
Sly Stone, leader of 1960s funk band, dies at age 82
Sly Stone, the driving force behind Sly and the Family Stone, a multiracial American band whose boiling mix of rock, soul and psychedelia embodied 1960s idealism and helped popularise funk music, has died at the age of 82, his family said on June 10.
Stone died after a battle with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and other health issues, a statement from his family said.
"While we mourn his absence, we take solace in knowing that his extraordinary musical legacy will continue to resonate and inspire for generations to come," the statement said.
Stone was perhaps best known for his performance in 1969 at the historic Woodstock music festival, the hippie culture's coming-out party.
His group was a regular on the U.S. music charts in the late 1960s and 1970s, with hits such as Dance to the Music, I Want to Take You Higher, Family Affair, Everyday People, If You Want Me to Stay, and Hot Fun in the Summertime.
But he later fell on hard times and became addicted to illegal substances, never staging a successful comeback.
The confident and mercurial Stone played a leading role in introducing funk, an Afro-centric style of music driven by grooves and syncopated rhythms, to a broader audience.
James Brown had forged the elements of funk before Stone founded his band in 1966, but Stone's brand of funk drew new listeners. It was celebratory, eclectic, psychedelic and rooted in the counterculture of the late 1960s.
"They had the clarity of Motown but the volume of Jimi Hendrix or The Who," Parliament-Funkadelic frontman George Clinton, a contemporary of Stone and another pioneering figure in funk, once wrote.
When Sly and the Family Stone performed, it felt like the band was "speaking to you personally," Clinton said.
Stone made his California-based band, which included his brother Freddie and sister Rose, a symbol of integration. It included Black and white musicians, while women, including the late trumpeter Cynthia Robinson, had prominent roles.
That was rare in a music industry often segregated along racial and gender lines.
Stone, with his orb-like Afro hairstyle and wardrobe of vests, fringes and skin-tight leather, lived the life of a superstar. At the same time, he allowed bandmates to shine by fostering a collaborative, free-flowing approach that epitomised the 1960s hippie ethic.
"I wanted to be able for everyone to get a chance to sweat," he told Rolling Stone magazine in 1970.
Disc jockey to singer
Born Sylvester Stewart in Denton, Texas, he moved as a child with his family to Northern California, where his father ran a janitorial business.
He took the show business name Sly Stone and worked for a time as a radio disc jockey and a record producer for a small label before forming the band.
The band's breakthrough came in 1968, when the title track to their second album, Dance to the Music, cracked the Top 10.
A year later, Sly and the Family Stone performed at Woodstock before dawn. Stone woke up a crowd of 400,000 people at the music festival, leading them in call-and-response style singing.
Stone's music became less joyous after the idealistic 1960s, reflecting the polarisation of the country after opposition to the Vietnam War and racial tensions triggered unrest on college campuses and in African American neighbourhoods in big US cities.
In 1971, Sly and the Family Stone released There's a Riot Goin' On, which became the band's only No. 1 album.
Critics said the album's bleak tone and slurred vocals denoted the increasing hold of illegal substances on Stone. But some called the record a masterpiece, a eulogy to the 1960s.
In the early 1970s, Stone became erratic and missed shows. Some members left the band.
But the singer was still a big enough star in 1974 to attract a crowd of 21,000 for his wedding to actress and model Kathy Silva at Madison Square Garden in New York. Silva filed for divorce less than a year later.
Sly and the Family Stone's album releases in the late 1970s and early 1980s flopped, as Stone racked up drug possession arrests. But the music helped shape disco and, years later, hip-hop artists kept the band's legacy alive by frequently sampling its musical hooks.
The band was inducted into the Rock and Roll Hall of Fame in 1993 and Stone was celebrated in an all-star tribute at the Grammy Awards in 2006. He sauntered on stage with a blond Mohawk but bewildered the audience by leaving mid-song.
In 2011, after launching what would become a years-long legal battle to claim royalties he said were stolen, Stone was arrested for illegal substance possession. That year, media reported Stone was living in a recreational vehicle parked on a street in South Los Angeles.
