Ukrainian visa schemes in UK leave refugees in limbo
Lin Taylor,
Reuters
After fleeing Ukraine with her new-born baby and toddler in 2022, Lidiia rebuilt her life Britain, but now the 36-year-old fears she will have to return next year because there is no easy way to get the right to permanently stay in her new home. With the Russian invasion well into its third year and little sign of peace, Lidiia, who asked to use a pseudonym to protect her privacy, is terrified for her children. "Even if they say there's a ceasefire ... I will have in my mind that in five, six years, (the Russians) are going to be back," she told the Thomson Reuters Foundation.
"And then my son will have to be a soldier. My daughter might be killed," she said. Like most of the 218,000 Ukrainians who came to Britain on special visas from 2022, Lidiia is running out of time — her original visa is expiring and although she is applying for an extension, even that will run out after another 18 months. Although nearly 70% of Ukrainians in Britain want to stay, according to a 2024 Office for National Statistics (ONS) survey, without legal status, many say they will have no choice but to head elsewhere or return to their war-ravaged homeland.
With Ukraine urging citizens to come back — it created the Ministry of National Unity last December to facilitate the return of nearly 7 million citizens — and Britain offering no permanent resettlement process, Lidiia feels trapped. She says her children feel more British than Ukrainian and have close bonds with their community in northern England. "I want to stay in the UK, 100%. If the UK doesn't want us to stay, I will go back to Ukraine and just hope that we'll survive. There is no other choice," said the charity worker.
Britain has two visa schemes for Ukrainian refugees: one for those with family already in the UK — a route that has now closed — and the Homes for Ukraine sponsorship scheme that allowed Britons to offer accommodation to those fleeing the war.
In February this year, the government opened an 18-month Ukrainian Protection Extension visa to those whose initial three-year visas were due to expire this year. But none of these schemes offer the option of staying permanently and the Home Office, or interior ministry, has yet to propose further visa extensions. "Our offer of temporary sanctuary is in line with the Ukrainian government's strong desire for the future return of its citizens, and does not lead to settlement," a Home Office spokesperson said in emailed comments.
Ukrainian support charity Opora said Ukrainians should have the choice to resettle in Britain and could help rebuild Ukraine from afar by, for example, sending back remittances. "Ukraine will need people going back to rebuild, of course, but closing off options and thereby forcing people to go back will not build a happy cohort of returnees. So give people a choice," said managing director Stan Beneš.
In early June, the European Commission proposed extending temporary protection for around 4.26 million Ukrainian refugees in the European Union until March 2027. It also recommended member states start transitioning those who want to stay to other legal statuses, for instance by offering work permits and student visas.
Settled, a charity that supports EU citizens and Ukrainians in Britain, urged London to follow suit and increase the duration of the extension visa to 36 months from 18, and also offer resettlement possibilities, as is the case for Afghans and Hong Kongers.
"Ukrainians should be given a path to settlement. We have children who have been born and are growing up in the UK. English is their first language," said Yuliia Ismail, an immigration adviser at Settled.
She said she had seen an increase in Ukrainians wanting to apply for asylum, despite a record backlog, because if they were successful they would be able to stay indefinitely.
In the first quarter of 2025, there were nearly 380 asylum claims by Ukrainians, compared to 570 in all of 2024 and around 100 the year before, according to official data.
"This uncertainty pushes people to the asylum system," Ismail said.
Even with an 18-month visa extension, many Ukrainians are unable secure rental accommodation or work contracts because of uncertainty over their ultimate status, charities say.
More than a third of Ukrainians surveyed by the ONS in 2024 said they were looking for work, and only a third said they were working in the same sector as they did in Ukraine.
A February report by the British Red Cross said without jobs, many Ukrainians were unable to rent properties and were more than twice as likely to be homeless than the general population.
Maria, a 40-year-old single mother from Kyiv living in Scotland, said she could not find teaching work despite retraining to get local qualifications and applying for around 100 jobs.
Maria, who also used a pseudonym for privacy, said employers were not interested in hiring Ukrainians for longer-term jobs.
