From memories of old guard
IN February 1939, the 'National Jaafari School' was inaugurated as the first public charitable private school and the third public school in Kuwait's history. Despite the sectarian connotations of its original name, the school was entirely moderate. It did not teach Shia jurisprudence specifically; rather, its doors were open to all students, regardless of sectarian affiliation. During the Iran-Iraq War, the school's name was changed to 'The National School.'
Ahmad Mohammad Hussein Marafie was the visionary behind the establishment of the school and was the first to donate and lead fundraising efforts for its founding. In the 1950s, ownership and licensing of the school were transferred to the late Mohammad Rafi Marafie, who took on the responsibility of covering any budget deficits.
After his passing, these responsibilities were passed to his son, the well-known businessman Abdullah Marafie, who, along with the Marafie family, continued to finance any financial shortfalls the school encountered. The 'National School' was distinguished by the quality of its education, and remains so to this day. Its academic approach was notably serious, with particular emphasis on subjects such as Mathematics, Arabic, and English. As students in public schools, we often noticed the academic excellence of students who had transferred from the National School, especially in these core subjects.
In its early years, the National School offered elementary education free of charge to children from underprivileged families. Unlike Al-Mubarakiya School and Al-Ahmadiyya School, the National School continues to operate nearly ninety years after its founding. What refutes any claim of sectarianism at the Jaafari School are the names of the distinguished educators who taught there, or were educated there themselves, including professors Fahd Al-Mousa, Duaij Al-Aoun, Mohammad Al-Nashmi, Abdul Latif Al-Omar, Abdul Latif Al-Falah, Khaled Al-Masoud, Abdulaziz and Moajab Al-Dousari, Abdulaziz Al-Balool, Saud Al-Kharji, Abdullah Al-Hindi, Mulla Issa Al-Matar, Mulla Rashid Al-Saif, Abdul Wahab Hashim Al-Badr, and many others.
Among its notable students were His Highness the Amir of Kuwait Sheikh Mishal Al-Ahmad Al-Jaber Al-Sabah, along with his brothers Sheikh Khaled and Sheikh Nawaf. The National School also educated prominent figures such as Jaber and Salem Al-Ali, Salem, Abdullah, and Ali Sabah Al-Nasser, as well as Malik, Yousef, Mubarak, and Ali Al-Malik, Mubarak Abdullah Al-Jaber, and Nasser Sabah Al-Nasser. Other notable alumni include Issa Al-Yousefi, Aqeel Yaqoub Behbehani, Mohammad Musaed Al-Saleh, Thabet Mohammad Al-Muhanna, Ismail Bahman, Hassan Tifuni, Hamed Amin (the singer), and thousands of others.
The late Ruler, Sheikh Ahmed Al- Jaber, was the first prominent figure to donate to the establishment of the school, and he enrolled several of his sons as students. The National School came under the supervision of the Ministry of Education in 1978, with Salah Al-Din Al- Qadoumi appointed as its first principal. One of the school's foundational figures was the Jordanian teacher Mohammad Hassan Odeh, who joined the school as a teacher sixty years ago. Over the years, he held several key positions, including serving as General Manager of the Knowledge Company for Educational Services.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Kuwait Times
2 days ago
- Kuwait Times
G7 summit minus Trump rallies behind Ukraine
G7 summit minus Trump rallies behind Ukraine Canadian PM welcomes Zelensky, announces $1.47bn of military support KANANASKIS: Group of Seven leaders on Tuesday vowed greater support for Ukraine but stopped short of joint condemnation of Russia for its growing attacks, at a summit missing Donald Trump. The US president had been due to speak at the G7 summit with his Ukrainian counterpart Volodymyr Zelensky, with whom he has had a volatile relationship, but flew back Monday over the Zionist-Iran conflict. Zelensky met the remaining leaders at a remote lodge in the Canadian Rockies hours after Russia hit Kyiv with one of the worst bombardments since it invaded in February 2022, killing at least 10 people in the capital. Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney welcomed Zelensky and announced Can$2 billion ($1.47bn) of military support, including drones and helicopters, for Ukraine. But the G7 summit stopped short of issuing a joint statement, unlike in past years under Trump's predecessor Joe Biden when the club of major industrial democracies denounced Russian 'aggression.' A Canadian official, backtracking on an earlier account of the United States trying to water down a proposed statement, said there was never an attempt to issue one due to Trump's continued hopes of mediating with Russian President Vladimir Putin. 