James Carville Says He'll Back AOC If She Wins 2028 Democratic Nomination
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources.
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
Veteran Democratic strategist James Carville said Tuesday that he'll throw his support behind U.S. Representative Alexandria-Ocasio Cortez of New York if she wins the 2028 Democratic presidential nomination.
The Context
Carville's comments are a stark departure from his longtime criticisms of Ocasio-Cortez, one of the most progressive members of the House of Representatives.
Ocasio-Cortez has often clashed with Carville and other members of the Democratic establishment for what she's described as being out of touch with the party's base.
James Carville speaks at the annual U.S. Conference of Mayors on June 26, 2017, in Miami Beach, Florida.
James Carville speaks at the annual U.S. Conference of Mayors on June 26, 2017, in Miami Beach, Florida.
Lynne Sladky/AP
What To Know
Carville was asked during an appearance on MSNBC's The Beat with Ari Melber about a recent poll in which 26 percent of likely voters said they see Ocasio-Cortez as the face of the Democratic Party.
The longtime strategist and political consultant—who was a key architect of two-term President Bill Clinton's 1992 campaign—began his response by calling the poll "utterly useless."
"So all Republicans, all you see is AOC on Fox," he told Melber, referring to the New York lawmaker by her nickname. "So that's the general public's view. That's not the Democratic view. It means nothing."
Carville then said he doesn't have a "very favorable opinion of the Democratic Party" and that there "is no leader of the party" at the moment because it "doesn't have a message."
He went on to say Democrats will choose their leader during the 2028 election season, adding: "Look, we lost an election. I don't like the party. I don't blame the party reputation for being low, but I think that if AOC wants to run for president and she is the nominee, then God bless you."
"You are the leader of the Democratic Party," Carville said, while tipping his hat to the camera. "Whoever gets that nomination is going to be it."
Melber pointed out the significance of Carville's comments, saying, "Well, here we've backed into some intraparty news. You heard it here first. James Carville, once a critic of the AOC podcast landscape, now says, 'If you win, you win,' and you've got his support."
"If you win, you win," Carville said while laughing. "Look, that's my answer. If you win the election, you've got it."
The veteran strategist's comments Tuesday come weeks after he disparaged Ocasio-Cortez, independent Vermont Senator Bernie Sanders and other progressives who have criticized the Democratic establishment.
Both Ocasio-Cortez and Sanders are crisscrossing the country on their "Fighting Oligarchy" tour and drawing massive crowds as they call attention to President Donald Trump, Elon Musk and other billionaires' vast influence in politics.
"Bernie has run for president twice, he's lost twice. AOC and her kind ... they want to run against other Democrats," Carville said during an appearance on Chris Cuomo's NewsNation show last month. "They don't want to run against Republicans. When you beat a Republican, come back and see me and I'll be impressed."
Carville went on to suggest during his interview with Cuomo that Democratic voters were trying to send a message to Sanders by not selecting him as the party's nominee and that Ocasio-Cortez would see similar results if she runs for the top of the ticket.
"Maybe they need to split off from the Democratic Party," he told Cuomo.
What People Are Saying
Carville told The New York Times last year that the Democratic Party is run by too many "preachy females": "A suspicion of mine is that there are too many preachy females ... 'Don't drink beer. Don't watch football. Don't eat hamburgers. This is not good for you.' The message is too feminine: 'Everything you're doing is destroying the planet. You've got to eat your peas.'"
Ocasio-Cortez mocked Carville's comments in the Times piece, writing on X, formerly Twitter: "Maybe he should start a podcast about it. I hear men are really underrepresented in that space."
