I've been testing TVs for over over a decade — here's my top 5 picks for every budget

I've spent the last 10 years of my life looking for the best TVs. I've been lucky enough to see the vast majority of TVs from the likes of Samsung, LG, Sony, TCL and Hisense at various tradeshows, and even luckier to have dozens of them in my own home over the years
I've got lots of hands-on time with them, but with new models coming every year, it can be hard to know exactly how much to spend when shopping for a new TV.
Now, to help, I've put together lists of the best TVs under $500 and the best TVs under $1,000 — and these are great resources when you need them — but not everyone has the time to spend reading articles.
Below, you'll find a truncated version of those lists. It's light on technical information (though it's all available if you click on each TV) but you can use this as a quick guide on what to buy and how much to actually spend when shopping for a new set.
This is the TV price range most folks shop for — and there are a lot of good value options here.
My favorite TV under $500 has to be the TCL QM7. It's a Mini-LED TV (basically an LED-LCD TV with far better control over its dimming zones) with a native 120Hz refresh rate. That refresh rate can be boosted up to 144Hz when connected to a gaming PC and it supports both major types of dynamic HDR, Dolby Vision and HDR10+.
Alternatively, the Hisense U6N offers many of the same features (but lower brightness and color volume) for around $200 less, as do the lower-end TCL Q6 and the slightly older Roku Series Plus. I think it's worth paying the extra money for the better performance, but I totally understand if your budget doesn't stretch that far.
Get instant access to breaking news, the hottest reviews, great deals and helpful tips.
All the TVs mentioned above are either available in a 55-inch or a 65-inch for under $500.
Unfortunately, there's no 75-inch or 85-inch TV I could comfortably recommend at this price. If you don't need a 55-inch TV and want something a bit smaller, we're currently reviewing the Samsung F6000F Full HDTV that's on sale at Amazon for $200. It doesn't remotely compete with the TCL QM7 mentioned above, but it's a brand-new smart TV for a very tough-to-beat sticker price.
At $1,000, picking a clear winner is much harder. Basically, you can either get an amazing OLED TV at its smallest size; a huge 75-inch budget TV; or a decent-sized mid-range model, all for under a grand. So let's walk through each scenario.
No one ever sets out to buy a small TV. But once I explain what makes OLED so great, lots of folks then decide that they'd rather have a small, gorgeous-looking TV than a larger, lower-performing model. If you feel like you fit in that category, I recommend looking at the 55-inch LG B4 OLED. At 55 inches, it's still a pretty reasonable size, and its picture is unmatched at this price point.
If 55 inches just won't cut it for your living room, go for the 65-inch Hisense U8N. This is my favorite TV from 2024, and I think it delivers performance that rivals TVs that cost twice as much. It's not an OLED, obviously, but thanks to its Mini-LED backlighting, its contrast is much better than your average LED-LCD screen and its color saturation is exceptional. It's a native 120Hz screen with support up to 144Hz with Dolby Vision and Atmos on-board. The same is true for the 65-inch TCL QM8 that's $100 less at $899.
For larger screens under $1,000, you have a few options: There's the 85-inch Hisense U6N model I mentioned earlier, if you don't mind something from 2024, or the 75-inch TCL QM6K from 2025 if you want something fresh from the factory. Both are great Mini-LED models.
Unfortunately, there's no 98-inch model under $1,000 yet — but maybe that will change in 2026.
OK, now we're talking big bucks. If you're spending this much money, you're definitely getting a sizable OLED or a huge Mini-LED TV.
At some point in the near future, the 65-inch LG C5 OLED should drop down to just under $2,000. Until then, last year's excellent LG C4 OLED is available in a 77-inch screen size for just $1,799. Given its size and performance, it's the TV I'd currently recommend buying.
In a very close second place is the Samsung S90D OLED. It's also available in a 77-inch screen size, but it's $2,199. The extra $200 is worth it for the additional brightness, but if your hard limit is $2,000, the smaller 65-inch version is an option.
You might be wondering where Sony TVs rank on this list — unfortunately the best Sony TVs cost well over $2,000. The best we can do at this price point is the 75-inch Sony Bravia 7. It's an exceptional Mini-LED TV, don't get me wrong, but it's no OLED.
If you simply want the biggest TV for your buck without compromising on performance, there's the 85-inch version of the Hisense U8N I mentioned earlier or the 85-inch TCL QM8. Both are $1,699 and offer similar performance.
I have a hunch you might be able to get one of the larger 98-inch versions for under $2,000 later — but we won't know for sure until Black Friday rolls around in November.
The prices listed above are current as of June 2025. Amazon Prime Day 2025 is coming up from July 8 to July 11, and those prices could take a steep nose-dive. The same is true for Black Friday, though, that won't happen until November 28.
Here's the good news: The dynamic links on this page will change when that happens, so just come back if you need the latest prices, or head on over to our Best Cheap TV Deals page to see what's on sale at this very second.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Forbes

