Do the rite thing: Reflections on the transition to manhood
Rites of passage are funny old things. Whether religious, societal, or based out of another construct within our lives, the human need to mark transitions from one phase of life to the other is nothing short of fascinating to me.
Yes, celebrating the birth of a child is simply a must-do. If a child enters the world into a loving family that is enriched by their arrival, of course we would want to give voice to our joy.
Yes, gathering to mourn the death of a loved one is also a must-do. Death is the big one, the ultimate of the great divides.
A person we once loved and cherished is gone forever, irrecoverable and irreplaceable and we need to give voice to the grief rising from the void they leave in our lives.
But, between birth and death, we feel the need to mark various transitional milestones in our lives by various means. Hence the term 'rite of passage'. We are making the passage from some point in our lives or version of ourselves to a different one.
And while I am not attacking the belief systems — religious, cultural or otherwise — of anyone at all, when one views everything from a detached, logical point of view, many of these rites of passage do not make a whole lot of sense.
But we imbue them with meaning, because we know we are now crossing a great divide, a tipping point in our lives after which there is no going back to the way it was before.
I was born into, and brought up in, a faith and underwent its requisite rites of passage. I got married and had two children. I got divorced.
All of these are transitory phases in one's life, all of them important, many of them marked by some sort of procedure and/or celebration.
And yet, the rite of passage I remember more fondly than all of the above, barring the birth of my wonderful children, happened in 1998, at the age of 19.
This was my first year staying at Knockando Men's Residence, established by the now-defunct Johannesburg College of Education for its male students.
While I did not attend JCE, I had family ties to Knock, as it is fondly known, and so wound up as a resident while attending Wits.
And as with many university residences, one does not simply start living there, one must earn the right in a variety of ridiculous ways.
Knock's orientation was a truly mild version of what other student residents underwent.
We ran a lot and sang a lot and were deprived of a lot of sleep but, in return, we were fed a lot of alcohol and introduced to a lot of young women. A fair trade, to most of us.
The only event that even came remotely close to other residence initiations was Status Night.
This was the final night of our two-week orientation, and as the name implied, was the night you earned your status as a true Knockandian.
Without going into too much detail, Status Night involves much running, shouting, darkness, water being thrown from great heights, singing to a stuffed goose which everyone insists is a duck, a staggering amount of alcohol and an unfortunate amount of public male nudity.
But after that, you were done, and could stand shoulder-to-shoulder with senior members of the residence with nothing distinguishing you from one another.
And, while it is in no way equal in importance, it is this event which most frequently popped into my mind while reading Jeffrey Rakabe's debut outing Led by Shepherds.
The novel is bookended by Rakabe's experiences during koma, the rite of passage that Pedi men undergo to transition to adulthood.
But in-between these slices of his recounting, Rakabe goes into further detail about his experiences during tertiary education and slightly afterwards, and it is in this part of the book that the magic occurs.
To be perfectly honest, up until about the halfway mark of this book, there was nothing remarkable about it. Rakabe's language is fluid and descriptive, and he creates similes and metaphors that are enlightening, evocative and in some cases laugh-out-loud funny.
His choice of words and writing style definitely stood out. But until he starts ruminating on how his life changed during the Covid-19 lockdown, the book is a standard memoir, a recollection of the events of his life to that point.
However, during Rakabe's lockdown recollections, the book emerges from its cocoon. His life is markedly different now from the time when he underwent koma — he has encountered people, places and intellectual concepts that he did not even dream existed as the young boy who went off into the mountains to become a man.
And these new introductions into his life, his consciousness, have caused him to re-frame all his previous experiences, including koma which, up until that point, had been the most important and influential event in his life.
When we return to koma after Rakabe's intellectual re-framing, we find it to be a markedly different event. The fear and uncertainty of a young boy facing a terrifying, unknown sequence of events remain, but are now viewed through the lens of a grown man who is realising some of the unfortunate downsides to this long-standing tradition.
