It's Europe's 'global euro's moment, says ECB's Lagarde as dollar stumbles

ECB's Christine Lagarde says the euro's global moment is now, urging Europe to act boldly as US dollar's supremacy falters read more
Europe stands at a critical crossroads in the shifting landscape of global finance, according to European Central Bank President Christine Lagarde. In a detailed article published in the Financial Times, Lagarde emphasises a 'profound shift in the global order,' where the foundations of open markets and multilateral rules are fracturing, and the long-standing dominance of the US dollar—the cornerstone of the international system—is no longer guaranteed.
'The rise of protectionism, zero-sum thinking and bilateral power plays are replacing the old order,' Lagarde warns. This growing uncertainty is already exacting a heavy toll on Europe's economy, which is deeply integrated into global trade networks supporting some 30 million jobs. However, she emphasises that this disruption also offers Europe a unique opportunity to 'take greater control of its own destiny' and to elevate the euro's role on the world stage.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Currently, the euro is the world's second most-used currency, representing about 20 per cent of global foreign exchange reserves, compared with the US dollar's 58 per cent. Lagarde argues that increasing the euro's global status would yield 'tangible benefits,' including lower borrowing costs for European entities, reduced vulnerability to currency fluctuations, and protection from sanctions or coercive measures imposed by other powers.
Yet, she stresses that this rise will not happen automatically. 'It must be earned,' she writes, noting that despite growing concerns about the dollar's dominance, investors have so far preferred to increase their holdings of gold rather than shift to alternative currencies.
To realise the euro's full potential, Lagarde identifies three foundational pillars that Europe must strengthen: geopolitical credibility, economic resilience, and legal and institutional integrity.
First, Europe's geopolitical standing is crucial. The EU is the world's largest trading bloc and the primary partner for 72 countries, accounting for nearly 40 per cent of global GDP. This trade dominance is reflected in the euro's use as an invoicing currency, which currently stands at around 40 per cent. Lagarde calls on the EU to leverage this position by forging new trade agreements and rebuilding its hard power, which she believes will bolster confidence in the euro globally.
Second, economic strength underpins any international currency's success. Lagarde points to Europe's persistent structural challenges, including sluggish growth, fragmented capital markets, and a shortage of high-quality safe assets. While the EU's aggregate fiscal position is relatively strong, with a debt-to-GDP ratio of 89 per cent compared to 124 per cent in the US, the supply of sovereign bonds rated AA or higher is less than 50 per cent of GDP—far below US levels. To address this, she urges completing the single market, reducing regulatory barriers, and building a robust capital markets union. Supporting strategic sectors such as green technologies and defence through coordinated EU-wide policies, including joint financing of public goods, could also increase the supply of safe assets.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Third, investor confidence depends on the strength and integrity of institutions backing the currency. Lagarde acknowledges that the EU's complex structure can be difficult to understand from outside, but she insists that its inclusive decision-making processes guarantee checks and balances, stability, and policy certainty. Respect for the rule of law and the independence of institutions like the ECB are critical advantages that Europe should leverage. To enhance this further, she calls for institutional reforms, including limiting the use of single-member vetoes that block collective EU interests and expanding qualified majority voting in key areas to enable Europe to speak with one voice.
Lagarde concludes with a powerful reminder that global currency regimes have shifted before and can shift again. 'This moment of change is an opportunity for Europe: it is a 'global euro' moment,' she writes. 'To seize it and enhance the euro's role in the international monetary system, we must act decisively as a united Europe taking greater control of its own destiny.'
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Her message is clear: Europe must rise to the challenge, turning uncertainty into opportunity by strengthening its economic, geopolitical, and institutional foundations to secure the euro's place as a truly global currency.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Mint

an hour ago

• Mint

Europe wants to show it's ready for war. Would anyone show up to fight?

