APIKUR Pushes for Agreement to Resume Kurdistan Oil Exports
By John Lee.
Representatives from the Association of the Petroleum Industry of Kurdistan (APIKUR) member companies met with officials from the Government of Iraq (GoI) and the Kurdistan Regional Government (KRG) on March 6 to discuss the resumption of oil exports through the Iraq-Türkiye Pipeline.
APIKUR reiterated that its member companies are ready to restart exports immediately, provided their longstanding conditions are met. The companies insist on: Payment Surety: Formal sales/lifting agreements with clear terms, ensuring full and timely payment for both past and future oil exports. Payments for oil supplied between October 2022 and March 2023 must also be settled directly and transparently, without intermediaries.
Respect for Production Sharing Contracts (PSCs): The legal and economic terms of existing PSCs must be upheld. APIKUR insists that the role of an independent technical consultant, required under the revised Budget Law, should be limited to verifying that oil sales invoices comply with PSC terms.
Full statement from APIKUR:
Representatives from Association of the Petroleum Industry of Kurdistan member companies attended a meeting with Government of Iraq and Kurdistan Regional Government officials to discuss restoration of oil exports through the Iraq-Türkiye Pipeline on March 6. APIKUR member companies conveyed their conditions required to resume oil exports. Additional meetings are required to finalize agreements.
APIKUR member companies (Companies) reiterate that they are ready to immediately resume exports through the Iraq-Türkiye Pipeline as soon as the conditions communicated repeatedly since November 2023 are met, that treats oil producers in Iraq's Kurdistan Region in a similar manner as oil producers in Federal Iraq. Fair and transparent agreements are necessary that include payment surety, transparent implementation of Iraq's budget law stipulations, and resolution of payments that are in arrears. The conditions are: Surety of payment for past and future oil exports. The Companies need formal sales/lifting agreements with the buyers of any exported oil, setting out terms and conditions and providing surety that Companies will be fully paid for the oil - even if in two tranches. There also needs to be agreements put in place that see Companies being paid for oil delivered but not paid for between October 2022 and March 2023. These payments need to be made directly and transparently to the Companies, without intermediaries or undue delays.
The Companies need formal sales/lifting agreements with the buyers of any exported oil, setting out terms and conditions and providing surety that Companies will be fully paid for the oil - even if in two tranches. There also needs to be agreements put in place that see Companies being paid for oil delivered but not paid for between October 2022 and March 2023. These payments need to be made directly and transparently to the Companies, without intermediaries or undue delays. Maintenance of Production Sharing Contracts commercial terms and economics. The Companies' existing contracts are legally valid and their terms must prevail. The economic model within the PSC's must be respected. The work scope of an independent technical consultant, required by the revised Budget Law, should be agreed by all parties and limited to confirming that the Companies' oil sales invoices are prepared in accordance with the PSCs, and there needs to be formal agreed dispute resolution provision within the confirmation process. APIKUR member companies have recommended consultants to KRG officials from recognized independent international firms.
" APIKUR member companies are ready to meet all stakeholders and finalize the agreements needed to resume oil exports, " said Myles B. Caggins III, APIKUR spokesman. " We appreciate the emphasis Prime Minister Sudani and the U.S. Government have placed on keeping all parties focused on swiftly restoring oil exports through the Iraq-Türkiye Pipeline to strengthen Iraq's economy. "
(Source: APIKUR) Tags: Association of the Petroleum Industry of Kurdistan (APIKUR), Ceyhan, cg, featured, Genel Energy, GKP, Gulf Keystone Petroleum, Iraq Oil Exports News, Iraq Oil Production News, Iraq-Turkey Pipeline (ITP), KRG, Kurdistan News, Ministry of Oil, oil contracts, oil revenues, OPEC, State Oil Marketing Organization (SOMO), Turkiye
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Iraq Business
7 hours ago
- Iraq Business
Petrel submits Proposal re Relinquished Block from 4th Licensing Round
By John Lee. Irish-based Petrel Resources last week issued unaudited preliminary results for the year ending 31 December 2024. The company, which announced a fundraising in March, said that it has submitted a proposal to undertake contractor obligations on a relinquished block from Iraq's 4th Bid Round, and has also prepared an updated development plan for the Merjan oil field. The company said it sees opportunities in recovering flared gas and liquids. Full statement from Petrel Resources: Highlights Market overview 2024 set consumption records for oil and LNG consumption, but oil prices fell in early 2025 due to the 'Trump tariff war' triggering fears of reduced demand. Uncertainty increases risk and delays investment decisions. Available fiscal terms, however, reflect the boom conditions between 2003 and 2014 rather than current market conditions. States have been slow to update contractual terms to align interests, which deters development. Oil explorers are not yet attracting strong investor interest in western markets. Majors buy shares back and issue dividends rather than invest the c. $610 billion necessary to supply future demand. Assets overview In Ghana, ratification discussions with the Ghanaian authorities on Tano acreage have re-commenced - though acreage adjustments are likely, and governance remains an issue. In Iraq, there may be early opportunities to recover gas and liquids currently being flared. Petrel submitted a proposal to undertake contractor obligations on a relinquished Block from the 4 th Bid Round. An updated Merjan oil field development proposal has been prepared. Iraqi oil output was c.4 million barrels daily