Pressure on Sars to prevent tax increases in 2026

And reprioritised government spending must lead to 'positive outcomes'.
All eyes are on Sars to make good on its promise to reduce the tax debt book, which currently sits at R400bn. Picture: Moneyweb
The pressure is on the South African Revenue Service (Sars) to collect sufficient outstanding revenue to prevent additional tax increases of R20 billion in 2026.
Finance Minister Enoch Godongwana said in his third budget for 2025 that he believes Sars will be able to raise an additional R35 billion that will be sufficient to close the current revenue gap.
Kyle Mandy, a tax partner at PwC, says the R20 billion additional tax, which has not yet been specified, is probably the most contentious issue in the budget. There is now a lot of pressure on Sars to collect outstanding taxes on the back of the R7.5 billion over the medium-term additional investment from the National Treasury.
Sars has indicated that it will be able to collect tax debts of between R20 billion and R50 billion per year. It was able to collect R95 billion in tax debt in 2024/25.
ALSO READ: Sensible or underwhelming? Economists react to Godongwana's Budget 3.0
'There is clearly a reluctance on the part of National Treasury to pencil in revenue expectations from the investment in Sars until such time that Sars proves that they can deliver,' says Mandy.
He explains that from a fiscal point of view, revenue is only accounted for when it lands in Sars's bank account. Currently, the tax debt book is around R400 billion, and all eyes are now on Sars to make good on its promise to reduce the debt book.
Kabelo Moutloatse, tax accounting specialist at Latita Africa, welcomed the increased investment in Sars to ensure higher tax collections and compliance.
'That is something that we need to see more of to ensure that those who are operating outside of the system are brought in. There has been leakage in the past and that should be worked on.'
ALSO READ: SA loses R30 billion in revenue due to illicit trade in cigarettes and liquor
Growth-enhancing reforms
Business Leadership SA (BLSA) says the focus on growth-enhancing structural reforms is encouraging, with the minister confirming the second phase of Operation Vulindlela's priority areas, which includes seeing through existing reforms in energy, water, logistics, and the visa regime, with new reform areas being local government, digital transformation, and addressing spatial inequalities.
'The R1 trillion allocation over three years on critical infrastructure is retained, which is important to support many of the above reforms and lift growth prospects.'
ALSO READ: Godongwana cuts government spending to offset VAT shortfall
Lower growth and inflation
Budget 2.0 and Budget 3.0 made no inflationary adjustments for bracket creep or medical aid tax credits.
In March, Treasury expected income of R19.5 billion from individual taxpayers, but this has now been revised downwards to R18 billion.
Government has revised downwards the forecasts for economic growth and inflation, which will have a knock-on effect on revenue.
'So they are pencilling in lower-than-expected increases for salaries and wages,' says Mandy.
He adds that removing the inflationary adjustment for the general fuel levy was not unexpected, given the withdrawal of the Vat rate increase of 0.5%.
Moutloatse says this will certainly impact lower-income households.
ALSO READ: Budget 3.0: First fuel levy increase in three years – Here's by how much
Many businesses, particularly smaller businesses, will pass this increase on to consumer, reducing their already stretched disposable income.
He adds that one of the key things in Godongwana's third take is the reprioritisation of spending, moving away from any tax increases.
'We need to see more accountability with programmes and when government spends money it should lead to positive outcomes.'
This article was republished from Moneyweb. Read the original here.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

