Tesla expected to launch long-discussed robotaxi service
The launch -- which comes as Musk refocuses on his business ventures following a controversial stint in Donald Trump's administration -- will employ the Model Y sport utility vehicle rather than Tesla's much-touted Cybercab, which is still under development.
The long-awaited launch follows the dramatic meltdown earlier this month in relations between Musk and Trump, which saw a cascade of bitter attacks from both men.
Since then, Musk has publicly expressed regret for some of his statements, while his company's Texas operation has readied the Austin push -- part of a major drive on autonomous technology and artificial intelligence that Tesla bulls believe will yield huge profits.
This group includes Wedbush analyst Daniel Ives, who said autonomous technology could be a catalyst for potentially $1 trillion in additional market value or more.
"There are countless skeptics of the Tesla robotaxi vision with many bears thinking this day would never come," said Ives, who predicted that Trump's administration would clear roadblocks for Tesla and pivot from the recent "soap opera."
"The golden era of autonomous for Tesla officially kicks off on Sunday in Austin," Ives said in a note Friday.
Business-friendly Texas
But the unveiling in the Texas state capital comes amid questions about how Tesla will try to overcome criticism of Musk's activities for Trump.
Tesla saw profits plunge 71 percent in the first quarter following poor sales in several markets.
In picking Austin for the debut of the autonomous vehicle (AV) service, Musk is opting for a US state known for its company-friendly approach to regulation.
"Texas law allows for AV testing and operations on Texas roadways as long as they meet the same safety and insurance requirements as every other vehicle on the road," the Texas Department of Transportation told AFP.
An Austin website listed six autonomous vehicle companies at various stages of operation: ADMT (Volkswagen), AVRide, Tesla, Zoox (Amazon), Motional (Hyundai) and Waymo (Alphabet/Google).
But the Texas legislature this year enacted a new bill that requires prior authorization from the state's Department of Motor Vehicles before companies can operate on a public street without human drivers, a group of seven Democratic lawmakers said in a June 18 letter to Tesla.
Citing the enhanced system, the lawmakers asked Tesla to delay testing until after the law takes effect September 1.
If Tesla proceeds with the launch this weekend, "we request that you respond to this letter with detailed information demonstrating that Tesla will be compliant with the new law," the letter said.
Starting slow
Musk had initially planned the launch for June 12, before pushing back, saying he was being "super paranoid" about safety.
"We want to deliberately take it slow," Musk said in a May 20 interview on CNBC, telling the network that Tesla would probably only operate 10 autonomous vehicles the first week.
But that number will rise to perhaps 1,000 "within a few months," Musk told CNBC. "And then we will expand to other cities.... San Francisco, Los Angeles, San Antonio."
The service will be offered from 6:00 am until midnight and will be available to "early access" users on an invitation-only basis in a geofenced area, Tesla owner Sawyer Merritt said Friday on Musk's X platform, adding that Tesla had given him permission to release the information.
Musk last fall unveiled the Cybercab, which has no steering wheel or pedals. But production is not expected to begin on the vehicle until 2026.
Tesla's robotaxi launch comes well after Waymo's offering of commercial robotaxi service, with more US cities gradually added.
The US National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) in October 2024 opened a probe into Tesla's Full Self-Driving (FSD) software after receiving four reports of crashes.
The NHTSA on May 8 asked Tesla for additional information on its technology in light of the Austin launch.
But the NHTSA does not "pre-approve" new technologies, the agency told AFP.
"Rather, manufacturers certify that each vehicle meets NHTSA's rigorous safety standards, and the agency investigates incidents involving potential safety defects," the NHTSA said.