in Spring 2025, with export growth constrained by contractual terms and OPEC+ agreements. Petrel seeks direct negotiations, where possible, rather than bid rounds, which are expensive and high risk, thus inappropriate for juniors. Outlook The board is considering expansion opportunities in oil & gas, and energy-related projects worldwide. Our group participates in the EU Commission's Critical Resource Minerals' Initiative, which offers attractive diversification given current market conditions. We offer an established record and potentially high liquidity and capital appreciation for the right story. As investors re-focus on 'hard industries' and cash flow, this is a time of opportunity. Recent months remind investors of some eternal truths: market uncertainty has increased, amid armed conflict and trade wars. Western dependence on Chinese processing of Critical Resource Minerals means that efforts to reduce dependence on fossil fuels will not reduce exposure to distant sources and supply chains. Policy-makers have discovered the limits of their bold dreams of a Green transition: energy costs have risen rather than fallen. The new technologies bring new headaches: electricity storage turns out to be prohibitively expensive for grid-scale coverage. EVs continue to penetrate markets but are price-competitive only in China. But developed economies prefer to protect their automotive sectors rather than import cheap Chinese EVs. In such policy myopia lies the roots of the next oil boom. Like all previous energy transitions, Green sources turn out to be additive to rather than replacing traditional, r eliable fuels - which will continue to dominate the 21st century: During 2024/25 there were a serious of close-calls, power failures, and brown-outs globally, culminating in the Iberian black-outs of April 2025. These were not the routine power failures common in the global south, or planned "load-shedding" in South Africa. These power failures were caused by over-dependence on intermittent renewable generation, allied with inadequate investment in legacy grids designed for centralised, reliable world-scale plants fuelled traditionally by coal, and then increasingly by nuclear and natural gas. The failure was not that of renewable generation per se, since hydro-power or geothermal generally provide reliable supplies. The problem was with unpredictable intermittent generation, which produces Direct Current, rather than Alternating Current, and consequently does not deliver significant inertia to protect against periodic interruptions. Battery storage, is expensive and would require vast quantities of Critical Resource Minerals to adequately back a grid up. Traditional storage methods such as hydro are available for only a small percentage of demand. It turns out that the intermittent renewable generation on which the "Green transition" relies is only suitable for up to 30% of demand which is the natural surplus in electrical systems. Beyond that point, costs and risks soar. This means that Natural Gas will continue to dominate electrical generation, both directly, and as essential back-up for the reliability modern economies require. In price-sensitive markets, coal will continue to dominate. Nuclear power is also an effective solution, but involves bureaucratic planning requirements, up-front costs, and is opposed politically in some developed societies. Consumption data bear this out: recent years have seen record demand for oil and even coal. LNG is now 55% of total traded gas, helped by malicious damage to pipelines and the time needed to extend more gas pipelines to Asian consumers. Markets are always transitioning, which is why an average 3.75% global economic growth translates into only 2.1% energy consumption growth due to greater efficiencies. But every energy transition in history has added new fuels rather than substituted them. Legislators are unlikely to achieve what market forces cannot. And yet there has been a dramatic under-investment in reliable energy exploration & development since 2014. This is also true even of those Critical Resource Minerals necessary to fuel the new industries, which include Copper and Nickel as well as Lithium, Cobalt and the other 50-odd minerals. To maintain adequate oil & gas supplies the world needs about $610 billion of investment (depending on materials' costs and rig-rates), but the industry invests only c.$360 billion - much of it in existing properties and basins of super-majors and National Oil Companies. There has been little frontier exploration since 2015. Most of the developing world is starved of investment. Instead, producers prefer to issue dividends and buy shares back. Part of the reason is that politicians also display myopia about how to deliver effective exploration. Risk-investors require a risk-adjusted rate of return. The higher the uncertainty, the more return investors require. Best results are achieved by aligning interests, and linking taxes to profits, rather than requiring up-front payments, or royalties. Formal bid rounds, involving up-front fees, qualification criteria designed for majors, and limited upside, are not how you expedite projects, keep cost control and optimise reservoir recovery. That is why Petrel prefers direct negotiations, where possible, after which we can bring partners via farm-ins. But our industry is cyclical, and majors' caution offers opportunities for independents - who have always pioneered new approaches, from offshore drilling to fracking. So far, the emerging supply constraints have not filtered through to exploration & development. But when they do, there will be a sharp reversal in sentiment, rewarding those farsighted enough to develop attractive acreage ripe for exploitation. We have received several approaches offering new oil & gas exploration projects but also in Helium and other energy-related projects. So far, all prospects have fallen short on legal title, price expectations, or financing terms. There is no value for Petrel shareholders in over-paying. Petrel is an EU company, and our involvement in the EU Commission's Critical Resource Minerals' "Team Europe" has fostered relationships with industrial buyers, financing institutions and key decision-makers. There are surprisingly few juniors able to swim in all these seas. In the meantime, there is market interest in Petrel's strong shareholder following and liquidity - especially at times of intense news-flow. Accordingly, we continue to explore expansion opportunities. Financing There are contrarian investors keen to fund the right project. As during the pandemic and previous times of turbulence, directors and their supporters are open to covering working capital needs, and are prepared to participate in any necessary, future fundings. (Source: Petrel Resources)
