FRC housekeeping can help preserve classic championship
The adage "perfect is the enemy of good" was surely somewhere in Jim Gavin's Football Review Commitee philosophy.
When they set about this task, getting everything perfect the first time was always going to be impossible.
Attempting to do so would have been a huge barrier to the breakneck speed with which they executed their mission.
For someone as detail orientated as Jim Gavin appears to be, this allowance for imperfection and adapting as things develop could not have rested particularly easy.
To minimise issues, the group were exhaustive in their attempt to reason out every change and the myriad of knock-on consequences.
While the continuous tweaks during the Allianz League frustrated many, their overall success was remarkable and allowed them to put their rule amending pens away ahead of the championship.
Since then we have all got to sit back and enjoy the results of the group's labours. Drawing a direct cause and effect between the enhancements and the great championship we are experiencing to date is open to accusations of bias.
The fact that the championship is more open, that there were great games under the previous rules, and that teams are simply too inexperienced with the new rules to wrestle the game back under their control means that a definitive conclusion on the direct impact of the rules cannot be drawn.
Even the greatest contrarian would have to admit though that the coincidence of the rule changes and the quality of games we are seeing is notable. The exciting thing is that we are only reaching the stage where, over the past 10 to 20 years, the good football usually starts.
And this is the thing. We are also reaching the stage where the line in the history books are completed, a player's entire career finds their defining moment and supporters see their dreams come through.
My biggest dread over the next seven weeks is that a quirk in the rules becomes the decisive event.
Now, for me, is the perfect moment, between group stage and knockout games, for the FRC to do a bit of housekeeping.
There is much that can and will be debated as the game evolves under the new rules over the coming years, but there are things that have become evident and need to be tidied up as the outworkings which we have seen are presumably going against what the FRC envisaged.
My biggest dread over the next seven weeks is that a quirk in the rules becomes the decisive event
Most importantly for me is the rule that allows a touch by an opposition player to decrease a two-point effort's value to one.
Why is this very minor and infrequent rule the most important? The likelihood for it being game-deciding is perhaps greater than any other rule.
As we know, big games have a habit of coming down to the wire. In these scenarios, and with the hooter game in particular, teams know exactly what they or their opponent need.
If a player, at a critical moment, goes for that two-pointer and scores it, why should it be halved in value because an opposition player touches the ball?
I believe this rule came in to prevent the scenario that if a ball was dropping close to the crossbar and players jumped to assist/prevent it travelling over, it may be difficult to ascertain if it was touched and by whom or, more critically, if the touch was necessary for the ball to make it over the bar.
This type of thing is evidence of the extent to which the FRC went into the minutiae to try to avoid potential problems with its various enhancements.
The problem here is that in ensuring their rule didn't fall foul of the extremely rare scenario described, they ended up making it feel unnaturally complicated. If a touch is required to make a shot travel over the bar, then it should not be counted as a two-pointer. If an opposition player attempts to stop a shot but it still travels over, then it should count.
Moving onto the solo and go, that almost universally liked enhancement - albeit, ironically one which reduces kick passing and increasing control of possession - is almost too advantageous in some scenarios.
When a player can throw it out of the immediate location of the free kick to a team-mate taking it at full speed it is a huge advantage. We wouldn't allow a free-kick to be taken so loosely in relation to the position of the foul.
Similarly, the kick-out mark is having overly advantageous impact.
A theme to both of these is the massive impact of a 50m penalty - and the two-pointer option that carries - with any infringement against them. In combination, that gives them a game-defining ability.
Like it or not and trust me, this isn't just the Tyrone in me coming out, that means every team will be looking at playing 'smart' in such moments and drawing those 50m penalties. The thought of an All-Ireland final being decided on such would be a terrible end to a great championship.
The FRC has held its counsel for several weeks now, but I believe it's time to see Jim and his crew break out their pens for a bit of light editing.
