Mali government adopts bill granting junta leader five more years in power
Last Updated:
Bamako (Mali), Jun 12 (AP) Mali's Council of Ministers on Wednesday adopted a controversial bill granting the head of the military junta an additional five years in power.
Gen Assimi Goita has led the West African nation since orchestrating two coups in 2020 and 2021. The move follows the military regime's dissolution of political parties in May.
According to the government's cabinet statement, the bill will lead to the 'revision of the Transition Charter, granting the Head of State a five-year renewable mandate starting in 2025." It implements the recommendations of the national dialogue consultations organised by the military regime in April, which the political parties boycotted.
The bill now awaits ratification by the National Transitional Council, the legislative body overseeing the transition.
Earlier in May, Gen Goita signed a decree dissolving political parties, a decision made against a backdrop of burgeoning opposition. It coincided with a surge in kidnappings of pro-democracy activists in the capital, Bamako, and just days after a demonstration by several hundred activists.
Mali, a landlocked nation in the semi-arid region of Sahel, has been embroiled in political instability that swept across West and Central Africa over the last decade.
The nation has seen two military coups since 2020 as an insurgency by jihadi groups linked to al-Qaida and the Islamic State group worsened. The junta had promised a return to civilian rule by March 2024, but later postponed elections. No date has been set yet for the presidential election. (AP) RUK RUK
First Published:
June 12, 2025, 05:15 IST
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
Middle East conflict: Could Iran's nuclear sites turn toxic? Experts weigh risks after US and Israeli strikes
This satellite image provided by Maxar Technologies shows the Fordo enrichment facility in Iran before U.S. strikes, Friday, June 20, 2025. (Pic credit: AP) As US and Israeli airstrikes tear through Iran's key nuclear infrastructure, international attention is shifting to a far graver question: Are these attacks triggering nuclear contamination risks across the region? US President Donald Trump declared on Sunday that Iran's most fortified nuclear sites, including Fordow, Natanz, and Isfahan, had been "completely obliterated" in coordinated military strikes. While Iran denies the presence of nuclear weapons at the sites, several of them are central to the country's uranium enrichment program. So far, the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) has not detected increased radiation levels outside the impacted areas. But experts warn that doesn't mean there's no danger. Which sites were hit and what do they contain? The US strikes targeted: Fordow: An underground uranium enrichment facility Natanz: Home to centrifuge halls and production centers Isfahan: A complex that includes Iran's Uranium Conversion Facility Previous Israeli strikes also hit Arak (Khondab), a site under construction, and other centrifuge hubs in Tehran and Karaj. While most of these sites were not actively running reactors, they did contain uranium hexafluoride (UF6), a toxic chemical compound used in uranium enrichment. Chemical, not radiological but still dangerous Experts emphasise: attacks on enrichment sites like Natanz or Isfahan don't create nuclear mushroom clouds, but they can release toxic substances, especially UF6, into the air. "When uranium hexafluoride interacts with moisture, it creates harmful chemicals," Reuters quoted Darya Dolzikova of London's RUSI think-tank. "The danger is more chemical than radiological but still real." Whether those chemicals stay near the site or spread across borders depends on wind speed, direction, and the facility's depth underground. Are underground sites safer to bomb? Ironically, yes. Hitting a site buried under concrete and rock, like Fordow, may actually reduce the spread of contamination. "You're burying the hazardous material in tons of earth," said Simon Bennett, a safety expert from the University of Leicester. "The material is toxic, but it doesn't travel far, and it's barely radioactive in its pre-reactor form." The nightmare scenario: Bushehr While attacks on enrichment sites carry low to moderate environmental risk, experts warn that a strike on the Bushehr nuclear power plant could trigger a radiological catastrophe. Located on Iran's Gulf coast, Bushehr is an active reactor. Israeli forces mistakenly claimed to have struck the site on June 19, sparking panic before walking the statement back. "A hit on Bushehr could release radioactive material into the sea or air," said James Acton of the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. "It would be a Chernobyl-level disaster in waiting." Why the Gulf states are extremely nervous The Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) is on high alert. Not just because of fallout, but because millions depend on the Gulf's waters for desalinated drinking water. Qatar, Bahrain, and the UAE rely on desalination for over 80–100% of their water supply Saudi Arabia still sources 50% from desalination An oil spill, natural disaster, or nuclear leak could cripple the region's water infrastructure "One contaminant near a coastal desalination plant can shut down freshwater access for an entire city," said Nidal Hilal, director of NYU Abu Dhabi's Water Research Centre.
