Kanata nuclear facility owner broke law during strike, labour board rules

Social Sharing
A federal labour board has found the owner of a west Ottawa nuclear facility broke the law by failing to negotiate with employees in good faith during a protracted strike.
About 40 Best Theratronics Ltd. (BTL) workers represented by Unifor returned to work late last month after securing an 11 per cent wage increase and a new collective agreement, more than nine months after walking off the job.
About a dozen workers represented by the Public Service Alliance of Canada (PSAC) are still on strike.
Last week, the Canada Industrial Relations Board (CIRB) upheld unfair labour practice complaints against the owner of the medical manufacturing company.
In separate complaints lodged last year, Unifor and PSAC accused the owner of BTL, Krishnan Suthanthiran, of breaching the Canada Labour Code.
CIRB heard the complaints as BTL is federally regulated as a licensed nuclear facility.
In a decision dated Feb. 27, the independent administrative tribunal found that BTL had failed to bargain in good faith, a breach of the code.
BTL also failed to give representatives authority to bargain on its behalf and had bargained in bad faith by disseminating false and misleading communications designed to influence the bargaining process, CIRB found.
Reasons for decision to come later
CIRB also found that BTL issued explicit anti-union statements, which undermined the unions in the eyes of bargaining unit employees. BTL's communications amounted to an attempt to interfere with the representation of PSAC's members, the board found.
Finally, CIRB concluded that BTL disseminated misinformation as a means of threatening, intimidating and coercing unionized workers so that they would not continue their affiliation with the complainants and exercise their collective bargaining rights.
The board said it would provide its reasoning at a later date.
CIRB also said that before exercising "its remedial powers" it had appointed an industrial relations officer to assist the parties in resolving the dispute, asking him to report back before March 31.
One union disappointed
In a statement, PSAC regional executive vice-president Ruth Lau MacDonald said they were happy CIRB recognized that BTL had violated the code.
But the union is "disappointed that the decision only entails a CIRB staff resource to be assigned and report back by March 31," she added.
"This means that the board is not making use of its remedial powers to fix the situation, while our workers have been on the picket line for almost 300 days now."
While the two sides are still trying to reach an agreement, BTL has not responded to PSAC since last Thursday, she said.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Cision Canada

2 days ago

• Cision Canada

Protecting Canadian Labour: Replacement Workers Legislation now in Force

GATINEAU, QC, June 20, 2025 /CNW/ - As of today, Bill C-58, An Act to amend the Canada Labour Code and the Canada Industrial Relations Board Regulations, 2012, came into force. This legislation strengthens protections for Canadian workers – because they are the foundation of Canada's ambition. What we heard is that the use of replacement workers compromises the fundamental right to strike; it can tip the scales, derail good faith bargaining, and heighten tensions. That is why the Government of Canada introduced and passed Bill C-58. Starting today, the use of replacement workers to do the work of unionized employees who are on strike or locked out is prohibited in federally regulated workplaces, allowing parties to stay focused on reaching fair, negotiated deals. Changes have also been made to improve the maintenance of activities process. Employers and unions must now come to an agreement within 15 days after notice to bargain is issued to determine what work needs to continue to protect the health and safety of the public during a work stoppage. If they cannot agree, the Canada Industrial Relations Board will decide what activities need to be maintained, if any. A strong economy depends on stable labour relations. These amendments to the Canada Labour Code will improve labour relations, protect workers' right to strike, limit interruptions to collective bargaining and provide greater stability to the economy during federal labour disputes. At the heart of the Government's vision is collaboration – and we thank the unions, stakeholders, workers and partners for their work on this bill – to make sure Canada has the skilled talent and support to meet the needs of this critical moment. Quotes "Banning the use of replacement workers in federally regulated sectors during strikes or lockouts is a major win for workers' rights, collective bargaining, and fairness. This is a historic victory after decades of union advocacy and paves the way for more stable, respectful labour relations in Canada." – Patty Hajdu, Minister of Jobs and Families and Minister responsible for the Federal Economic Development Agency for Northern Ontario "The Canadian labour movement has been asking for this for a long time. The use of replacement workers during federal strikes and lockouts is officially prohibited. This marks a milestone that levels the playing field and ensures parties work towards getting a fair deal at the bargaining table." – John Zerucelli, Secretary of State (Labour) Quick facts The legislation was developed through extensive consultations with unions and employers and received support in Parliament. From 1999 to 2025, a limited prohibition on replacement workers was in place. Prior to 1999, employers were not prohibited in any way from using replacement workers during a strike or lockout. The ban on replacement workers applies to any strike or lockout ongoing on or after June 20, 2025, and the new maintenance of activities requirements apply to any collective bargaining process for which notice to bargain is given on or after June 20, 2025. Exceptions may apply in situations where there are health and safety threats that cannot be managed by the employer's existing workforce. A union or an employee who believes that an employer is violating this ban can file a complaint with the Canada Industrial Relations Board (CIRB), which will investigate the issue. The CIRB is the independent administrative tribunal that resolves workplace disputes and certain appeals that arise under the Canada Labour Code. SOURCE Employment and Social Development Canada