This championship to date has been the best in 20 years. The rules have been central to that in my opinion. But, while they have defined it, it would be a real pity if they end up deciding it.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Times
14 hours ago
- Irish Times
The GAA's sceptical relationship with time keeping is not a new phenomenon
At last November's special congress, Jim Gavin's Football Review Committee (FRC) managed to have all of its provisions accepted for implementation in the 2025 season. It was a remarkable feat of persuasion in less than a year. Neither were there any cliffhangers. In fact, the least enthusiastically received idea was that of the match clock, which attracted the support of a relatively restrained 74 per cent of delegates. Since its introduction, it has been one of the most troublesome amendments. It triggered concerns that it would prove too expensive or too complicated in the requirement that it be synced with the time displays on broadcast coverage. A countdown clock was accepted in women's football in the mid-1990s. Following its largely seamless application, it wasn't long prompting the men's game to wonder if it might it be a worthwhile adoption. READ MORE Twice the idea, having been floated at congress, came to nothing – once defeated and the next time, accepted but never introduced, again for logistical reasons, after being trialled in third-level matches. Since 2015, things have changed. The whole area of time was reviewed and in response to rising concern about gamesmanship, a new set of guidelines were issued to referees. One of the main sources of disquiet was the use of strategic substitutions to run down the clock. It was accordingly decided that 20 seconds should be added for every replacement brought on during a match. That is why there is apparently more time in the second half of matches than in the first: it's when the bulk of the substitutions are made. Other issues to come under scrutiny were goalkeepers coming up the field for free-kicks and pauses for Hawk-Eye determinations. Eventually, the FRC motions 46 and 47, providing for clock/hooter use and the hand-signal protocol for referees to stop and resume play were passed and implemented – at least in broadcast matches. [ Ciarán Murphy: Keeping cool in front of goal is key to landing All-Ireland Opens in new window ] The GAA's apparently sceptical relationship with time keeping is not a new phenomenon. It is all of 87 years since an initial attempt was made to mechanise time keeping and remove it from a referee's duties. Maurice Bogue was the inventor of the eponymous Bogue Clock, a pioneering idea to display time at GAA grounds, which would be stopped and restarted as the referee indicated. The point was to ensure that a full hour would be played in matches. Display was on a large clock face with Roman numerals – according to one report, 'like a giant stopwatch' – and it was first used in a challenge match between Louth and Mayo in May 1938 at the Gaelic Grounds in Drogheda. Later that year, it was used to keep time at a league match between Louth and Meath, which ended in a draw. Attempts to incorporate the clock into the rule book in 1939 and 1940 were not successful and although Bogue, a businessman and inventor, who lived in Drogheda, was prepared to mount exhibitions of his timepiece in various grounds across the country, the matter did not return to congress for 10 years. In 1950, delegates declined to introduce the clock but did stipulate that it should be trialled the following year and evidence of that can be seen in PD Mehigan's report of the Railway Cup semi-finals on February 19th, 1951. 'The advent of the Bogue Clock as timekeeper instead of the referee was on trial and pleased the public, who were able to follow the different stages of the game,' the report said. At congress in 1951, the idea of the clock was buried despite the range of enthusiasts for the prospect of referees being able to concentrate on officiating rather than also keeping time. A report in The Irish Times Pictorial, a weekly published between 1942-1958, reflected on the fate of the Bogue Clock at congress. 'Opinions were divided on the wisdom of having a clock at all in Croke Park. The system of leaving the referee to keep an eye on the time and on the play, while making up broken time, appears to be the popular idea,' the report said. 'In support of the system [status quo] a Cork delegate said that Cork had lost five All-Irelands by a point, in each case near time and had never questioned the referee's ability to play full time.' This may have been in solidarity with the county's Paddy O'Keeffe, who was general secretary of the GAA at the time, and who had expressed the view that discussions on the Bogue Clock might be seen as an unwelcome reflection on the association's referees.