Stone had a son, Sylvester, with Silva. He had two daughters, Novena Carmel, and Sylvette "Phunne" Stone, whose mother was bandmate Cynthia Robinson.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The National
13 hours ago
- The National
Al Hilal show 'power and potential of Saudi football' in Real Madrid draw
On the eve of Wednesday's Fifa Club World Cup tie between Al Hilal and Real Madrid, amid the Art Deco diners that line Miami's South Beach reminiscent of something out of Back to the Future, two men sat debating football in front of a baby blue Cadillac. Both dressed in Al Hilal shirts, both having arrived from Riyadh the previous evening, the pair couldn't agree on their side's hopes of toppling the European behemoth that is Real Madrid. One gave his side a 'less than zero' chance of victory, while the other clung to the idea that 'nothing is impossible'. Yet they agreed on one thing: The result was immaterial, they were here for a week of fun. And they were not alone. Al Hilal took over South Beach ahead of the match, which proved an enjoyable 1-1 draw as the perceived impossible was almost realised by an impressive Saudi side that at times completely dominated their illustrious Spanish opponents in the blistering 32°C heat. Hookah cafes, Hilal tops, and an expansive fan fest that proved so popular prizes ran dry. So too did the nearby sportswear store, which stuck a sign up in its window: 'Al Hilal Sold Out Sorry :)'. Yet inside the Hard Rock Stadium, it was a different story. Fifa is well aware of the biggest draw of its new 32-team Club World Cup. During the opening ceremony earlier this week, its camera lingered uncomfortably on only one club crest: That of the 15-time European champions. And, despite the local organising committee's army of volunteers clad in Hilal-style blue, the stadium was a white hot sea of Madrid shirts. Unsurprising given the temperature, regrettable 3pm kick-off time, and lack of a flux capacitor, there was to be no throwback to the 2022 Club World Cup final when Madrid beat Hilal 5-3. Yet at times this was as much a Madrid performance as we have grown to expect in recent years – riding their luck for large periods, before finding a goal against the run of play. In the end, perhaps the only surprise was they failed to capitalise on a penalty to snare all three points. With new Madrid coach Xabi Alonso handing debuts to both Dean Huijsen and Trent Alexander-Arnold on the right-side of defence, the new-look back-line had appeared shaky. Hilal, also marking their first match under a new coach in Simone Inzaghi, came close to scoring early on through Sergej Milinkovic-Savic and Marcos Leonardo, before left-back Renan Lodi slid the ball past Thibaut Courtois only to see it ruled offside. 'We got to see the true level of our team today,' Lodi said. 'We were playing against a club that has dominated Europe, won Champions Leagues, but we held our own. For this, I am very happy. Soon, I'll have been at Hilal for two years and I think everyone is seeing now that we too can play great football. Madrid is a team of the highest level, but we showed the power and potential of Saudi Arabian football.' Watched on by Grammy Award-winning Palestinian-American record producer DJ Khaled, Hilal indeed looked perfectly at home, dominating possession for large spells. Yet the old habits of Madrid are not yet ready to fade like a family photograph, and it was the Spanish side who typically took the lead against the run of play. Rodrygo picked out Gonzalo Garcia, whose first-time finish struck his own planted foot and floated over goalkeeper Yassine Bounou. Hard luck in the Hard Rock for the ever-popular 'Bono'. Unperturbed, Hilal continued to plug away. Captain Salem Al Dawsari proving a constant threat on the left. The 2021 AFC Asian League winners levelled the tie just before half time when Raul Asencio was judged to manhandle Leonardo in the box and Ruben Neves made no mistake from the spot. They could have added a second soon after too through Al Dawsari, but his well-worked shot took a deflection and curled wide. Madrid grew into the game, with Vinicius Jr exploiting the space behind Joao Cancelo before Inzaghi made a switch – though not before substitute Arda Guler and Gonzalo Garcia both tested Bono. 'There are some positives to take from the match, especially in the second half,' said Alexander-Arnold. 'The coach told us at half time we needed to dominate the ball more. In these games, especially in this heat, you need to dominate the ball otherwise you are chasing shadows.' Hilal managed only two shots in the second half but they were well deserving of a point. It appeared a cruel twist then when Argentine referee Facundo Tello, after an on-field review, awarded a penalty for Mohammed Al Qahtani's clumsy arm connecting with the mouth of Fran Garcia. Bono came to the rescue, throwing himself down to save both Federico Valverde's penalty and what could be a crucial point in the quest to progress to the knock-out stages. 'This was a great test for us,' said Joao Cancelo. 'We were able to compete against one of the best teams in the world, but it's very difficult. To play against Rodrygo, [Jude] Bellingham, [Luka] Modric, Valverde … We competed well and can be proud.'


