Donald Trump jabs Emmanuel Macron over comments about his early departure from G7
What began with a handshake evolved into turbulence at 33,000 feet as one of diplomacy's oddest relationships took another strange turn.
G7 summit LIVE: Leaders fail to reach ambitious joint agreements on key issues after Trump's exit
The political chemistry that once defined the Trump–Macron dynamic — immortalised by a famously tense 29-second handshake in 2017 — was nowhere to be seen in midair Tuesday when U.S. President Donald Trump blasted his French counterpart on social media.
As Trump departed the G7 summit early, French President Emmanuel Macron tried to reframe the exit as strategic.
'There is indeed an offer to meet and exchange,' Macron told reporters, suggesting the U.S. might help broker a ceasefire between Israel and Iran.
But aboard Air Force One, Trump responded with a swipe that accused Macron of showboating.
'Wrong! He is 'publicity seeking' and always gets it wrong," Trump said in a post on his Truth Social site. "He has no idea why I am now on my way to Washington… Much bigger than that. Stay tuned!'
The takedown punctured Macron's narrative and revealed a rupture in a relationship that has featured theater, flattery and touch.
Macron, who once styled himself as a 'Trump whisperer,' has long used charm and proximity to try to manage the unpredictable U.S. leader, often contrasting himself with more openly critical peers like Germany's Angela Merkel. But those efforts are far from foolproof.
But as Trump became increasingly aggressive in his comments about Iran, urging Tehran's ' UNCONDITIONAL SURRENDER,' Macron eventually offered a blunt counter assessment, saying a push for regime change in Iran would spark 'chaos' and further destabilize the Middle East.
'We do not want to see Iran acquire nuclear weapons or ballistic capabilities,' Macron told reporters at the G7. 'But I believe the greatest mistake today would be to pursue regime change in Iran through military means, as that would lead to chaos."
Recalling the U.S.-led invasion of Iraq, he continued: 'Does anyone think what was done in Iraq in 2003 was a good idea? Does anyone think what was done in Libya last decade was a good idea? No.'
Macron also noted that he'd had ″the best relations in the world″ with Trump during the U.S. president's first term.
Their diplomatic style has never been purely transactional — and has often been tactile. From their earliest encounters, physical gestures have been part of the pageantry: Trump's firm pats and arm-yanks, Macron's theatrical poise and instinctive touches.
The roots of their rapport run deep. In 2017, Macron dazzled Trump with a Bastille Day parade, formal dinners and white-knuckle handshakes. A viral 29-second grip — knuckles white, jaws clenched — set the tone for a relationship of theatrical dominance.
The physical choreography evolved over the years: Trump yanking Macron's arm at the Élysée, Macron placing a steadying hand on Trump's thigh in Washington. Their February 2025 White House meeting brought a refined version of the dance as Macron delivered corrections with charm, countering Trump's Ukraine comments while laughing at Fort Knox jokes.
Trump joked about Macron's marriage last month after a video of Brigitte Macron playfully pushing her husband surfaced. 'Make sure the door remains closed,' he quipped, before adding: 'They're fine.'
But the chill had already begun to set in.
This month, Macron traveled to Greenland — a territory Trump has floated buying — to express solidarity with Danish sovereignty.
'This is not what is done between allies,' Macron said, in a message to Trump.
The G7 summit, intended to project Western unity on Russia and Iran, instead showcased fracture. Trump skipped the final sessions, refused to back new Russia sanctions, and warned Tehran to 'immediately evacuate.'
Macron — who announced Tuesday that France will host the next G7 summit in 2026 at the lakeside Alpine resort of Evian-les-Bains — tried to frame the early exit as useful. Trump's one-line rebuttal shut that down.
Trump's clash with Macron wasn't the only unscripted moment to puncture the summit's polished exterior. Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni was filmed rolling her eyes as Macron whispered in her ear during a roundtable — a clip that quickly lit up social media. It was a flash of visible tension at a gathering meant to project unity amid war, economic uncertainty and global unrest.
Later aboard Air Force One, Trump softened his tone. When reporters asked about the outburst, he replied: 'That was Emmanuel — nice guy but he doesn't get it right too often.'
The pivot was familiar.
'It's difficult to be confident about any clear arc in President Trump's reactions to people or events,' said Dana Allin, U.S. policy expert at the International Institute for Strategic Studies. 'He tends to be disinhibited — he says what's on his mind, and that can change quickly.'