an hour ago

• Forbes

The 2nm Race: Intel's 18A Faces Uphill Task Against TSMC

CANADA - 2025/05/26: In this photo illustration, the Intel Corporation logo is seen displayed on a ... More smartphone screen. (Photo Illustration by Thomas Fuller/SOPA Images/LightRocket via Getty Images) Intel (NASDAQ:INTC) has been fully committed to transforming itself into a global foundry leader, especially as the competition for next-generation 2-nanometer (nm) chips intensifies with its 18A process at the heart of its strategy. Over the last four years, the company has poured more than $90 billion into capital expenditures aimed at expanding its foundry operations and narrowing the gap with TSMC and Samsung. The stakes are considerable. The foundry segment suffered losses of nearly $13 billion last year, and Intel's shares have decreased by nearly 50% since their peak in 2024. So, how does Intel's new technology compare with that of its rivals? In the realm of chip manufacturing, 'nm' indicates the size of the process node in nanometers. Generally, smaller nodes allow for an increased number of transistors to be integrated into a designated area, leading to enhanced performance, improved energy efficiency, and the ability to accommodate more intricate designs. This is particularly crucial for high-performance applications such as AI, smartphones, and advanced server tasks. However, transitioning to smaller nodes is a costly and complicated endeavor. Initial yield rates are often lower, and the investment required to construct and equip fabrication facilities for such advanced production is substantial. Intel is optimistic that its new 18A process, which employs 1.8nm technology, is presently in risk production. Here, initial batches are utilized to evaluate and enhance the manufacturing process before mass production begins. Laptops utilizing 18A-based processors are already being sampled with original equipment manufacturers (OEMs). This process creates chips employing technologies like RibbonFET gate-all-around transistors and PowerVia backside power delivery. These innovations permit the creation of smaller transistors that enhance performance and energy efficiency. PowerVia could provide significant benefits for AI applications as well as high-performance computing tasks. The rollout of Intel's 18A is occurring just as its competitors are gaining momentum. TSMC, the leading player in the foundry market, commands over two-thirds of the overall foundry space and is expected to retain its lead in the 2nm generation by a considerable margin. TSMC plans to commence mass production of its 2nm process in the latter half of 2025 at its fabrication facilities in Taiwan. TSMC's 2nm process represents its first incorporation of gate-all-around (GAA) transistor architecture, which promises a 10% to 15% enhancement in performance and up to 30% reduction in power usage in comparison to its 3nm node. Furthermore, TSMC has demonstrated exceptional manufacturing prowess. As reported by the Taiwan Economic Daily, current yields for the 2nm process are at 60%, indicating that out of every 100 dies sliced from a silicon wafer, 60 meet quality control standards. That's a remarkable statistic. Some reports from March estimated that Intel was only achieving yields of between 20% to 30% on its 18A process, while Samsung was reportedly achieving 40% yields on its rivaling technology. TSMC's customer base is also extensive and loyal, featuring major clients like Apple and AMD that have already committed to utilizing its 2nm process. Even Intel is diversifying its strategy, engaging TSMC as an alternative source for some of its forthcoming Nova Lake desktop processors, anticipated in 2026. Counterpoint Research projects that TSMC may achieve full utilization of its 2nm capacity by the fourth quarter of 2025. Now, Intel asserts that the 18A process will provide improved performance and reduced power usage compared to TSMC's competing node. Nonetheless, TSMC's chips are likely to maintain an edge in terms of density and cost. Compounding Intel's difficulties, the company has experienced ongoing delays in introducing new nodes, and its 18A process has already witnessed some external clients withdraw after initial trial production, resulting in demand that fell short of expectations. Meanwhile, TSMC possesses the scale, ecosystem, and a broad array of loyal customers who are ready to embrace its 2nm technology, potentially complicating matters for Intel. Not only has Intel's stock performed poorly, but its annual returns have also been significantly more volatile than those of the S&P 500. The stock's returns were 6% in 2021, -47% in 2022, 95% in 2023, and -60% in 2024. In contrast, Trefis High Quality (HQ) Portfolio, which includes 30 stocks, shows much lower volatility. It has significantly outperformed the S&P 500 over the past 4 years. What accounts for this? As a collective, HQ Portfolio stocks have delivered better returns with reduced risk compared to the benchmark index; a more stable experience, as reflected in HQ Portfolio performance metrics.