I confess — Rakabe zigged where I thought he would zag. I expected this book to be a loving recollection of a rite many South Africans undergo.
Instead, what Rakabe presents us with is a stark revisiting of this rite, of its many implications, spoken and otherwise, and how it shapes those who go through it, for better or for worse.
Merely for the way it bucks tradition, this book should receive kudos.
But it should also receive kudos for what it is — one man reviewing a pivotal event in his past, now in possession of knowledge that he didn't have at the time, and realising how a rite of passage might echo through one's life with unintended consequences.
A worthwhile read.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mail & Guardian
3 days ago
- Mail & Guardian
Reflecting on relationships: Is it ‘just sex'?
People who choose abstinence, monogamy or sexual restraint are made to feel as though something is wrong with them. True sexual freedom should include the right not to participate. First, I must admit that I might be out of my depth here — these are simply personal musings about life as I currently understand it. I welcome responses and critiques, which I would take seriously. Now in my late twenties, conversations about sex and relationships have become more common among my friends. One recurring question we debate is — who has it easier when it comes to dating or finding a partner for sex? To be clear, I recognise that relationships exist in many diverse forms, far beyond the traditional, monogamous, heterosexual model. I don't claim to fully grasp the nuances of every type of relationship. For the sake of focus, however, this reflection concerns relationships between male- and female-presenting individuals. I used to believe that female-presenting individuals had it easier when it came to dating, largely because they typically aren't expected to initiate interactions or make the first move. In many cases, it seems they just need to dress up and show up and there will be no shortage of people vying for their attention. Of course, I now recognise that this perception is heavily shaped by 'pretty privilege', which disproportionately benefits conventionally attractive women. A friend once challenged my view by pointing out that this dynamic — being pursued rather than pursuing — can be disempowering. It places women in the passive position of waiting to be chosen which, upon reflection, doesn't sound empowering at all. Some of my female-presenting friends argue that men, particularly heterosexual men, have it easier. They are seen as the ones who do the choosing and, crucially, enjoy broader social backing for their behaviour. For example, a man who has multiple sexual partners is often celebrated or, at the very least, not judged harshly — whereas a woman who does the same is frequently shamed. This discrepancy reflects deeper patriarchal structures that centre men socially and culturally. These structures often allow men to navigate life with fewer social constraints and less moral scrutiny. While it's arguably true that men benefit from these systems, I don't believe that societal validation necessarily confers moral legitimacy. The fact that society might praise or excuse a man who sleeps with many women doesn't make the act inherently admirable or ethically sound. Building on arguments like the one above — which only begin to scratch the surface — I've come to believe that the more important question is not who gets sex more easily, but rather, what are people's orientations toward sex ? In today's world, either party in a heterosexual dynamic can theoretically have as much sex as they want, although it's true that society often treats one more favourably than the other for doing so. I support people exploring their sexualities freely but I believe two important considerations are often overlooked. The first is self-control. Does experiencing a sexual urge automatically justify acting on it — or even having multiple partners to satisfy it? A common retort is, 'It's just sex.' But, in reality, it isn't just sex. Like in physics, every action has a consequence — though these might be less visible in the moment. Every sexual act, I believe, involves an exchange — not only of physical presence, but of something deeper. For example, bodily fluids like saliva or semen contain DNA, which is foundational to our biological identity. While these exchanges might not have immediate or visible effects, I suspect they register somewhere in our being, perhaps even subtly shaping how we relate to ourselves and others. Moreover, sexual intimacy triggers powerful hormonal responses. Oxytocin, often called the 'bonding hormone', is released during and after orgasm, creating emotional and psychological ties between partners. These biological realities are often minimised in favour of momentary pleasure but they suggest that sex carries more significance — physically, emotionally and spiritually — than we often admit. The second point — and, in fact, my main motivation for writing this piece — is the subtle but growing pressure placed on those who choose not to 'explore' sexually, particularly those who, by personal conviction, do not wish to have multiple sexual partners. A striking irony