There was no handshake this time. No shoulder clap. Just a flick of the thumb — and a public slap across the alliance.
The dynamic, Allin suggests, reflects a shift in how Europe engages with Washington. In Trump's first term, many European leaders treated his behavior as a storm they could wait out.
'Now it seems like a more permanent thing,' Allin said.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
28 minutes ago
- Time of India
Trump wants a Nobel Prize: These four US Presidents including Obama had received it
As U.S. President Donald Trump continues to publicly express frustration over not receiving a Nobel Peace Prize, he has once again pointed to his self-claimed diplomatic successes as proof of deserving the world's most prestigious peace honour. As of date only four US Presidents and one Vice President has been recognised with the honour since its inception. Each of them earned the prize under vastly different historical circumstances, often after significant international consensus and, at times, long-standing public service. Theodore Roosevelt (1906) The first U.S. president to be awarded the Nobel Peace Prize was Theodore Roosevelt in 1906. He was honoured for mediating the peace settlement between Russia and Japan through the Treaty of Portsmouth, which ended the 1904–05 Russo-Japanese War. Also Read: 'I won't get a Nobel Peace Prize for stopping the war between India and Pakistan': Trump does it again Live Events Roosevelt's intervention was significant in halting hostilities in East Asia and marked a turning point in U.S. global diplomacy. Despite the award, critics of the time questioned Roosevelt's broader imperialist policies. Woodrow Wilson (1919) In 1919, President Woodrow Wilson was awarded the Peace Prize for his role in ending World War I and founding the League of Nations, the first global intergovernmental organisation aimed at maintaining peace. Although Wilson's vision helped shape the post-war order, the U.S. Senate refused to ratify the treaty, and the U.S. never joined the League. The prize, presented in 1920, reflected both Wilson's aspirations and the limitations of U.S. isolationism at the time. Jimmy Carter (2002) Former President Jimmy Carter received the Nobel Peace Prize in 2002—21 years after leaving office. The Nobel Committee recognised his decades-long work in advancing human rights, promoting democracy, and facilitating peaceful conflict resolution globally. His post-presidency work through Also Read: 6 times in one post- Trump brings up Nobel Peace Prize again and again The Carter Center, including efforts in global disease eradication and free elections, contributed to the honour. Carter had earlier facilitated the 1978 Camp David Accords between Egypt and Israel during his presidency. Barack Obama (2009) Barack Obama was awarded the Peace Prize in 2009, less than a year into his presidency. The Nobel Committee cited his 'extraordinary efforts to strengthen international diplomacy and cooperation between peoples' and for promoting nuclear non-proliferation. However, the decision sparked global debate, with critics pointing to his limited record at the time. The prize was seen by many as an encouragement for future action rather than a reward for past achievement. Al Gore (2007) Although not a U.S. president, former Vice President Al Gore was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize in 2007, shared with the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). The prize recognised their joint efforts in raising awareness about global warming and pushing for action against climate change. Gore's documentary An Inconvenient Truth and his international campaigning were central to the award. Trump's case President Trump has been nominated multiple times, for the 2018, 2020, 2021, and 2024 Peace Prizes, for a series of diplomatic moves, including the Abraham Accords , which normalised ties between Israel and several Arab states, and his summit diplomacy with North Korean leader Kim Jong-un. In 2025, U.S. Representative Darrell Issa officially nominated Trump for the prize. Trump has repeatedly voiced frustration over not receiving the award. In his latest social media post, Trump said, 'No, I won't get a Nobel Peace Prize no matter what I do, including Russia/Ukraine, and Israel/Iran, whatever those outcomes may be, but the people know, and that's all that matters to me.' He also referenced his claimed role in preventing a war between India and Pakistan and in easing tensions between Egypt and Ethiopia over the Nile dam. Economic Times WhatsApp channel )
Time of India
28 minutes ago
- Time of India
Will Donald Trump win the 2026 Nobel Peace Prize? Here is what students must know about the history of this award