Ottawa Citizen

13-06-2025

• Ottawa Citizen

Ottawa's Best Theratronics misses nuclear decommissioning guarantee deadline

A Kanata company that produces nuclear medical equipment has failed to meet a June 9 deadline set by the Canada's nuclear safety watchdog. Article content Best Theratronics Ltd. manufactures external beam therapy units, blood irradiators, and cyclotrons for hospitals and medical research centres outside Canada. It's part of the Virginia-based TeamBest Global Companies empire headed by Krishnan Suthanthiran, who purchased the company from MDS Nordion in 2007 for a reported $15 million. Article content Article content Article content Last November, Best Theratronics was ordered to provide a $1.8-million financial guarantee to cover the costs of decommissioning the plant on March Road, should that be necessary, by the Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission (CNSC). Article content Article content Given that the deadline has passed, 'CNSC staff will be contacting Best Theratronics to determine the next steps,' said the commission, which regulates nuclear energy, facilities and materials. Article content 'The financial order is still in place and Best Theratronics has not yet fulfilled the conditions of the order.' Article content Best Theratronics is required to re-establish an overall financial guarantee of $1.8 million acceptable to the commission, which is calculated based on the estimated costs of decommissioning, said CNSC in a statement. Article content Article content 'As Canada's nuclear regulator, our rigorous oversight of this facility is ongoing, and we continue to monitor Best Theratronics Ltd. and all nuclear licensees for regular compliance to ensure the safety of workers, the public and the environment.' Article content The financial guarantee is a condition of Best Theratronics' operating licence. According to a CNSC decision, Best Theratronics had failed to maintain the financial guarantee, gave inaccurate reports to the CNSC about the validity of its financial guarantee and was inattentive to updating its preliminary decommissioning plan. That was cause for 'significant concern,' said the decision, signed by CNSC president Pierre Tremblay. Article content Under the CNSB order, among other conditions, Best Theratronics can't operate a cyclotron or possess nuclear substances for manufacturing radiation devices and radioactive source teletherapy machines. It also can't possess a radioactive source teletherapy machine for the purposes of developing and testing radioactive source teletherapy machines.

