Senate passes landmark GENIUS stablecoin bill, giving crypto industry its first major win
The Senate on Tuesday passed the GENIUS Act, a landmark bill that for the first time establishes federal guardrails for U.S. dollar-pegged stablecoins and creates a regulated pathway for private companies to issue digital dollars with the blessing of the federal government.
The bill passed with a 68-30 vote.
It's a milestone day for the crypto industry and for President Donald Trump's sprawling digital asset empire.
This is the first legislative victory for the digital asset industry, which put around $250 million in the 2024 cycle to elect what's now considered to be the most pro-crypto Congress in U.S. history.
The bill still faces hurdles in the Republican-held House, but passage in the Senate signals a turning point — not just for the technology, but for the political clout behind it.
The GENIUS Act, short for the Guiding and Establishing National Innovation for U.S. Stablecoins Act, sets guardrails for the industry, including full reserve backing, monthly audits, and anti-money laundering compliance.
It also opens the door to a broader range of issuers, including banks, fintechs, and major retailers looking to launch their own stablecoins or integrate them into existing payment systems.
The bill grants sweeping authority to Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, who last week told a Senate appropriations subcommittee in a hearing that the U.S. stablecoin market could grow nearly eightfold to over $2 trillion in the next few years.
"Stablecoin legislation backed by U.S. Treasuries or T-bills will create a market that will expand U.S. dollar usage via these stablecoins all around the world," Bessent said.
GENIUS now heads to the House, which has its own version of a stablecoin bill dubbed STABLE. Both prohibit yield-bearing consumer stablecoins — but diverge on who regulates what.
The Senate's version centralizes oversight with Treasury, while the House splits authority between the Federal Reserve, the Comptroller of the Currency, and others. Reconciling the two could take a while, according to Congressional aides.
The GENIUS Act was supposed to be the easiest crypto bill to pass, but took months to reach the Senate floor, failed once, and passed only after fierce negotiations.
"We thought it would be easiest to start with stablecoins," Sen. Cynthia Lummis, R-Wyo., said on stage in Las Vegas at this year's Bitcoin 2025 conference, which focused heavily on stablecoins.
"It has been extremely difficult. I had no idea how hard this was going to be," she said.
At the same event, Sen. Bill Hagerty, R-Tenn., echoed the frustration: "It has been murder to get them there," he said of the 18 Senate Democrats who ultimately crossed the aisle.
Stablecoins are a subset of cryptocurrencies pegged to the value of real-world assets. About 99% of all stablecoins are tethered to the price of the U.S. dollar.
The appeal is simple: Stablecoins offer instant settlement and lower transaction fees, cutting out the middlemen and directly threatening legacy payment rails.
Shopify has already rolled out USDC-powered payments through Coinbase and Stripe. Bank of America's CEO said last week at a Morgan Stanley conference that they're having conversations with the industry and individually exploring stablecoin issuance.
Payment stocks like Visa, Mastercard, PayPal, and Block slid after The Wall Street Journal reported that Amazon and Walmart are exploring their own stablecoins.
That action has helped drive Circle's blockbuster stock surge, with shares up 400% since its public debut on June 5.
Deutsche Bank found that stablecoin transactions hit $28 trillion last year, surpassing that of Mastercard and Visa, combined.
Still, there are limits. The GENIUS Act limits non-financial Big Tech companies from directly issuing stablecoins unless they establish or partner with regulated financial entities — a provision meant to blunt monopoly concerns.
JPMorgan, meanwhile, is taking a different route, launching JPMD, a deposit token designed to function like a stablecoin but tightly integrated with the traditional banking system.
Issued on Coinbase's Base blockchain, JPMD is only available to institutional clients and offers features like 24/7 settlement and interest payments — part of the broader push by legacy finance to adapt to the stablecoin era without ceding ground to crypto-native firms.
While Democrats tried to amend the bill to prevent the president from profiting off crypto ventures, the final legislation only bars members of Congress and their families from doing so.
