How Philosophy Can Help With The Endless News Cycle
WASHINGTON, DC - JANUARY 30: U.S. President Donald Trump calls on reporters during a press ... More conference about the collision of an American Airlines flight with a military helicopter near Ronald Reagan National Airport in the Brady Press Briefing Room at the White House on January 30, 2025 in Washington, DC. Officials said they believe that all 64 people on the commercial jet and the three service members on the U.S. Army helicopter perished when they collided in midair and crashed into the Potomac River airport outside Washington, D.C. on Wednesday. (Photo by)
In the relentless chainsaw coming out of Washington, every headline, opinion, and policy decision seems more polarizing than the last.
Each of these events and decisions have vast implications. If you hope to accurately understand an issue, then you must widen your view beyond just that issue. For example, to fully form an opinion on recent tariffs, then you need to have at least an elementary grasp of international relations, supply chains, employment, and the financial markets, as well as the more immediate areas of trading and taxes.
While this is not distinct to the current administration - now nearing its first 100 days - the sheer barrage of news does seem unique. It leaves you without much time to focus on anything else if you do want to form a thoughtful opinion on current events.
Is there a dependable way to not get overwhelmed? Is keeping up with current events even worth it?
These questions become even trickier for people in leadership positions. A leader who is well-versed on the issues of the day can back up her own decisions with real world examples, relate to others with topical conversation, and more generally have a better understanding of the world. However, it is likely not necessary to succeed. Furthermore, the current political and market volatility can become distracting, or even isolating.
Philosophers are in a unique place to solve this riddle as current events are largely trivial in their work. Let's look at three notable philosophers and how they might address the never-ending news cycle. We will find out that you can't know everything, you can't control everything, but you can't ignore the most significant issues of the day.
What may be the most famous quote in the history of philosophy appears in Plato's Apology. In response to an overly confident interlocutor claiming he can define whatever metaphysical concept thrown his way, Socrates says, 'the only thing I know is that I know nothing, and I am not quite sure that I know that.'
The two ideas behind this famed Socratic statement are that you can never fully understand anything, and there is always more to know. By this logic, an authentic opinion of current events is only possible by first acknowledging how little you know. This will take some pressure off. Stream the news to learn more, not to look for some confirmation of bias.
Another philosopher who shares values similar to Socrates is Seneca, born in Ancient Rome about a half century after Socrates was put to death. Along with Marcus Aurelius, Seneca is likely the best known of the Stoic philosophers, and his Letters From A Stoic continues to be a relevant essay almost 2,000 years after publication.
The crux of the argument for Seneca and the Stoics is to understand what you can and cannot control. Having this frame of mind can be a shield against the constant panic in the news.
Most of us have no material influence over the swirl of current events. Stoicism in action means it is foolish to think otherwise and get distressed over them. Importantly, this does not mean they should be ignored. Instead, by digesting current events through the lens of a Stoic is to remove feelings from your response.
Why are you doomscrolling? Is it just to elicit certain emotions? Self-reflection can be beneficial for those unable to pace themselves on social media, cable news, and podcasts.
For a different point of view, we turn to 96-year-old philosopher and linguist Noam Chomsky. According to Chomsky, removing emotions from current events is objectionable. It is necessary for anyone who can form an opinion to do so and let it be known.
For Chomsky, it is a question of morality. He has frequently and harshly criticized the U.S. throughout his career, and has actually implied that he would have preferred to have written less on this topic but felt he had a moral compulsion to do so. 'It is the responsibility of intellectuals to speak the truth and expose lies,' he wrote in a 1967 essay.
None of the ideals that these philosophers have set forth are right or wrong. It is a personal decision on how you confront the polarizing events of the day. When making the choice, it is beneficial to know that whatever you choose, you will be on the side of some of the greatest thinkers in history.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
38 minutes ago
- Yahoo
If You Had Invested in Trump's 1980s Companies, Here's How Much You'd Have Today
President Donald Trump wasn't always the commander-in-chief; prior to having engaged in a political career which has seen him become the 45th and 47th president of the United States in serving non-consecutive terms, Trump was known as a businessman — and later, media personality — who partook in a variety of different entrepreneurial ventures. Trump's Economy: Read Next: If you'd backed those publicly traded ventures in the 1980s, how would your investments be faring today? Launched to much fanfare in 1995, Trump took Trump Hotels and Casino Resorts public, attracting $140 million in stock purchases from investors betting big on the well-known real estate tycoon. However, with Trump at the helm, holdings went from a single Atlantic City Casino to quickly snatching up debt-burdened Taj Mahal and a third Atlantic City casino, both previously owned by the now-president himself. A number of personal loans borrowed from the company followed suit, according to a Forbes report, and eventually, the company lost $647 million from 1995 through 2004, when it declared bankruptcy. Learn More: Following the initial 2004 bankruptcy, Trump Hotels and Casino Resorts was renamed as Trump Entertainment Resorts. And while Trump was paid $2 million per year despite stepping down as CEO (after receiving an