Nice tanks you got there, Europe—got anyone to drive 'em? Such are the taunts the continent's generals might have to endure following the announcement of a splurge in defence spending expected from the NATO summit in The Hague on June 24th-25th. Assuming European governments don't bin their commitments to bigger defence budgets once some kind of peace is agreed to in Ukraine—or Donald Trump leaves the White House—spending on their armed forces will roughly double within a decade. A disproportionate slug of the jump from a 2% of GDP spending target to 3.5% will go towards purchasing equipment. But armies are about people, too. Attracting youngsters to a career that involves getting shot at has never been easy; a bit of forceful nagging (known in military jargon as 'conscription") is already on the cards in some countries. Even dragooning recalcitrant teens into uniform will not solve a problem that is lurking deep in the continent's psyche. Europeans are proud of their peaceful ways. If war breaks out there, will anybody be there to fight it? Polling that asks people how they would behave in case of an invasion ought to send shivers down the spines of Europe's drill sergeants. Last year a Gallup survey asked citizens in 45 countries how willing they would be to take up arms in case of war. Four of the five places with the least enthusiastic fighters globally were in Europe, including Spain, Germany and notably Italy, where just 14% of respondents said they were up for taking on a foreign foe. Given Russia's snail-paced advances since it launched its full-scale invasion of Ukraine in 2022, countries over a thousand kilometres away from today's front lines may not feel the chill wind of the Kremlin. But even in Poland, which shares a border with Ukraine (and with the Russian exclave of Kaliningrad), fewer than half of respondents say they would fight in a war involving their country. In a separate poll taken before the invasion, 23% of Lithuanian men said they would rather flee abroad than fend off an attack. Citizens asked to stand up and be counted are giving a resounding shrug instead. To some Europeans, a citizenry with no appetite for fighting is the reflection of a job well done. The union at the continent's heart bills itself as a 'peace project". The past seven decades have been about ensuring Germany would never take up arms against France and vice versa. Meshing economies together within the European Union and even outside it was meant to make invasions impractical at first and unthinkable in time. The bureaucratic pacificism that endures within the EU—'make meetings not war!" would be a fine motto—may have resonated a bit too much with some citizens. Some may have forgotten that those outside the club, like one Vladimir Putin, were not privy to such arrangements. Military matters were at most an afterthought. Only in the past year has the bloc appointed a commissioner for defence, while making clear the job is about overseeing the companies making shells and missiles, not the armed forces per se. To what can the broader population's lack of appetite to bear arms even in case of war be attributed? Sociologists speak of Europe as a 'post-heroic" society, where individualism and aspirations of 'self-realisation" trump the supposed patriotic fervour of generations past. T he continent's polarised politics have played a part: support for parties of the hard right and left has surged in recent decades, and their voters are notably cooler on the idea of fighting for their country. Older people tend to be less gung-ho about taking up arms, and Europe is an ageing continent. Places with recent histories of dictatorship, such as Spain and Portugal, are also gun-shy. Seeing misfiring American operations in Afghanistan and Iraq (in which Europeans had at best a supporting role) comforted pacifists that theirs was the right way. Notwithstanding its peace-mongering ways, Europe does not lack men and women in uniform. Despite a scything in the number of troops since 1990, to less than half the previous figure in many countries, the continent still has more soldiers than America, and roughly as many as a share of its overall population. Still, some countries like Poland are now talking of bringing some form of conscription back (a few, like Denmark and Greece, never quite got rid of it). Abolishing military service was once hailed as a liberal accomplishment. Now drafting youngsters is seen as a way of promoting the idea that national defence is everybody's job, not just the role of a few paid soldiers. The fog of peace That notion may take a while to take hold. For something strange happens when you ask Europeans about defence matters. In surveys carried out by the European Commission, the bloc's citizens list Russia's invasion of Ukraine and matters of defence as the biggest threats facing the EU as a whole. Well over half think that fighting within the union's borders is likely in coming years. But asked what issues affect them personally and Europeans forget about Russia altogether, worrying more about inflation, taxes, pensions and climate change than they do about potential invaders. It is not that Europeans don't see the looming threat. It is that they think it is somebody else's problem. The upshot is a continent that gives the impression of being battle-weary without having fought the battle. Already Trumpians have a dim view of Europeans' fighting verve. J.D. Vance, the American vice-president, in March dismissed the possibility of 'some random [European] country that hasn't fought a war in 30 or 40 years" credibly deterring Russia by putting boots on the ground in Ukraine. It was offensive precisely because it contained elements of truth. Getting Europeans to shell out for more of their own defence has taken decades of Americans nagging. Convincing them to give war a chance might take even longer. © 2025, The Economist Newspaper Limited. All rights reserved. From The Economist, published under licence. The original content can be found on