Hindustan Times
2 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
How US military's decoy B-2 Bomber mission helped it achieve stealth during Iran strikes
The United States military employed decoy tactics and misdirection to maintain the surprise element in its strikes on nuclear sites in Iran, the Pentagon revealed on Sunday. The military scrambled a fake B-2 stealth bomber mission to draw attention away from its real mission -- the bombing of three Iranian nuclear sites. US defense secretary Pete Hegseth during a press conference on strikes against Iran. (AP) The operation was called "Midnight Hammer". It entailed bombing using 125 aircraft overall, strikes by Tomahawk missiles launched from a US submarine, and the use of 14 Massive Ordnance Penetrator bombs (also called bunker-buster bombs). The military created a diversion by ordering a fake missing. A group of B-2 bombers flew west across the Pacific Ocean as decoys to maintain tactical surprise, according to US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth. News reports on Saturday morning that picked up on flight-tracker data suggested those planes were being deployed as a way to strong-arm Iran into fresh talks on its nuclear program, reported Bloomberg. These planes got all the attention, including that of Iranian defenders. Another group of B-2s flew east carrying the bunker-busters. Air-refuelling tankers, a guided missile submarine, and fourth- and fifth-generation fighters were involved in the attack, which hit nuclear sites at Fordow, Isfahan and Natanz. The White House had promised on Thursday that President Donald Trump would decide on a strike 'within two weeks,' suggesting there might be more time. The Pentagon called the strikes a successful operation. The officials said Iran didn't fire at US military assets. Hegseth said members of Congress were only notified after the planes were out of danger. Hegseth said the plane took several months of preparation. "This is a plan that took months and weeks of positioning and preparation, so that we could be ready when the president of the United States called,' said. 'It took a great deal of precision. It involved misdirection and the highest level of operational security.' Also read: Iran Israel war news LIVE updates: Iran parliament orders closure of Strait of Hormuz, says report US attacks Iran Trump said on Saturday that the US strikes hit key nuclear enrichment facilities and obliterated them. The US strikes came after a week of open conflict between Israel and Iran, sparked by Israel's sudden barrage of attacks against Iran's nuclear and military structure. Israeli strikes began on June 13. Targeting Iranian military and nuclear sites, they killed several top military officials and nuclear scientists. Iran retaliated by firing hundreds of missiles and drones at Israel, some of which penetrated the country's vaunted multi-tiered air defence system. Reacting to the attack, Iranian foreign minister Abbas Araghchi said that Iran 'strongly condemns' the US attacks on its nuclear sites. He held Washington "responsible" for the consequences of its act of aggression. Araghchi added that US President Donald Trump did not just betray Iran but "deceived his nation". The Iranian foreign minister said the US "betrayed diplomacy and negotiations", adding that it is irrelevant to ask Tehran to return to diplomacy. With inputs from AFP, AP
Hindustan Times
2 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
Perils of war in West Asia
The ongoing Iran-Israel conflict threatens to turn into a regional war with the US bombing three nuclear sites in Iran Sunday morning. President Donald Trump has announced that the bombings obliterated Iran's nuclear facilities and, ominously, said more attacks could follow if 'peace does not come quickly'. Tehran has indicated that it will retaliate. Iran's neighbourhood is home to numerous US bases that house over 40,000 American troops, warships, and other equipment. What follows next, especially the nature, scale, and targets of Iran's response, will shape the contours of the conflict and the power relations in West Asia. India imports about 40% of all its oil and about half of its liquified natural gas through the narrow Strait of Hormuz that separates Iran from the Arab peninsula, which Tehran has threatened to close (AP) The US's entry into this war is significant in many ways. One, it is a unilateral action unlike its 2001 invasion of Afghanistan or 2003 attack on Iraq, when it received material support from its Nato allies such as the UK. Israeli PM Benjamin Netanyahu said that US strikes were carried out 'in full coordination' between the American and Israeli militaries. Two, the White House did not take the US Congress into confidence before ordering the bombing of Iran's nuclear sites. Three, Trump's action lacks bipartisan support and even threatens to divide his core Make America Great Again (MAGA) constituency. The Republican leader had promised during his presidential campaign that he would stop America's participation in global conflicts and pursue peace in Ukraine and Gaza. How Trump steers the US out of the current crisis, especially if Tehran targets its assets in the region, will have implications for the remainder of his term. An extended war in West Asia will plunge the world into a crisis. The immediate impact will be felt on oil prices. Shipping routes in the region may come under attack, impacting global trade in a big way. The turmoil in Iran, seen as the custodian of Shia interests, will have repercussions beyond national borders. Proxy Iranian militias in the region — Hezbollah, Hamas, and Houthis — have been silent but they can disrupt Western interests in the region, and add to the instability. As for India, any war in West Asia is bad news. One, India imports about 40% of all its oil and about half of its liquified natural gas through the narrow Strait of Hormuz that separates Iran from the Arab peninsula, which Tehran has threatened to close. Two, close to nine million Indians work in West Asia and a wider conflict in the region has dire economic consequences. Three, if the US and Israel weaken Iran and force a regime change in Tehran, it may open up the space for countries such as Pakistan, which is evident from the new bonhomie between Washington and Rawalpindi. New Delhi must play its cards carefully.