approximately $50 million for services and rents rendered during his tenure as chief over Trump Hotels and Casino Resorts), that company lost $189 million in 2007 and a further $232 million in 2008. On Feb. 13, 2009, Trump as well as his daughter, Ivanka Trump — installed on the board in 2007 — resigned their posts. On Feb. 17, Trump Entertainment Resorts declared bankruptcy. Today, Trump Entertainment Resorts exists as a fractional penny stock with negligible value, meaning that investors who did not sell their shares earlier would be essentially left with no value. Trump Media & Technology Group remains in play, however, with majority ownership resting in the hands of the president. The company is most notably involved with Trump's Truth Social social media platform, although in recent days it has been dedicated to building a substantial Bitcoin treasury reserve. According to Benzinga, the SEC recently gave the nod of approval for Trump Media to expand upon these plans with a slated $2.3 billion capital investment, coming from more than 50 institutional investors. Following an initial blockbuster public opening on March 26, 2024 — the first time in nearly 30 years where a portion of the president's business empire went public, per CNN — where shares reached ~$78 before falling to rest at around $70, Trump Media's stock price has tumbled precipitously. As of close of trading on June 20, share prices were at $17.83. Editor's note on political coverage: GOBankingRates is nonpartisan and strives to cover all aspects of the economy objectively and present balanced reports on politically focused finance stories. You can find more coverage of this topic on More From GOBankingRates How Much Money Is Needed To Be Considered Middle Class in Your State? This article originally appeared on If You Had Invested in Trump's 1980s Companies, Here's How Much You'd Have Today
Yahoo
39 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Satellite images show the damage at Iran's deeply buried Fordow nuclear site after massive US strikes
New satellite images show damage after US airstrikes at Iran's Fordow nuclear facilities. Fordow was one of three Iranian nuclear sites that the US bombed early Sunday morning (local time). The strikes came amid an Israeli campaign to degrade Iran's nuclear program. New satellite imagery reveals damage at the Fordow nuclear facility in Iran after US military aircraft bombed the site. In the images, which were captured on Sunday by the US commercial satellite imaging company Maxar Technologies and obtained by Business Insider, several large holes or craters can be seen on a ridge over the underground complex at Fordow, south of Tehran. The images show what looks like a layer of dust or debris caused by the US airstrikes over the area, and several tunnel entrances that lead to the underground facility appear to be blocked with dirt. President Donald Trump announced early Sunday morning local time that the US had attacked Iran's Fordow, Natanz, and Isfahan nuclear facilities in what he later described as a "spectacular military success." He said that US aircraft dropped a "full payload" of bombs on Fordow, one of Iran's main nuclear enrichment facilities. The site is buried deep in the side of a mountain and is the country's most hardened facility, designed specifically to be protected from air attacks. Gen. Dan Caine, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, said seven B-2 Spirit stealth bombers dropped a total of 14 heavy bunker-buster bombs on Iran's nuclear facilities. He described the operation, known as Midnight Hammer, as highly secretive and complex. Speaking to reporters early on Sunday, Caine said that the B-2s dropped the 30,000-pound GBU-57 Massive Ordnance Penetrator, or MOP, which is the US military's largest non-nuclear bomb and believed to be the only weapon that is capable of penetrating Iran's deepest nuclear facilities like Fordow. It marked the first-ever operational use of the MOP, Caine added. Several of these bombs were dropped on Fordow. However, it's unclear how much damage the underground facility sustained. During a press conference, Caine said that over 125 US aircraft — a mix of the B-2s, 4th- and 5th-generation fighter jets, and aerial refueling tankers — were involved in the operation, which consisted of a considerable amount of deception. He said that American forces used 75 precision-guided weapons against Iranian targets, including the 14 MOPs and more than two dozen Tomahawk cruise missiles launched from a submarine in an undisclosed location in the Middle East. Caine said the battle damage assessment will take some time, although he said initial indications are that all three Iranian nuclear sites that were struck sustained damage and destruction. Additional satellite imagery captured by Maxar on Sunday and obtained by BI revealed the aftermath of the US strikes at Natanz and Isfahan, the other two nuclear facilities that officials named. Both sites are located south of Tehran in the center of the country. The dozens of submarine-launched Tomahawk missiles targeted key infrastructure at Isfahan, with imagery showing that the site sustained heavy damage in the strikes. Rafael Grossi, the United Nations nuclear watchdog chief, said there was extensive damage at Isfahan. He added that Iranian authorities had reported no increase in off-site radiation levels following the US strikes on the three nuclear sites. The US bombing came after a week of sweeping Israeli airstrikes across Iran that officials said were intended to degrade the country's nuclear program and military capabilities. Trump, who had long pushed Tehran to agree to a new nuclear deal, had spent the past few days weighing whether to join Israel in its campaign. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who has preferred a military solution to Iran's nuclear program, praised Trump for attacking the Iranian nuclear sites. Since June 13, Israeli fighter jets have targeted Iran's nuclear sites, top scientists, senior commanders, missile launchers, air defenses, bases, warplanes, weapons production facilities, and other high-profile military infrastructure. Iran has retaliated by launching hundreds of ballistic missiles and drones at Israel, many of which have been intercepted. The US bombing is a major escalation in the conflict that could see Iran retaliate by targeting American forces, as Tehran has threatened to do. The Pentagon has a large presence in the Middle East, consisting of warships, aircraft carriers, fighter jets, and ground troops. Both Trump and Pentagon leadership have called for peace, warning Iran it could see more strikes if that can't be achieved. Read the original article on Business Insider
