SpaceX's Starship explodes on test stand in yet another setback
Article content
A SpaceX Starship rocket exploded on a test stand in Texas, adding to a series of setbacks to Elon Musk's space ambitions that include return trips to Mars.
Article content
The huge blast enveloped the craft as it stood upright at Starbase, before massive plumes of flames and smoke mushroomed into the night sky, video footage of the incident late Wednesday showed. The incident shook windows and rattled dishes, according to local media reports.
Article content
Article content
Article content
The rocket appeared to be undergoing a routine 'static fire test' of its engines. A static fire test is a pre-launch procedure in which a rocket's engines are fired while the rocket remains securely held down on the launch pad — essentially a rehearsal for the real launch, allowing engineers to test the rocket's systems without actually sending it into space.
Article content
Article content
In a statement, SpaceX said the Starship 'experienced a major anomaly' during preparations for a 10th flight test. No one was injured and local residents aren't at risk, the company said.
Article content
The apparent destruction of the rocket extends the string of mishaps for a spaceship program that's central to NASA's plans to put American boots back on the moon — and also to Musk's grander ambitions to send cargo and people to Mars. The incident comes at a moment when Musk's business empire faces falling demand for Tesla Inc.'s electric vehicles, and after Musk engaged in a public feud with President Donald Trump.
Article content
Article content
SpaceX holds contracts with NASA worth around US$4 billion to land the agency's astronauts on the moon using Starship, the world's largest and most powerful launch system.
Article content
Article content
Last month, SpaceX's colossal Starship disintegrated mid-flight after spinning out of control. That loss was its third consecutive setback after flights in January and March were cut short just minutes after takeoff when the spacecraft exploded over the Gulf of Mexico, sending debris raining down from the sky and disrupting air travel.
Article content
January's explosion was caused by a propellant leak while the March failure was triggered by a hardware problem with one of Starship's Raptor engines, according to SpaceX.
Article content
Starship 10 hadn't been assigned an official launch date, and it's now unclear when the next flight will take place. Following the failure of the ninth launch, SpaceX said it would carry out a data review and make improvements to the rocket system before the next test.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Winnipeg Free Press
4 hours ago
- Winnipeg Free Press
Pulling the levers behind artificial intelligence
Opinion Sometimes, artificial intelligence looks downright stupid. Other times, it just looks dangerous. A rather famous recent AI mistake/mashup involved both Meta AI and Google being asked about the time zone in Cape Breton, N.S., and both telling users that the area was 12 minutes ahead of Atlantic Standard Time and 18 minutes behind Newfoundland time. It isn't. The AI systems had merely sampled all they could find on the topic of Cape Breton and time zones — a satirical piece on the comedy site The Beaverton — and presented it as fact. As the old saying about computers goes, garbage in, garbage out FILE Elon Musk AI is getting better, especially in areas where it can sample a large variety of sources of information, but there are still cases where AI has simply invented sources. For that reason, there's a lot at stake if AI answers are accepted at face value, and if people aren't willing to go further to verify the sources of material the AI devices are using. Because many are doing just that, taking an AI one-and-done approach to 'proof.' So much so that, on social media sites like X (formerly Twitter), users regularly go to that site's Grok AI to try to establish whether things cited as fact on the site are actually true, or whether images posted by other users are accurate. It's certainly better than just accepting everything you see on social media, but it's become such an accepted form of proof that users happily post Grok's answers, and even say that Grok was their one and only source. (In unintended hilarity, Grok's owner, Elon Musk was labelled a 'top misinformation spreader' by Grok itself, a position Grok seems to have mysteriously mellowed on since then, arguing that Musk is both a spreader of misinformation and a target of those who don't like Musk's self-claimed free speech absolutism.) But think about the following situation. Elon Musk posted that 'the far left is murderously violent' after two Democrat politicians and members of their families were shot in Minnesota and the alleged shooter was misidentified at first as a Democrat supporter. When X users, responding to the post, asked Grok, 'Who commits more domestic terrorism? The 'far-left' or the 'far-right?', it responded, 'Data consistently shows far-right groups commit more domestic terrorism in the U.S. than far-left groups, both in frequency and lethality.' Musk then replied, 'Major fail, as this is objectively false. Grok is parroting legacy media. Working on it.' Working on what? Grok cited sources from the U.S. Government Accountability Office to the Department of Homeland Security to the FBI to the University of Maryland, all saying that far-right terrorism easily outstrips far-left terrorism. Only two of 15 sources were even from the media — and they were reporting on other studies. Weekday Mornings A quick glance at the news for the upcoming day. Clearly, Musk was letting his own beliefs dictate what was objectively true or objectively false — which he's welcome to do, because that's how personal opinions tend to work. You believe things to be true if you agree with them, and doubt their veracity if you don't. But 'working on it' suggests a new — and real — concern about depending on AI to determine 'truth.' Because the machine is only as accurate as its programmer wants it to be. And that leaves the possibility of a thumb on the scales. In the next few weeks, a Grok 'tweak' may well change its position on just who leads the way in domestic terrorism in the U.S. If, at the end of the day, AI is only as accurate as the rich person standing behind the machine wants it to be, we're in deep, deep trouble.