News18

an hour ago

• News18

Mercedes-Benz Likely To Hike Prices Again, Check When And On Which Models

Last Updated: According to the reports, the company hinted at deciding on a price hike, blaming the fluctuation of the Euro against the Indian Rupee. There is a trend of increasing the price range by top manufacturers when components and labour costs increase. The strategy to survive in the dominating market is followed by the top German player, Mercedes-Benz. It has been reported that the company is likely to hike the price across the range in September this year. However, an official announcement for the same it yet to be made. Reason Behind Price Hike According to the reports, the company hinted at deciding on a price hike, blaming the fluctuation of the Euro against the Indian Rupee. The company has already revised its price brackets by 1.5 per cent, each in January and June this year. Here's What Report Says As per the details shared by PTI, quoting the company's Managing Director and CEO Santosh Iyer, who said, 'If you see, yesterday night, one Euro is equal to Rs 99 and it is the first time that Euro has breached the Rs 98 mark. We had priced our cars (when One EURO) at Rs 89-90. Withthe Euro going up, even though we localise more than 30 per cent of our cars, 70 per cent of the cars still have European content and when the EURO goes up (against Rupee), the price (of the Mercedes-Benz range of cars) will go up." Statement From Top Official He even noted that the brand has already effected a price increase of its cars twice in 2025, in January and June. Up to 1.5 per cent was the increase in hike. Now, he said, 'And the third one (increase in price) equal to 1.5 per cent will come in September, because we cannot pass this in one go and we are doing it in a phase wise," PTI reported. Talking about the sale figures, he revealed that the company had an excellent May (in terms of Sales) and June also seems to be strong and hopefully, during the festive period. 'We will bring back even more cheer (in terms of sales for his company)" Iyer said. First Published: June 18, 2025, 18:35 IST

Hans India

an hour ago

• Hans India

Israel bombs Iran's nuke site as conflict enters 2nd week

Tel Aviv: Israel's military said Saturday it struck an Iranian nuclear research facility overnight and killed three senior Iranian commanders in targeted attacks as the war between the two nations continued into a second week. Early Saturday, smoke could be seen rising from an area near a mountain in Isfahan, where a local official said Israel had attacked the nuclear research facility in two waves. The target was two centrifuge production sites, and the attacks came on top of strikes on other centrifuge production sites elsewhere in recent days, according to an Israeli military official speaking on condition of anonymity under army guidelines to brief reporters. It was the second attack on Isfahan, which was hit in the first 24 hours of the war as part of Israel's goal to destroy the Iranian nuclear program. Akbar Salehi, Isfahan province's deputy governor for security affairs, confirmed the Israeli strikes had caused damage to the facility but said there had been no human casualties. Iran launched a new wave of drones and missiles at Israel but there were no immediate reports of significant damage, and the Israeli official called it a 'small barrage' that was largely intercepted by Israel's defences. The official said part of the reason that Iran's overnight attack had been relatively small was that the military had been targeting its launchers, and estimates it has now taken out more than 50% of them. 'We've been able to take out a large amount of their launchers, creating a bottleneck — we're making it harder for them to fire toward Israel,' he said. 'Having said all that, I want to say the Iranian regime obviously still has capabilities.' Israel's Magen David Adom rescue service said Saturday an Iranian drone hit a two-story building in northern Israel, but there were no casualties. Talks in Switzerland fail to produce diplomatic breakthrough The ongoing fighting comes after talks in Geneva on Friday failed to produce a diplomatic breakthrough. European officials expressed hope for future discussions, and Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi said he was open to further dialogue while emphasizing that Tehran had no interest in negotiating with the US while Israel continued attacking. 'Iran is ready to consider diplomacy if aggression ceases and the aggressor is held accountable for its committed crimes,' he told reporters. No date was set for the next round of talks. Iran warns against US becoming militarily involved US President Donald Trump is weighing active US military involvement in the conflict, which Araghchi said Saturday 'would be very unfortunate.'