Iraq Business
7 hours ago
- Iraq Business
Basra Gas Company to Boost LPG Output
By John Lee. The Ministry of Oil plans to increase the production of liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) at the Basra Gas Company (BGC) to more than 8,000 tonnes per day in the coming years. Speaking at the LPG Forum organised by the BGC, Izzat Saber Ismail, Deputy Oil Minister for Gas Affairs, said that this effort is part of the Ministry's gas sector development strategy, which aligns with government programmes and directives from Deputy Prime Minister for Energy Affairs and Oil Minister Hayan Abdul Ghani. Current LPG production at BGC stands at 6,000 tonnes per day. The Ministry has increased associated gas investment to over 70 percent, up from 53 percent in the first year of the current government. The Ministry, in collaboration with international companies, has implemented several gas investment projects in Basra, Maysan, Dhi Qar, the central oilfields, and Kirkuk. These projects aim to eliminate gas flaring and thermal emissions between 2028 and 2030, in line with Iraq's commitment to the 2016 Paris Agreement. Ismail emphasised the economic significance of LPG as a major revenue source and a key contributor to diversifying Iraq's national income. He also reiterated the Ministry's commitment to developing the gas sector based on sound technical and economic foundations. (Source: Ministry of Oil)
Iraq Business
a day ago
- Iraq Business
Gulf Keystone Maintains Production Guidance Amid Regional Tensions
By John Lee. Gulf Keystone Petroleum (LSE: GKP) provided an operational and corporate update ahead of its AGM on Friday, reaffirming its 2025 production and financial guidance despite regional uncertainties. CEO Jon Harris reported strong performance so far this year, with gross average production of approximately 44,900 barrels of oil per day (bopd) supported by steady local demand and optimisation efforts. The company paid a $25 million [approx. IQD 32.5 billion] interim dividend in April and remains debt-free with $100 million [approx. IQD 130 billion] in cash as of 19 June. Regarding exports, Gulf Keystone continues to engage with government stakeholders to resume oil exports through the Iraq-Türkiye Pipeline (ITP). The company emphasised the need for agreements on payment guarantees, repayment of outstanding receivables, and preservation of contract terms before any restart. Full statement from GKP on Friday: 2025 AGM Operational & Corporate Update Ahead of today's 2025 Annual General Meeting ("AGM"), Gulf Keystone, a leading independent operator and producer in the Kurdistan Region of Iraq, provides an operational and corporate update. Jon Harris, Gulf Keystone's Chief Executive Officer, said: " We are looking forward this morning to welcoming GKP shareholders to our 2025 AGM. The Company has performed well in the year to date, with robust local sales demand enabling gross average production of c.44,900 bopd, supporting continued free cash flow generation and an interim dividend of $25 million paid in April. "Looking ahead, our 2025 annual guidance is unchanged. While we have seen no material impact on Shaikan Field operations to date, we are closely monitoring the developing conflict between Israel and Iran. We are also continuing to engage with government stakeholders regarding an exports restart solution. While there remains no timeline, we are hopeful of ultimately reaching an agreement." Operational & Financial Strong safety track record, with Zero Lost Time Incidents for over 880 days Gross average production of c.44,900 bopd in 2025 year to date (to 18 June 2025): Production supported by robust local market demand and optimisation initiatives offsetting field declines and well maintenance Realised prices have remained at around $27-$29/bbl this year despite the recent fluctuations in Brent price Continued disciplined capital expenditures and strict cost control have supported free cash flow: $25 million interim dividend paid in April according to the Company's announced approach of semi-annual dividend reviews; the next Board review is expected around the Half Year Results in August Debt-free balance sheet, with cash of $100 million as at 19 June 2025 Outlook 2025 operational and financial guidance 2025 gross average production guidance unchanged at 40,000 - 45,000 bopd: The planned PF-2 shutdown, expected to last c.3 weeks, has been deferred from Q4 2025 to Q2 2026, to support production and provide greater work programme flexibility The Company continues to carefully manage natural field declines and production rates on certain wells constrained by water and gas Production guidance remains subject to local market demand 2025 net capital expenditure and cost guidance unchanged: Expect c.$20 million net capex on PF-2 safety upgrades and maintenance, with the majority of the required equipment purchases and activity taking place in 2025 despite the deferral of the facility shutdown to Q2 2026, and $5-$10 million on production optimisation initiatives Continue to review plant initiatives to enhance production and improve reliability, including water handling Operating costs guidance of $50-$55 million and other G&A expenses guidance below $10 million unchanged Kurdistan exports GKP continues to engage with government stakeholders regarding a solution to enable the restart of Kurdistan crude exports through the Iraq-Türkiye Pipeline The Company remains ready to resume oil exports provided we have agreements on payment surety for future oil exports, the repayment of outstanding receivables and the preservation of current contract economics (Source: Gulf Keystone Petroleum)
