WazirX Offers Partial Repayment Amid Court‑Mandated Restructuring
WazirX has unveiled a revised restructuring plan under Singapore High Court oversight that proposes to repay approximately 85% of users' pre‑hack balances, while the remaining 15% would be settled over time through a Recovery Token mechanism. A final court decision is expected by 20 June, setting the stage for ensuing repayments.
A hack that occurred on 18 July 2024 led to the theft of nearly US $235 million from the exchange's wallets, widely attributed to North Korean Lazarus Group operatives. WazirX parent company Zettai Pte Ltd subsequently secured a moratorium in Singapore and initiated a formal Scheme of Arrangement allowing creditors to vote on recovery proposals.
By April, rebalancing of assets was completed, enabling the exchange to present each affected user's USD and INR valuations based on their 18 July 2024 holdings. Around 93% of creditors voted in favour of this plan in April, far exceeding the 75% threshold required by law.
ADVERTISEMENT
Under the scheme, the initial payment—estimated at 85% of the original holdings—would be disbursed in either the original asset or USDT within ten business days of court approval. The remaining 15% would be issued as RTs, tradable tokens redeemable via quarterly buybacks funded from WazirX's profits or recovered assets.
Risks remain, however: if creditors reject the plan, the court may order liquidation under Section 301 of the Singapore Companies Act. That scenario could trigger asset fire‑sales, reducing recovery potential and extending the timeline until 2030.
Community reaction is mixed. Many users have expressed doubts over the exchange's transparency and the partial compensation model. Subreddits suggest a collective legal response is forming in Kerala and beyond. One user asserted:
'If anyone still believes that WazirX will return our funds without us taking any action — that hope is gone after yesterday's court decision.'
Meanwhile, creditor‑activist voices have argued the restructuring represents a better outcome than liquidation. As one FTX creditor remarked, it is 'far superior to liquidation' for preserving value.
CoinSwitch has also launched a parallel initiative named CoinSwitch Cares, offering affected users a potential path to full recovery—up to ₹600 crore—with added incentives for sign‑ups and referrals. However, that scheme depends on WazirX restoring withdrawal functionality.
The Singapore High Court's deadline of 20 June will determine whether the court grants final sanction to WazirX's Scheme of Arrangement. Should it proceed, initial disbursements would begin between late June and July. If it's rejected, WazirX would head into liquidation—triggering a protracted, uncertain payout stretching possibly until 2030, with potentially deep losses.
WazirX's recovery architecture combines immediate restitution and long‑term tools designed to align creditor outcomes with the firm's future performance. The RT buyback mechanism underscores this approach, offering users potential upside linked to the exchange's profitability and asset recovery.
Users must act to verify claims through WazirX's Claim Tracker, accept the rebalanced valuations, and monitor further updates. Approval hinges on the court's formal order and the willingness of creditors to embrace a controlled, phased repayment versus the uncertain prospects of full liquidation.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Crypto Insight
4 hours ago
- Crypto Insight
ZachXBT slams Bitcoin bridge Garden Finance for laundering hacked funds
Blockchain sleuth ZachXBT has accused Garden Finance, which brands itself as 'the fastest Bitcoin bridge,' of facilitating the laundering of funds linked to major crypto thefts, including the Bybit hack. In a June 21 post on X, ZachXBT claimed that over 80% of Garden's recent fee revenue stemmed from illicit transactions allegedly tied to the North Korean Lazarus Group. The allegation came in response to an earlier post by Jaz Gulati, a co-founder of Garden Finance, who had recently touted the platform's success, citing 38.86 Bitcoin in collected fees — $300,000 of which was earned over the 12 days ending June 2. 'You conveniently left out >80% of your fees came from Chinese launderers moving Lazarus Group funds from the Bybit hack,' ZachXBT said. Laundering via centralized liquidity ZachXBT further alleged that that a single actor continuously topped up cbBTC liquidity from Coinbase, effectively fueling illicit flows while Garden claimed to operate a trustless and decentralized model. 