logo
Holyrood governing body defends 'unfair' trans toilet ban

Holyrood governing body defends 'unfair' trans toilet ban

The Nationala day ago

In May, Presiding Officer Alison Johnstone announced that access to the parliament's facilities would be based on biological sex, not gender identity, after the Supreme Court judgment on the definition of a woman.
Following the ruling, the Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC) issued interim guidance that banned transgender people from using the bathroom of their acquired gender.
READ MORE: John Swinney tears into 'weak man' Anas Sarwar at FMQs
The move led to MSPs and staff writing to Holyrood's governing body expressing 'deep concern' over the decision, but the policy has remained in place.
Westminster, Stormont, and the Senedd have not changed their polices and allow transgender people to use the toilets of their acquired gender.
On Thursday, Scottish Greens co-leader Patrick Harvie raised the issue during SPCB questions.
He noted that the SPCB previously said it 'remains committed to providing an inclusive environment' at Holyrood.
(Image: Scottish Parliament) Harvie pointed to letters written to officials from LGBT+ groups the Equality Network and Scottish Trans which demonstrated 'the opposite is the case' and the changes will make trans people feel 'less welcome' at the Scottish Parliament.
'I am also aware that the response to colleagues in the staff union, representing staff in the Scottish Green parliamentary group, has also not addressed the substantive points they raised.
'They say it didn't address the lack of initial consultation, specific negative impacts on trans staff members or on gender non conforming people, the violation of privacy and dignity, criticism the EqIA [Equality Impact Assessment] and other points.
READ MORE: Protesters take to Holyrood amid 'deadlocked' Ardrossan Harbour deal
'Given that the corporate body is now well aware that it has not achieved its intention of an inclusive workplace, surely it is time for the corporate body to think again and rescind this unclear and unfair interim position until a full position can be consulted on.'
Responding on behalf of the SPCB, Scottish Tory MSP Jackson Carlaw insisted the governing body had 'legal responsibilities'.
'Our job, even though we are politicians, is not to debate the politics of an issue, but to ensure that we are implementing the law as the law is communicated to us,' Carlaw told MSPs.
(Image: Scottish Parliament) 'Now having said that we recognize the interim stance to fulfill those legal responsibilities is a change. So let me acknowledge on behalf of the SPCB and Mr Harvie that for some this has proved both upsetting and a cause for anxiety and concern for their own wellbeing.
'With this in mind, managers were asked to immediately engage with their teams to discuss the interim stance, to identify any concerns about its impact and to support individuals who may be personally affected.
'This is an ongoing process, and we are committed to the wider wellbeing of our staff, which is embedded in a number of our policies and our management approach.'
Carlaw added that the Scottish Parliament was working to 'improve inclusivity' and any further policy changes would take into account the EHRC statutory code 'once it is finalised'.
READ MORE: 'Impossible to say' when MV Caledonian Isles will be fixed, says CalMac
Scottish Labour's Carol Mochan asked Carlaw to explain why the SPCB chose to introduce changes now before the EHRC's full guidance was published.
'Officials took urgent steps following its publication to review the judgment in detail and consider its implications for services and facilities at Holyrood,' he replied.
'Now this is in line with the EHRC statement that those duties under the Equality 2010 act need to comply with the law and should be urgently reviewing what changes need to be made to their existing policies and practices. It's a matter for others to determine how they address their responsibilities.'
Scottish Tory MSP Pam Gosal noted that anti-trans campaign group Sex Matters have 'warned they will come after organisations refusing to follow the ruling' and a challenge would leave 'taxpayers footing the bill'.
(Image: Scottish Parliament) 'Therefore will the Parliament commit to following and implementing the interim update issued by the EHRC on the protection of single sex spaces,' she said.
'It is the responsibility of the corporate body to implement the law and the advice that we receive. That is what the corporate body's duty is.
'I've said, of course, that it's an interim position, and that there's a consultation taking place.
'That we remain committed to inclusivity, and that that is the primary objective of the work that we are doing.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump news at a glance: Day of environmental setbacks across US after judicial and executive decisions
Trump news at a glance: Day of environmental setbacks across US after judicial and executive decisions

