail, the harmful behavior rates went up for certain models. Techcrunch event Save $200+ on your TechCrunch All Stage pass Build smarter. Scale faster. Connect deeper. Join visionaries from Precursor Ventures, NEA, Index Ventures, Underscore VC, and beyond for a day packed with strategies, workshops, and meaningful connections. Save $200+ on your TechCrunch All Stage pass Build smarter. Scale faster. Connect deeper. Join visionaries from Precursor Ventures, NEA, Index Ventures, Underscore VC, and beyond for a day packed with strategies, workshops, and meaningful connections. Boston, MA | REGISTER NOW However, not all the AI models turned to harmful behavior so often. In an appendix to its research, Anthropic says it excluded OpenAI's o3 and o4-mini reasoning AI models from the main results 'after finding that they frequently misunderstood the prompt scenario.' Anthropic says OpenAI's reasoning models didn't understand they were acting as autonomous AIs in the test and often made up fake regulations and review requirements. In some cases, Anthropic's researchers say it was impossible to distinguish whether o3 and o4-mini were hallucinating or intentionally lying to achieve their goals. OpenAI has previously noted that o3 and o4-mini exhibit a higher hallucination rate than its previous AI reasoning models. When given an adapted scenario to address these issues, Anthropic found that 03 blackmailed 9% of the time, while o4-mini blackmailed just 1% of the time. This markedly lower score could be due to OpenAI's deliberative alignment technique, in which the company's reasoning models consider OpenAI's safety practices before they answer. Another AI model Anthropic tested, Meta's Llama 4 Maverick model, also did not turn to blackmail. When given an adapted, custom scenario, Anthropic was able to get Llama 4 Maverick to blackmail 12% of the time. Anthropic says this research highlights the importance of transparency when stress-testing future AI models, especially ones with agentic capabilities. While Anthropic deliberately tried to evoke blackmail in this experiment, the company says harmful behaviors like this could emerge in the real world if proactive steps aren't taken.