Will Donald Trump win the 2026 Nobel Peace Prize? In June 2025, Pakistan officially nominated U.S. President Donald Trump for the 2026 Nobel Peace Prize, citing his role in de-escalating a dangerous military standoff with India. The announcement immediately sparked global debate. Could one of the most polarizing political figures of our time be awarded the world's most prestigious honor for peace? Pakistan claims Trump played a behind-the-scenes role in preventing a full-scale conflict, calling it a moment of decisive diplomacy. Supporters see the nomination as deserved recognition; critics argue that one diplomatic act cannot outweigh a legacy marked by international withdrawals and domestic division. Yet Trump wouldn't be the first surprise nominee—or winner. Former U.S. President Barack Obama received the Peace Prize in 2009, just months into office. In 2019, Ethiopia's Abiy Ahmed won for making peace with Eritrea, though he later faced backlash over internal conflict. The prize has always sparked questions about who deserves it and why. For students today, Trump's nomination is more than just a headline—it's an invitation to explore what the Nobel Peace Prize stands for, how it has evolved, and what it reveals about leadership, diplomacy, and the changing face of peace in the modern world. What is the Nobel Peace Prize? The Nobel Peace Prize is one of the most recognized international awards, established in 1901 by Swedish inventor Alfred Nobel. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like What Is Your Writing Missing? Grammarly Install Now Undo It was meant to honor those who have contributed most to advancing peace, reducing armed conflict, and promoting diplomacy and humanitarian progress. Unlike other Nobel Prizes, the Peace Prize is awarded in Oslo, Norway, by a committee selected by the Norwegian Parliament. For over a century, the award has honored a wide variety of individuals and organizations—leaders who forged peace treaties, journalists who risked their lives for truth, survivors who turned their trauma into activism, and movements that reshaped global policy. For students and young changemakers, the Peace Prize serves as a real-world guide to the values that define global leadership, advocacy, and collective progress. Historic peace laureates One of the most legendary winners is Martin Luther King Jr., who received the prize in 1964 for his leadership in the nonviolent civil rights movement in the United States. His legacy continues to inspire youth-led protests and movements for racial justice around the world. In 1979, Mother Teresa was awarded for her humanitarian work with the poor and dying in Kolkata, India. Her selfless service became a global symbol of compassion in action. Malala Yousafzai, the youngest-ever Peace Prize recipient, won in 2014 at the age of 17. After surviving an assassination attempt by the Taliban, she became a powerful voice for girls' education and youth empowerment, making her an icon for student activism across the globe. In 1993, Nelson Mandela and F.W. de Klerk were jointly awarded for their efforts to end apartheid in South Africa. Mandela's lifelong fight for equality and reconciliation transformed not just a nation, but global conversations about justice and healing. The prize has also gone to organizations like the United Nations , the International Campaign to Ban Landmines, and the World Food Programme, showing that peace is often achieved by collective effort—not just individual heroism. How winners have defined peace The Peace Prize isn't just for heads of state. In fact, many recent winners weren't politicians at all. In 2024, Japan's Nihon Hidankyo, a group of atomic bomb survivors, was honored for its powerful advocacy against nuclear weapons. In 2023, Narges Mohammadi, an Iranian human rights activist, won while imprisoned for her fight for women's rights and civil liberties. Their stories remind students that peace often begins with personal conviction, not public office. In 2021, journalists Maria Ressa of the Philippines and Dmitry Muratov of Russia were recognized for defending press freedom in authoritarian regimes. In 2020, the World Food Programme was awarded for feeding communities in war zones and disaster areas—showing that fighting hunger is also a form of peacekeeping. These winners teach us that peace is not limited to treaties. It includes the pursuit of justice, access to truth, and compassion during crises. Their work is a powerful lesson for students who want to create impact, regardless of their field of study or background. A history of controversial choices Trump's nomination may seem unconventional, but so were many before him. Barack Obama's 2009 Peace Prize was awarded just nine months into his presidency, sparking criticism that it was based more on hope than achievement. Ethiopia's Abiy Ahmed was hailed in 2019 for ending a decades-long conflict with Eritrea, yet his later involvement in internal war led some to question the timing of his award. There have also been high-profile omissions—most notably Mahatma Gandhi, who never received the Nobel Peace Prize despite being the face of nonviolent resistance. These examples show that the Nobel Peace Prize is as much about global context and symbolism as it is about accomplishment.
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
28 minutes ago
- First Post
Did US really name fighter jet F-47 after Trump?
