Increased UK defence spending only makes war more likely

For any country, reviewing defence in the modern age is a valuable exercise.
The UK's new strategic defence review fails to get to grips with those challenges, and perpetuates a view of security as being solely about the aggressive projection of military power.
We do face direct threats that we need to acknowledge, not least from the brutal Putin regime. A military-only response risks seeing the whole world 'tooling up' for conflict, creating a tinderbox situation, and also misses the other action we can take which we know improves human security and makes conflict less likely.
READ MORE: BBC Debate Night branded 'farce' as formal complaint made over 'bias'
Strong international cooperation and a commitment to the international rule of law are critical to improving security, yet the UK continues to arm war criminal regimes instead of pursuing justice against them.
Alliances must be fostered with countries we trust, and the threat of far-right regimes must be acknowledged. Yet the UK continues to treat the Trump regime as though it's a reliable ally, while it threatens democratic countries like Greenland and Canada.
Food and water security, and so much else that international development invests in, also provide the basis for a more secure world. Yet the UK has followed the lead of the Trump White House by slashing development aid.
The climate emergency is barely mentioned in the review, and where it does come up it's mostly about access to Arctic waters rather than the profound threat it poses to human and environmental security around the world.
And of course the UK's continued attachment to nuclear weapons continues unabated. Reconsidering the vastly expensive replacement of Trident doesn't even merit a line.
In truth, Trident poses a greater threat to the people of Scotland than it does to anyone else.
Its record of accidents and poor maintenance goes back a long way, and its presence makes the west coast of Scotland a key target in any potential conflict.
The hundreds of billions of pounds spent on these weapons could be far better spent on international development, climate action, or emerging issues like cybersecurity or biosecurity which can't be addressed by just hiking military spending.
There's so much that's needed aside from military responses that can actually reduce the threats we face instead of funnelling even more funds towards nuclear weapons. Let's also remember that these are weapons which cannot discriminate between military and civilian targets, and whose use in any circumstances would surely be the biggest war crime in human history.
Such a decision made now will lock us into a more dangerous world, for decades to come. And that decision would be at the expense of action that could be taken to promote peace, and make progress towards a world that's safer because it's fairer, greener, and more just.
As for the claims about jobs, this truly is a red herring.
Spend tens of billions on pretty much anything and you'll create jobs, and in truth there are far better ways to build an economy that works for people than making a '10 times more lethal' army.
A defence review that really engages with the changing world we live in is something I'd really like to see. This simply isn't it.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

NBC News

18 minutes ago

• NBC News

Israel-Iran live updates: Conflict enters 9th day as diplomacy falters

CONFLICT ENTERS 9TH DAY: Iran sent a missile barrage into Israel early this morning, sending millions into bomb shelters but with no reported casualties. Israel continued to strike military sites in Iran. NO BREAKTHROUGHS ON INTERNATIONAL DIPLOMACY: A summit in Geneva yesterday with Iran's foreign minister and European leaders yielded no signs of a breakthrough. At the United Nations Security Council, Iran and Israel traded insults in a heated but ultimately inconclusive meeting. U.S. POSITION: Trump dismissed the European effort, suggesting that a diplomatic solution would require U.S. involvement. On Thursday, he opened a two-week window for negotiations with Iran, delaying a decision on a U.S. military strike on Iranian nuclear sites. IRAN AND ISRAEL: Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi told NBC News that Iran was not sure it could trust the U.S., and that they would not negotiate 'as long as the aggression continues.' The Israeli military chief said yesterday that the country is ready for 'a prolonged campaign' against Iran. NUCLEAR SITE RISKS: The head of the U.N. nuclear watchdog, the IAEA, said Israel's strikes on Iranian nuclear power sites have caused some radiological leaks. There is no danger to the public for now, he said,'but there is a danger this could still happen.' HUNDREDS KILLED: Israeli strikes have so far killed at least 630 people in Iran, The Associated Press reported, citing a Washington-based human rights group. The Iranian health ministry says more than 2,500 people have been wounded. The death toll in Israel from Iran's retaliatory strikes remains at 24.

Reuters

an hour ago

• Reuters

Putin says Russia has told Israel there's no evidence Iran wants nuclear weapons, Sky News Arabia reports

MOSCOW, June 21 (Reuters) - Russia has repeatedly told Israel that there is no evidence Iran is aiming to get nuclear weapons, Sky News Arabia on Saturday quoted Russian President Vladimir Putin as saying in an interview. "Russia, as well as the IAEA (International Atomic Energy Agency), has never had any evidence that Iran is preparing to obtain nuclear weapons, as we have repeatedly put the Israeli leadership on notice," Sky News Arabia quoted Putin as saying. Russia is ready to support Iran in developing a peaceful nuclear programme, Putin was quoted as saying, adding that Iran has the right to do so. Speaking at an economic forum in St. Petersburg on Friday, Putin said Russia was sharing its ideas on how to stop the bloodshed in the Iran-Israel conflict with both sides. He did not give details of those ideas.