What Happens Next
Ocasio-Cortez has refrained from announcing whether she plans to run for the 2028 presidential nomination, saying that her "central focus" is countering Trump's agenda on issues like health care, Social Security and immigration.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
24 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump Slapped With ‘Impeachment' Threats After Bombing Iran
Top Democrats are calling for the impeachment of President Donald Trump following the shocking military strikes on Iranian nuclear sites on Saturday evening. 'This is an unambiguous impeachable offense,' Congressman Sean Casten (D-IL) tweeted in response to the news. 'No president has the authority to bomb another country that does not pose an imminent threat to the U.S. without the approval of Congress." Trump announced news of the attacks on Truth Social, describing the bombing of the three nuclear sites at Fordow, Natanz, and Isfahan as 'very successful.' '[Trump] has impulsively risked launching a war that may ensnare us for generations,' Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) tweeted. 'It is absolutely and clearly grounds for impeachment.' The raid on Iran comes after weeks of speculation over whether or not America would get involved in the conflict with Israel. Israel had called on the U.S. to use its bunker-busting aircraft to destroy underground sites it claimed were being used for uranium enrichment in pursuit of a nuclear weapon. The U.S. had initially rejected the request. 'I'm not saying we have the votes to impeach,' Casten continued. 'I'm saying that you DO NOT do this without Congressional approval and if Johnson doesn't grow a spine and learn to be a real boy tomorrow we have a BFing problem that puts our very Republic at risk.' 'To be clear, I do not dispute that Iran is a nuclear threat,' Casten wrote. 'That's why Obama negotiated the JCPOA. But whether that is better resolved through diplomatic or military measures is not a decision that the executive branch has unilaterally'. Technically, the executive branch does not have the legal authority to engage in foreign military attacks without the approval of Congress. That said, Congress has not actually declared a war since WWII and lawmakers and legal scholars are divided on whether the president has the authority to do so. Similar actions, like the killing of Iranian Major General Qassem Soleimani in 2020, were justified on the grounds of 'national interest.' But, as Casten points out, these legal semantics are dicey. 'It's worth noting that 'imminent threat' is a gray area,' Casten wrote. 'Trump did attack Soleimani without Congressional approval. Black ops do happen. Leaving details aside, there is a case that Presidents need to move to protect the homeland quickly in some cases. This was not that". It's not just Democrats who are up in arms about the recent action. Republican Rep. Thomas Massie also tweeted that he though the action was 'unconstitutional,' but stopped short of calling for consequences. 'I am open to the idea that the U.S. should attack Iran,' Casten concluded. 'But I am not open to the idea that Congress cedes all authority to the executive branch. No matter how many lickspittle sycophants in the GOP argue to the contrary.'
Boston Globe
25 minutes ago
- Boston Globe
Trump ignites debate on presidential authority with Iran strikes and wins praise from Republicans
The instant divisions in the U.S. Congress reflected an already swirling debate over the president's ability to conduct such a consequential action without authorization from the House and Senate on the use of military force. While Trump is hardly the first U.S. president to go it alone, his expansive use of presidential power raised immediate questions about what comes next, and whether he is exceeding the limits of his authority. Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up 'This was a massive gamble by President Trump, and nobody knows yet whether it will pay off,' said Rhode Island Sen. Jack Reed, the top Democrat on the Senate Armed Services Committee. Advertisement Democrats, and a few Republicans, said the strikes were unconstitutional, and demanded more information in a classified setting. Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer of New York said that he received only a 'perfunctory notification' without any details, according to a spokesperson. 'No president should be allowed to unilaterally march this nation into something as consequential as war with erratic threats and no strategy,' Schumer said in a statement. 'Confronting Iran's ruthless campaign of terror, nuclear ambitions, and regional aggression demands strength, resolve, and strategic clarity.' Advertisement House Democratic Leader Hakeem Jeffries said that Trump 'misled the country about his intentions, failed to seek congressional authorization for the use of military force and risks American entanglement in a potentially disastrous war in the Middle East.' The quick GOP endorsements of stepped up U.S. involvement in Iran came after Trump publicly considered the strikes for days and many congressional Republicans had cautiously said they thought he would make the right decision. The party's schism over Iran could complicate the GOP's efforts to boost Pentagon spending as part of a $350 billion national security package in Trump's 'big, beautiful' tax breaks bill, which is speeding toward votes next week. 'We now have very serious choices ahead to provide security for our citizens and our allies,' Wicker posted on X. House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., and Senate Majority Leader John Thune both were briefed ahead of the strikes on Saturday, according to people familiar with the situation and granted anonymity to discuss it. Thune said Saturday evening that 'as we take action tonight to ensure a nuclear weapon remains out of reach for Iran, I stand with President Trump and pray for the American troops and personnel in harm's way.' Johnson said in a statement that the military operations 'should serve as a clear reminder to our adversaries and allies that President Trump means what he says.' House Intelligence Committee Chairman Rick Crawford, R-Ark., said he had also been in touch with the White House and 'I am grateful to the U.S. servicemembers who carried out these precise and successful strikes.' Advertisement Breaking from many of his Democratic colleagues, Sen. John Fetterman of Pennsylvania, an outspoken supporter of Israel, also praised the attacks on Iran. 'As I've long maintained, this was the correct move by @POTUS,' he posted. 'Iran is the world's leading sponsor of terrorism and cannot have nuclear capabilities.' Both parties have seen splits in recent days over the prospect of striking Iran, including some of Trump's most ardent supporters who share his criticism of America's 'forever wars.' Republican Rep. Warren Davidson of Ohio posted that 'while President Trump's decision may prove just, it's hard to conceive a rationale that's Constitutional.' Kentucky Rep. Thomas Massie, a longtime opponent of U.S. involvement in foreign wars, also posted on X that 'This is not Constitutional.' 'This is not our fight,' said Republican Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene of Georgia. Most Democrats have maintained that Congress should have a say, even as presidents in both parties have ignored the legislative branch's constitutional authority. The Senate was scheduled to vote soon on a resolution from Virginia Sen. Tim Kaine that would require congressional approval before the U.S. declares war on Iran or takes specific military action. Kaine said the bombings were 'horrible judgment.' 'I will push for all senators to vote on whether they are for this third idiotic Middle East war,' Kaine said. Democratic Rep. Greg Casar, the chairman of the Congressional Progressive Caucus, also called on Congress to immediately pass a war powers resolution. He said politicians had always promised that 'new wars in the Middle East would be quick and easy.' 'Then they sent other people's children to fight and die endlessly,' Casar said. 'Enough.'