is emerging in contemporary discourse — while many champion sexual liberty and personal choice, that freedom is often only respected when it aligns with dominant expectations. In other words, you're free to do what you want — as long as what you want is what everyone else considers liberating. Increasingly, people who choose abstinence, monogamy or sexual restraint are made to feel as though they're missing out, failing to live fully, or even that something might be wrong with them. The pressure to 'just have sex' or 'have more partners' can be subtle or overt but it undermines the very principle of autonomy that sexual liberation claims to uphold. This is deeply problematic. True freedom should include the right not to participate, the right to say no without shame and the right to define one's values and boundaries on one's own terms. People should be supported in expressing their sexuality — or their decision not to — regardless of whether it aligns with cultural trends or popular narratives. Authentic self-expression sometimes means going against what is expected. That, too, is a valid form of liberation. Sex, as a deeply pleasurable act with the profound potential to create life, deserves to be acknowledged for what it truly is — something far more significant than just another casual activity or physical exercise. While people are free to explore their sexuality and have multiple partners if they so choose, those who decide otherwise should be equally respected. Choosing restraint, monogamy or abstinence is no less valid than choosing openness or experimentation. Ultimately, sexuality is a deeply personal journey. Different people have different values, goals and paths toward fulfillment — and they should be free to navigate those paths without judgment or pressure. True sexual freedom lies not in doing what is popular or expected but in having the agency to choose what aligns with one's own convictions, however that may look. Emmanuel Anoghena Oboh is a PhD student of philosophy at the Center of Applied Ethics, Stellenbosch University.
The Herald
4 days ago
- The Herald
Improving literacy among foundation pupils must be a national priority
Addressing SA's literacy challenge from the early years is fundamental to improving quality and efficiency throughout the education system. Our country's constitutional promise is that all South Africans should achieve their potential — and the ability to read for meaning is the primary capability which propels learning as a means of achieving that potential. In our constitutional democracy based on democratic values, social justice and fundamental human rights, creating access to the conditions necessary to achieve literacy is the responsibility of the state — through the basic education system — and supported by families. All of the data available on achieving foundational literacy shows not only that our children are not achieving the levels of reading performance our curriculum requires in order for pupils to succeed in primary school, but that pervasive inequalities in the conditions under which children are learning to read continue to reinforce inequality in reading achievement, and shape subsequent unequal trajectories in learning and consequent life-opportunities. Learning to read requires the realisation that symbols in text — squiggles on pages — can represent the meaning of the spoken word. This realisation comes from environments in which text is used for sharing information, for pleasure, for communal activities. What follows is the acquisition of the correspondence of elements of the written text to its corresponding sound and propelled by meaning-making. Reading to children, sharing pleasure in making sense of words on a page in storytelling, abundant opportunities to read accessible text in the first language of the child with supportive guidance where necessary are all essential for the early development of literacy ang give wings to a lifelong engagement with text for multiple purposes. But these conditions are not equally available to all children at home and at school. Recognising the material inequalities which perpetuate inequalities in learning achievement and taking the necessary steps to correct systemic deficiencies — particularly in schools — is an essential first step and investment in addressing injustices of access to learning. Children who cannot read for meaning by grade 4 fall further and further behind as the curriculum increasingly depends on the independent reading of text across all subjects. It must be a national priority to target the improvement of literacy (and numeracy) from the foundation phase of schooling as a powerful disrupter of inequality. The steps which are necessary must include attention to the pupils most at risk of falling behind in foundational literacy and making the achievement of the conditions necessary for success non-negotiable. Is SA, succeeding in achieving the conditions necessary for early reading achievement? In 2024, the department of basic education released the results of the SA Systemic Evaluation (SASE) which was conducted in 2022 in schools across all provinces. This is a sample-based assessment. It does not assess all children as was the case with the Annual National