2,000 metric tonnes of illegal e-waste collected in Ops Hazard 2.0, says Environment Department

KUALA LUMPUR: Some 2,000 metric tonnes of illegal e-waste were seized in Ops Hazard 2.0, says the Environment Department.
Its enforcement division director, Rosli Zul, said the department also issued equipment seizure orders on 24 premises raided during the special operation.
"It was done per Section 38(1)(a) of the Environmental Quality Act 1974 (Act 127) for operating machinery without any pollution control systems.
"We also issued 59 directives under Sections 31 and 37 of the Act, while 18 compounds were issued for various violations of the Environmental Quality (Scheduled Wastes) Regulations 2005," he told a press conference in Bukit Aman on Thursday (June 19).
Rosli said investigations have been opened into 25 premises for various offences, including failure to comply with license conditions and operating unlicensed scheduled waste storage facilities.
"Other offences detected were failure to obtain written approval from the department's director-general, failure to submit an Environmental Impact Assessment report and disposal of scheduled waste without proper approval.
'These illegal activities not only break the law but pose serious threats to human health and the environment due to the potential release of hazardous pollutants into the air, water, and soil,' he said.
Many of the illegal operations were found in remote areas and outside approved industrial zones, making enforcement and monitoring more difficult, and increasing risks for enforcement officers, Rosli said.
He stressed that any management of scheduled waste, including e-waste, without proper approval from the director-general is a serious offence
" Under the latest amendments to the Environmental Quality Act (Amendment) 2024, offenders now face fines of up to RM10mil and jail terms of up to five years if convicted," he added.
Ops Hazard 2.0 was recently conducted, involving various agencies led by the police's General Operations Force.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Borneo Post

2 hours ago

• Borneo Post

Used clothes seller acquitted, discharged of possessing drugs

Mohd Jamri (left) smiles after his acquittal. With him is his counsel Chew. KOTA KINABALU (June 20): A used clothes seller was acquitted and discharged by a Sessions Court here today from two counts of possessing cannabis and syabu. Judge Dayang Ellyn Narisa Abang Ahmad freed Mohd Jamri Basir, 24, after a full trial. The first count accused Mohd Jamri of possessing 158.6 grams of cannabis at an apartment at Jalan Tuaran Bypass on May 15, 2020. The charge was under Section 39A (2) of the Dangerous Drugs Act 1952, punishable under Section 6 of the same Act. The second count accused him of having 6.64 grams of syabu at the same place and on the same day. The alleged offence was under Section 12 (2), punishable under Section 39A (1), both of the same Act. The prosecution commended the case on December 7, 2022 and rested it on August 15, 2024. Ten witnesses were called by the prosecution while the defence called three witnesses, including Mohd Jamri. Mohd Jamri was represented by counsel Dominic Chew Ban Huat.

Focus Malaysia

10 hours ago

• Focus Malaysia

'Report graft to MACC, PDRM first – not social media – to be entitled for whistleblower protection'

