Google is using YouTube videos to train its AI video generator
Google is using its expansive library of YouTube videos to train its artificial intelligence models, including Gemini and the Veo 3 video and audio generator, CNBC has learned.
The tech company is turning to its catalog of 20 billion YouTube videos to train these new-age AI tools, according to a person who was not authorized to speak publicly about the matter. Google confirmed to CNBC that it relies on its vault of YouTube videos to train its AI models, but the company said it only uses a subset of its videos for the training and that it honors specific agreements with creators and media companies.
"We've always used YouTube content to make our products better, and this hasn't changed with the advent of AI," said a YouTube spokesperson in a statement. "We also recognize the need for guardrails, which is why we've invested in robust protections that allow creators to protect their image and likeness in the AI era — something we're committed to continuing."
Such use of YouTube videos has the potential to lead to an intellectual property crisis for creators and media companies, experts said.
While YouTube says it has shared this information previously, experts who spoke with CNBC said it's not widely understood by creators and media organizations that Google is training its AI models using its video library.
YouTube didn't say how many of the 20 billion videos on its platform or which ones are used for AI training. But given the platform's scale, training on just 1% of the catalog would amount to 2.3 billion minutes of content, which experts say is more than 40 times the training data used by competing AI models.
The company shared in a blog post published in September that YouTube content could be used to "improve the product experience … including through machine learning and AI applications." Users who have uploaded content to the service have no way of opting out of letting Google train on their videos.
"It's plausible that they're taking data from a lot of creators that have spent a lot of time and energy and their own thought to put into these videos," said Luke Arrigoni, CEO of Loti, a company that works to protect digital identity for creators. "It's helping the Veo 3 model make a synthetic version, a poor facsimile, of these creators. That's not necessarily fair to them."
CNBC spoke with multiple leading creators and IP professionals, none were aware or had been informed by YouTube that their content could be used to train Google's AI models.
The revelation that YouTube is training on its users' videos is noteworthy after Google in May announced Veo 3, one of the most advanced AI video generators on the market. In its unveiling, Google showcased cinematic-level video sequences, including a scene of an old man on a boat and another showing Pixar-like animals talking with one another. The entirety of the scenes, both the visual and the audio, were entirely AI generated.
According to YouTube, an average of 20 million videos are uploaded to the platform each day by independent creators by nearly every major media company. Many creators say they are now concerned they may be unknowingly helping to train a system that could eventually compete with or replace them.
"It doesn't hurt their competitive advantage at all to tell people what kind of videos they train on and how many they trained on," Arrigoni said. "The only thing that it would really impact would be their relationship to creators."
Even if Veo 3's final output does not directly replicate existing work, the generated content fuels commercial tools that could compete with the creators who made the training data possible, all without credit, consent or compensation, experts said.
When uploading a video to the platform, the user is agreeing that YouTube has a broad license to the content.
"By providing Content to the Service, you grant to YouTube a worldwide, non-exclusive, royalty-free, sublicensable and transferable license to use that Content," the terms of service read.
"We've seen a growing number of creators discover fake versions of themselves circulating across platforms — new tools like Veo 3 are only going to accelerate the trend," said Dan Neely, CEO of Vermillio, which helps individuals protect their likeness from being misused and also facilitates secure licensing of authorized content.
Neely's company has challenged AI platforms for generating content that allegedly infringes on its clients' intellectual property, both individual and corporate. Neely says that although YouTube has the right to use this content, many of the content creators who post on the platform are unaware that their videos are being used to train video-generating AI software.
Vermillio uses a proprietary tool called Trace ID to asses whether an AI-generated video has significant overlap with a human-created video. Trace ID assigns scores on a scale of zero to 100. Any score over 10 for a video with audio is considered meaningful, Neely said.
In one example cited by Neely, a video from YouTube creator Brodie Moss closely matched content generated by Veo 3. Trace ID attributed a score of 71 to the original video with the audio alone scoring over 90.
Some creators told CNBC they welcome the opportunity to use Veo 3, even if it may have been trained on their content.
"I try to treat it as friendly competition more so than these are adversaries," said Sam Beres, a creator with 10 million subscribers on YouTube. "I'm trying to do things positively because it is the inevitable —but it's kind of an exciting inevitable."