Yahoo
40 minutes ago
- Yahoo
US warns against Iran retaliation as Trump raises 'regime change'
By Phil Stewart and Idrees Ali WASHINGTON (Reuters) -U.S. President Donald Trump on Sunday raised the question of regime change in Iran following U.S. strikes against key military sites over the weekend, as senior officials in his administration warned Tehran against retaliation. "It's not politically correct to use the term, 'Regime Change,' but if the current Iranian Regime is unable to MAKE IRAN GREAT AGAIN, why wouldn't there be a Regime change??? MIGA!!!" Trump wrote on his social media platform. Trump's post came after officials in his administration, including U.S. Vice President JD Vance and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, stressed they were not working to overthrow Iran's government. "This mission was not and has not been about regime change," Hegseth told reporters at the Pentagon, calling the mission "a precision operation" targeting Iran's nuclear program. Vance, in an interview on NBC's "Meet the Press with Kristen Welker," said "our view has been very clear that we don't want a regime change." "We do not want to protract this or build this out any more than it's already been built out. We want to end their nuclear program, and then we want to talk to the Iranians about a long-term settlement here," Vance said, adding the U.S. "had no interest in boots on the ground." "Operation Midnight Hammer" was known only to a small number of people in Washington and at the U.S. military's headquarters for Middle East operations in Tampa, Florida. Complete with deception, seven B-2 bombers flew for 18 hours from the United States into Iran to drop 14 bunker-buster bombs, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, General Dan Caine, told reporters. In total, the U.S. launched 75 precision-guided munitions, including more than two dozen Tomahawk missiles, and more than 125 military aircraft in the operation against three nuclear sites, Caine said. The operation pushes the Middle East to the brink of a major new conflagration in a region already aflame for more than 20 months with wars in Gaza and Lebanon, and a toppled dictator in Syria. DAMAGE TO FACILITIES With the damage visible from space after 30,000-pound U.S. bunker-buster bombs crashed into the mountain above Iran's Fordow nuclear site, experts and officials are closely watching how far the strikes might have set back Iran's nuclear ambitions. Caine said initial battle damage assessments indicated all three sites sustained extremely severe damage and destruction, but he declined to speculate whether any Iranian nuclear capabilities might still be intact. U.N. nuclear watchdog chief Rafael Grossi was more cautious, saying while it was clear U.S. airstrikes hit Iran's enrichment site at Fordow, it was not yet possible to assess the damage done underground. A senior Iranian source told Reuters on Sunday that most of the highly enriched uranium at Fordow, the site producing the bulk of Iran's uranium refined to up to 60%, had been moved to an undisclosed location before the U.S. attack. Vance told NBC the U.S. was not at war with Iran but rather its nuclear program, and he thought the strikes "really pushed their program back by a very long time." Trump called the damage "monumental," in a separate social media post on Sunday, a day after saying he had "obliterated" Iran's main nuclear sites, but gave no details. Tehran has vowed to defend itself and responded with a volley of missiles at Israel that wounded scores of people and destroyed buildings in its commercial hub Tel Aviv. But, perhaps in an effort to avert all-out war with the superpower, it had yet to carry out its main threats of retaliation, to target U.S. bases or choke off the quarter of the world's oil shipments that pass through its waters. Caine said the U.S. military had increased protection of troops in the region, including in Iraq and Syria. The United States already has a sizeable force in the Middle East, with nearly 40,000 troops in the region, including air defense systems, fighter aircraft and warships that can detect and shoot down enemy missiles. Reuters reported last week the Pentagon had started to move some aircraft and ships from bases in the Middle East that may be vulnerable to any potential Iranian attack. NOT OPEN-ENDED With his unprecedented decision to bomb Iran's nuclear sites, directly joining Israel's air attack on its regional arch foe, Trump has done something he had long vowed to avoid - intervene militarily in a major foreign war. There were sporadic anti-war demonstrations on Sunday afternoon in some U.S. cities, including New York City and Washington. It was unclear why Trump chose to act on Saturday. At the press conference, Hegseth said there was a moment in time when Trump "realized that it had to be a certain action taken in order to minimize the threat to us and our troops." After Trump disputed her original assessment, Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard on Friday said the U.S. had intelligence that should Iran decide to do so, it could build a nuclear weapon in weeks or months, an assessment disputed by some lawmakers and independent experts. U.S. officials say they do not believe Iran had decided to make a bomb. U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio, asked on CBS' "Face the Nation with Margaret Brennan" whether the U.S. saw intelligence that Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei had ordered nuclear weaponization, said: "That's irrelevant." Hegseth, who said the Pentagon notified lawmakers about the operation after U.S. aircraft were out of Iran, said the strikes against Iran were not open-ended. Rubio also said no more strikes were planned, unless Iran responded, telling CBS: "We have other targets we can hit, but we achieved our objective. There are no planned military operations right now against Iran - unless they mess around."