'Explain how it is 'decentralized' when I watched in real time for multiple days as a single entity kept topping up cbBTC liquidity from Coinbase,' ZachXBT wrote, questioning the project's claims of decentralization. In response, Garden Finance founder Jaz Gulati denied the allegations, pointing out that 30 BTC in fees were collected prior to the Bybit incident. He dismissed the criticism as misinformation, calling the 'fake decentralized' label baseless. Garden Finance claims to enable crosschain swaps within 30 seconds while offering zero-custody risk. According to its Dune Analytics dashboard, the project has facilitated over 24,984 BTC in total volume, equivalent to more than $1.5 billion, across 40,571 atomic swaps. The platform has collected 40.11 BTC in fees to date, with its largest single swap reaching 10 BTC. Cointelegraph reached out to Jaz for comment via X but had not received a response by publication. Crypto founder accused of laundering $530M Last week, Iurii Gugnin, the founder of crypto payments firm Evita Pay, was arrested in New York. He faces 22 federal charges tied to a sprawling money laundering scheme allegedly involving over $530 million. According to the US Department of Justice, Gugnin facilitated stablecoin transactions that enabled clients connected to sanctioned Russian banks, such as Sberbank and VTB, to bypass restrictions and gain access to sensitive US technologies. Prosecutors say the operation ran from June 2023 through January 2025. Gugnin is charged with wire fraud, money laundering, and running an unlicensed money transmission business. If found guilty, he could face a life sentence. Source:
Arabian Post
7 hours ago
- Arabian Post
Apple Hit with Lawsuit Over AI Timeline Claims
Apple is facing a class action securities fraud lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, with shareholders led by Eric Tucker accusing the company and its top executives of misleading investors about the readiness of its Apple Intelligence platform—particularly the advanced Siri features. The suit alleges that assurances made during the June 2024 Worldwide Developers Conference implied that AI-driven upgrades would be available in the iPhone 16, despite the absence of a working prototype and no realistic timeline for deployment. The complaint identifies CEO Tim Cook, CFO Kevan Parekh and former CFO Luca Maestri as defendants, asserting that they downplayed the time needed to integrate advanced AI into Siri. Defendants are accused of misrepresentation and securities fraud after shareholders suffered substantial losses following Apple's admission of delays on March 7, pushing Siri enhancements to 2026. The class period covers the year ending June 9 2025, during which Apple's share price has fallen by almost 25 per cent from its December 26 2024 peak—erasing around US $900 billion in market value. Plaintiffs claim Apple's AI rollout was significantly more modest than anticipated. While Apple did launch features like Writing Tools and Image Playgrounds in late 2024, enhanced Siri—a major selling point of Apple Intelligence—did not materialise. At the June 2025 Worldwide Developers Conference, upgrades were again muted, disappointing analysts and intensifying investor frustration. ADVERTISEMENT Central to the lawsuit is an alleged gap between Apple's public statements and the internal progress of its AI projects. Shareholders contend that Apple lacked a functional Siri prototype at the time of its WWDC 2024 announcement, rendering its claims unrealistic. Observers like tech commentator John Gruber described those AI demonstrations as 'vaporware,' a view echoed in the suit's filing. The lawsuit highlights systemic challenges Apple faces in communicating its AI strategy to investors. It suggests that the company's announcements gave a misleading impression that advanced Siri capabilities would be a key differentiator for the iPhone 16 experience. As one unnamed industry analyst noted, while the company admitted delay in March, it did not appear again in June to give clarity or reassurance, further eroding confidence. Apple has not yet issued an official statement in response to the lawsuit. In prior cases, such as the 2025 settlement of US $95 million over Siri privacy issues, the company has defended its actions while emphasising its commitment to user privacy and software quality. The legal claim raises questions about expectations set for Apple Intelligence, which faced criticism in early reviews for being underwhelming. Observers like The Verge's Allison Johnson labelled notification summaries a modest step, pointing to a broader trend: while Apple's AI narrative emphasised 'transformative' features, actual releases—including Siri enhancements—have fallen short. This lawsuit joins a growing wave of scrutiny directed at tech giants over AI disclosure practices. Apple's legal challenge follows earlier litigation in March 2025 alleging false advertising tied to Apple Intelligence being promoted in major marketing campaigns ahead of delivery. That earlier suit, filed in San Jose, referenced widespread airwaves coverage and featuring actor Bella Ramsey, alleging those ads cultivated unreasonable expectations among consumers. Apple is now at a critical juncture. Having marketed Siri's next-generation capabilities as central to its AI push, the company must address whether its internal timelines align with public messaging—and whether investors were misled. The outcome of this suit could define legal boundaries around tech disclosures and reshape how Apple—and its competitors—manage expectations in the rapidly growing AI landscape.