© 2025 AFP
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
France 24
an hour ago
- France 24
Trump's decision to strike Iran marks his riskiest foreign policy gamble
With his unprecedented decision to bomb Iran's nuclear sites, directly joining Israel's air attack on its regional arch foe, U.S. President Donald Trump has done something he had long vowed to avoid - intervene militarily in a major foreign war. The dramatic US strike, including the targeting of Iran's most heavily fortified nuclear installation deep underground, marks the biggest foreign policy gamble of Trump's two presidencies and one fraught with risks and unknowns. Trump, who insisted on Saturday that Iran must now make peace or face further attacks, could provoke Tehran into retaliating by closing the Strait of Hormuz, the world's most important oil artery, attacking US military bases and allies in the Middle East, stepping up its missile barrage on Israel and activating proxy groups against American and Israeli interests worldwide, analysts said. Such moves could escalate into a broader, more protracted conflict than Trump had envisioned, evoking echoes of the 'forever wars' that America fought in Iraq and Afghanistan, which he had derided as 'stupid' and promised never to be dragged into. 'The Iranians are seriously weakened and degraded in their military capabilities,' said Aaron David Miller, a former Middle East negotiator for Democratic and Republican administrations. 'But they have all sorts of asymmetric ways that they can respond... This is not going to end quick.' In the lead-up to the bombing that he announced late on Saturday, Trump had vacillated between threats of military action and appeals for renewed negotiation to persuade Iran to reach a deal to dismantle its nuclear program. A senior White House official said that once Trump was convinced that Tehran had no interest in reaching a nuclear agreement, he decided the strikes were 'the right thing to do'. Trump gave the go-ahead once he was assured of a 'high probability of success', the official said – a determination reached after more than a week of Israeli air attacks on Iran's nuclear and military facilities paved the way for the US to deliver the potentially crowning blow. 03:39 Nuclear threat remains Trump touted the 'great success' of the strikes, which he said included the use of massive 'bunker-buster bombs' on the main site at Fordow. But some experts suggested that while Iran's nuclear program may have been set back for many years, the threat may be far from over. Iran denies seeking a nuclear weapon, saying its program is for purely peaceful purposes. 'In the long term, military action is likely to push Iran to determine nuclear weapons are necessary for deterrence and that Washington is not interested in diplomacy,' the Arms Control Association, a non-partisan US-based organisation that advocates for arms control legislation, said in a statement. 'Military strikes alone cannot destroy Iran's extensive nuclear knowledge. The strikes will set Iran's program back, but at the cost of strengthening Tehran's resolve to reconstitute its sensitive nuclear activities,' the group said. Eric Lob, assistant professor in the Department of Politics and International Relations at Florida International University, said Iran's next move remains an open question and suggested that among its forms of retaliation could be to hit 'soft targets' of the U.S. and Israel inside and outside the region. Iranian reaction to the US strikes on its nuclear sites 01:16 But he also said there was a possibility that Iran could return to the negotiating table – 'though they would be doing so in an even weaker position' – or seek a diplomatic off-ramp. In the immediate aftermath of the US strikes, however, Iran showed little appetite for concessions. Iran's Atomic Energy Organization said it would not allow development of its 'national industry' to be stopped, and an Iranian state television commentator said every U.S. citizen or military member in the region would now be legitimate targets. Early on Sunday, Iran's foreign ministry issued a statement warning that Tehran 'considers it its right to resist with all its might against U.S. military aggression.' Karim Sadjadpour, an analyst at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, posted on X: 'Trump indicated this is now the time for peace. It's unclear and unlikely the Iranians will see it the same way. This is more likely to open a new chapter of the 46-year-old US-Iran war than conclude it.' 'Regime change' Some analysts suggested that Trump, whose administration has previously disavowed any aim of dislodging the Iranian leadership, could be drawn into seeking 'regime change' if Tehran carries out major reprisals or moves to build a nuclear weapon. That, in turn, would bring additional risks. 'Beware mission creep, aiming for regime change and democratisation campaigns,' said Laura Blumenfeld, a Middle East analyst at the Johns Hopkins School for Advanced International Studies in Washington. 'You'll find the bones of many failed US moral missions buried in Middle East sands.' Jonathan Panikoff, a former U.S. deputy intelligence officer for the Middle East, said Iran's leadership would quickly engage in 'disproportionate attacks' if it felt its survival was imperilled. But Tehran will also have to be mindful of the consequences, he said. While actions such as closing the Strait of Hormuz would pose problems for Trump with the resulting higher oil prices and potential US inflationary impact, it would also hurt China, one of Iran's few powerful allies. At the same time, Trump is already facing strong pushback from congressional Democrats against the Iran attack and will also have to contend with opposition from the anti-interventionist wing of his Republican MAGA base. Trump, who faced no major international crisis in his first term, is now embroiled in one just six months into his second. Even if he hopes US military involvement can be limited in time and scope, the history of such conflicts often carries unintended consequences for American presidents. Trump's slogan of 'peace through strength' will certainly be tested as never before, especially with his opening of a new military front after failing to meet his campaign promises to quickly end wars in Ukraine and Gaza. 'Trump is back in the war business,' said Richard Gowan, UN director at the International Crisis Group. 'I am not sure anyone in Moscow, Tehran or Beijing ever believed his spiel that he is a peacemaker. It always looked more like a campaign phrase than a strategy.'