'It was clear that it would not have been feasible to find detailed language that all G7 partners could agree to in that context,' the official said on condition of anonymity. Carney dismissed suggestions of friction, saying that all G7 leaders agreed to be 'resolute in exploring all options to maximize pressure on Russia, including financial sanctions.' But he admitted that some G7 leaders 'would say above and beyond' what was in the chair's summary he issued instead of a formal statement signed by all leaders. G7 leaders, however, managed unity Monday on a joint statement on the Iran conflict that backed Zionist entity but also called broadly for de-escalation, despite Trump contemplating greater US military involvement. US waits on pressure Carney earlier joined Britain in tightening sanctions on Russia's so-called shadow fleet of ships used to circumvent international sanctions on its oil sales. 'These sanctions strike right at the heart of Putin's war machine, choking off his ability to continue his barbaric war in Ukraine,' Prime Minister Keir Starmer said in a statement. US lawmakers have drafted a package of new sanctions on Russia but Trump has been hesitant to give his support and isolate Putin, to whom he spoke by telephone on the eve of the G7 summit. Trump infamously berated Zelensky in the Oval Office on February 28, saying he was ungrateful for US aid, but has since voiced disappointment that Putin has rebuffed a US proposal for at least a temporary ceasefire. Zelensky told Carney the latest Russian attack showed the need for allies' support and pressure on Moscow—while making clear that he still backed Trump-led calls for negotiations. 'It's important for our soldiers to be strong in the battlefield, to stay strong until Russia will be ready for the peace negotiations,' said Zelensky, who cut short meetings in Canada scheduled after the summit. French President Emmanuel Macron accused his Russian counterpart of exploiting global focus on the Middle East to carry out the deadly attack. 'It shows the complete cynicism of President Putin,' Macron told reporters at the summit. In Washington, the State Department also condemned the Russian strikes and offered condolences to the victims' families. Tough trade talks The G7 - Britain, Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan and the United States—was holding its first summit since the re-election of Trump, who openly questions longstanding US alliances. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent remained to represent the United States at the summit, where discussions have also concentrated on Trump's attempts to radically overhaul the world's trading system. Trump has vowed to slap sweeping tariffs on friends and foes alike on July 9, although he has postponed them once. The US president, speaking to reporters on his way back from the summit, complained that the European Union was not yet offering a 'fair deal' on trade. 'We're either going to make a good deal or they'll just pay whatever we say they will pay,' he said. European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen said she still hoped for a negotiated solution and talks were 'intense and demanding.' Trump's negotiators have already sealed a deal with Britain and, outside of the G7, reached an agreement to lower tariffs with rival China.— AFP
Kuwait Times
2 days ago
- Kuwait Times
KU's Gulf Studies Center hosts lecture on Kuwait's global image
KUWAIT: The Center for Gulf and Arabian Peninsula Studies at Kuwait University hosted a lecture titled 'Kuwait in Foreign Eyes' on Thursday, delivered by Croatian Ambassador to Kuwait Emir Muharemi. The event was held in conjunction with the country's 64th Independence Day celebrations and was moderated by Dr Ghanem Al-Najjar, Professor of State Relations at KU. Speaking to KUNA following the event, Head of the Center Dr Yaqoub Al-Kandari said the lecture featured the presentation of Ambassador Muharemi's newly released book titled Kuwait: Sand, Pearls, and Oil – An Introduction to History, Politics, and Foreign Relations, which he authored and translated into English. Notably, it is the first foreign-authored publication to be issued by the center. Dr Yaqoub Al-Kandari Ambassador of Croatia, Amir Muharemi Al-Kandari emphasized that the center's role extends beyond academic discourse to fostering cultural understanding and showcasing Kuwait's historical and geopolitical significance through diverse perspectives. 'These activities are integral to our mission, especially as we mark a cherished national occasion,' he noted, stressing the importance of promoting cultural exchange and enhancing Kuwait's presence across scientific, diplomatic and cultural arenas. In remarks to KUNA, Ambassador Muharemi said the lecture aimed to offer foreign diplomats and business professionals a concise overview of Kuwait's political landscape, foreign policy, and international standing. He noted that the book explores key milestones in Kuwait's modern history, including its independence, the adoption of the constitution, and the establishment of the country's parliamentary democracy. The ambassador also delved into Kuwait's historical ties with the Ottoman Empire and Britain, the founding of the Mubarak Al-Sabah dynasty, and the delineation of Kuwait's modern borders. Expressing his gratitude, Muharemi thanked the Center for hosting the event and supporting the English translation of his work. 'This book is my humble tribute to Kuwait and its people – a reflection of the warmth and generosity I have experienced during my time here,' he said.- KUNA