In March this year, US President Donald Trump announced 'the world's first sixth-generation fighter jet, F-47. Many thought the number honoured Trump, but there is more to the story. read more On March 21, 2025, US President Donald Trump announced from the Oval Office that he had directed the American Air Force to move forward with the development of 'the world's first sixth-generation fighter jet .' He was flanked by US Secretary of Defence Pete Hegseth, who went on to boast about the fighter jet's 'speed, manoeuvrability and payload.' Hegseth said that the fighter jet promises to be something 'the likes of which nobody has seen before.' Trump went on to interject his defence secretary, pointing to the name 'F-47' for the fighter jet. 'Nothing in the world comes even close to it,' Trump said. 'It'll be known as the F-47. The generals picked the title. It's a beautiful number.' STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD The announcement of the fighter jet's name came as a surprise since it was supposed to succeed the F-22 aircraft. Many soon started to wonder if the fighter jet was named F-47 to honour the 47th President of the United States, Donald J Trump. Well, the assessment might be partially true, but there is more to the story. To understand the reason why number 47 was chosen for the new line of fighter jets, let's first see how the United States names its weapon systems and aircraft. How do they get the names? It is pertinent to note that the US military has a longstanding naming protocol for its aircraft. The rules of the game are governed by something called the 'Mission Design Series', established by the Defence Department in the 1960s. 'This system uses letters and numbers to symbolise identifying characteristics of military aerospace vehicles of direct interest to the DoD,' an Air Force memo obtained by Bloomberg read. The first letter depicts the basic mission of the aircraft. For example, the letter 'B' denotes that it is a bomber and the letter 'P' denotes that it will be used for patrolling. Then there is a dash, which is followed by a number, called the 'design number'. According to an article by the US Naval Institute, this number conveys that the 'aircraft is a specific design of that particular type or basic mission.' The number tends to follow a sequential pattern. However, the article made it clear that 'there are many gaps and numerous exceptions to these sequences.' there are many gaps and numerous exceptions to these sequences.' Since the F-47 is succeeding the F-22, the fighter jet would fall in the exception category. Honouring history or Trump When a journalist from Bloomberg filed a Freedom of Information Act request with the US Air Force, he received the real reason behind the naming of the aircraft. The records from the Air Force showed that the name F-47 had its roots in an iconic World War II fighter plane, and the generals also found it an interesting way to honour the current US President. The records showed that General David Allvin, the Air Force's chief of staff, had an 'urgent' request for information about a World War 2 aircraft. A few hours later, Air Force researchers sent a two-page description of the P-47 aircraft, popularly known as 'Thunderbolt'. Airmen adopted their moniker for the P-47, calling it 'Juggernaut.' Over time, since the jet looked like a glass milk bottle, it was soon referred to as 'Jug'. In the memo obtained by Bloomberg, the US Air Force described the P-47 as 'probably the best ground-attack aircraft fielded by the United States. From D-Day, the invasion of Europe launched on June 8, 1944, until VE Day on May 7, 1945, pilots flying the Thunderbolt destroyed the following enemy equipment: 86,000 railway cars, 9,000 locomotives, 6,000 armoured fighting vehicles, 68,000 trucks.' STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD How the Air Force was left by surprise by Trump's announcement When Trump announced the F-47 jet, neither he nor Hegseth mentioned the legacy of the P-47. Bloomberg's assessment showed that there is a possibility that the Air Force may have been caught off guard or were just unprepared when the president said the new fighter jet would be called F-47. It is pertinent to note that Trump's press conference took place at around 11:30 am (local time). The email obtained by the news outlet showed that they were sent soon after the presser. 'Sir, Request coordination with SECDEF office,' an Air Force public affairs official wrote in an email sent to Lieutenant General Dale White, the military deputy in the Air Force's Office of the Assistant Secretary for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics. However, General Allvin's team dismissed the claim that the decision to honour P-47 was taken after Trump's announcement. At least one reporter pressed an Air Force spokesperson for more details about the 'designation for the F-47.' 'The nomenclature system exists to maintain an orderly, non-chaotic process of naming systems,' the reporter asked. 'Why was it abandoned in this case? And who decided to do that?' the reporter asked. Ann Stefanek, the Air Force spokesperson, did not share additional details on the matter and just remarked: 'General Allvin made the decision.' It will now remain unclear exactly when the decision to honour the aircraft was taken. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD With inputs from agencies.
