
No intention of responding to tariffs imposed by Trump administration — Pakistan finmin
ISLAMABAD: Pakistani Finance Minister Muhammad Aurangzeb has said Islamabad was concerned about new tariffs imposed by the US administration of President Donald Trump but had no intentions of imposing reciprocal taxes, BBC reported on Sunday.
Islamabad would have been slapped with a 29% tariff rate before Trump's temporary suspension announcement on Wednesday. A 10% blanket duty on almost all US imports will remain in effect, the White House has said.
'There is a minimum tariff of 10% and then there is an additional tariff, I think we need to talk about this issue,' Aurangzeb said in an interview to the BBC.
In response to a question about reciprocal tariffs, he said: 'If your question is whether we are going to give any response [to the US] in return, the answer is no.'
'There is a situation of uncertainty, and we all have to think about how to move forward with this new world order,' the finance minister added.
When asked if he felt Pakistan was losing out in the tug-of-war between the US and China, he said Washington had been a 'strategic partner' of Pakistan for a long time, not just in trade but also in other sectors, while relations with China were important in their own right.
A study by the Pakistan Institute of Development Economics (PIDE) entitled 'Impact of Unilateral Tariff Increase by United States on Pakistani Exports' said this month when added to the existing 8.6% Most Favored Nation (MFN) tariff, the total duty after the imposition of the 29% tariff could reach 37.6%. This would likely result in a 20-25% decline in Pakistani exports to the US, translating into an annual loss of $1.1-1.4 billion, with the textile sector bearing the brunt of the blow.
The textile sector in Pakistan generates about $17 billion in exports and is the largest employer in the country, according to the Pakistan Textile Council. The industry is expected to face significant challenges from the tariffs, with potential losses of up to $2 billion in textile exports estimated by experts if the 29% tariff rate is reinstated after Trump's 90-day pause ends.
Despite the risks, the PIDE reports also view the tariffs crisis as an 'opportunity for strategic transformation.'
In the short term, it recommended that Pakistan engage in high-level diplomatic efforts to highlight the mutual costs of the tariffs and preserve long-standing trade relations. In the long term, it called for the need to diversify both export products and markets, seeing destinations such as the European Union, China, Asean nations, Africa and the Middle East as offering growth potential in sectors like IT, halal food, processed foods and sports goods.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Asharq Al-Awsat
5 hours ago
- Asharq Al-Awsat
Pakistan to Nominate Trump for Nobel Peace Prize
Pakistan said on Saturday it would recommend US President Donald Trump for the Nobel Peace Prize, an accolade that he has said he craves, for his work in helping to resolve the recent conflict between India and Pakistan. Some analysts in Pakistan said the move might persuade Trump to think again about potentially joining Israel in striking Iran's nuclear facilities. Pakistan has condemned Israel's action as a violation of international law and a threat to regional stability. In May, a surprise announcement by Trump of a ceasefire brought an abrupt end to a four-day conflict between nuclear-armed foes India and Pakistan. Trump has since repeatedly said that he averted a nuclear war, saved millions of lives, and grumbled that he got no credit for it. Pakistan agrees that US diplomatic intervention ended the fighting, but India says it was a bilateral agreement between the two militaries. "President Trump demonstrated great strategic foresight and stellar statesmanship through robust diplomatic engagement with both Islamabad and New Delhi, which de-escalated a rapidly deteriorating situation," Pakistan said. "This intervention stands as a testament to his role as a genuine peacemaker." Governments can nominate people for the Nobel Peace Prize. There was no immediate response from Washington. A spokesperson for the Indian government did not respond to a request for comment. Trump has repeatedly said that he's willing to mediate between India and Pakistan over the disputed Kashmir region, their main source of enmity. Islamabad, which has long called for international attention to Kashmir, is delighted. But his stance has upended US policy in South Asia, which had favored India as a counterweight to China, and put in question previously close relations between Trump and Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi. In a social media post on Friday, Trump gave a long list of conflicts he said he had resolved, including India and Pakistan and the Abraham accords in his first term between Israel and some Arab countries. He added: "I won't get a Nobel Peace Prize no matter what I do." Pakistan's move to nominate Trump came in the same week its army chief, Field Marshal Asim Munir, met the US leader for lunch. It was the first time that a Pakistani military leader had been invited to the White House when a civilian government was in place in Islamabad. Trump's planned meeting with Modi at the G7 summit in Canada last week did not take place after the US president left early, but the two later spoke by phone, in which Modi said "India does not and will never accept mediation" in its dispute with Pakistan, according to the Indian government. Mushahid Hussain, a former chair of the Senate Defense Committee in Pakistan's parliament, suggested nominating Trump for the peace prize was justified. "Trump is good for Pakistan," he said. "If this panders to Trump's ego, so be it. All the European leaders have been sucking up to him big time."

