- Labcorp was the blockbuster Supreme Court case that wasn't
June 23 (Reuters) - When the U.S. Supreme Court earlier this year agreed to take up medical testing company Laboratory Corporation of America's appeal of a class certification order, it was one of the buzziest cases of the term.
The parties, along with amici in 19 friend-of-the-court briefs and the legal press – me included – cast it as a potentially monumental matter, one that could upend class action litigation by making it more difficult for plaintiffs to bring cases.
What we got instead was … nothing. A little over a month after oral argument, the high court on June 5 dismissed the case, opens new tab as improvidently granted, though Justice Brett Kavanaugh dissented from the majority's one sentence order.
In issuing the so-called dismiss as improvidently or DIG, the justices tacitly admitted that it was a mistake to grant certiorari in the first place, though presumably not because of the question presented.
The question that remains unanswered is whether a class be certified if it contains uninjured members – an issue that the high court circled in two prior class certification decisions, Tyson Foods v. Bouaphakeo in 2016 and TransUnion v. Ramirez in 2021, but left open.
Why instead of a firecracker did Labcorp v Davis turn out to be a dud? The most likely answer is procedurally nuanced, involving a tangle of superseding district court orders.
Still, how the case unspooled offers a window into when and why the justices DIG a case, a rare move where the court takes no action, instead leaving the appellate decision in place.
Here, it meant a win for a class of blind plaintiffs suing Labcorp for violations of the Americans with Disabilities Act, allowing them to proceed with their suit in Los Angeles federal court. An unconventional move by Deepak Gupta, who represented the class action plaintiffs, could also provide a model for advocates looking to DIG a case – but more on that later.
Labcorp did not respond to requests for comment, and the company's outside counsel, Jones Day partner Noel Francisco, declined to comment through a firm spokesperson.
A bit of context: Legal scholars say that from 1955 to 2005, the justices disposed of an average of two to three cases per term via DIGs, a move that typically requires agreement from at least six justices. There was one such dismissal in 2023-2024 and a total of three this term. (The other two were both securities class actions, with Gupta also getting a DIG in litigation against chipmaker Nvidia. The other case involved Meta's Facebook.)
The court often declines to offer an explanation for DIG-ing a case, leaving onlookers to speculate on what went awry, said Michael Solimine, a professor at the University of Cincinnati College of Law and co-author of the DIG study, opens new tab, via email.
For example, after oral argument the justices might realize there was a jurisdictional issue, or they might identify another problem that made the case a poor vehicle to address the question at hand, Solimine said. 'Or it could simply be that there was no majority that could decide the case.'
In Labcorp, according to Kavanaugh's dissent, the obstacle that kept the court from deciding the case was mootness – meaning, technically, that the class certification order that Labcorp appealed was no longer in effect and had been supplanted by subsequent district court orders. Kavanaugh, however, deemed the concern 'insubstantial' and wrote that he would have ruled in favor of the company on the merits.
Originally filed in 2020, the suit against Labcorp was brought on behalf of visually impaired people who were unable to use check-in kiosks when arriving for blood draws or other medical tests.
Labcorp argued that thousands of class members were uninterested in using the kiosks, preferring to check in with a person at the front desk. That meant they sustained no injury and lacked standing to sue under Article III of the U.S. Constitution, Labcorp said.
U.S. District Court Judge Fernando Olguin in May of 2022 certified a damages class. Labcorp had appealed the order, and the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals last year in an 8-page, unpublished opinion, opens new tab had upheld Olguin's decision.
But there was a wrinkle. While Labcorp's interlocutory appeal was pending, the district court modified the class certification order two times to tweak how the class was defined.
That meant the order before the Supreme Court was inoperative, Gupta argued for the class action plaintiffs. With no live controversy, any decision by the high court would be nothing more than an advisory opinion, the Gupta Wessler co-founder said.
This jurisdictional argument wasn't something the class action plaintiffs initially flagged in opposing, opens new tab Labcorp's cert petition (though they raised it in their respondent's brief, opens new tab when they suggested that the court DIG the case, as did seven law professors in an amicus brief, opens new tab).
In an unusual step, Gupta, who was hired after cert was granted, filed a letter, opens new tab with the court on April 23, six days before oral argument and after briefing was complete, to reiterate the jurisdictional problems and again ask the court to DIG the case.
Sending the letter felt like 'waving a red flag in front of a bull,' Gupta told me, drawing the focus on procedural questions rather than the merits. 'I wanted to make sure the court understood the problem here.'
Writing in response, opens new tab, Francisco called the letter 'nothing more than an improper surreply,' and said the arguments were meritless.
The justices' interest was piqued. During oral arguments in April, Justice Clarence Thomas asked why the court had jurisdiction to rule on a lower court's "inoperative" order. Later, Justice Sonia Sotomayor said, 'I still don't see how this is not an advisory opinion.'
And Justice Elena Kagan remarked, 'We're staring at the wrong order.'