Android Authority

an hour ago

• Android Authority

One UI 8 could give screenshots an HDR glow-up that was missing from betas

Joe Maring / Android Authority TL;DR Samsung is testing HDR screenshot support for One UI 8 with its latest closed beta (ZYF7) release. The feature likely relies on Android 16's embedded gain maps to show true HDR imagery when viewed correctly. HDR screenshots aren't yet available in the One UI 8 Beta 2 release, but may arrive with future open betas or the stable release. Samsung will be bringing Android 16 to its devices with the release of One UI 8. The beta program is live for the Galaxy S25 series, and we're already at the second beta release. Samsung also has an internal test track that runs ahead of the open beta, and thanks to these test builds, we have now learned that the company could be bringing support for HDR screenshots. With Android 16, Google has implemented support for true HDR screenshots. Screenshots of HDR content will be saved in HDR format, namely as PNG files with HDR gain maps embedded in them. Viewing these screenshots will brighten the screen to allow the HDR highlights to pop. These gain maps enable the screenshots to appear as HDR when viewed on Android 16 devices but as SDR on other devices. Leaker Ice Universe mentions that the latest One UI 8 ZYF7 build (available in the closed beta but not yet in the open beta) includes support for HDR screenshots. The leaker installed the update on their Galaxy S25 Ultra and took a screenshot of an HDR photo they saw on social media. To Google and Samsung's credit, the screenshot retains the HDR effect of the original image. I saw it on social media, and took a screenshot and put it in my gallery. It still retains the HDR effect of the original photo. However, it is… By the way, Samsung S25 Ultra One UI 8 ZYF7 (Android16 feature) supports screenshot HDR. This is an HDR photo of OPPO Find X8 UltraI saw it on social media, and took a screenshot and put it in my still retains the HDR effect of the original it is… — ICE CAT (@UniverseIce) June 20, 2025 The leaker notes that HDR screenshots is a new feature of the ZYF7 closed beta firmware and is not available in the One UI 8 Beta 2 (ZYF3) release. While there's a good chance this feature will be included in the next open beta release and the stable One UI 8 release, there's still a small probability that it will not. We're crossing our fingers to see HDR screenshots in the stable One UI 8 update when it launches alongside Samsung's next-generation foldables in the coming weeks. Got a tip? Talk to us! Email our staff at Email our staff at news@ . You can stay anonymous or get credit for the info, it's your choice.

Android Authority

3 hours ago

• Android Authority

Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge sales are going exactly how you expected

Ryan Haines / Android Authority TL;DR Samsung is reportedly selling fewer Galaxy S25 Edge units than originally expected. The company has 'considerably lowered' the number of units it was producing for this month. The news follows a report that Samsung was considering replacing the Galaxy S26 Plus with an S26 Edge. Samsung just launched the Galaxy S25 Edge, and it stands out thanks to a slim and light design. However, this phone design comes with several notable cutbacks. Now, it sounds like sales haven't met Samsung's expectations. The Elec reports that Samsung is selling fewer Galaxy S25 Edge units than expected. In fact, the outlet's sources say that Samsung has 'considerably lowered' the number of units it was manufacturing for this month. The sources explained that new phones typically see solid sales for the first three months on the market, but that this 'nosedive' wasn't a good sign. This news follows The Elec's report last month that Samsung was 'highly likely' to swap the S26 Plus for an S26 Edge model in 2026. However, a source noted at the time that Samsung could retain the S26 Plus if the S25 Edge sees slow sales. Needless to say, it seems more likely that the Galaxy S26 Plus will live to fight another day. Samsung's new flagship phone is just 5.8mm thick, has a lightweight design, and a 6.7-inch QHD+ screen. However, it lacks a big battery, fast wired charging, and a telephoto camera. It also doesn't help that the phone starts at $1,100. It's no wonder colleague Ryan Haines gave the phone three out of five stars in his Galaxy S25 Edge review. In addition to the aforementioned downsides, Ryan also lamented the poor thermals, as sustained performance lagged behind even the standard Galaxy S25. However, he praised the design, the primary camera, Samsung's software, and the build quality. Got a tip? Talk to us! Email our staff at Email our staff at news@ . You can stay anonymous or get credit for the info, it's your choice.