PAS condemns US attack on Iran
PETALING JAYA: The attack on Iran by the United States is a violation of sovereignty and a war crime under international law, says PAS president Tan Sri Abdul Hadi Awang.
He said that the attack amounts to an invasion that contravenes the United Nations Charter.
'This act not only violates Iran's sovereignty but also constitutes a war crime that clearly breaches international law and the UN Charter,' he said on Sunday (June 22).
He said that the assault reveals the 'true nature' of the US and its ally, Israel, accusing them of acting like terrorists with no regard for international norms.
'This attack exposes the true face of the United States and its ally, Israel, as terrorists who blatantly disregard international law and universal humanitarian values,' he added.
He urged the UN Security Council and the Organisation of Islamic Cooperation to take firm action against this aggression.
'PAS calls for strong and immediate action from the UN Security Council and the OIC to halt this aggression and to condemn the arrogance of the United States, which remains a staunch ally of the illegitimate Israeli regime,' he said. Follow us on our official WhatsApp channel for breaking news alerts and key updates!
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New Straits Times
2 hours ago
- New Straits Times
12 Malaysians still in Iran, Wisma Putra monitoring closely
SEPANG: At least 12 Malaysians are still in Iran and are being closely monitored by Malaysian authorities following the successful evacuation of its citizens and their dependents over the weekend. Malaysian Ambassador to Iran Khairi Omar, who led the evacuation mission, said the remaining individuals include students and Malaysians married to Iranian nationals, currently residing in various parts of the country including Tehran and Shiraz. "We are keeping track of their whereabouts and ensuring they are safe. "Should the situation permit and they choose to leave, we will assist them," he said during a press conference at Kuala Lumpur International Airport (KLIA) late Sunday night. Khairi had accompanied 24 evacuees, comprising 17 Malaysians, six Iranian dependents, and a Singaporean, who arrived safely in Kuala Lumpur after a gruelling 1,000km overland journey from Tehran to the Turkmenistan border. He said the group spent the night at the border before flying out of Ashgabat, Turkmenistan and transiting in Thailand en route to Malaysia. "We were on the road for over 24 hours. It was a long and challenging journey, but Alhamdulillah, everything went smoothly," he said. Khairi said they decided to use an eastern land route was made to avoid areas of conflict in the west, following heightened tensions due to Israeli strikes on Iranian targets. This, he said, as the evacuation involved multiple checkpoints and long delays due to the high number of foreign nationals also attempting to leave the country, but praised the cooperation from the Iranian and Turkmen authorities in facilitating the border crossing. He added that communication with Malaysians in Iran remained difficult, with roaming services restricted and messaging apps like WhatsApp heavily affected during the conflict. "We made do with old-school SMS messaging, which still worked locally. It wasn't easy, but we managed to stay in contact," he said. Reflecting on the initial days of the conflict, Khairi said the embassy had not anticipated the intensity or speed of the escalation. "Many were caught off guard. The nights were tense with retaliatory strikes, but during the day there seemed to be a pattern of restraint," he said. On Saturday, Foreign Minister Datuk Seri Mohamad Hasan ordered the temporary closure of the Malaysian embassy in Iran, directing embassy staff in the country to return home immediately. Mohamad said that many other foreign missions have done the same following the latest developments in the Middle East involving Israel. The United States announced its entry into the Iran-Israel conflict earlier, stating that it has carried out attacks on three Iranian nuclear sites, including the underground uranium enrichment facility at Fordow.
New Straits Times
3 hours ago
- New Straits Times
Iran executes man convicted of being spy for Israel: Judiciary
TEHRAN: Iran executed a man on Sunday who was convicted of being an agent for Israel's Mossad spy service, the judiciary said, as the two foes traded fire for a 10th day. "Majid Mosayebi... was hanged this morning after going through the full process of criminal procedure and after his sentence was confirmed by the Supreme Court," the judiciary's Mizan Online website said. Mosayebi was accused of seeking to provide "sensitive information... to Mossad." Iran has carried out multiple arrests of people suspected of spying for Israel since the start of its bombing campaign against the Islamic republic on June 13. Later Sunday, judiciary spokesman Asghar Jahangir said three people had been arrested in the western province of Kermanshah on allegations of espionage. The arrests were made thanks to "the rapid presence of the population and their assistance to the intelligence services, law enforcement agencies and judicial officers", he said. "One of them is said to be a national of a European country," he added, quoted by Mizan. Jahangir also announced that "special judicial branches would be formed" in provincial prosecutors' offices and courts to handle Israeli-linked espionage cases on an "extraordinary" basis.
