Court: NI farmer fined for water pollution offence
A court in Northern Ireland has fined a farmer for a water pollution offence arising from 'farm effluent' being discharged into a river.
Hugh Allen of Drumahiskey Road, Ballymoney, Co. Antrim was convicted today (Friday, June 6) at Coleraine Magistrates' Court for an offence under Article 7(1)(a) of the Water (Northern Ireland) Order 1999, as amended.
The 55-year-old had pleaded guilty and was fined £1,500 plus £15 offenders levy.
Court
The court heard that Northern Ireland Environment Agency (NIEA) water quality inspectors responded to a report of dead fish in the Ballymoney River on June 18, 2024.
The inspectors carried out their investigation in an upstream direction to where grey fungus was visible on the bed of the Ballymoney River.
The inspectors traced the polluting impact further upstream to a location where a concrete pipe was actively discharging farm effluent to the waterway.
As part of the investigation, a statutory sample of the discharge was collected and analysed.
The sample results indicated that the sample contained poisonous, noxious or polluting matter which would have been potentially harmful to aquatic life in a receiving waterway.
On June 19, 2024, inspectors examined the silo area on the suspected farm.
A silage effluent collection channel was noted to have been blocked with grass and as a result silage effluent was discharging from the silage clamp into a piped drain before entering the Ballymoney River.
The Department of Agriculture, Environment and Rural Affairs (DAERA) advised anyone wishing to report a pollution incident to call the 24-hour NIEA Incident Hotline on 0800 80 70 60.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Times
6 hours ago
- Irish Times
‘It's a matter of time before her husband is worn down by her': How the gossip website Tattle Life nearly broke me
Last week in Northern Ireland's High Court, Mr Justice Colton unmasked the owner of Tattle Life, a website which has become synonymous with online hatred, harassment and doxxing, as Sebastian Bond, also known as Bastian Durward. Bond, a vegan cooking influencer and author of the book Nest and Glow, had been taken to court by Neil and Donna Sands, a Northern Irish couple who were subject to defamation and harassment on the site. It awarded them £300,000 (€351,000) in libel damages, believed to be the largest defamation payout of its kind in Northern Ireland. Founded in 2018, Tattle Life describes itself as a 'commentary website on public business social media accounts'. For all intents and purposes, it's a gossip forum in the vein of Reddit, with threads on a variety of topics and individuals, which are posted and commented on by its users. But it's a lucrative one: it was making about £320,000 per year through online advertising. The official line of the website is that it serves to 'allow commentary and critiques of people that choose to monetise their personal life as a business and release it into the public domain', a version of 'if you're going to put yourself out there, you deserve whatever you get'. The fact that the website's founder put such a veil of secrecy around his own identity feels both ironic and exactly what you'd expect. Posters share to the site anonymously – much like Bond himself, who used the pseudonym Helen McDougal to post on the site – expressing grievances they maintain they can't otherwise. READ MORE But the reality of it is darker. As someone who's been the subject of several threads on Tattle – some positive, in the 'rave about' section, but more negative – I've seen first hand the relentless hatred the site facilitates, which is aimed, by and large, at female influencers. Given that women outnumber men in the influencer marketing industry, this is perhaps unsurprising, but even the more prolific male influencers don't inspire the same feverish vitriol as their female counterparts. [ Rosemary Mac Cabe: My 'menmoir' was a necessary exorcism of the ghosts in my head Opens in new window ] Though I was, for a time, a journalist, TV and radio personality and social influencer, since 2020 or thereabouts, I've written a reader-supported newsletter on Substack, co-presented a podcast with my sister, and posted inconsistently on Instagram, sharing my life in Indiana, where I moved to in March 2020. I've had an online presence for almost half of my life, and I've been the subject of criticism on the internet for just as long – but it was never quite as nasty as it has been since the dawn of Tattle. Though a disclaimer on the home page states it has 'a zero-tolerance policy to any content that is abusive, hateful or harmful', Tattle has been the site of some of the most personal attacks I've seen. I've seen comments about me such as: 'She's next level pathetic, adds no value to society, yet her entitlement knows no bounds'; 'it's only a matter of time before her husband is worn down by her relentless negativity. She really doesn't contribute anything of note to the family unit'; and 'She has to be the laziest person alive'. And this is tame by comparison to what I've seen on others' threads. There is no common link between posts. These people are not dedicated, for example, to exposing influencers who don't declare their sponsored content; or to catching out Instagram stars who are lying about what shampoo they use, or which mattress they sleep on. This is not about keeping the internet honest, although that is the lie a lot of them will tell, when pressed. Instead, the link is one of a kind of insidious, creeping misogyny; never are the users of Tattle Life more incensed than when a woman they follow seems to 'fail', somehow, in her role as a woman. They deride