Khaleej Times
7 hours ago
- Khaleej Times
Airlines continue to avoid Middle East airspace after US attacks Iran nuclear sites
Airlines continued to avoid large parts of the Middle East on Sunday after US strikes on Iranian nuclear sites, according to flight tracking website FlightRadar24, with traffic already skirting airspace in the region due to recent missile exchanges. "Following US attacks on Iranian nuclear facilities, commercial traffic in the region is operating as it has since new airspace restrictions were put into place last week," FlightRadar24 said on social media platform X. Its website showed airlines were not flying in the airspace over Iran, Iraq, Syria and Israel. They have chosen other routings such as north via the Caspian Sea or south via Egypt and Saudi Arabia, even if it results in higher fuel and crew costs and longer flight times. Missile and drone barrages in an expanding number of conflict zones globally represent a high risk to airline traffic. Stay up to date with the latest news. Follow KT on WhatsApp Channels. Safe Airspace, a website run by OPSGROUP, a membership-based organisation that shares flight risk information, said on Sunday that the US attacks on Iran may increase risks to US operators in the region. "While there have been no specific threats made against civil aviation, Iran has previously warned it would retaliate by attacking US military interests in the Middle East — either directly or via proxies such as Hezbollah," Safe Airspace said. Since Israel launched strikes on Iran on June 13, carriers have suspended flights to destinations in the affected countries, though there have been some evacuation flights from neighbouring nations and some bringing stranded Israelis home. In the days before the US strikes on Iran, American Airlines suspended flights to Qatar, and United Airlines did the same with flights to Dubai. Safe Airspace said it was possible airspace risks could now extend to countries including Bahrain, Kuwait, Oman, Qatar, Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates. "We continue to advise a high degree of caution at this time," it said. Israel's largest carriers, El Al Israel Airlines, Arkia and Israir, said on Sunday they were suspending rescue flights that allowed people to return to Israel until further notice. El Al said it would also extend its cancellation of scheduled flights through June 27. Israel's airports authority said the country's airspace was closed for all flights, but land crossings with Egypt and Jordan remained open. Tens of thousands of Israelis and others who had booked tickets to Israel are stuck abroad. At the same time, nearly 40,000 tourists in Israel are looking to leave the country, some of whom are going via Jordan's borders to Amman and others by boat to Cyprus. The tourism ministry is trying to facilitate getting these people out. Japan's foreign ministry said on Sunday it had evacuated 21 people, including 16 Japanese nationals, from Iran overland to Azerbaijan. It said it was the second such evacuation since Thursday and that it would conduct further evacuations if necessary. New Zealand's government said on Sunday it would send a Hercules military transport plane to the Middle East on standby to evacuate New Zealanders from the region. It said in a statement that government personnel and a C-130J Hercules aircraft would leave Auckland on Monday. The plane would take some days to reach the region, it said. The government was also in talks with commercial airlines to assess how they may be able to assist, it added.