New York Post
34 minutes ago
- New York Post
Bill Clinton endorses former top aide Cuomo for NYC mayor
Ex-President Bill Clinton on Sunday endorsed his former Housing secretary Andrew Cuomo in the Big Apple's mayoral primary, describing the city as in 'crisis'' and his pal as a 'competent leader.' In a robocall released by Cuomo's campaign, the Democratic former commander in chief urged New Yorkers to back the ex-governor in the Tuesday's Dem showdown. 3 Former President Bill Clinton formally endorsed his previous HUD secretary, Andrew Cuomo, for New York City mayor in a robocall to voters. Paul Martinka Advertisement 'The election will decide the next mayor of New York, and I urge you to vote for Andrew Cuomo,' Clinton said in the recorded message. 'As president, I chose Andrew to be my secretary of Housing and Urban Development, and he never let me down.' Clinton, 78 — who lives in tony Chappaqua in Westchester County — noted that Cuomo worked in his presidential administration on such issues as affordable housing and helping to stave off hate, including 'discrimination, including against the Ku Klux Klan (KKK) and antisemitism,' he said. The ex-president said Cuomo can fix what he called a city in 'crisis. Advertisement 'New York City is facing major challenges. There is a desperate need for affordable housing, homelessness is at a crisis level, and public safety must be restored,' Clinton said. 'It is imperative that New York chooses a mayor who has the ability, talent, and experience to do the job. 'He's a fighter who knows how to make government work, and at a time when our basic rights are under assault, I know he'll stand up and protect the people of this city,' he said of Cuomo, adding his Dem buddy has the ability to raise the 'progressive standard.' 3 Clinton expressed his confidence that Cuomo could lead a city in 'crisis.' Matthew McDermott Advertisement Cuomo, 67, responded to the endorsement with gratitude. 'I am honored to have the support of President Bill Clinton — a personal mentor, friend, and hero. His administration was one of the most accomplished in modern political history,' Cuomo said in the message. Cuomo, who resigned in disgrace as governor in 2021 amid a slew of sexual-harassment allegations, is aiming for a political resurrection in his mayoral comeback bid. Cuomo has vehemently any accusation of wrongdoing. Clinton similarly had a presidency rocked by scandal. Advertisement His Oval Office affair with then-22-year-old intern Monica Lewinsky led him to be impeached by the House for perjury and obstruction of justice — though he was acquitted by the Senate and never resigned. 3 The two Democrats have had political careers rocked by scandal. Richard Harbus Clinton's endorsement of Cuomo comes just two days before the city's Tuesday primary. Democratic kingmaker and 84-year-old South Carolina Congressman Jim Clyburn endorsed Cuomo on Friday — as surging socialist contender Zohran Mamdani's campaign garnered a mix of fresh condemnation and support. In the city's ranked-choice voting contest, Cuomo currently prevails 55% to 45% against Mamdani in a potential seventh round, according to a recent Marist College Institute for Public Opinion survey. The poll indicated a big drop from a Marist poll conducted in May, when Cuomo led Mamdani 60% to 40% after all the other candidates were eliminated and second preference votes transferred to the two finalists.