Al Arabiya
6 hours ago
- Al Arabiya
Ukraine asks allies to allocate 0.25 percent of GDP to boost its weapon production
President Volodymyr Zelenskyy has called on Ukraine's Western partners to allocate 0.25 percent of their GDP to helping Kyiv ramp up weapons production and said the country plans to sign agreements this summer to start exporting weapon production technologies. In remarks released for publication by his office on Saturday, Zelenskyy said Ukraine was in talks with Denmark, Norway, Germany, Canada, the United Kingdom, and Lithuania to launch joint weapon production. 'Ukraine is part of Europe's security and we want 0.25 percent of the GDP of a particular partner country to be allocated for our defense industry and domestic production,' Zelenskyy said. As the war with a bigger and better-equipped Russia has intensified in recent weeks, Ukraine's need for new weapons and ammunition is constantly growing. This year Kyiv had secured $43 billion to finance its domestic weapon production, Zelenskyy said. Member nations of the NATO military alliance are expected to meet next week in The Hague, to discuss higher defense spending. NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte has proposed that countries should each agree to spend 5 percent of their GDP on defense and security measures. Zelenskyy said he was likely to visit the NATO summit, adding that several meetings with Western leaders had been set up on the sidelines. He also said that he hoped to meet U.S. President Donald Trump. Last week, Zelenskyy attended the Group of Seven summit in Canada as he sought to discuss stronger sanctions against Russia and more military support for Ukraine with Trump there. But he failed to meet with the U.S. President as Trump left a day early for Washington to address the Israel-Iran conflict. Ukraine currently covers about 40 percent of its defense needs with domestic production, and the government is constantly looking for ways to increase production further. Kyiv plans to launch joint weapon production outside of the country and will start exporting some of its military production technologies, Zelenskyy said. 'We have launched a program 'Build with Ukraine' and in summer we will sign relevant agreements to start exporting our technologies abroad in the format of opening production lines in European countries,' Zelenskyy said. The discussions focused on producing different types of drones, missiles, and potentially artillery, he said.


Saudi Gazette
6 hours ago
- Saudi Gazette
Trump says Gabbard was wrong on Iran, warns Israeli strikes may be hard to halt
WASHINGTON — U.S. President Donald Trump said Friday that his Director of National Intelligence, Tulsi Gabbard, was 'wrong' to suggest earlier this year that Iran was not building a nuclear weapon, and warned that it could be 'very hard to stop' Israel's ongoing strikes against Iranian targets. Speaking after landing in New Jersey for a political fundraiser, Trump dismissed Gabbard's March congressional testimony in which she said U.S. intelligence agencies did not believe Iran was assembling nuclear warheads. 'Well then, my intelligence community is wrong. Who in the intelligence community said that?' he said. Told it was Gabbard, Trump replied, 'She's wrong.' Gabbard later responded on X, saying her remarks were misrepresented: 'America has intelligence that Iran is at the point that it can produce a nuclear weapon within weeks to months, if they decide to finalize the assembly.' Trump has taken a more hawkish tone in recent days as he considers whether to authorize U.S. military involvement in the conflict between Israel and Iran, particularly a potential strike on Iran's underground Fordo uranium enrichment facility — believed to be beyond the reach of conventional weaponry. While the White House said this week that Trump would make a decision within two weeks, citing a 'substantial chance of negotiations,' Trump appeared less optimistic on whether the U.S. could ask Israel to halt its strikes to facilitate talks, Trump said, 'I think it's very hard to make that request right now. If somebody is winning, it's a little bit harder to do than if somebody is losing.''It's very hard to stop when you look at it,' he added. 'Israel's doing well in terms of war. And, I think, you would say that Iran is doing less well.'Trump's remarks reflect a complicated balancing act as he faces criticism from both sides — with conservatives wary of deeper U.S. entanglement abroad and others pressing him to prevent a full-scale regional president defended his position by drawing a distinction between Iran and past conflicts.'There were no weapons of mass destruction [in Iraq]. I never thought there were,' Trump said. 'And that was somewhat pre-nuclear. It was a nuclear age, but nothing like it is today.'He further questioned Iran's stated intention to use its nuclear program for civilian purposes, such as power generation: 'You're sitting on one of the largest oil piles anywhere in the world. It's a little bit hard to see why you'd need that.' — Agencies