logo
Why a Law Requiring Gas Detectors Is a Headache for Landlords

Why a Law Requiring Gas Detectors Is a Headache for Landlords

New York Times24-04-2025

Good morning. It's Thursday. Today we'll find out about a requirement for natural gas detectors that many apartment buildings in New York City will be hard-pressed to comply with. And, with the Democratic primary for mayor now two months away, we'll also have details on four new endorsements and one candidate's campaign strategy.
A week from today, a statute known as Local Law 157 is scheduled to go into effect in New York City, imposing a seemingly mundane requirement that many buildings will find themselves hard-pressed to comply with.
Local Law 157 says that a detector that can sense the buildup of natural gas must be installed wherever there is a gas-powered appliance — in every kitchen with a gas stove and every laundry room with a gas dryer.
New York is the first major city to require such devices along with smoke alarms and carbon monoxide detectors. But for buildings that prefer battery-powered detectors over plug-in ones, there is a holdup: Only one company makes battery-operated units that meet standards set by Local Law 157. Suppliers say that shipments cannot arrive fast enough.
That has many building owners and superintendents worried about missing the May 1 deadline. But housing inspectors will not immediately issue violations while the city works out details on enforcement.
One City Council member, Eric Dinowitz, a Democrat from the Bronx, said he had circulated a letter signed by 17 other Council members calling on the Department of Buildings to 'intervene and pump the brakes on this thing.' But a spokesman for the agency said it could not stop the law from going into effect.
'The purpose of this law was not to become more of a burden on buildings,' Dinowitz said. 'It's ostensibly to promote safety.' He said the Council was also working on drafting new legislation 'to be realistic about implementation.'
Some managing agents fear that having detectors in every apartment will lead to unnecessary calls to 311 or 911 and to building-wide gas shut-offs. They also worry that it could take months to satisfy requirements for turning the gas on again, leaving residents to cook on hot plates and hang their clothes up to dry.
It has taken nine years for Local Law 157 to reach this moment. The City Council passed it after three major gas explosions that killed 10 people and injured more than 70 over 18 months. One in 2014 destroyed a building on Park Avenue in Harlem. There were two in 2015, one that leveled three buildings on Second Avenue in the East Village and another at John F. Kennedy High School in the Bronx.
But as drafted by the City Council, Local Law 157 was not to take effect until after there was a national standard for gas detectors. The National Fire Protection Association, a nonprofit group that prepares safety codes that state and local governments often adopt as their own, eventually published a standard. The city's Buildings Department, in turn, published its own version last year.
That started a countdown — Local Law 157 said it would take effect on May 1 of the year after the standard was finalized — and a scramble to find devices that comply and are listed and labeled UL1484, signifying that they have been tested by the independent laboratory formerly known as Underwriters Laboratories.
'The demand has skyrocketed in the last 60 days, and we're unable to keep up,' said Evan Jacobs, the director of operations for F&F Supply, a Bronx company whose customers include apartment buildings. 'We are getting calls from large management companies that I have been reaching to for a year that are saying, 'This is finally going into effect, and I don't have devices.''
For many resident managers, the instructions in Local Law 157 about where to place the detectors are problematic. It says they are to go within 12 inches of a ceiling, at least five feet from a stove or cooktop hood and between three and 10 feet from other types of gas-powered appliances.
The height requirement is 'impractical,' said John Rusk, the president of ProSentry, a company that installs building monitoring systems. 'Other than the occasional outlet for a kitchen clock, there are not regularly installed electrical outlets' a foot from the ceiling 'in any New York City apartment that I've ever seen, and no one wants an electrical cord stringing across their kitchen.'
That has left building managers looking for battery-powered models that meet the standards the city adopted. That, in turn, has led them to an Illinois-based company, DeNova Detect, that says it makes the only battery-powered detectors that comply.
The detectors were originally made only in Japan. Ron Lazarus, the chief executive of DeNova Detect, said that the company had added a factory in Mexico and was shipping 'significant quantities' to New York. He would not say how many.
But those who waited to place orders will wait for deliveries. Paul Xuereb, a vice president for Tri-Star Equities, a property management firm, said that about 60 buildings in its portfolio had not ordered detectors. 'We're not going to get them till August,' he said, adding that he had even tried Amazon. But it too said the DeNova Detect alarm was unavailable.
Expect a sunny day with the temperature reaching the low 70s. The evening will be mostly clear with a drop to around 57.
In effect until May 26 (Memorial Day).
The latest Metro news
Four endorsements and a 'Rose Garden' strategy
The race for mayor was shaken up by four endorsements for Adrienne Adams, the City Council speaker. Three came from unions, including District Council 37, the city's largest municipal union. The fourth came from Letitia James, the state attorney general.
My colleague Emma G. Fitzsimmons writes that the labor endorsements were a sign that the front-runner, former Gov. Andrew Cuomo, won't get all the institutional support in the race against Mayor Eric Adams. Speaker Adams, who is not related to the mayor, announced her campaign later than the eight other major candidates in the June 24 Democratic primary.
James, who appeared with Speaker Adams and leaders of the three unions at a rally on Wednesday, said that Speaker Adams had the experience and integrity to run the city. And, making an indirect but unmistakable reference to Cuomo, she urged voters not to 'look to the past' or to candidates seeking 'political revenge or even redemption.'
Cuomo is following a so-called Rose Garden strategy in his tightly controlled campaign, attending a small number of events that allow him to avoid confrontational interactions with his opponents.
He used the same strategy when he ran for re-election as governor. This time around, he does not have the benefit of incumbency, and he is drawing criticism from his opponents, including the actual incumbent. Mayor Eric Adams said Cuomo has been hiding 'in the shadows.'
'He's in this bubble — you can't even get near him,' the mayor said at a news conference last month. He added: 'He controls walking in. He controls walking out. He's not answering questions from you.'
Play Ball
Dear Diary:
I was running some errands in my Upper West Side neighborhood on a Saturday in March.
First, I dropped off my shirts at the dry cleaner. From there, I walked briskly up Broadway. As I did, I approached and then began to pass an older man wearing a Yankees jacket. The lettering and logo on the front and back were gigantic.
With spring training in full swing, I asked how he thought the team was shaping up for Opening Day.
He shrugged and chuckled.
'I don't know,' he said. 'My cousin gave me this jacket.'
— Chris Parnagian
Illustrated by Agnes Lee. Send submissions here and read more Metropolitan Diary here.
Glad we could get together here. See you tomorrow. — J.B.
P.S. Here's today's Mini Crossword and Spelling Bee. You can find all our puzzles here.
Stefano Montali and Ed Shanahan contributed to New York Today. You can reach the team at nytoday@nytimes.com.
Sign up here to get this newsletter in your inbox.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Accused Minnesota assassin wildly claimed in ‘incoherent' letter that Gov. Tim Walz instructed him to kill Sen. Amy Klobuchar: report
Accused Minnesota assassin wildly claimed in ‘incoherent' letter that Gov. Tim Walz instructed him to kill Sen. Amy Klobuchar: report