BBC News

an hour ago

• BBC News

Iran and Israel exchange strikes after Iran rules out nuclear talks while under attack

Update: Date: 08:22 BST Title: Trump says his director of national intelligence is 'wrong' on Iran Content: This video can not be played Watch: Trump says Tulsi Gabbard is 'wrong' on Iran More now from US President Donald Trump, who spoke to reporters yesterday on the tarmac next to Air Force One. He was asked what intelligence he has that suggests Iran is building a nuclear weapon, when his intelligence community has previously said they have no evidence. "Well, then my intelligence community is wrong. Who in the intelligence community said that?" Trump asked. The reporter replied that it was Director of National Intelligence, Tulsi Gabbard. "She's wrong," Trump quickly replied. In March, Gabbard told Congress that US intelligence agencies determined Iran had not resumed its suspended 2003 nuclear weapons programme, even as the nation's stockpile of enriched uranium - a component of such weapons - was at an all-time high. Update: Date: 08:19 BST Title: Trump won't let Iran develop a nuclear weapon Content: Jake KwonNorth America correspondent In March Tulsi Gabbard told a Senate Committee Iran was not building nuclear weapons. After Mr Trump said she was wrong, Ms Gabbard blamed the media for distorting her words and now says that she believes Iran could build nuclear weapons within weeks. President Trump insisted that Iran had gathered a 'tremendous amount of material' and could have a weapon within weeks - or if not weeks then months – and the US couldn't let that happen. On Thursday, Mr Trump said he would decide within the next fortnight whether the US should join the strikes on Iran. He now says two weeks is the 'maximum' time Iran has to reach a deal with the US – hinting that he could make a decision before the 14 days are up. The IAEA earlier this month expressed concern that Iran had amassed enough uranium enriched up to 60% purity - a short, technical step away from weapons grade, or 90% - to potentially make nine nuclear bombs. Update: Date: 08:02 BST Title: Iran only ready for diplomatic talks once aggression stops - a recap Content: Iran's foreign minister Abbas Araghchi On Friday, top diplomats from the UK, EU, Germany and France held hours-long talks with their Iranian counterpart, Abbas Araghchi, in Geneva. The Europeans had hoped to make progress on a diplomatic breakthrough at what UK Foreign Secretary David Lammy called a "perilous moment". But the talks didn't yield the outcome they wanted. Araghchi told reporters afterwards Iran was only "ready to consider diplomacy once the aggression is stopped" and Israel is held accountable "for the heinous crimes committed". He added that Iran's nuclear programme was peaceful, and that Iran would continue to "exercise its legitimate right of self-defence". "I make it crystal clear that Iran's defence capabilities are non-negotiable." Update: Date: 07:49 BST Title: Israel says senior Iranian commander killed in strike - reports Content: Israel's Defense Minister Israel Katz said on Saturday the IDF had killed a senior Iranian commander in a strike on an apartment in the city of Qom, local media and Reuters news agency reported. Saeed Izadi was responsible for financing and arming Hamas ahead of its October 7 attacks on Israel, Katz said. "This is a major achievement for Israeli intelligence and the Air Force," Katz said in a statement. "Justice for the murdered and the hostages. Israel's long arm will reach all its enemies." Izadi was a member of Iran's powerful Quds Force, a branch of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) responsible for overseas activities, including supporting Iran's proxies in the region. The IRGC is yet to confirm Izadi's death. Update: Date: 07:36 BST Title: European discussions yield no breakthrough, but Iran ready to keep talking Content: Lyse DoucetChief international correspondent, reporting from Geneva Yesterday, European foreign ministers met with their Iranian counterpart in Geneva. Here are the key takeaways from the discussions: More than three hours of discussions in Geneva yielded no breakthrough. But European ministers emerged convinced that Iran was ready to keep talking, and more willing to put issues on the table which hadn't been there before. They all emphasised that Iran has to resume its talks with the United States. In his statement, Iran's Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi said he was ready to meet with the Europeans again, but would only consider diplomacy with the US once Israeli attacks stopped and, in his words, the aggressor was held accountable. Britain's Foreign Secretary David Lammy, who flew straight to Geneva after meetings in Washington with US officials, came with tough messages – that the threat of U.S. military action was real, but a window for diplomacy was still open. No one can say for sure for how long. Lammy warned it was 'a perilous moment'. The message from Europe's top diplomats was that only a negotiated agreement - not more military action - could provide a lasting solution to Iran's nuclear programme, and to regional stability. Update: Date: 07:18 BST Title: Israeli military intercept Iranian strikes overnight, IDF says Content: Israel says it has intercepted multiple Iranian drones that entered its airspace overnight and this morning. Two were intercepted by the Israeli air force in Israeli-occupied Syrian territory roughly an hour apart, just just before 07:00 (5:00 BST) and 08:00 (06:00 BST) local time, according to the IDF. It says a third was intercepted less than an hour later just north of the West Bank. Update: Date: 07:04 BST Title: Israel strikes Isfahan nuclear facility - Iranian state media Content: Israel has continued its military operation against Iran's nuclear infrastructure overnight. Iranian state media reports an Israeli attack on a nuclear facility in Isfahan in the early hours of this morning. Iranian air defences reportedly responded to the attack, causing loud explosions. The attack did not cause the leakage of any hazardous material, Fars News Agency reports, although there has been no update yet from the UN's atomic agency, the IAEA, on the facility's status. Overnight, the Israeli military said it launched a "series of strikes" against missile storage and infrastructure sites in central Iran. Update: Date: 07:02 BST Title: Iran and Israel exchange strikes, as Iran refuses nuclear talks while attacks continue Content: Missiles fired from Iran in retaliation for Israeli attacks are seen in the sky over the Hebron, West Bank Good morning and welcome to our live coverage as Israel and Iran continue to exchange strikes on the ninth day of the ongoing conflict. Israel targets nuclear infrastructure in fresh strikes as Iranian media report an attack on a nuclear site in Ifsahan, in the centre of the country. Israeli Defense Forces say they struck down several drone and missile attacks from Iran overnight. It comes after Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi ruled out nuclear talks while under attack. Speaking to reporters yesterday, Aragchi said Iran is "ready to consider diplomacy once again once the aggression is stopped" and "the aggressor is held accountable for the heinous crimes committed". We'll continue to bring you the latest developments and analysis throughout the day, stay with us.