Little wonder the court opted for a DIG.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
an hour ago
- Reuters
US investor strikes $1 billion merger to create bitcoin treasury company
BOSTON, June 23 (Reuters) - U.S. investor and entrepreneur Anthony Pompliano announced on Monday the creation of a new bitcoin treasury company that would hold up to $1 billion of the world's largest cryptocurrency on its balance sheet. Pompliano said in a statement that his financial services firm ProCap BTC would merge with Columbus Circle Capital I, a special purpose acquisition company (CCCM.O), opens new tab, to create ProCap Financial, a bitcoin treasury firm. Several public companies have employed bitcoin treasury strategies, which involves allocating a portion of their cash and reserves toward bitcoin, to replicate the success of software company Strategy (MSTR.O), opens new tab, which began accumulating bitcoin in 2020 and now holds more than $63 billion worth of the digital token. The trend comes as U.S. President Donald Trump has sought to overhaul cryptocurrency policy, including calls to establish a strategic bitcoin reserve, after courting cash from the industry on the campaign trail. Pompliano, one of the biggest investors in the crypto space over the last several years, said ProCap BTC has raised $500 million in equity and $250 million in a convertible note, in what he termed the largest initial fundraising in history for a bitcoin treasury company. Unlike traditional bitcoin treasury companies, Pompliano said ProCap Financial would use its bitcoin balance sheet to generate revenue and profit through a variety of strategies, including lending, derivatives, and other products and services. He also said leading institutional investors Citadel, Susquehanna, Jane Street, and Magnetar have committed capital, as have crypto firms Off the Chain Capital, Pantera, Coinfund, Parafi, opens new tab, and FalconX. Reuters was unable to verify whether these companies were investing in ProCap Financial. "The legacy financial system is being disrupted by bitcoin right before our eyes," Pompliano said. "Our objective is to develop a platform that will not only acquire bitcoin for our balance sheet, but will also implement risk-mitigated solutions to generate sustainable revenue and profits from our bitcoin holdings."
The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
Why your credit score is important and easy ways to improve it
We live in an era dominated by instant financial transactions, from contactless payments to 'Buy Now, Pay Later' schemes and rapid online loan approvals. In light of this, maintaining a robust credit score has become an increasingly complex challenge for many. Yet, this metric plays a quiet but integral role in countless aspects of modern life, from securing a mortgage or switching utility providers to simply signing up for a new mobile phone contract. The ease and affordability of accessing these essential services are often directly tied to one's credit standing. Despite its pervasive influence, a significant number of individuals remain unaware of how their credit score is calculated, let alone how to effectively improve it. To demystify this crucial aspect of personal finance, consumer finance experts are now offering essential insights into understanding and boosting your credit standing. A credit score explained and why it matters Many of us wouldn't dream of applying for a job without knowing what our CV says – yet when it comes to borrowing money, we often forget to check the financial CV that is our credit score. This three-digit number, used by lenders to judge our trustworthiness, can affect everything from mortgages to mobile phone contracts. 'A credit score is a personalised number that lenders use to assess how trustworthy you are when it comes to borrowing money,' explains TV's consumer finance expert and founder of Nous, Greg Marsh. 'A higher score means you're more likely to get approved for a loan, and offered better rates.' These scores are based on information held by three main credit reference agencies – Experian, Equifax and TransUnion – and each can possess slightly different records. Marsh says it's worth checking all three periodically. What affects your score Your score isn't arbitrary – it reflects your financial past. It includes whether you've paid bills or loans on time, how much of your credit limit you're using and the age of your accounts.' Avoid going over your credit limit or using too much credit, as this will incur additional fees and charges and potentially damage your credit score,' says Tesco Bank' s director of Help Me Borrow, Mamta Shanbhag. Opening too many credit cards in a short space of time, or maxing them out, can count against you. 'Making multiple credit applications at once – such as several credit cards in a week – can negatively affect your score, as it signals to lenders that you may be in financial difficulty,' says Equifax UK' s chief strategy and innovation officer, Craig Tebbutt. How to improve it Improving your score is less about tricks and more about habits. 'It's crucial to pay your bills and loan repayments on time to show lenders you've been reliable in the past,' says Marsh, 'setting up Direct Debits is useful as you don't need to remember to make a payment.' Other positive steps include keeping credit card balances low, staying within any arranged overdraft and registering to vote at your current address – a surprisingly important detail for verifying identity. 'Being on the electoral register and having a positive track record with different types of credit can also boost your score,' says Tebbutt. 'The best way to improve your score is to always pay your bills on time, keep credit card balances low, and avoid applying for too much new credit in a short period of time.' Shanbhag recommends using 'eligibility calculators' before applying for credit. These tools show how likely you are to be accepted without affecting your score. 'If you apply for a credit card or loan in full and get rejected, or complete multiple applications, it could affect your credit score,' she warns. What tools to use It's important to remember that you don't have to pay to check your credit score. There are several free and paid-for tools to monitor and improve your score. ' ClearScore gives free access to your Equifax report, while Credit Karma offers your TransUnion file,' says Marsh. 'Experian Boost also lets you add regular payments – like council tax or Netflix – to your score to demonstrate reliability.' He also points to paid-for sites like Loqbox, which reports your savings habits to credit agencies, and specialist credit cards for those with low scores – although these can carry high interest rates if not paid off in full. Credit scores don't change overnight. 'Generally, you'll start to see improvements within three to six months after making positive changes,' says Marsh. But rebuilding after defaults or missed payments will take longer. The key is consistency and patience. 'Check where you stand, build good habits and monitor your progress,' says Shanbhag. 'It's not about perfection – it's about showing that you're responsible with money.'
Reuters
an hour ago
- Reuters
Anthony Pompliano's crypto venture ProCap Financial to go public via SPAC deal
June 23 (Reuters) - Anthony Pompliano's crypto venture ProCap Financial will go public in the U.S. through a merger with blank-check vehicle Columbus Circle Capital Corp (CCCM.O), opens new tab, the American entrepreneur said on Monday. The combined company will have bitcoin worth up to $1 billion on its balance sheet. The transaction is expected to close before the end of 2025.