New York Post

time32 minutes ago

  • New York Post

Accused Minnesota assassin wildly claimed in ‘incoherent' letter that Gov. Tim Walz instructed him to kill Sen. Amy Klobuchar: report

Accused Minnesota political assassin Vance Boetler wrote a deranged letter addressed to the FBI in which he wildly claimed Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz instructed him to kill Sen. Amy Klobuchar, according to a report. Boetler, 57, alleged in the rambling, conspiratorial letter that the former Democrat vice presidential candidate directed him to murder Klobuchar (D-MN) as part of a supposed plot for Walz to take her spot in the Senate, The Minnesota Star Tribune reported, citing people familiar with the writings. The letter, which is one and a half pages long, is mostly incoherent and gives insight into the muddled mind of the Minnesota madman, those sources told the outlet. Advertisement 5 Boetler is accused of killing Minnesota Representative Melissa Hortman and her husband and shooting state senator John Hoffman and his wife Yvette. Vance Boelter/Linkedin 5 Boelter was arrested on June 15, 2025. via REUTERS Neither Walz nor Klobuchar responded directly to the information contained in the letter but each issued statements on the shootings following the report. Advertisement 'Governor Walz is grateful to law enforcement who apprehended the shooter, and he's grateful to the prosecutors who will ensure justice is swiftly served,' Walz spokesman Teddy Tschann told the Star Tribune. Klobuchar said in a statement, 'Boetler is a very dangerous man and I am deeply grateful that law enforcement got him behind bars before he killed other people.' Boetler is accused of killing Minnesota House rep Melissa Hortman and her husband and shooting state senator John Hoffman and his wife Yvette in an early morning targeted attack on June 14 during which the alleged killer donned a creepy latex mask and wore a police officer's uniform. 5 A copy of notes the suspect allegedly wrote in his notebook. District Court of Minnesota Advertisement 5 Boetler alleged that he was ordered to murder Sen. Amy Klobuchar Getty Images 5 Neither Walz nor Klobuchar responded directly to the information contained in the letter. AP At the home of Hoffman, investigators got into a shootout with Boetler who fled — leaving behind a 'manifesto' that listed the names of 70 politicians to kill – including Gov. Walz who once appointed the 57-year-old to a state-wide board. Advertisement Boetler was captured in a wooded area in Sibley County on Sunday following the largest manhunt the Land of 10,000 Lakes has ever seen — with SWAT teams swarming after getting a tip from a local resident who spotted the fugitive on a trail cam, the Star Tribune reported. The maniac faces federal murder and stalking charges in addition to state charges and, if convicted, could face the death penalty.