New Straits Times
3 hours ago
- New Straits Times
Asean not morally ambiguous
AS the war in Gaza grinds on, some have begun to question Asean's moral posture, suggesting it is caught between ethical clarity and geopolitical caution. A recent Nikkei Asia editorial, for instance, claimed Asean suffers from a strategic and moral dilemma in responding to the Israel-Palestine conflict. However, far from being paralysed, Asean has consistently supported a peaceful resolution based on international law. Since the 1970s, Asean has endorsed the two-state solution as the only viable path towards lasting peace. This includes support for United Nations Security Council Resolutions 242 and 338, the 1993 Oslo Accords, and the 2002 Arab Peace Initiative — also known as the Makkah Accord. These are firm commitments to legality, diplomacy and human rights. The claim that Asean has been muted or morally ambiguous dismisses the role played by key member states — especially Malaysia and Indonesia. Both have consistently condemned Israeli aggression and voiced support for Palestinian self-determination. Singapore, while maintaining diplomatic relations with Israel, has also supported peaceful coexistence and a two-state solution grounded in rule of law. Asean has chosen collective consensus and sustained diplomacy over reactionary statements or token gestures. If paralysis exists, it is not within Asean, but within Israel's long-standing policy of rejectionism. Since the assassination of prime minister Yitzhak Rabin in 1995, successive Israeli governments have walked away from every serious peace initiative. The expansion of illegal settlements, the military blockade of Gaza and discriminatory policies against Arab citizens have created a system many have likened to apartheid. The tragic events of Oct 7, 2023, have been cited by Israel to justify its indiscriminate bombardment of Gaza's hospitals, schools and refugee camps. Entire neighbourhoods have been flattened. Food, water and fuel have been denied to over two million civilians, more than half of whom are children. This is not self-defence — it is collective punishment, forbidden under international humanitarian law. Asean, by contrast, has called for an immediate ceasefire, unimpeded humanitarian access and a return to negotiations. What Asean cannot do — because of geography and geopolitical limits — is intervene in a war sustained by decades of US vetoes at the UN Security Council and continuous arms support for Israel from Washington, London and Berlin. Notably, even within Europe there is growing unease. Belgium, Spain, Norway and Ireland have moved towards recognising Palestine as a sovereign state. They have criticised Israel's starvation tactics and disproportionate use of force. This shift is not an abandonment of Western alliances — it is a recognition that peace cannot be achieved through occupation and siege. Asean's position has also found resonance across the Global South. At the Asean-GCC Summit in October 2023, both blocs jointly reaffirmed their support for the two-state solution and peaceful coexistence. Asean's alignment with the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC), the UN and the Arab League signals a unified call for justice — not through military intervention, but through diplomatic resolve. Asean does not practise megaphone diplomacy. Its strength lies in principled patience and coordinated regional consensus. Unlike Western powers, which condemn Russia's invasion of Ukraine but defend Israeli strikes on Gaza, Asean does not apply moral standards selectively. What many forget is that this is not a war between two equal sides. It is the latest chapter in a prolonged occupation that began in 1967. To fault Asean for not taking sides in such a structurally unequal conflict is to conflate strategic restraint with moral apathy. Indeed, Asean's restraint is its greatest diplomatic asset. By refusing to inflame tensions or escalate rhetoric, Asean positions itself as a principled bloc that adheres to international norms. Malaysia and Indonesia, as prominent members of the Organisation of Islamic Cooperation, have also spoken not just for Muslims, but for all who uphold dignity, justice and legality. The tragedy of Gaza is the failure of Israel to embrace coexistence, to respect international law and to heed decades of global appeals for peace. Asean has made its position clear: the only path forward is an end to occupation and the realisation of Palestinian statehood. Until that happens, it is not Asean's credibility that should be questioned — it is Israel's.
