Signalgate 2.0: After Hegseth's leaked Signal chat, watchdog files suit to preserve Trump officials' messages

A nonprofit watchdog group, American Oversight, expanded a lawsuit on Monday aimed at several senior national security officials in the Trump administration, requesting a federal judge to mandate the preservation of all messages sent via the encrypted communications app Signal.
Tired of too many ads? go ad free now
The lawsuit was filed in US District Court in Washington, DC, and focuses on messages related to official business that have been sent using Signal, an app with an auto-delete feature and no apparent record-keeping system for federal records.
The amended lawsuit follows a New York Times report revealing that Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth shared details about military strikes in Yemen on March 15 in a private Signal group chat.
The chat, which also included Hegseth's wife, brother, and personal lawyer, was part of a broader issue of government officials using Signal for official communications.
The suit expands on an earlier version filed by American Oversight in response to the revelation that Hegseth, CIA Director John Ratcliffe, and Vice President JD Vance were part of a separate Signal chat where they discussed sensitive matters about military strikes in Yemen against Houthi rebels.
The lawsuit contends that the use of Signal by top officials for official government business is widespread and may violate federal records retention requirements.
American Oversight's new request asks Judge James Boasberg, who is overseeing the case, to preserve messages sent by or received from Hegseth, Ratcliffe, and other officials, including National Intelligence Director Tulsi Gabbard, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, and Secretary of State Marco Rubio.
Tired of too many ads? go ad free now
Late last month, Boasberg had already ordered the preservation of messages from the "Houthi PC Small Group Chat," where officials discussed the Yemen strikes.
Hegseth's use of Signal for these communications raised further concern when it was revealed that a second chat—dubbed 'Defense 'Team Huddle''—included details of the same Yemen strikes and involved 13 individuals, including Hegseth's family members and other personal associates.
The group was not authorized to use Signal for sensitive or classified information, raising questions about the handling of government communication.
In response, the White House and Pentagon dismissed concerns, accusing former employees of spreading false information. White House deputy press secretary Anna Kelly argued that "no classified information was shared" in the chats and claimed that disgruntled ex-employees were attempting to undermine the administration.
President Donald Trump publicly defended Hegseth, calling any concerns over his actions a "waste of time." Speaking on the South Lawn after the Easter Egg Roll, Trump expressed confidence in Hegseth's handling of military operations. "He's doing a great job – ask the Houthis how he's doing," Trump remarked, referring to the Yemen rebel group targeted in the strikes.
Trump's backing of Hegseth is part of a broader pattern of standing by his top officials, despite controversies.
Sources close to the president have stated that Trump is determined to resist any pressure to dismiss Hegseth, emphasizing that he does not want to provide satisfaction to "fake news" outlets by firing a key figure in his administration.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Business Standard

29 minutes ago

• Business Standard

Trump hints at regime change, says 'Make Iran Great Again': Top points

US President Donald Trump has made another U-turn on his stance on the Israel-Iran conflict, suggesting the possibility of a regime change in Tehran days after denying it. In a post on X, Trump wrote: "It's not politically correct to use the term, 'Regime Change,' but if the current Iranian Regime is unable to MAKE IRAN GREAT AGAIN, why wouldn't there be a Regime change??? MIGA!!!" On Sunday, the US launched strikes on three key nuclear programme sites in Iran, with Trump saying that the sites were 'completely and fully obliterated'. Iran vowed retaliation, with the country's parliament approving the closure of the Strait of Hormuz to Western ships. Here are the top developments on the Israel-Iran conflict: 1. Hostilities between Israel and Iran continued on Monday, with both countries exchanging missile strikes. According to an Israeli military spokesperson, Israeli fighter jets targeted military positions in western Iran. Earlier, Iranian missile attacks caused significant damage in Tel Aviv, injuring numerous civilians and destroying buildings. 2. The Israeli military announced that its forces had targeted several Iranian military locations on Sunday. "Approximately 20 (Israeli air force) fighter jets conducted intelligence-based strikes using over 30 munitions on military targets in Iran," the Israeli army stated on Telegram, as reported by AFP. The strikes focused on 'storage and missile launching infrastructure sites', in addition to 'military satellites and radar sites'. Amid reports of strikes in Tehran, air defence systems were activated in central areas of the Iranian capital, according to local media cited by Reuters. 3. At a UN Security Council emergency session, Acting US Ambassador Dorothy Shea reiterated Trump's warning that any Iranian aggression — either direct or through its proxies — against American personnel or assets would result in strong retaliation. 4. Russia's UN envoy Vassily Nebenzia condemned the US airstrikes on Iran's nuclear facilities, warning they had opened a 'Pandora's box' with unpredictable outcomes. He said Moscow had offered to mediate but claimed the US showed no interest in peaceful dialogue. Nebenzia warned of a potential large-scale conflict with dangerous global consequences if de-escalation efforts failed. 5. Iran accused the US of derailing diplomatic efforts by bombing its nuclear infrastructure. Amir Saeid Iravani, Iran's envoy to the UN, said the Iranian military would determine the 'timing, nature and scale of Iran's proportionate response". He also alleged that Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu had influenced President Trump to escalate tensions and involve the US in another costly regional conflict. 6. International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) Director General Rafael Grossi voiced concern over the rising tensions, warning that the US strikes could worsen the Israel-Iran standoff. However, he said that diplomacy remained possible and called on Iran to permit inspectors to verify the country's 4,400 kg stockpile of uranium enriched to 60 per cent. 7. Amid growing regional instability, India's evacuation drive continued. The Ministry of External Affairs confirmed the safe return of 311 Indian nationals from Mashhad to New Delhi on June 22. This brings the total number of evacuated citizens to 1,428. 8. Global oil markets reacted sharply, with Brent crude prices surging up to 5.7 per cent, hitting $81.40 a barrel. The US strikes on Iran's main nuclear sites sparked fears of potential disruptions in energy supply from West Asia. 9. US Vice President JD Vance said that the United States was targeting Iran's nuclear programme — not the country itself. 'We're not at war with Iran. We're at war with Iran's nuclear programme,' Vance said on NBC's Meet the Press with Kristen Welker. He credited the strikes with setting Iran's nuclear ambitions back by several years and criticised Tehran for failing to negotiate in good faith. 10. On Saturday, Iran's Health Ministry reported that Israeli strikes had resulted in around 400 deaths and left around 3,056 people injured. (With agency inputs)