Globe and Mail
15 hours ago
- Globe and Mail
As Musk's 'robotaxi' rollout approaches, Democratic lawmakers in Texas try to throw up a roadblock
NEW YORK (AP) — A group of Democratic lawmakers in Texas is asking Elon Musk to delay the planned rollout of driverless 'robotaxis' in the state this weekend to assure that the vehicles are safe. In a letter, seven state legislators asked Tesla to wait until September when a new law takes effect that will require several checks before autonomous vehicles can be deployed without a human in the driver's seat. Tesla is slated to begin testing a dozen of what it calls robotaxis for paying customers on Sunday in a limited area of Austin, Texas. 'We are formally requesting that Tesla delay autonomous robotaxi operations until the new law takes effect on September 1, 2025,' the letter from Wednesday, June 18, reads. 'We believe this is in the best interest of both public safety and building public trust in Tesla's operations.' It's not clear if the letter will have much impact. Republicans have been a dominant majority in the Texas Legislature for more than 20 years. State lawmakers and Republican Gov. Greg Abbott have generally embraced Musk and the jobs and investment he has brought to Texas, from his SpaceX rocket program on the coast, to his Tesla factory in Austin. The company, which is headquartered in Austin, did not responded immediately to a request for comment from The Associated Press. The law will require companies to secure approval from the state motor vehicles department to operate autonomous cars with passengers. That approval, in turn, would depend on sufficient proof that the cars won't pose a high risk to others if the self-driving system breaks down, among other reassurances. Companies would also have to file detailed plans for how first responders should handle the cars if there is a problem, such as an accident. The letter asked Tesla to assure the legislators it has met all the requirements of the law even if it decides to go ahead with the test run this weekend. The letter was earlier reported by Reuters. Musk has made the robotaxi program a priority at Tesla and a failure would likely be highly damaging to the company's stock, which has already tumbled 20% this year. Musk's political views and his affiliation with the Trump administration have drastically reduced sales of Tesla, particularly in Europe, where Musk's endorsement of Germany's far-right Alternative for Germany party in February's election drew broad condemnation. Tesla shares bottomed out in March and have rebounded somewhat in recent months. Much of the rise reflects optimism that robotaxis will not only be deployed without a hitch, but that the service will quickly expand to other cities and eventually dominate the self-driving cab business. Rival Waymo is already picking up passengers in Austin and several other cities, and recently boasted of surpassing 10 million paid rides. In afternoon trading Friday, Tesla shares were largely unchanged at $320.
CTV News
16 hours ago
- CTV News
As Musk's ‘robotaxi' rollout approaches, Democratic lawmakers in Texas try to throw up a roadblock
Elon Musk listens as President Donald Trump speaks during a news conference in the Oval Office of the White House, Friday, May 30, 2025, in Washington. (AP Photo/Evan Vucci) NEW YORK — A group of Democratic lawmakers in Texas is asking Elon Musk to delay the planned rollout of driverless 'robotaxis' in the state this weekend to assure that the vehicles are safe. In a letter, seven state legislators asked Tesla to wait until September when a new law takes effect that will require several checks before autonomous vehicles can be deployed without a human in the driver's seat. Tesla is slated to begin testing a dozen of what it calls robotaxis for paying customers on Sunday in a limited area of Austin, Texas. 'We are formally requesting that Tesla delay autonomous robotaxi operations until the new law takes effect on September 1, 2025,' the letter from Wednesday, June 18, reads. 'We believe this is in the best interest of both public safety and building public trust in Tesla's operations.' It's not clear if the letter will have much impact. Republicans have been a dominant majority in the Texas Legislature for more than 20 years. State lawmakers and Republican Gov. Greg Abbott have generally embraced Musk and the jobs and investment he has brought to Texas, from his SpaceX rocket program on the coast, to his Tesla factory in Austin. The company, which is headquartered in Austin, did not responded immediately to a request for comment from The Associated Press. The law will require companies to secure approval from the state motor vehicles department to operate autonomous cars with passengers. That approval, in turn, would depend on sufficient proof that the cars won't pose a high risk to others if the self-driving system breaks down, among other reassurances. Companies would also have to file detailed plans for how first responders should handle the cars if there is a problem, such as an accident. The letter asked Tesla to assure the legislators it has met all the requirements of the law even if it decides to go ahead with the test run this weekend. The letter was earlier reported by Reuters. Musk has made the robotaxi program a priority at Tesla and a failure would likely be highly damaging to the company's stock, which has already tumbled 20% this year. Musk's political views and his affiliation with the Trump administration have drastically reduced sales of Tesla, particularly in Europe, where Musk's endorsement of Germany's far-right Alternative for Germany party in February's election drew broad condemnation. Tesla shares bottomed out in March and have rebounded somewhat in recent months. Much of the rise reflects optimism that robotaxis will not only be deployed without a hitch, but that the service will quickly expand to other cities and eventually dominate the self-driving cab business. Rival Waymo is already picking up passengers in Austin and several other cities, and recently boasted of surpassing 10 million paid rides. In afternoon trading Friday, Tesla shares were largely unchanged at US$320. --- Bernard Condon, The Associated Press AP reporter Jim Vertuno contributed from Austin.