The South African

11 hours ago

• The South African

Tensions grow between SASSA and the National Treasury

SASSA and the National Treasury were at loggerheads this week in Parliament. New SASSA CEO Themba Matlou, who's barely been in the job permanently for two months, had to answer to the Parliament portfolio committee on social development. At the centre of tensions between SASSA and the National Treasury are conditions attached to the R265-billion budget allocation. On one hand, you have the High Court ruling back in January 2025 that said SASSA was being 'deliberately exclusionary.' And now you have the National Treasury wanting to see have SASSA is reviewing, suspending and cancelling grants to keep the budget in check … It's a little farfetched to expect SASSA SRD R370 applicants to have a smartphone and data for monthly verifications. Image: File Unfortunately, this puts the South African Social Security Agency in a highly compromised position. If it doesn't actively exclude grant recipients, the National Treasury will say conditions to its budget allocation are not being met. However, after the High Court ruling earlier this year, civil society is watching closely to see how the agency 'increases grant inclusivity.' As such, SASSA CEO Themba Matlou told the committee this week that its new review process for social grants will comply with the National Treasury's requirements. The first necessity is a quarterly report, due at the end of July, that proves the number of grants reviewed, suspended, cancelled and money saved by the agency. Meanwhile, it's the elderly who suffer and must travel to SASSA offices to have their identity verified. Image: File Key to the agreement between SASSA and the National Treasury is the agency must improve its income, biometric and governmental verification systems. Meanwhile, it's overtly clear that these new digital processes are impacting poor beneficiaries who don't have access to smartphones and data. Nevertheless, when the National Treasury allocated R265 billion budget to SASSA, it had the following provisos. 'SASSA must introduce bank income checks on grants. It must conduct large-scale database checks at least twice a year. It must finalise agreements with SARS and NSFAS to verify beneficiaries' income. And it must intensify biometric checks on suspicious applications,' reports GroundUp . SASSA's first report is due to the National Treasury next month. Image: File As a result, these reviews have already started being implemented. Specifically, Child Support, Old-Age, Disability and Care Dependency grants were flagged for undisclosed income and alternative forms of identification. Instead of the usual three-month review period, affected individuals had their grants withheld until they completed in-person verification at a SASSA office. However, Matlou and SASSA has come under fire over these latest verification policies. And he told Parliament he is aware of the frustration. 'Through beneficiary education, we emphasise that citizens have a responsibility to assist the government to save money. And beneficiaries need to notify SASSA when their financial circumstances have changed,' explained Matlou. Furthermore, the agency says it will start rolling out service kiosks at offices to help clients with remote biometric identity verification. 'The goal is to make biometrics compulsory for all SASSA applicants, whether you are trying to access the social assistance programme with or without identification,' concluded Matlou. Let us know by leaving a comment below, or send a WhatsApp to 060 011 021 1. Subscribe to The South African website's newsletters and follow us on WhatsApp, Facebook, X and Bluesky for the latest news.

IOL News

19 hours ago

• IOL News

Sars enforcement: the new era of tax compliance in South Africa

Tax Discover how the South African Revenue Service has transformed into a powerful enforcement agency with Project AmaBillions, and learn how to navigate the new landscape of tax compliance to protect your finances. The South African Revenue Service (Sars) is no longer the passive revenue service many South Africans remember. With the injection of R3.5 billion from the national budget and the ominous launch of 'Project AmaBillions,' Sars has entered its most aggressive phase of enforcement in years and is quickly turning into one of the most sophisticated, assertive, and unrelenting revenue authorities in the world. Welcome to the new high-stakes era of tax compliance, which marks the end of the era of any perceived leniency. It is now the time of relentless enforcement. If you've received a surprise assessment or an additional tax bill, doing nothing could be financially and legally disastrous. Sars has flipped the switch: compliance or consequences South Africa's budget is strained, and Sars has one clear mandate: collect at all costs. The days of informal engagement are over. Today, Sars is functioning as a well-resourced enforcement agency, driven by targets and backed by increasingly automated systems that flag non-compliance in real-time. Their legal tools of collection include: - Final demands; - Civil judgments; - Third-party appointments are issued directly to your bank without having to inform you; - Garnishee orders issued directly to your employer; - Instructing the Sheriff to collect; - Asset seizures; and - Criminal prosecution. If you disagree with an assessment, silence is surrender. Unless formally and timeously disputed, Sars will pursue recovery. And they don't knock, they act. From garnishee orders to default judgments, Sars is now executing collections swiftly and with minimal notice. Once the machine is in motion, it becomes significantly harder and more expensive to reverse. There's a process, but it's not forgiving Yes, there is a dispute process. And yes, it exists to protect taxpayers, but only if used strategically and correctly. You have 80 business days from the date of assessment to object. Miss this window, and you must beg Sars to condone your lateness, and they're under no obligation to say yes. Even if the assessment is wrong, Sars is entitled to collect unless and until a dispute is lodged and the debt is suspended. Without this, enforcement proceeds. Your bank accounts, salary, or even those who owe you may be targeted. Sars has shown no hesitation in using every legal mechanism at its disposal, and you must thus use every legal mechanism at your disposal to protect your interests. Disputes must be strategic - this is a legal battlefield This is not the time for 'DIY' tax disputes. In the enforcement era, objections need to be drafted like legal pleadings, not complaints. Sars doesn't respond to emotion; it responds to evidence, statute, and precision. A skilled tax attorney can mean the difference between a successful objection and irreversible enforcement. This is especially critical when multiple years are at stake or where Sars alleges serious non-disclosures. Sars Commissioner Kieswetter has made their philosophy clear: compliance will be facilitated; non-compliance will be punished. The playing field may be fair, but it is also ruthless to those who don't act timeously. Every single day counts, and delay is dangerous In today's enforcement climate, an assessment is not a suggestion; it's a trigger. It signals the start of Sars' collection clock. If you don't respond with speed and legal force, you may find your finances, assets, and reputation under siege. Every day you delay, Sars gains ground. An assessment isn't an invitation to negotiate. It's a legal action, and if you fail to act swiftly and strategically, Sars will act for you through your bank, your employer, or the courts. Dispute on time. Dispute strategically. Or prepare for the full force of Sars enforcement. Act now, those who wait, lose. * Daniels is the head of tax controversy and dispute resolution at Tax Consulting SA. PERSONAL FINANCE