Trump's first financial disclosure as president, released Friday, revealed he earned at least $57 million in 2024 alone from token sales tied to World Liberty Financial, a crypto platform closely aligned with his political brand.
He holds nearly 16 billion WLFI governance tokens — the crypto equivalent of voting shares — which could be worth close to $1 billion on paper, based on prior private sales.
That's just one slice of the Trump crypto pie.
The family's ventures, which include the controversial $TRUMP meme coin, a $2.5 billion bitcoin Treasury and proposed bitcoin and ether ETFs via Truth.Fi, and a newly launched mining firm called American Bitcoin, reflect a full-throttle push into digital finance.
Forbes recently estimated Trump's crypto holdings at nearly $1 billion, lifting his total net worth to $5.6 billion.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
26 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump Frantically Tries to Stop MAGA Civil War Over Iran
Donald Trump is trying to stave off a MAGA civil war over America's involvement in the Middle East that threatens to tear apart his conservative base. After the president abruptly left the G7 in Canada to meet with his national security team in Washington, the White House went into overdrive to assuage 'America First' die-hards who are angered that the U.S. could be dragged into Israel's battle against Iran. 'We know exactly where the so-called 'Supreme Leader' is hiding,' he posted on Truth Social on Tuesday, calling for Iran's 'unconditional surrender." 'He is an easy target, but is safe there - we are not going to take him out (kill!), at least not for now.' As tensions simmered, Vice President J.D. Vance took to social media to talk up the 'remarkable restraint' the president had shown in trying to keep American troops and citizens safe. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth appeared on Fox News to assure people there had been no change in the military's defense posture in the region. On social media, Trump's rapid response team posted video after video to demonstrate that he 'has always been consistent' on Iran. And at the White House, his communications team fired off a press release documenting 15 times that Trump stated Iran 'cannot be allowed to have a nuclear weapon'. The messaging efforts point to the dilemma Trump faces as he tries to balance his support for Israel with ongoing demands from within his base to avoid another war in the Middle East. Having come to office promising no more 'endless wars,' Trump must now decide whether to help Israel destroy a deeply buried Iranian nuclear enrichment facility at Fordow using a 30,000 pound U.S. bomb known as a 'bunker buster'. But such a move would risk any remaining chance of the nuclear disarmament deal Trump has been pursuing and further divide the very base that got him elected. 'We now have complete and total control of the skies over Iran,' Trump said on Tuesday. 'Iran had good sky trackers and other defensive equipment, but it doesn't compare to American made, conceived and manufactured 'stuff'. Nobody does it better than the good ol' USA.' Others in MAGA, however, are not convinced of America's ongoing role. Carlson, a former Fox News host, entered the fray last week, calling Trump complicit and suggesting that the administration 'drop Israel [and] let them fight their own wars.' This led to Trump suggesting on Monday that he was irrelevant now that he no longer had his own television show, which in turn, led to Trump ally Marjorie Taylor Greene siding with Carlson. 'Tucker Carlson is one of my favorite people. He fiercely loves his wife, children, and our country. Since being fired by the neocon network Fox News, he has more popularity and viewers than ever before,' she said. Turning Point USA leader Charlie Kirk had earlier warned the issue could cause 'a massive schism in MAGA and potentially disrupt our momentum and our insanely successful Presidency.' MAGA activist Jack Posobiec agreed, saying that 'a direct strike on Iran right now would disastrously split the Trump coalition.' But Vance's lengthy post on X sought to de-escalate tensions. Noting the 'crazy stuff' that was being put out on social media, he said that Trump had been 'amazingly consistent, over 10 years, that Iran cannot have a nuclear weapon.' 'He may decide he needs to take further action to end Iranian enrichment,' Vance added. 'That decision ultimately belongs to the president. And of course, people are right to be worried about foreign entanglement after the last 25 years of idiotic foreign policy.'