THE issue of whistleblower protection has recently become a topic of public attention, especially in the context of combating corruption. Unfortunately, there is widespread misunderstanding among the public regarding who qualifies for protection and the procedures that must be followed. Some believe that anyone with information about misconduct can apply for protection as a whistleblower but the reality is not that simple. Malaysia has specific legislation to protect whistleblowers from unfair retaliation, namely the Whistleblower Protection Act 2010. However, this protection is subject to certain conditions and procedures to ensure its effectiveness and prevent abuse. A common misconception is the belief that whistleblowers may disclose information publicly – such as to the media or social media – before applying for protection. This is incorrect. Under the law, information regarding misconduct must first be reported to an enforcement agency. If someone discloses the information publicly before making an official report, it may compromise their identity and the validity of the disclosed information. There is also the risk that such information may not be verified or could be misinterpreted, ultimately damaging the credibility of the case. Additionally, enforcement agencies cannot provide protection to whistleblowers who have 'exposed' themselves before making a formal report. Criteria for protection To obtain whistleblower protection, an individual must meet several conditions. Firstly, the report must be made to a legitimate enforcement agency such as the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC), Royal Malaysia Police (PDRM) or other relevant government bodies. Secondly, the report must be made in good faith and not out of malicious intent such as revenge or defamation. Another key condition is that the whistleblower must not be involved in the reported misconduct. Section 11(1) of the Whistleblower Protection Act 2010 clearly states that protection may be revoked if the whistleblower is found to be complicit in the misconduct disclosed. This is to maintain the integrity of the whistleblower and prevent abuses t the protection status as a 'shield' to cover up their own wrongdoing. Challenges encountered Despite existing laws, whistleblowers often face challenges in upholding the truth. Among them, whistleblowers are often labelled as 'informers' or 'traitors', especially if the offence involves their employer or organisation. Additionally, despite legal protections, there remains concern about threats or discrimination they may face directly or indirectly. In fact, many still do not understand the legal procedures to become a whistleblower and how they can apply for protection legally. The process for applying for whistleblower protection is clearly stipulated. An individual must report directly to a government enforcement agency such as MACC or PDRM. Once the report is received and meets the criteria set out in the Act, the whistleblower will be granted protection guaranteed by law. Forms of protection provided include: Confidentiality of identity: The whistleblower's identity will be kept completely confidential and will not be disclosed to any party, including during court proceedings. The whistleblower's identity will be kept completely confidential and will not be disclosed to any party, including during court proceedings. Legal immunity: The whistleblower is protected from civil, criminal or disciplinary action related to the report made. The whistleblower is protected from civil, criminal or disciplinary action related to the report made. Protection against retaliation: Any retaliation such as dismissal, discrimination or intimidation as a result of the report is strictly prohibited. Any retaliation such as dismissal, discrimination or intimidation as a result of the report is strictly prohibited. Protection for related individuals: Besides the whistleblower, protection is also extended to family members or individuals closely related to the whistleblower if they face risks due to the disclosure. Social responsibility, incentives As a responsible society, we must understand the role and responsibility of reporting corruption. Section 25 of the MACC Act 2009 stipulates that anyone who knows of the giving, receiving or offering of a bribe but fails to report it can be fined up to RM100,000 or imprisoned for up to 10 years, or both. Additionally, the government has since 2011 introduced cash reward incentives and recognition for civil servants who report corruption to MACC. These rewards are given based on the value of the corruption involved when their reports or complaints result in convictions in court. As of 2024, a total of 514 civil servants have received rewards exceeding RM1 mil under this incentive programme with the highest reward of RM100,000 given to a public officer for reporting corruption. The whistleblower protection law is an important tool in efforts to combat corruption and misconduct in this country. It provides confidence to legitimate whistleblowers to come forward without fear of retaliation. However, the existing Act still has weaknesses that need improvement to ensure more effective protection. Legal reform The Whistleblower Protection (Amendment) Bill 2010 (Act 711) was tabled for its first reading in the Dewan Rakyat on March 6. This amendment aims to further strengthen protection for whistleblowers who report misconduct, particularly in the public and private sectors involving corruption. It is expected to provide more comprehensive protection for whistleblowers, including protection against harmful actions and immunity from civil or criminal proceedings. This amendment is hoped to encourage more individuals to report misconduct without fear. Recently, the MACC and Transparency International Malaysia (TI-M) expressed full support for efforts to improve this Act during a courtesy visit by TI-Malaysia president Raymon Ram to MACC chief commissioner Tan Sri Azam Baki. Awareness about the role, responsibilities, and protection of whistleblowers must be raised in society. The misconception that anyone can apply for protection without fulfilling the required conditions must be corrected to prevent misuse and abuse of the law. As concerned citizens, we must understand that whistleblowers play a critical role and that all support should be given to expose misconduct and uphold the integrity of institutions. With robust laws and public awareness of their responsibilities, efforts to combat corruption in Malaysia can be more effectively implemented. – June 20, 2025 Datuk Wan Shaharuddin Wan Ladin is the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commissions' (MACC) senior director (legal and prosecution division). The views expressed are solely of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Focus Malaysia.

The Star

14 hours ago

• The Star

RM500mil worth of illegal e-waste seized

Major bust: Comm Azmi speaking at a press conference on Ops Hazard 2.0 in Bukit Aman. — RAJA FAISAL HISHAN/The Star KUALA LUMPUR: A staggering half a billion ringgit worth of illegal e-waste, including components and products, was seized in a nationwide operation involving 57 premises. Codenamed Ops Hazard 2.0, the multi-agency raid was spearheaded by the police's General Operations Force and uncovered a web of crimes, possible tax evasion and exploitation of foreign labour. Bukit Aman Internal Security and Public Order Department director Comm Datuk Seri Azmi Abu Kassim said 453 people, aged between 16 and 70, were arrested, with 41 of them Malaysians, while the rest were foreigners from countries including Myanmar, Bangladesh, Cambodia and the Philippines. The Inland Revenue Board also estimated potential tax evasion losses of up to RM500mil linked to the illegal operations, he said. 'Among the offences detected were conducting illegal e-waste processing business, employing undocumented migrants and operating without valid business licences,' Comm Azmi said during a press conference at Bukit Aman yesterday. Seized items included RM240mil worth of e-waste products, RM182mil in components and RM82mil in various other assets. He said the latest operation brings the total value of seized e-waste materials since January to RM13.2bil, with 1,060 individuals detained. 'Ops Hazard 2.0 has increased the pressure on the illegal e-waste industry,' Comm Azmi said, adding that syndicates are adapting by using proxies, exploiting loopholes and possibly even receiving tip-offs ahead of raids. In some cases, targeted premises were found already closed when enforcement teams arrived, raising suspicions of information leaks. 'We will work with the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission to curb this problem. We also believe the syndicates have become more cautious since Ops Hazard 1.0,' he said. A total of 1,582 officers and personnel were involved in Ops Hazard 2.0. Meanwhile, Environment Department enforcement division director Rosli Zul revealed a worrying twist: seven of the raided premises were licensed e-waste processors, now under investigation for allegedly importing waste illegally. 'These facilities had valid licences, but we found some e-waste materials believed to have been smuggled in from overseas,' he said. 'We have to investigate further. If confirmed, it would represent a very serious violation of the law.' Malaysia, Rosli added, continues to be targeted by international e-waste syndicates. 'Over 600 containers have already been detected at Port Klang. Many were falsely declared as recyclable items but actually contained e-waste. 'Most of these illegal factories lack proper environmental control mechanisms. The pollution resulting from their operations is highly dangerous,' he warned.