Euronews
an hour ago
- Euronews
US operation against Iran in detail: bombs, planes and missiles used
The operation, which marks a significant escalation in tensions, has resulted in Iran's nuclear programme being hit "substantially" with full details to emerge. The US attack was executed with military precision using B-2 Spirit strategic bombers and Tomahawk cruise missiles launched from naval platforms. According to information provided by Fox News' reporter Sean Hannity, following direct conversations with President Donald Trump, the operation employed between five and six bunker buster bombs dropped from B-2 bombers, exceeding initial estimates of only two bombs for the mission. The facilities attacked included the nuclear facilities at Natanz and Estefan, which were neutralised by 30 Tomahawk missiles launched from a distance of approximately 640 kilometres. The main target was the Fordow plant, which is considered a cornerstone of Iran's nuclear programme and which, according to sources quoted by Fox News, "was completely destroyed". This information was backed up by US President Trump himself, who tweeted that "Fordow is gone". US military deployment In the weeks leading up to the attack, the US deployed a considerable military force to the Middle East. This deployment included the aircraft carrier USS Nimitz, Air ForceF-16, F-22 and F-35 fighters, in addition to the B-2 bombers that took part in the operation. Several B-2 bombers took off for the Pacific after completing the mission, having left Iranian airspace by the time of the official announcement. President Trump has been clear about US targets in the region. In remarks reported by Fox News, he said: "We're not looking for a ceasefire. We're looking for total and complete victory. I repeat, you know what the victory is: no nuclear weapons". This statement underscores the US' determination to completely eliminate Iran's nuclear capabilities, beyond seeking temporary agreements or ceasefires. Military arsenal used: Technical analysis of missiles and bombs The bunker buster bombs used in the operation represent the latest technology in deep penetration weaponry. These weapons are specifically designed to neutralise fortified underground targets, such as Iranian nuclear facilities. Technical characteristics: The 30 Tomahawk missiles used in the attack represent the gold standard in long-range cruise missiles for the US Navy. Tomahawk specifications: The use of five to six bunker buster bombs indicates the involvement of three B-2 Spirit bombers, each capable of carrying two high-penetration bombs. B-2 capabilities: Regional and global implications This strike marks a turning point in US foreign policy towards Iran and sets a significant precedent in the fight against nuclear proliferation. The destruction of key facilities such as Fordow represents a significant setback for Iran's nuclear programme, which has been the target of international sanctions and nuclear diplomacy for more than a decade. The operation also demonstrates the US' ability to execute long-range precision strikes against highly defended targets, using its most advanced military technology. At this point Iran could either escalate its attacks into war or sign a peace and nuclear technology non-proliferation agreement as Trump initially sought.
France 24
2 hours ago
- France 24
The US had been moving B-2 planes to Guam for several days before striking Iran
22/06/2025 At least 430 Iranian civilians killed this week according to the health ministry Middle East 22/06/2025 Israel kills 3 top Iranian officers in Shiraz strike before US bombing Middle East 22/06/2025 US enters war against Iran, bombing three nuclear sites Middle East 22/06/2025 France 24 reports on Iran's reaction to US air strikes on its territory Middle East 22/06/2025 No further US strikes on Iran planned, France 24 reports from Washnigton Middle East 22/06/2025 Trump says US forces bombed Iran nuclear sites Americas 22/06/2025 US President Donald Trump's White House speech on US strikes on Iranian nuclear sites Middle East 21/06/2025 Iran's foreign minister says aggression must stop so diplomacy can resume Middle East 21/06/2025 Israeli strikes kill Iranian commander: the latest on the ground in Tehran Middle East