The Guardian

timean hour ago

  • The Guardian

Trump news at a glance: Day of environmental setbacks across US after judicial and executive decisions

It was a day of environmental setbacks across the US on Friday after the Trump administration moved to keep two Michigan coal plants open and the US supreme court handed a win to fossil fuel firms in an emissions case. Already, the US Department of Energy (DoE) has ordered the JH Campbell coal plant on Lake Michigan to remain open beyond its 31 May closure date, while the administration is expected to prolong the life of the Monroe power plant on Lake Erie, scheduled to begin closing in 2028. The plants emit about 45% of the state's greenhouse gas pollution. Opponents say the order has little support in Michigan, could cost ratepayers hundreds of millions of dollars and is ideologically driven. The state's utilities have said they did not ask for the plants to stay online, and the Trump administration did not communicate with stakeholders before the order, a spokesperson for the Michigan Public Service Commission, which regulates utilities and manages the state's grid, told the Guardian. Here are the key stories at a glance: Fossil fuel companies are able to challenge California's ability to set stricter standards reducing the amount of polluting coming from cars, the US supreme court has ruled in a case that is set to unravel one of the key tools used to curb planet-heating emissions in recent years. The conservative-dominated court voted by seven to two to back a challenge by oil and gas companies, along with 17 Republican-led states, to a waiver that California has received periodically from the federal government since 1967 that allows it to set tougher standards than national rules limiting pollution from cars. Read the full story Columbia University graduate Mahmoud Khalil was released from US immigration detention, where he has been held for more than three months over his activism against Israel's war in Gaza. The release came after an order from a federal judge who said during a hearing on Friday that Khalil was not a flight risk and 'is not a danger to the community, period, full stop'. Read the full story A teenage student and soccer standout was arrested by immigration authorities four days after his high school graduation ceremony in Ohio and deported to Honduras this week, his family has said. Emerson Colindres, 19, had no criminal record and was attending a regularly scheduled appointment with Immigration and Customs Enforcement in Cincinnati when he was detained on 4 June, according to the Cincinnati Enquirer. Read the full story Elizabeth Warren has confronted the US secretary of state, Marco Rubio, over reports that the state department is considering redirecting $500m from USAID to the controversial Gaza Humanitarian Foundation, the Israel- and US-backed Gaza food delivery group. Read the full story California's challenge to the Trump administration's military deployment on the streets of Los Angeles returned to a federal courtroom in San Francisco on Friday after an appeals court handed Donald Trump a key procedural win in the case. Read the full story The president failed to mark Juneteenth, commemorating the ending of slavery in the US, until he posted on Thursday night that there are 'too many non-working holidays' in the country. Read the full story Experts fear the US is now in worse shape to respond to a pandemic than before 2020 amid controversial dismissals at health agencies and lacklustre responses to the bird flu and measles outbreaks. The Trump administration has terminated 639 employees at Voice of America and its parent organisation in the latest round of sweeping cuts that have reduced the international broadcasting service to a fraction of its former size. The US supreme court declined to speed up consideration of whether to take up a challenge to Trump's tariffs even before lower courts have ruled in the dispute. Catching up? Here's what happened on 19 June 2025.

US Supreme Court curbs discrimination claims over lost retiree benefits
US Supreme Court curbs discrimination claims over lost retiree benefits