Editorial: Mayor Brandon Johnson should not veto snap curfews
Editorial: Mayor Brandon Johnson should not veto snap curfews

Yahoo

time2 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Editorial: Mayor Brandon Johnson should not veto snap curfews

On Wednesday, Chicago's City Council passed by a vote of 27-22 an ordinance authorizing so-called 'snap curfews,' meaning that Chicago police will have the authority to get teenagers off the streets if they sense trouble is brewing. In essence, police Superintendent Larry Snelling would have the power to impose curfews in specific public areas within Chicago where large, unpermitted teen gatherings are beginning, or expected soon to form. The idea is that police officers would be able to tell those already assembled that they have 30 minutes either to go home or take a walk with just a couple of friends elsewhere. Mayor Brandon Johnson blasted the ordinance approved by a clear majority of aldermen and said he planned to issue a rare mayoral veto (the first since 2006, the Richard M. Daley era) in coming days. He should rethink that idea. We're aware of arguments against giving the police this power, especially given our long-standing interest in guarding civil liberties. We've been concerned about a couple of kids being inside a movie theater, for example, only to walk out onto the street without knowing about any curfew and then finding themselves in conflict with the police. We're also of the view that law-abiding teens must be welcomed downtown and that there is nothing illegal in gathering with friends on a warm summer's night, shooting the breeze. That's why we were against making the existing 10 p.m. curfew for Under 17s any earlier, and why we applaud Jahmal Cole, founder and CEO of 'My Block, My Hood, My City,' who is planning to bring over 1,500 teens, primarily from the South and West sides, into the business and cultural districts of downtown Chicago on July 19 for what he calls 'a day of exploration, belonging and new opportunities.' This will be the third year the nonprofit organization also known as M3 will have chaperoned an initiative powered by donors and volunteers; we hear Cole expects to have more participants than ever this year. The plan is both to make these teens feel like they belong downtown, as they should, and also to start to shift some negative perceptions among downtown business owners and workers. We hope everyone has a great time together. But there is often a tradeoff between civil liberties and crime prevention and, where minors are concerned, protection must come first. If it is handled right, this new police power might actually keep kids safer by pre-empting any trouble before it happens. And to think that there is no danger of such trouble when teens gather en masse downtown is to put your head in the sand when it comes to the lessons of recent history, especially as hot summer nights are upon us. Johnson claimed that the ordinance, introduced by Ald. Brian Hopkins (2nd), 'is counterproductive to the progress that we have made in reducing crime and violence in our city.' With all due respect, we don't see the merit of that argument. It should be seen as a tool. And let's remember that incidents of violent crime don't just affect tourists or the business district — they're usually worse for the kids caught up in any melee. No parent or grandparent wants a teen to get stuck around a group of hot-headed peers who might encourage them to do things they later have cause to regret and that impairs the progress of their promising young lives. Such scenarios typically terrify a teenager's loved ones. Perhaps most importantly here, the city's aldermen, many of whom represent the impacted families and know their communities very well, are telling the mayor loud and clear that they want this protection, not just for folks downtown but for the kids themselves. And the vote would suggest that these aldermen of the majority, such as Ald. Pat Dowell (3rd), trust Snelling to guard against any problems, which will mean using the ordinance very sparingly, offering as much advance notice as possible and focusing on de-escalation. Snelling already has said in several interviews that he will commit to that. Good. And if no snap curfew is ever needed this summer, all the better. Still, whatever his ideological misgivings or sense of being personally affronted, the mayor would be wise to listen to the City Council and add this ordinance to the police's toolbox for keeping everyone safe. Submit a letter, of no more than 400 words, to the editor here or email letters@