CBC

13-06-2025

• CBC

Canada's 'worst boss' defies nuclear regulator, threatens to sue

A licensed nuclear facility in Kanata is ignoring orders from the federal regulator, with the owner claiming in all-caps rants that he will sue the Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission (CNSC). A deadline passed this week for Best Theratronics Ltd. (BTL) to provide the CNSC with a written update on its progress toward restoring a lapsed financial guarantee. After receiving no response from the company, the CNSC told CBC in an email that it will now "determine the next steps." BTL owner Krishnan Suthanthiran did not respond by publication time when asked about the deadline elapsing, but has previously accused CNSC of wrongdoing. "We are not in violation of CNSC RULES , it is CNSC THAT IS IN VIOLATION OF THEIR OWN RULES," Suthanthiran wrote to CBC in an email last month, claiming he was filing a lawsuit against the CNSC. "THIS AND MY BUSINESS EXPERIENCE IN CANADA WILL BE A GLOBAL MOVIE - DOCU DRAMA - under the generic title , " NO GOOD DEED GOES UNPUNISHED ", the septuagenarian continued, using idiosyncratic capitalization and punctuation. With Suthanthiran's conflict with the CNSC stretching back to last November, critics say the case highlights issues with the regulator's cosy relationship with the industry it oversees and raises questions about whether taxpayer money could be at stake if the dispute is not revolved. 'Canada's worst boss' BTL is a manufacturer of cancer treatment machines with a Class 1B nuclear substance processing facility operating licence. Formerly part of Crown corporation Atomic Energy Canada Ltd., it was privatized in the 1990s and then sold to the Indian-born Suthanthiran in 2007. The licence permits it to handle nuclear isotopes involved in the production of cobalt-60 external beam radiation therapy units and cesium-137 self-contained blood irradiators. As part of its licence, BTL is required to maintain a $1.8-million financial guarantee, to cover any costs associated with cleanup or decommissioning, should the company default on its obligations. Last year, as BTL was involved in a protracted labour dispute in which striking workers labelled Suthanthiran "Canada's worst boss," the CNSC was made aware this guarantee had lapsed. At the same time, the regulator was growing concerned about security at the then empty facility. In November, the CNSC issued two orders against BTL, one relating to restoring the financial guarantee and another related to security at the facility while the workers were on strike. In February, the CNSC amended the financial guarantee order, giving BTL until June 9 to provide a written update. "Providing extensions and long timelines for compliance is a hallmark of a regulator that is being too deferential and accommodating of industry," said Theresa McClenaghan, executive director of the Canadian Environmental Law Association. This accommodative approach toward a recalcitrant licensee was also seen in communications CNSC sent to BTL advising the company that it may be in breach of the financial guarantee order. "Some of the activities that Best Theratronics Ltd. has indicated have occurred ... may not be allowed under section 1 of the amended order," it wrote in a May 15 email seen by CBC. "As such, we request that you cease these activities." In a response seen by CBC, Suthanthiran replied to the regulator: "I HAVE BEEN BUSY IN RAISING LOAN FUNDS TO KEEP BTL OPERATIONAL , ( but not other companies ) . BUT WHY ARE YOU CHARGING LINCE FEES QUARTERLY WHEN YOU ARE DENYING THE CANCER PATIENTS GLOBALLY FROM GETTING THEIR TREATMENT . "CNSC TREAMENT OF BTL IS NOT A REGULATORY PRUDENCE BUT CRIMINAL . "BEST WISHES , HAVE A GRSAT FRIDAY ." 'The captive regulator problem' Part of CNSC's difficulty in dealing Suthanthiran is that its regulatory framework does not envisage dealing with bad faith actors, according to McClenaghan. Instead, its light-touch regulatory philosophy relies on licensed operators to uphold standards. "Licensees are directly responsible for managing regulated activities in a manner that protects health, safety, security and the environment," the CNSC writes on its website. "I can't think of a time in Canada where you just had somebody completely not complying" with orders, said McClenaghan. "In my view, the CNSC is not sufficiently independent." Among the next steps the CNSC may consider, it has the power to revoke Suthanthiran's licence. "The CNSC uses a graduated approach to enforcement to encourage and compel compliance and deter future non-compliances," a CNSC spokesperson told CBC in an email. "Enforcement actions can range from simply informing the licensee, to issuing an order or an administrative monetary penalty, to revocation of a licence and prosecution in the most extreme of cases." Green Party Leader Elizabeth May believes Suthanthiran's licence should be revoked. "Why is he still operating in Canada when he's out of compliance with many orders that the company has been issued?" she asked. Under investigation in Belgium In 2012, another company owned by Suthanthiran, Best Medical Belgium, was placed into administration after Belgian authorities accused Suthanthiran of illegally draining funds from the company and walking away. The Walloon regional government said the total cost of that cleanup operation eventually reached €128 million, now worth about $200 million Cdn. A criminal investigation into Suthanthiran in Belgium is ongoing, the Belgian prosecutor has told CBC. Given Suthanthiran's history, it is problematic that the CNSC has not moved more swiftly, according to May. "It's basically the captive regulator problem," she said, suggesting the CNSC may be too close to the industry it oversees. BTL is in the riding of Liberal MP Jenna Sudds, who said she takes matters of regulatory compliance seriously. "Ignoring directives from our national regulatory body raises serious concerns about the commitment to safety standards that protect both employees and our community," Sudds wrote in an emailed statement, adding that she will "monitor this situation closely."