Reuters

time4 hours ago

  • Reuters

US Supreme Court curbs discrimination claims over lost retiree benefits

June 20 (Reuters) - Retirees cannot sue their former employers for disability discrimination after leaving their jobs, the U.S. Supreme Court decided on Friday in a ruling against a disabled former Florida firefighter that could make it harder to bring lawsuits seeking to restore lost retiree benefits. The ruling, opens new tab upheld a lower court's decision to dismiss a lawsuit by Karyn Stanley, who had worked as a firefighter in Sanford, that accused the city of discriminating against her by ending a health insurance subsidy for retirees. Conservative Justice Neil Gorsuch, who authored the ruling, wrote that only job applicants and current employees are "qualified individuals" covered by the Americans with Disabilities Act, a landmark federal law that prohibits discrimination based on disability. "In other words, the statute protects people, not benefits, from discrimination. And the statute also tells us who those people are: qualified individuals, those who hold or seek a job at the time of the defendant's alleged discrimination," Gorsuch wrote. Gorsuch was joined by the court's five other conservative justices and liberal Justice Elena Kagan. Liberal Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown Jackson penned separate dissenting opinions. While Stanley worked for Sanford, located in the suburbs of Orlando, the city changed its policy to limit health insurance coverage for disabled retirees to 24 months after they stopped working. Stanley retired from her job after two decades because her Parkinson's disease had made it impossible for her to work, according to court filings. She sued the city in 2020, claiming it discriminated against workers who retired early because of a disability by giving them a smaller healthcare subsidy than employees who retired after 25 years of service. The city in court filings has said its policy was lawful and necessary to contain costs related to employee benefits. Sanford covers insurance costs for workers who retire after 25 years of service until they turn 65, and had previously done so for employees who retired due to a disability regardless of how long they worked for the city. While Stanley worked for the city, it changed its policy to limit coverage for disabled retirees to 24 months after they stopped working. Stanley was 47 when she retired. Friday's decision will help reduce the legal risks that employers face when they change or terminate retirement benefits, according to Caroline Pieper, a Chicago-based lawyer with the firm Seyfarth Shaw, which represents employers. "While there are certainly other considerations ... this case should give employers more comfort under the ADA when they modify or reduce post-employment offerings," Pieper said, referring to the Americans with Disabilities Act. Friday's ruling affirmed decisions by a judge in Florida and the Atlanta-based 11th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, which had dismissed Stanley's lawsuit.

Alison Johnstone to stand down as Holyrood presiding officer
Alison Johnstone to stand down as Holyrood presiding officer

Times

time4 hours ago

  • Times

Alison Johnstone to stand down as Holyrood presiding officer

Alison Johnstone will quit politics next year when she stands down as Scotland's sixth presiding officer at the Holyrood elections​. The departure of the 59-year-old, who sparked controversy in recent weeks after a series of rows with Douglas Ross, the former leader of the Scottish Conservatives, will raise hopes among her critics that her successor will drive more radical reforms of Holyrood. While Johnstone's tenure has been seen as steady, many at Holyrood believe the parliament would benefit from Westminster-style reforms which would weaken the control of party leaders and whips over committee memberships and encourage independence among backbenchers. The King listens as Johnstone speaks during the 25th anniversary celebrations of the Scottish parliament in 2024 EFF J MITCHELL/GETTY IMAGES Meanwhile, there has been concern about the quality of debates, with some MSPs in the habit of reading out pre-written speeches rather than engaging in genuine dialogue with opponents. Speaking to The Times, Johnstone said: ' I was elected in 2011 and it was always my intention that this would be my last term in Holyrood. 'I came from a wholly non-political background and got involved in a campaign to save a school playing field​.' She said, 'I was not in a political party but campaigned for the creation of a Scottish parliament​ and I then worked as an assistant for Robin Harper, the first-ever Green parliamentarian in the UK elected to the first-ever Scottish parliament.​' Johnstone is the second female and the first Green party member to hold the presiding officer position, which comes with a £126,452 salary. Nicola Sturgeon, the former first minister, left; Johnstone and Lord Offord of Garvel during a Remembrance Sunday service and parade in Edinburgh in 2022 JANE BARLOW/PA She took over the reins of Holyrood at a challenging time during the Covid pandemic, a period without precedent, and even her opponents said she did a good job steering its proceedings through uncharted waters. More recently she was involved in a series of rows with Ross who accused her of failing to 'act in a neutral manner ' after she suspended him from the Holyrood chamber. Johnstone was elected as a Green MSP in 2011, and before that was as an Edinburgh Green councillor for Morningside in 2007. ​S​he is a qualified athletics coach and former board member of Scottish Athletics​, previously​ holding the East of Scotland​ records in the 800 metre and 1,500-metre events. A quarter of the present crop of 129 MSPs have announced their departures including a handful of MSPs who have been in Holyrood since its creation in 1999. This week Sarah Boyack, the veteran MSP, announced she was leaving next year, leaving Jackie Baillie as the only Labour MSP with ministerial experience on Holyrood's benches. Baillie is also the only Labour MSP who was elected in 1999 who has been in the Scottish parliament continuously since the outset and will stand again next year.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store