Google includes an indemnification clause for its generative AI products, including Veo, which means that if a user faces a copyright challenge over AI-generated content, Google will take on legal responsibility and cover the associated costs.
YouTube announced a partnership with Creative Artists Agency in December to develop access for top talent to identify and manage AI-generated content that features their likeness. YouTube also has a tool for creators to request a video to be taken down if they believe it abuses their likeness.
However, Arrigoni said that the tool hasn't been reliable for his clients.
YouTube also allows creators to opt out of third party training from select AI companies including Amazon, Apple and Nvidia, but users are not able to stop Google from training for its own models.
The Walt Disney Company and Universal filed a joint lawsuit last Wednesday against the AI image generator Midjourney, alleging copyright infringement, the first lawsuit of its kind out of Hollywood.
"The people who are losing are the artists and the creators and the teenagers whose lives are upended," said Sen. Josh Hawley, R-Mo., in May at a Senate hearing about the use of AI to replicate the likeness of humans. "We've got to give individuals powerful enforceable rights and their images in their property in their lives back again or this is just never going to stop."
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
I didn't realize cats doing Olympic diving would be such compelling viewing – until the latest AI video craze from a new Veo 3 rival
When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission. MiniMax's new Hailuo 02 AI video model has sparked a viral trend of cats performing Olympic dives The videos blend advanced physics-based animation with internet absurdity Though not the quality of Google Veo 3, Hailuo 2 is rapidly gaining in popularity among casual AI users Watching the cat walk onto the diving board, I could imagine calls to the fire department or a huge crowd rushing to save it, causing a catastrophe, while the feline simply blinked at the tragedy. Instead, the cat executed an Olympic-caliber triple somersault into the pool. If it weren't for the impossible feat and my awareness that it was an AI-generated video, I'd be checking to see if there was a Freaky Friday situation with the U.S. swim team. Instead, it's a hugely viral video produced using Chinese AI video developer MiniMax's Hailuo 02 model. The millions of people watching the video of cats diving may not be real, but it's real enough to elbow its way into the competition for AI video dominance, alongside Google Veo 3 and OpenAI's Sora, among many others. MiniMax debuted Hailuo 02 earlier this summer, but the virality of the faux Olympics video suggests it's going to become a very popular tool for making still images or text prompts into videos. The model only makes five- to ten-second clips for now, but its motion customization, camera effects, and impressive imitation of real-world physics, like the movement of fur or splashing of water, make it more intriguing. Testing Hailuo 02 on cats diving came about seemingly organically when X user R.B Keeper (presumably not their real name) tried a prompt they'd seen tested on Veo 3. The idea spread from there to a version that garnered millions of views in a matter of hours and appeared on TikTok, Reddit, and Instagram, with numerous variations. Hailuo 02 uses frame-by-frame physics simulation, attention-mapped motion prompts, and multimodal input parsing. In other words, if you type a strange idea, the model will do its best to make it look and behave like it would in an approximation of the real world. Notably, Hailuo 02 is reportedly far cheaper and faster than Veo 3, though perhaps without quite the high-end gloss. Still, it's more accessible, not being limited to enterprise services and beta programs like Veo 3. The cat diving videos are the apex of a very specific Venn diagram of internet trends, accessible tools, and low-stakes fun. You don't need to be a professional editor or own a supercomputer to try it. And more upgrades are on the horizon. MiniMax has outlined plans to integrate synchronized audio, lighting, and texture control, as well as longer clips. As for Google Veo 3 and other major players, they have their professional niche for now. But if they want to widen their appeal to the masses, they might look to what MiniMax and smaller developers like Midjourney, with its V1 video model, are doing. Hailuo 02 is the kind of tool that will get people, like the cats, to dive in. Midjourney just dropped its first AI video model and Sora and Veo 3 should be worried I watched some of the viral ASMR videos made with AI and I feel more confused than soothed Google can now generate your AI videos more quickly than ever
Forbes
5 hours ago
- Forbes
Google's Quiet Confirmation Of The Pixel 10