Irish Daily Mirror
2 days ago
- Irish Daily Mirror
Armagh's Oisin O'Neill: Players 'frustrated' at continuously changing rules
Oisin O'Neill says it's "frustrating" for players that the rules of the game are still changing with less than six weeks of the season remaining. The latest alteration from Jim Gavin's Football Review Committee (FRC) comes to a new regulation they brought in themselves a few weeks ago. In the initial tweak a player that caught a kickout cleanly for a mark and elected to play on couldn't be challenged for four metres. The 50 metre penalty for contact in such a scenario proved draconian and often resulted in two point frees being scored - all based on a split second judgement by referees around the catch and the consequent play. However, the FRC have acted again and the punishment for such an offence will now be a free from where the contact occurred, a major reduction in the penalty for such a breach. This has led to fears that every time a player catches a kickout cleanly and tries to play on they will be fouled straight away. Armagh boss Kieran McGeeney was one of those to voice reservations, citing his concerns following his side's weekend defeat by Galway. 'I think Kieran's biggest issue is that they (rules) constantly change,' said Oisin O'Neill. 'We played half the League and then they changed and now they're talking about another change this week. 'There are four rounds of the championship left. like. I think Kieran has no issue with the rules. It's more just that they keep continuously changing. 'As players, that's frustrating because you're working on one thing one week and then it might change. But look, whatever it is it is, and we'll be ready for the quarter-final in two weeks. 'At the end of Round 5 they changed it. We probably had to tweak a few things that we had been working on and change certain things that we were trying to work on.' O'Neill, often a target for Armagh's long kickouts says the mark can work if it is officiated 'in the spirit that the rules depend on.' 'You have to allow a little bit of leeway for players to compete for the ball,' he continued. 'I think it's a reflection of how well coached they are. We were punished severely by it at the weekend and it's something that we wouldn't be happy with.'
RTÉ News
3 days ago
- RTÉ News
Oisín O'Neill: Kieran McGeeney's issue not with rules but constant tweaks
Kieran McGeeney's regular criticism of the FRC rule changes relates not to the rules themselves but the fact that they're constantly changing, according to Oisín O'Neill. This week saw the contentious 50m penalty for impeding a kickout mark buried before the commencement of the All-Ireland SFC knockout phase. This, despite earlier assurances in the wake of the league that the rules were set in stone for the rest of 2025, at least. Central Council voted - by 39 votes to one - to remove the 50m mark and replace with an on-the-spot free. On Saturday, it was confirmed that the FRC had proposed the abolition of the 50m penalty with immediate effect. Following his side's narrow defeat to Galway in Kingspan Breffni that evening, McGeeney lashed out at the decision to enact changes at a relatively late stage in the championship. "Some teams tell them to do something, I'd love that direct line," McGeeney said after the game. "Whoever has that direct line into Jim (Gavin) and Eamonn (Fitzmaurice), I would love that." Following the Cork-Kerry game in Round 2 of the group stage, both managers had criticised the 50m mark, with Jack O'Connor labelling it "ridiculous" and saying it was "going to have to be tidied up." While McGeeney has a reputation for being hostile to the FRC changes, O'Neill insists it's just the constant tweaking which was proving a headache for managers and players. "I think Kieran's biggest issue with them is they constantly change. We played half the league and they changed them," O'Neill said, at the launch of the All-Ireland SFC knockout stage. "They're talking about another change this week. There's four rounds of the championship left! "I think Kieran has no issue with the rules. It's more just that they're continuously changing. "As players, that's frustrating because you're working on one thing one week and then it might change." After five rounds of the league, the FRC introduced a major tweak, with teams now obliged to keep four players in their own half at all times to prevent the roaming goalkeeper functioning as an extra man in attack. "We probably had to tweak a few things that we've been working on and change certain things that we were trying to work on," O'Neill said. "Such as the mark, you know, you had to hold your hands up after going up and now you're being told you've five steps or whatever." As to whether he agreed with the kickout mark, O'Neill said it was fine as long as referees allowed players to compete for the ball. "I think if it's refereed in the spirit that the rules intended, you have to allow a little bit of leeway like for players to compete for the ball, but I think it's a reflection of how well coached you are. "And we were punished severely by it at the weekend, and it's something that we wouldn't be happy with." Follow a live blog on the All-Ireland Football Championship on Saturday and Sunday on and the RTÉ News app. Listen to updates on Saturday Sport and Sunday Sport on RTÉ Radio 1. Watch highlights on The Saturday Game at 9.15pm and The Sunday Game from 9.30pm on RTÉ2 and RTÉ Player.