Khaleej Times
a day ago
- Khaleej Times
Golden Globes unveils nominations, voting deadlines for 2026 ceremony
The Golden Globe Awards, one of the most anticipated events in the entertainment industry, has officially unveiled its timeline, eligibility rules, and award guidelines for the 83rd annual ceremony, slated to take place on January 11, 2026. The official social media handle of the Golden Globes has confirmed that the event, hosted by comedian and television personality Nikki Glaser, will be broadcast live from the Beverly Hilton Hotel on CBS and streaming on Paramount+. Save the date ð���ï¸� @NikkiGlaser returns to host the #GoldenGlobes - LIVE Sunday, January 11, 2026 on @CBS and @paramountplus! Nominations announced â�� Monday, December 8, 2025 — Golden Globes (@goldenglobes) April 24, 2025 As the Golden Globes retains its traditional role as the curtain raiser for the major awards season leading up to the Academy Awards, the 2026 Golden Globes will mark the start of an exciting awards season with the Oscars to follow on March 15, 2026. In a bid to reflect the changing landscape of entertainment, the Golden Globes has added a Best Podcast Award to its growing list of categories for the 2026 ceremony. According to the updated eligibility rules, the top 25 podcasts will be considered for nominations, and the final selection will consist of six final nominees for the category, as per Deadline. The data and insights company Luminate will play a pivotal role in determining which podcasts will qualify for consideration. In the past, the Golden Globes have mainly focused on motion picture and television awards, but with the rapidly expanding popularity of podcasts, this new category marks a significant step toward recognising new media in the realm of entertainment. The eligibility guidelines for this category can be found on the official Golden Globes submission platform. The 2026 Golden Globes ceremony will follow a detailed and tightly scheduled timeline leading up to the big night. Below is a breakdown of the key dates for submissions, nominations, and voting: August 1, 2025: Submission website opens for Motion Picture and Television entries for the 2026 Golden Globes. October 1, 2025: Submission website opens for Podcast entries. October 31, 2025: Deadline for Motion Picture, Television, and Podcast submissions. All entries must be completed online at the official Golden Globes submission platform. November 17, 2025: Deadline for Television and Podcast nomination ballots to be sent to all voters. November 23, 2025: Final date for Television and Podcast press conferences, and final date for programs to be uploaded to the official Golden Globes screening platform. November 24, 2025, by 5 pm PST: Deadline for the receipt of Television and Podcast nomination ballots. November 25, 2025: Deadline for Motion Picture and Cinematic and Box Office Achievement nomination ballots to be sent to voters. December 3, 2025: Final date for Motion Picture and Box Office Achievement press conferences, and final date for films to be uploaded to the screening platform. December 4, 2025, by 5 pm PST: Deadline for the receipt of Motion Picture and Cinematic and Box Office Achievement nomination ballots. December 8, 2025, at 5 am PST: Announcement of nominations for the 83rd Annual Golden Globes. December 19, 2025: Final ballots sent to all voters. January 3, 2026, by 5 pm PST: Deadline for the receipt of final ballots. January 11, 2026, at 5 pm PST: 83rd Annual Golden Globes ceremony.


Harpers Bazaar Arabia
a day ago
- Harpers Bazaar Arabia
The No-Make-Up Make-Up Revolution: Are You Wearing Any?