Google's "Talking Phones Podcast" title card Google is having a little bit of fun in its latest iPhone vs Pixel video. While the Pixel 9 Pro takes pride of place, there's also a surprising cameo for what comes next… the Pixel 10. The Pixel 10 Easter Egg The details come at the end of Google's latest promotional video posted on its Made By Google YouTube channel. In it, an iPhone and a Pixel talk about the recent advances made by Apple's smartphone, with a not at all surprised Pixel noting when that feature arrived on Pixel and Android. These include live translation, hold assistance and call screening arriving four, five and seven years ago respectively., Of course, the capabilities of all these features have improved significantly over the last few years, so there are shades of Oranges to (ahem) Apples here, but it makes Google's point effectively. The story of Android being ahead of iOS is here for all to hear. The little easter egg at the end is part of another story, leading into the next Pixel release. The iPhone quietly asks the Pixel 9 Pro, 'so, what are you working on for Pixel 10… just out of curiosity?' Naming The Pixel 10 It's no secret that Google is working on the next family of Pixel smartphones. Neither is it a secret that we're expecting an entry-level Pixel 10, a premium Pixel 10 Pro, a larger Pixel 10 Pro XL and an innovative Pixel 10 Pro Fold. Yet this is the first time Google has publicly acknowledged that the new handsets will carry the Pixel 10 branding. Although the sharp-eared watchers will note that it was the iPhone confirming the new Pixel 10, not the Pixel 9 Pro. So, did Apple confirm the new name, rather than Google? Google is expected to announce the Pixel 10 family at an upcoming Made By Google event. While dates have not been confirmed, talk within the community picks out Wednesday, Aug. 20 for the launch, and Thursday, Aug 28. for the first handsets to go on sale to the public. Now read how the Pixel 10 will impact every Android smartphone in 2025 and beyond…
Yahoo
7 hours ago
- Yahoo
Here's Why Jeff Bezos Only Paid Himself an $80,000 Salary From Amazon
The name Jeff Bezos is synonymous with Amazon and as a multi-billionaire. Although he's one of the richest people in the world, he's only paid himself a salary of $80,000 for around 20 years, according to the New York Times. Discover Next: Find Out: When asked why during an interview by the New York Times, Bezos said that he 'just didn't feel good about taking more' money when he 'already owned a significant amount of the company.' He said in the interview that he felt that he had 'plenty of incentive' since he owned more than 20% of Amazon and had gone down 10% since he started selling off his shares, and doesn't need any more wealth. Of course, as Amazon continues to remain profitable, his shares of Amazon keep increasing in value and are still making billions for him. Bezos isn't the only leader from a major corporation who has paid themselves a low salary. Here are a few. The Google co-founder reportedly pays himself a paltry $1 annual salary since 2004, when Google went public. He earns more from Google since Brin owns millions of Class A shares, which are used to have an ownership stake in the company. He also has thousands of Class B shares (which still have some voting rights) from the tech giant. The former CEO of Oracle has also paid himself a $1 annual salary, but owns around $90 million in stock options. Ellison also receives 'other compensation' equally, around $5 million. See Next: As the founder and former CEO of Whole Foods, he, too, earns $1 per year — it seems like a popular number. He has paid himself this amount since 2007. Due to his ownership in the grocery chain, he receives much higher compensation, not just through a salary. The co-founder and CEO of Facebook earns a higher salary than most on this list at $600,000. Yeah, that's a big number to most of us, but in comparison to other CEOs and what Facebook itself brings in, it seems small by comparison. In other words, some CEOs are getting paid multi-million-dollar salaries, while Zuckerberg is paid a fraction of that. Hayne is the president and CEO of Urban Outfitters, a fast fashion and lifestyle chain with locations all over the world. He, too, has opted for a $1 per year salary. However, he technically earns more than his base salary, as he gets a $5,000 bonus and $1 million from a non-equity incentive plan participation. What this means is that this compensation is based on Hayne's performance at his job and is not at all tied to his salary. Meaning, he could still earn a significant amount of money in his role at Urban Outfitters, but not a steady amount. More From GOBankingRates 6 Big Shakeups Coming to Social Security in 2025 This article originally appeared on Here's Why Jeff Bezos Only Paid Himself an $80,000 Salary From Amazon Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