Arab Times
5 days ago
- Arab Times
My friend Abbas ... and Iran-Israel conflict
Recently, Iran and Israel have dealt a blow to analysts and experts who long denied the existence of genuine hostility between them. Through their actions, both countries have disproved the claims that their apparent disputes and exchanged threats were merely tactics designed to mask behind-the-scenes cooperation and strategic harmony. These analysts had argued that Iran and Israel shared a common goal, which is to intimidate and manipulate the Arab world. Israel not only destroyed the majority of Iran's nuclear facilities, but, for the second time in history, it eliminated the entire top echelon of a hostile state's leadership without deploying a single soldier and without incurring any significant material losses to date. The first time was during its war against Hezbollah in Lebanon. Neutral observers believe that the situation is unlikely to conclude with any form of Iranian surrender. However, the loss of Iran's military, revolutionary, nuclear, and intelligence leadership may compel the regime to reconsider its strategic calculations, shift focus inward, and employ various methods to silence the opposition. The outcome we have reached was entirely predictable, and I have said so repeatedly. Weapons, no matter how advanced, dangerous, or effective, are meaningless without the human capacity to operate them. That human capacity must be grounded in the same freedoms, self-respect, and critical thinking enjoyed by citizens in the West. It must also be free from extremism and guided by the belief that the weapon of knowledge is the most powerful when placed in strong, educated hands. If I were in the place of Iran's adversaries, I would not have hesitated to do exactly what they did, which is to eliminate its ambitions to acquire a nuclear weapon. I simply do not trust Iran's intentions in this regard, especially given that it is the most extremist religious state in the region. The eight-year Iran-Iraq war stands as the clearest evidence that Iran is largely indifferent to the scale of losses that might result from the use of nuclear weapons. This isn't to suggest that I sympathize with Israel, as quite the opposite may be true. I am simply speaking from the perspective of a devil's advocate. My friend Abbas often says, 'Iran possesses all the elements of survival, resilience, resistance, and retaliation. We must recognize that Iran has, throughout its history, absorbed the patience of chess players and the precision of carpet weavers. We must support it. Iran is the last line of defense against Israel's growing ambitions to reshape the Middle East into a region completely loyal to its vision. Israel will use its military, financial, and technological power to bring everyone under the umbrella of the Abraham Accords. That would be a disaster for Arabs and Muslims. If that happens, we will lose all sense of identity and dignity, and become captives to Israel's agenda.' I told my friend Abbas that I fully understand his fears, as preserving our dignity is indeed our ultimate goal. But has the Iranian way of life become our ideal? Is Iran truly prepared to treat us as equals, respect our minds, and grant us the freedoms of expression, thought, and belief that we so deeply need? If Iran defeats its enemies, will it free us from one real or virtual prison only to place us in another? I do not doubt that the Israeli government is deeply extremist, and arguably the most brutal and criminal in the region's modern history. But it does not behave that way toward its own citizens, and that is the true source of its strength. Intelligence agencies in many of our countries struggle to find even a handful of citizens willing to collaborate as spies. In contrast, Israel receives a steady stream of applications from individuals eager to work with Mossad. Some of them even come from within the intelligence services of Arab states themselves, seeking to become agents, advocates of Israeli narratives, and defenders of its positions. One cannot give what they do not possess. A lack of dignity, humanity, and an educational system shaped by rigid ideology has left many among us feeling little guilt when cooperating with the enemies of our own nations. This war could end at any moment, and most likely, we will learn nothing from it. We will simply return to our old ways of life, unchanged and unaffected. It seems we have become almost entirely immune to any form of meaningful human development. Unfortunately, we have yet to learn this crucial lesson, even from our enemies.