IOL News

20 hours ago

• IOL News

One step off the greylist, but who's watching the watchdogs?

The announcement from the FATF Plenary in Strasbourg, France, marked a significant milestone for South Africa's beleaguered financial sector. Image: Ron AI BY ALL accounts, South Africa has come a long way since February 2023, when it was placed on the Financial Action Task Force (FATF) greylist over concerns about weak enforcement mechanisms and a lack of political will to combat high-level corruption. Now, nearly two years down the line, the country is on the cusp of delisting after 'substantially completed' all 22 action items set out by the global watchdog. The announcement from the FATF Plenary in Strasbourg, France, marked a significant milestone for South Africa's beleaguered financial sector. The country now awaits an on-site verification visit — a final step before potential delisting at the next FATF Plenary in October 2025. 'This is not just about ticking boxes,' National Treasury said in a recently released statement. 'This is about rebuilding institutions hollowed out during years of state capture, and restoring credibility to our financial systems.' Yet while the technical progress has been lauded internationally, domestic critics warn that celebration may be premature — and that complacency could unravel everything. South Africa's greylisting in 2023 was more than a reputational blow; it was a financial reckoning. Banks faced higher correspondent banking costs, foreign investment slowed, and businesses were forced to navigate an increasingly complex and costly regulatory environment. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Next Stay Close ✕ The legacy of state capture — under which law enforcement agencies were deliberately weakened — made the path to compliance long and arduous. But according to the FATF's latest communiqué: 'South Africa has demonstrated a sustained increase in investigations and prosecutions of serious and complex money laundering and the full range of terror financing activities in line with its risk profile.' That turnaround, according to officials, was only possible due to the relentless work of key institutions such as the Directorate for Priority Crime Investigation (DPCI — alias Hawks), the State Security Agency (SSA), and the National Prosecuting Authority (NPA). 'Without their commitment, we would still be floundering,' read the Treasury statement. 'These are the same institutions that were targeted during the Zuma era. To see them rise again is nothing short of remarkable.' The FATF has confirmed that South Africa has met the technical requirements for delisting, but the final verdict rests with the FATF Africa Joint Group, which is set to conduct an on-site visit prior to the October 2025 Plenary. 'The Joint Group will verify that implementation of AML/CFT reforms has begun and is being sustained, and that the necessary political commitment remains in place to sustain implementation in the future,' stated the FATF on June 13. National Treasury confirmed that preparations for the visit were already underway. While Treasury paints a picture of institutional renewal, opposition parties remain deeply skeptical. The DA, now part of the Government of National Unity (GNU), has cautiously welcomed the FATF's upgrade of South Africa's progress but issued a warning against any complacency that could derail the country's full removal. 'While this is an important step, the DA cautions the NPA and our financial regulators against complacency,' DA Deputy Spokesperson on Finance Wendy Alexander said in a statement. 'Exiting the greylist remains subject to a site visit by the FATF ahead of the body's next plenary in October.' Alexander stressed that further delays would only deepen the damage. 'The longer South Africa stays on the greylist, the harder it will be for our banks to do business both domestically and internationally,' she warned, adding that a one-off effort would not be enough. 'Exiting and staying off the greylist requires not once-off window dressing, but sustained change and implementation.' South Africa shares the spotlight with several African nations making strides against financial crime. Mali and Tanzania have been officially delisted from the FATF greylist, while Nigeria, Mozambique, and Burkina Faso were also recognised for having substantially completed their respective action plans.