women for hiring cleaners. They are aghast at women whose husbands cook dinner ('what does she even do all day?!'). They are at their most vitriolic when they perceive a woman to be criticising her children or, worse, admonishing them in a tone any more severe than a Mary Poppins sing-song. Threats of calling child protective services are not uncommon. There's something bizarre about all of it; by and large, the most common influencer genres are fashion, beauty, wellness and fitness. The achievement of traditional femininity, both aesthetically and in lifestyle terms (marriage, children and the keeping of a tidy home), is never more rewarded than on Instagram and TikTok. But step one perfectly pedicured foot out of place and there is a legion of critics ready to tear you apart. It's easy to see what these people get out of it – Tattle provides a place to vent their frustration and irritation with, and even hatred of, influencers who, in their minds, don't deserve their success or good fortune. But figuring out what they want, beyond finding a sense of camaraderie with other disgruntled social media users, is more complex, and perhaps more importantly, futile. This week's news has been remarkably clarifying: here is yet another man profiting from a culture that pits woman against woman Neil and Donna Sands found legal recourse for their defamation at the hands of Tattle's users – and in the arduous and costly process brought to light the man behind the site who has profited from the thinly veiled misogyny directed at women with a public platform. Their victory has given hope to the many influencers who would like to see Tattle's anonymous users unveiled in the same way. But you'd have to wonder: to what end? Do we really need to know the names of these posters in order to know what kind of people they are? For me, this week's news has been remarkably clarifying: here is yet another man profiting from a culture that pits woman against woman, encouraging them to belittle and criticise one another. Instead of seeking to unmask these anonymous posters, perhaps it's time we directed our focus elsewhere. Tattle Life nearly broke me. I've tried to examine why, exactly, I've given anonymous strangers such power – the power to upset me, sure, but also, at times, the power to censor me, to humiliate me, to cause me to second-guess my every online move. In part, I think it's because a lot of their criticisms – about my work ethic or my body or my relationship – are things I've felt about myself, one time or another. But another aspect of it is that I just want everyone to like me. Discovering the identities of these people won't change that.
Irish Times
2 days ago
- Irish Times
The Irish Times view on the riots in Ballymena: unequivocal political response essential
The recent rioting in Ballymena and surrounding areas is troubling on a number of levels, not least that it is unlikely to be an isolated event. What started out as a peaceful protest following an alleged sexual assault of a teenage girl in Ballymena on June 7th quickly descended into race riots when it then emerged that the alleged perpetrators, two 14-year old boys, needed the services of a Romanian interpreter during their court appearance. Studies of what happened show that Ballymena became the locus of far-right social media activity. At the most acute phase of the rioting, Ballymena was mentioned nearly 80,000 times across different platforms. Crucially, most of these accounts were from outside Northern Ireland. An analysis of these posts shows that many of them fall within the legal definition of incitement to hatred. It also became clear that many of the rioters were not from Ballymena and were intent on exploiting local tensions. Sporadic violence spread elsewhere in Northern Ireland as well. READ MORE This is similar to what happened in Southport in southern England last year. Far-right activists are opportunistically co-ordinating through social media to stoke tensions and foment race riots. There are some lessons to be learned. One is the need for ongoing improvement in social media controls. Elon Musk, the owner of X, has dismantled most of the guardrails on his platform on the basis that they undermine free speech. The reality is that X has become an unmediated platform for hateful content that has very real consequences for the more vulnerable in society, such as the migrant community in Ballymena. Against this backdrop, the EU has no choice but to resist any pressure from the Trump administration to lessen controls on social media as a quid pro quo for a US-EU trade deal. A key goal of the EU rules is to place responsibility on social media companies to ensure online content is safe, fair and secure. However, local factors were also at play in Ballymena. The town has become an unemployment blackspot in recent decades. Meanwhile, the 2021 census shows the arrival of non-English speaking migrants into the town and surrounding areas in recent years. While some tensions have been reported, the recent riots are a dramatic and worrying escalation. In responding to this, political leadership is important. Wrapping criticism of thuggish, racist violence with suggestions that shortcomings in managing immigration in some way provide a rationale – as at least some politicians seem to have done – is not acceptable. Condemnation of what happened must be unequivocal.
Irish Independent
2 days ago
- Irish Independent
‘We'll go after every troll who's been stalking us': Couple's warning after gossip site Tattle Life legal win
A man who, along with his wife, took on a gossip website has warned they will go after every anonymous user who posted about the Northern Ireland-based couple.