Yahoo
26 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Leavitt Gets Skewered on Trump's Bogus ‘Two-Week Deadlines'
White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt took heat from a reporter after announcing that President Donald Trump had punted on whether to attack Iran, giving himself a two-week deadline to decide. The reporter pointed out to Leavitt that Trump has previously given himself two-week deadlines on other major decisions, particularly related to the Russia-Ukraine war, and then failed to meet them. 'He's used this phrase about two weeks several times, in terms of 'We expect a two-week deadline,' and then you give another two-week deadline,' the reporter said. 'How can we be sure that he's gonna stick to this one, making a decision on Iran?' Leavitt's first response was to blame Joe Biden, saying that 'these are two different global conflicts that the president inherited from our previous, incompetent president.' Eventually Leavitt suggested that Trump's tendency to push his own self-assigned deadlines comes from his desire to broker peace. 'The last time the president said two weeks, you saw [Russia and Ukraine] have direct negotiations for the first time in years,' Leavitt said. 'The president is always interested in a diplomatic solution to the problems and the global conflicts in this world,' she added. 'He is a peace-maker-in-chief, he is the peace-through-strength president. If there is a chance for diplomacy, the president will grab it. But he is not afraid to use strength, I will add.' Questions about how Trump will handle the conflict between Israel and Iran have swirled over the last week, and the president has yet to give a straight answer. The prospect of the U.S. joining the conflict on Israel's behalf has divided the president's MAGA supporters. The last two-week deadline Trump set came on May 28, with regard to determining whether Russian President Vladimir Putin actually wants peace against Ukraine. It came and passed last week with no acknowledgment from the president. On April 24, Trump used the two-week line to evade a reporter's question about aid to Ukraine. Three days later, asked whether he trusted Putin, the president said, 'We'll let you know in two weeks.' And on May 19, Trump was asked whether Ukraine had done enough to foster negotiations. 'I'd rather tell you in about two weeks from now because I can't say yes or no,' Trump said. Trump's penchant for backing off of big decisions during his second term has led to the rise of the acronym TACO, short for 'Trump Always Chickens Out.' It went mainstream after Trump repeatedly lowered his steep tariff on China. The president hates the acronym, as he made clear to a reporter who asked him about in May. 'Don't ever say what you said,' Trump told the reporter. 'That's a nasty question.'
Yahoo
26 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump Issues Grave Warning to Reporters: ‘You Are in Danger'
President Donald Trump delivered a stark warning to a group of reporters interviewing him at an airfield in New Jersey, telling them they were 'in danger.' The president was fielding questions about Israel's conflict with Iran after announcing on Thursday that he had given himself a two-week deadline to decide on whether to attack Iran. 'Are you worried Iran's proxies would wage terror attacks against American targets abroad if you order military action?' a reporter asked. 'We're always concerned about that, and we have to take them out and be very strong,' Trump began, before his response took a seemingly dark turn. 'You're even in danger talking to me right now,' he said. 'Do you know that? You are in danger talking to me right now, so I should probably get out of here. But you guys are actually in danger. Can you believe it?' Interestingly, this isn't the first time that Trump has offered 'danger' as a reason to end an interview. Back in August, Trump cut short a conversation with Newsweek while he was near the U.S.-Mexico border because he was worried that authorities hadn't found a man who threatened his life. 'Can I tell you something,' he said then. 'We're in danger standing here talking, so let's not talk any longer. No, I know about it, but they don't want me standing here. They don't want you standing here either.' On the campaign trail, Trump survived two attempts on his life, including a near-miss at a rally in Butler, Pennsylvania, when a bullet scraped his ear. The question of whether Trump will join Israel in attacking Iran has divided MAGA over the last week, enraging even some of the president's most devout supporters. On Thursday, Trump punted the decision. The White House announced that he had given himself two weeks to come to a final determination. However, some have pointed out that Trump has a habit of giving himself two weeks to make important decisions—and then ignoring his own deadline. Over the last several months, Trump has repeatedly used the two-week line concerning several different questions about the Russia-Ukraine war.