LA Mayor Rips JD Vance for Calling Senator Padilla 'Jose': 'How Dare You'
LA Mayor Rips JD Vance for Calling Senator Padilla 'Jose': 'How Dare You'

Newsweek

time2 hours ago

  • Newsweek

LA Mayor Rips JD Vance for Calling Senator Padilla 'Jose': 'How Dare You'

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Los Angeles Democratic Mayor Karen Bass ripped Vice President JD Vance on Friday after he referred to Democratic U.S. Senator Alex Padilla as "Jose." Newsweek reached out to the office of Bass for additional comment Friday night. Why It Matters Republican President Donald Trump has prioritized immigration control as a key pillar of his second administration. The president campaigned in 2024 on the promise of mass deportations and appointed Tom Homan as his administration's border czar to execute his agenda. Protests broke out this month in Los Angeles in reaction to numerous U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) raids in the area. Trump sent National Guard troops and U.S. Marines to Los Angeles amid the strife, against the wishes of California Democratic Governor Gavin Newsom. The move was ultimately reversed by a judge, restoring Newsom's control over the state's Guard forces. What To Know Kristi Noem, secretary of the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), scheduled a news conference in Los Angeles last week regarding the ongoing protests, and Padilla, a California Democrat, was in attendance. Video footage from the incident showed Padilla pushed to the ground and handcuffed outside the door while attempting to speak to Noem during the conference. Noem stopped speaking for a brief moment during the commotion, then immediately continued. The DHS said she met with Padilla for 15 minutes after the gathering. Vance on Friday landed in Los Angeles amid the Trump administration's ramped up ICE raids in the city. While speaking to reporters, he was asked a question in reference to Padilla's forced removal from Noem's briefing. "The New York Times just did a story" about lawmakers who "keep getting handcuffed, suggesting that ... the Trump administration is cracking down on Democrats," a reporter said. "Can you comment on that?" "Well, I was hoping Jose Padilla would be here to ask a question, but unfortunately, I guess he decided not to show up because there wasn't the theater," the vice president said. "And that's all it is. I think everybody realizes that's what this is." Bass afterward called out Vance, saying, "Mr. Vice President, how dare you disrespect our senator. You don't know his name," Bass questioned. "But yet you served with him before you were vice president and you continue to serve with him today, because the last time I checked, the vice president of the United States is the president of the U.S. Senate." Bass continued, "You serve with him today and how dare you disrespect him and call him 'Jose.' But I guess he just looked like anybody to you. Well, he's not just anybody to us. He is our senator." When asked about the incident, a Vance spokesperson previously told Newsweek that "He must have mixed up two people who have broken the law." Bass has been a stanch critic of the Trump administration amid the ICE raids throughout the City of Angels and vowed to stand in solidarity with immigrant communities in her city. The mayor has also called for peaceful protests and condemned any violence in reaction to immigration initiatives set in motion by the White House. She also set a curfew for a portion of downtown Los Angeles amid the ongoing unrest. Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass speaks at a candlelight vigil on June 10 in Los Angeles. (Photo by) Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass speaks at a candlelight vigil on June 10 in Los Angeles. (Photo by) What People Are Saying Newsom on X, formerly Twitter, on Friday: "JD Vance served with Alex Padilla in the United States Senate. Calling him 'Jose Padilla' is not an accident." Padilla posted to X on Friday: "I asked a question—and ended up in handcuffs. If this is how the Trump administration treats a U.S. Senator in broad daylight, imagine what they're doing to immigrants behind closed doors. We cannot stay silent. We will not back down." California Democratic Senator Adam Schiff wrote on X Friday: "JD Vance served alongside Alex Padilla, and knows better. He's taking this cheap shot to distract from the real fear and havoc this Administration is creating. It's pathetic." What Happens Next It is believed that the Trump administration will continue executing his campaign promise of mass deportations throughout the country.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store