Mint

37 minutes ago

• Mint

‘Stop the war on Iran': Mass protests rock New York after US strikes Tehran; netizens ask ‘Do they have permit'

Anti-war protests erupted as demonstrators marched through the streets of New York to condemn the recent US airstrikes on Iranian nuclear facilities amid heightened security measures across major cities in the US. Meanwhile, netizens asked whether they have permit to march on streets. Hundreds of protesters took to the streets of New York, waving Palestinian flags and carrying signs that read "Hands Off Iran" and 'Stop the War on Iran', in response to Operation Midnight Hammer, a US-led military strike targeting Tehran's nuclear sites, namely Fordow, Natanz and Esfahan. Voicing the criticism toward Israel, protestors accused it of instigating the conflict with Iran and condemning its military actions in Gaza. One of the users commented, 'Do they have a permit to march in the street like that? If not, why is it tolerated?' Another stated, 'Do they have permits? Then arrest them. Charge them. Repeat.' A third remarked, 'Expected'. 'Nobody cares', 'Sad. Ignorant. Deviant.', 'Amazing. Preprinted signs carried by the unemployed. Where oh where do they get the money to print all of those signs? Hmmm' were some other reactions. Earlier in the day, the New York City Police Department (NYPD) mentioned that it was increasing its presence at key locations throughout the city to closely monitor any potential repercussions as the situation in Iran evolves. More resources would be deployed to religious, cultural and diplomatic sites throughout the city, it added, stressing the coordination with federal partners as part of precautionary measures. 'We're tracking the situation unfolding in Iran. Out of an abundance of caution, we're deploying additional resources to religious, cultural, and diplomatic sites across NYC and coordinating with our federal partners. We'll continue to monitor for any potential impact to NYC,' it said. Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth spoke of the success of the operation carried out by the US in Iran on Sunday. "Last night, on President Trump's order, the US Central Command conducted a precision strike in the middle of the night against three nuclear facilities in Iran - Fordow, Isfahan, and Natanz - in order to destroy or severely degrade Iran's nuclear programme. As Chairman of the Joint Chiefs will demonstrate, it was an incredible and overwhelming success," Hegseth stated.

Hindustan Times

39 minutes ago

• Hindustan Times

Did Iran move 400kg uranium from key nuclear site before US strikes? Israel officials reveal

The Fordow Fuel Enrichment Plant in Iran was one of the three nuclear facilities the US military struck on Sunday as it got directly involved in the Israel-Iran conflict. A satellite view shows an overview of Fordow underground complex, after the US struck the underground nuclear facility. (Source: Reuters)(REUTERS) As US President Donald Trump announced the US military action on the Natanz, Fordow and Isfahan plants, he said that that nuclear sites were "completely and totally obliterated". Later, satellite images also showed grave damage to the Fordow plant and to the mountain south of Tehran where it is located. However, two Israeli officials have told the New York Times that Iran had moved a significant amount of uranium and other equipment from the Fordow plant before the US strikes. Uranium in 400 kg in quantity and enriched to 60 per cent purity, barely short of the weapons-grade levels of 90 per cent, was reportedly moved from the enrichment plant as the Trump administration sought time to decide if the US would send ground troops to Iran. Even when the US strikes sparked radiation leak fears, Iran had said that the nuclear sites struck did not contain materials that cause radiation. According to the NYT report, senior US officials, including Vice President JD Vance, has conceded that they were not aware of where Iran's stockpile of uranium was. Vance reportedly has said that the US would work towards ensuring that something is done with the uranium. "That's one of the things that we're going to have conversations with the Iranians about," he told ABC. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth and the new chairman of the Joint Chiefs of staff, Dan Caine's remarks were also not in line with Trump's "completely and totally obliterated" claim for the nuclear sites. The US officials only said that significant damage and destruction was caused, which is also what the Israeli military's initial assessment of the strikes showed. Considered impenetrable by Israeli bombs, the Fordow plant was a primary target of the US military action. It is believed to have the capability to produce enough weapons-grade material for up to nine nuclear bombs in less than a month. The US had dropped six bunker buster bombs in strikes on Fordow and 30 Tomahawk missiles on other Iranian nuclear sites.