Glossier may have helped usher in our current 'you get better' era, but the origins of natural-looking make-up go back decades. Here, a brief history of who started it, who ran with it, and how it transformed the way we think about beauty In the autumn of 2014, on the top floor of a makeshift office space in an old brick building in Manhattan where SoHo melds into Chinatown, Emily Weiss gathered the 12 employees of her then nascent beauty brand, Glossier, in front of a wall of images of glowy, fresh-faced, smiling models against a sky-blue backdrop. She asked her team to put little dots on the images they liked best. At the time, 'Glossier' was just a mysterious Instagram account populated with behind-the-scenes images, cute little stickers, and a distinctive pastel shade that would become known as millennial pink. No one really had a clue what Emily, already a fixture in the beauty world herself, thanks to the popular four year-old beauty blog Into the Gloss, was up to, but it didn't matter; whatever Glossier was or wasn't, it piqued readers' interest. 'You don't see any make-up in those pictures,' Emily recalls of Glossier's inaugural campaign. 'You see these amazing women who are themselves and very present.' She's right; they all look eff ortlessly beautiful, seemingly make-up free, and dewy – the now omnipresent descriptor popularised by Glossier that refers to radiant, luminous, hydrated, and moist but not oily skin. Of course, the models were wearing make-up in this campaign, including Glossier's new pigmented skin tint designed to even out tone but still look like skin. You just wouldn't know it. These images would be pivotal in launching a brand that changed the course of the modern beauty industry, creating an aesthetic that would become one of the most copied, not only within beauty but also in direct-to-consumer marketing. Besides the way the products looked and what they were named (Balm Dotcom was simply a cleverly marketed salve, similar to Vaseline or Aquaphor), Glossier talked about beauty in a new way, and it conveyed a lifestyle. Glossier redefined young people's relationship to beauty and the concept of 'no-make-up make-up,' a decades-old approach to thinking about and applying cosmetics that is subtly enhancing and imperceptible. The Glossier look stood out against the prevailing beauty landscape at the time, which was dominated by strobing, baking, overlined matte lips, dramatic eyebrows, and perhaps the Kardashians' biggest contribution to mid-2010s' beauty trends: contouring. But it was simply an evolution of what make-up artist Bobbi Brown had been doing since the late '80s. 'I started looking at a natural, beautiful face in the best lighting and trying to figure out how I could use make-up to make people look like that,' says Bobbi. In 1990, she started selling lipsticks out of her home that 'looked like my lips, but a little more intense.' A few years later, French make-up artist Laura Mercier introduced the concept of tinted moisturiser to the masses, and it quickly became a staple for people who didn't want to wear foundation. No-make-up make-up wasn't just gaining popularity at department-store beauty counters; on TV, make-up artist Victoria Jackson, who publicly started talking about the idea in the 1980s, had success selling Victoria Jackson Cosmetics through infomercials and QVC appearances in the 1990s. In more recent years, a number of newer make-up lines have taken off – Westman Atelier, Saie, Ami Colé, Merit, Brown's Jones Road, and Rhode among them – all of which subscribe to a similar less-is-more philosophy but differ on key points. Some offer advancements in formulations that combine efficacious skincare ingredients with color; Merit comes in multi-use forms that make it 'impossible to mess up'; Ami Colé has created its products specifically for 'melanin-rich' skin first, addressing the dearth of inclusivity in complexion make-up. The concept of no-make-up make-up has withstood decades, recessions, a pandemic, multiple social-media platforms, the Kardashians, and several generations. The reason the look resonates so deeply now owes much to the Covid skincare obsession. Sheerer formulas, dewy highlighters, and barely there lip and cheek stains are great ways to show off skin perfected by a carefully crafted routine. The story of no-make-up make-up really starts with Clinique, which in the 1970s began to offer foundations that more closely matched people's skin tones. At the time, natural-looking make-up was barely on anyone's radar. Eyeshadow was blue and purple; lipstick was red, fuchsia, or pink and frosty. Customers' needs for complexion make-up were far more rudimentary; they wanted to find something that was the same colour as their neck. Clinique, which has sold cosmetics alongside skincare since its 1968 launch, was groundbreaking for merging the worlds of make-up and skincare. 'The make-up was formulated in the same way and not only could do no harm but could also enhance your skin,' says Jane Hertzmark Hudis, executive vice president and chief brand officer of the Estée Lauder Companies. 