Assessments, but gives a dipstick sense of trends. The results are unequivocal and confirm two key findings of international comparative studies in which SA participates: by grade 3 our pupils are not reading at the required level; and the patterns of poorer reading follow the contours of under-resourcing at home and school. T he department's SASE established a baseline that in 2022 only 20% of grade 3 pupils level demonstrate the understanding and skills required for reading in grade 3. These results are further disaggregated across and within provinces by socioeconomic quintile The evidence is clear that reading achievement is lower in schools serving poorer communities. If we are to disrupt cycles of poverty, we must start with empowering children from our poorest communities to read confidently from the foundation phase. Pervasive deficiencies in the learning and teaching environments in which children should be taking their first steps towards reading with confidence must be addressed. This requires foundation-phase classrooms in which all pupils have access to attractive books appropriate to the child's reading development in their home/first language, in which the number of children in the class conforms with national norms so that the teacher can be in touch with and respond to the reading needs of each child, and in which all teachers are professionally supported to improve their practice. This is not the case in schools serving the poorest children. While the department aims for a limit of 45 pupils in a class, its 2017/18 School Monitoring Survey showed that for grade 3, 48% of classes in the poorest schools across the country had more than 40 pupils, and 23% had more than 50 pupils. In the Free State and Limpopo, there were more than 60 in a class. In Mpumalanga, Limpopo, and the Eastern Cape more that 20% of grade 3 teachers reported having classes larger than 70. The survey also showed that only 46% of grade 3 children had language 'textbooks We do not have enough data about the availability of reading material in classrooms, or for pupils to take home to read for pleasure. Children need access to reading material to learn to read. Investment in improving literacy in the foundation years must be a national priority. This must go beyond broad declarations of intent and must be visible in evidence-based planning which is aligned to realistic assessments of the resources required, and the resources available accompanied by a determination to address the resource gaps. This must be informed by the rigour of learning from research — and from evaluations of what is working in interventions in which the government and the private sector are collaborating. Mary Metcalfe is a professor of practice at the University of Johannesburg's school of public management, governance & public policy, and is a national planning commissioner.
The Herald
4 days ago
- The Herald
Good Samaritans come to the rescue after fire destroys family home
While on her way to bury her 43-year-old daughter, Nomalungelo Sithole, 74, received news which brought some relief amid her grief — her fire-damaged home in Joe Slovo, near Despatch, will be rebuilt. Sithole's daughter died after a long illness worsened by exposure to the cold in the single room the family has been living in since a fire destroyed their house almost two years ago. She was buried on June 13. The National African Federated Chamber of Commerce and Industry (Nafcoc) in Nelson Mandela Bay has stepped in to rebuild her home. Sithole said her daughter had hidden her illness from the family. However, during the Easter weekend she had become bedridden. 'I do not have enough or the right words to say thank you to Nafcoc. 'My family helped me to bury her. 'My daughter had a creche, she helped with soccer, traditional dancing and the choir in the community,' Sithole said. With five people sharing the only remaining room, the house was in no condition to be lived in and posed a serious safety hazard. The fire occurred on September 21 2023. Sithole said this was the second fire which had started in an unexplained manner. 'My home burned down about two years ago. 'We do not know how the fire started.' Seeing smoke, she made her way towards the house, to find it was was on fire. 'When I arrived, I did not have the strength to watch. I blacked out. I collapsed only to be woken up later. 'Though everything was burned, the one miracle is that my room did not burn. 'That is the room we lived in for two years. My clothes were not burned, nor was the ceiling. 'I was sick first due to the cold, I had to stop going to church, my back was affected and my feet were always cold. 'I had given up hope that the government would help me. Nafcoc Nelson Mandela Bay region deputy chair Sithembele Vatala, acting general secretary Mlungisi John and executive member Mzukisi Tyuwa said one of their members had agreed to rebuild the house. 'The condition Sithole lives under is painful. Even her daughter died due to the cold after suffering from pneumonia,' Vatala said. 'That home is not ideal for anyone to live in. 'BLB JV Group on Cape Road agreed to build the house from scratch, and we are happy that granny said she will never forget what we have done for her.' The Herald