'It was designed to work together.' At the time, the company owned just three brands: Estée Lauder, Clinique, and Aramis. It would be years before Bobbi hit the scene, but the make-up artist's philosophy wouldn't just push this budding beauty movement forward; Bobbi Brown Cosmetics would later become the Estée Lauder Companies' newest brand. Bobbi says that while working as an editorial make-up artist in the 1980s, she would go to theatrical make-up stores to buy yellow, orange, and red to 'fix' foundations for more accurate shade matching. In 1992, fed up with the existing offerings, Bobbi introduced Bobbi Brown Cosmetics foundation sticks in 10 shades, from fairest to deepest, designed to more closely match one's skin tone. She was on to something, and in 1995, the Estée Lauder Companies paid a reported USD$74.5 million for her brand. Another make-up artist saw an opportunity. A year after Laura Mercier released her namesake brand in 1996, her tinted moisturiser made make-up more approachable to people who were hesitant about foundation. It became a cornerstone of the no-make-up-make-up movement. To this day, Laura Mercier's tinted moisturiser is the second-best-selling prestige tinted moisturiser in the U.S., according to the brand. (BareMinerals' Complexion Rescue tinted moisturiser is the first.) Victoria actually trademarked the term 'No Make-up Make-up' in 2002, after she concluded a 10-year QVC run that she says generated a billion dollars in sales for the network. Last year, she introduced a second brand, the on-the-nose-titled No Make-up Make-up, which sells a cream-balm foundation for Dhs200. 'People say it's trending now, but I don't think it's ever not been trending,' Victoria points out. 'There are always the women out there who want to look great but want to look like themselves.' The next generation of beauty consumers, made up of millennials and Gen-Zers, had little interest in buying lipstick from late-night infomercials. Many were too young (or not even born yet) during Bobbi's heyday, and others were seeking something more natural than some of the bolder offerings from M.A.C, Nars, and Urban Decay. An 'artistry' point of view propelled M.A.C and Nars to prominence, making them make-up-artist favourites in the 1990s, and Urban Decay's anti-pink stance popularised edgier items like black nail polish and oxblood lipstick. Although plenty of new beauty brands were born in the two decades following the introduction of nude lip colour and tinted moisturiser, it wasn't until Glossier came along that no-make-up make-up became the look. Glossier's modern repackaging of these ideas – which largely mirrored those of Emily's predecessors – made these products appealing to a younger customer who lived online. Instead of relying on books and Today Show appearances, Glossier won with sprawling stores outfitted with life-size products and sales associates in pink jumpsuits. It helped that Glossier's rise dovetailed with Instagram's, which had launched only a few years before. Glossier used the platform to build its brand and, crucially, a community before many other brands or make-up artists were even active there. Its values – looking like yourself, only better – resonated on Instagram, where there was an expectation to post photos of yourself and your 'real' (but still enviable!) life. It's true that when Glossier came out, there was another dominant trend running parallel to Emily's cast of dewy faces. Make-up was in the midst of a YouTube tutorial boom, and influencers and brands like Huda Kattan, Kylie Cosmetics, and Anastasia Beverly Hills gained massive followings for their expertise in contouring, elaborate eyeshadow and eyeliner application, eyebrow enhancing, and more. Their product offerings yielded highly pigmented, full-coverage looks, giving rise to an entire beauty subculture online. There was also Kim Kardashian, who, along with her longtime make-up artist Mario Dedivanovic, made the contouring technique a sensation of the 2010s. Emily says this is the beauty landscape she was trying to go up against. 'We were so passionate about mainstreaming the adoption and accessibility of a set of values and way of living, which was about freedom in the present moment and acceptance of you in the present without any additional modifications,' she explains, adding that the inspiration behind Glossier was make-up artists and how they prepped and primed skin. The whole point of Glossier was to reject 'the current landscape of 'befores and afters.' It was about 'Wait a second, what's in the middle?'' In other words, Emily was selling the antidote to transformation. Countless brands sprang up in Glossier's wake, hoping to capture that lightning in a bottle (or balm). Glossier alum Diarrha N'Diaye-Mbaye launched Ami Colé in 2021 as a make-up brand that embraced the no-make-up-make-up look, but with products designed specifically for women of color. Growing up, Diarrha says, there was no 'permission and space' to embrace no-make-up make-up, and as a result she spent much of her life and career 'transforming' to the degree that she wouldn't leave the house without a full face of make-up on. This stopped once she started working at Glossier. 'I walked into this space where I can put on face oil and actually be okay with the insecurities with my brow,' Diarrha says. 'I was shocked at how much that affected my confidence. It was okay to look like you and lean into those imperfections or perfections. 'Th is is me; take me as I am.' ' In 2019, Diarrha decided to take the leap and start her own brand. After securing funding (Ami Colé shares an investor with Skims and Glossier), the line had entered more than 270 Sephora stores by the end of 2022. Diarrha says her point of difference is that she formulates for darker skin tones first, not the other way around. 'I knew there was magic in this make-up form,' she says, 'but there was no one talking to this customer the way I knew her or understood her.' One of the most indelible beauty moments of the last decade occurred on May 19, 2018, when Meghan Markle (now Sussex) married Prince Harry. Everything about the moment bucked convention: Meghan was a Hollywood star, a commoner, and a woman of colour marrying into the most royal of families. Expectations for how she should look could not have been higher. Yet she did things her way, right down to the beauty look she chose for that historic day. Rather than adhering to the more formal, full coverage foundation and heavier make-up often favoured by brides, the duchess looked natural; her skin was luminous, and her freckles were visible. Online reactions ranged from celebratory to downright vicious. 'It made people realise, 'I don't need the pomp and circumstance of looking a certain way on my wedding day,'' Daniel Martin, Meghan's make-up artist, says of this 'cultural fork in the road.' He adds: 'When you saw her make-up, you saw her. Not the make-up first.' A few years later, Covid would solidify the appeal of skin forward make-up. Lockdowns, quarantining, and social distancing led to plummeting make-up sales. A collective obsession with self-care and skincare emerged in response, including a newfound emphasis on ingredients and what they do. This, coupled with advances in formulations and, more recently, skincare's inclusion in make-up and vice versa, pushed the idea of no-make-up make-up further into what has become known as the 'skinification' of make-up. The idea was that if your skincare routine was on point, barely there make-up would simply highlight a poreless glow. Brands like RMS Beauty and Ilia, which focus on sheer, minimalist, and easy-to-apply make-up, took off, and newcomers like Saie, Merit, Kosas, and Westman Atelier developed cult followings. Hailey Bieber launched Rhode as a skincare line in 2022, and it was an instant success, thanks to Hailey's massive social following and obsession with 'glazed donut skin,' as well as the fact that the products were actually good. She has since expanded into colour cosmetics that contain ingredients like peptides and lactic acid, more commonly found in skincare. These newer labels promised innovations (lighter-weight formulas with superior coverage, pigment added to unconventional skincare items, multi-use products, and more) with modern messaging, but most importantly, they offered 'better for you' ingredients that emphasised skincare benefits. 'Glossier was the first to boldly call out 'skin first' when skincare related to make-up was only 'How do you remove your make-up?' and 'How do you prep for make-up?' ' says Cassie Cowman, co-founder of View from 32, a beauty consultancy. 'Ultimately, no-make-up make-up works at its best when you have good skin, and that's why it resonates so much today. Yes, it's still about covering up, but it's about putting good things on your skin.' Even Bobbi Brown has followed up on the success of her original brand with Jones Road, a make-up line she introduced in 2020 that feels refreshingly new. Jones Road's Miracle Balm, which became an instant bestseller, can be used almost anywhere for a hint of glow or tint. She says her newest product, a tinted moisturiser called Just Enough, has 'coverage and luminosity' yet 'looks like you have nothing on.' And then there's Gucci Westman, the celebrity make-up artist who launched her own make-up line, Westman Atelier, in 2018 with a skin-first focus. Her Vital Skin Foundation Stick was part of the original line-up and remains a hero product, and Gucci has expanded upon the concept with complexion drops and a concealer. Her products are beloved because they sit at the intersection of 'real skin' and this idea that one can wear make-up, including foundation, but also see skin. As for Emily, she admits that, at the time she was launching Glossier, she wasn't even thinking about no-make-up make-up. 'I don't think we've ever historically even said the words… I don't think we've ever even talked about ourselves in that way,' she says. 'It comes back to a higher order, mission, spirit, purpose – and the industry has gone in that direction. It's also allowed for something really beautiful – which is choice.'