"It really distresses me. We cannot buy anything new for our home like a wardrobe, even an extra spoon. What will we do if we need to leave? Everyday life is just unstable. I cannot think about what tomorrow will be," she said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Gulf Today
3 hours ago
- Gulf Today
European powers urge Iran to continue US nuclear talks
European powers on Friday urged Iran to continue diplomacy with the United States to find a solution in the standoff over its nuclear programme as Israel keeps up its bombardment of the Islamic republic. "The good result today is that we leave the room with the impression that the Iranian side is ready to further discuss all the important questions," said German Foreign Minister Johann Wadephul in a statement alongside his British, French and EU counterparts after talks with Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi. "It is of great importance that the United States takes part in these negotiations and the solution," he added. The statement read by all four top diplomats in their native languages after the talks expressed hope of further progress but did not make any mention of a breakthrough in the talks in Geneva. British Foreign Secretary David Lammy said: "We are keen to continue ongoing discussions and negotiations with Iran, and we urge Iran to continue their talks with the United States." "This is a perilous moment, and it is hugely important that we don't see regional escalation of this conflict," he added. French, British, German and European Union High Representative for Foreign Affairs talk over lunch at the offices of the honourary Consul of the Federal Republic of Germany in Geneva on Friday. Reuters French Foreign Minister Jean-Noel Barrot said there "can be no definitive solution through military means to the Iran nuclear problem. Military operations can delay it but they cannot eliminate it." After Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu did not rule out killing supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, Barrot also warned: "It is illusory and dangerous to want to impose a regime change from the outside. It is up to the people to decide their own destiny." "We invited the Iranian minister to consider negotiations with all sides, including the United States, without awaiting the cessation of strikes, which we also hope for," he said. EU foreign policy chief Kaja Kallas said for her part: "Today the regional escalation benefits no-one. We must keep the discussions open."Iran's state-run IRNA news agency said earlier the Iranian delegation "emphasised that Iran has not left the negotiating table." Israel began its campaign on Friday last week saying the operation was aimed at halting Tehran from obtaining an atomic bomb, an ambition Iran denies having. Iranian strikes launched in response have also caused damage in Israel. Agence France-Presse
Arabian Post
5 hours ago
- Arabian Post
China-Russia Joint Intervention Delays Trump's Decision To Join War Against Iran
By Nitya Chakraborty The Israel-Iran war which entered its eighth day on Friday June 20 witnessed some major developments in the last 24 hours frustrating Tel Aviv's desperate bid to speedily finish off its task of destroying Iran, especially Teheran. Chinese President Xi Jinping talked to Russian President Vladimir Putin late Thursday on the joint strategy to deal with the war. They came out with the strongest condemnation of Israeli attack so far and asked President Trump not to join Israel in the ongoing war against Iran. China also suggested a four point formula for immediate ceasefire and starting of negotiations to solve Iran's nuclear power issue. At the other end, the Iran foreign minister responded to the offer of the foreign ministers of Britain, France and Germany to hold talks in Geneva on Friday. Accordingly talks are taking place. Diplomatic moves have finally started. Trump also has postponed his decision to join the war against Iran by two weeks. Earlier, President office sources indicated that Trump would be taking decision on joining war by this Sunday. Why this sudden change in Trump's latest position to give diplomacy a chance for another two weeks when only on Wednesday, he was talking of surrender by the Iranian cleric head Ayatollah Ali Khomeini.? Apart from China Russia's joint stand against Israel and any US participation in war supporting that country, there were other hard military factors that came to light suggesting that Iran might be shattered now, but it has the capacity to retaliate with much high tech missiles which the Iranian forces have not used yet. Apart, Pentagon is worried that Iran will be getting more sophisticated arms from China and Russia if the war continues. The latest analysis of the London based The Guardian shows that Israel's interceptors which are playing the key role in combating the Iranian missiles, are being exhausted and if the war continues, Tel Aviv will fall short of the requisite high powered interceptors to deal with the ballistic missiles which Iranians are having. Sources say that Israel can not win this war on its own unless USA joins. Netanyahu therefore is desperately requesting Trump to take his decision immediately and join war. Both the leaders share the same objective but they differ on strategy. Trump has to take care of the dissent among his MAGA base as also the strong position taken by China and Russia. Trump tried his best to ensure that both President XI and President Putin were kept away from this Israel-Iran war since both were in the process of concluding deal with him. But he is upset now with President XI virtually challenging his Middle East policy openly and putting forward an alternative proposal. President Xi put forward a four-point proposal that ceasefire must be an urgent priority, ensuring civilian safety must be a top priority, dialogue and negotiation are the fundamental solutions, and the international community's peacemaking efforts are indispensable. The formula was on the basis of his discussions with President Putin. . The coordination of positions between the Chinese and Russian leaders not only reflects the depth of strategic cooperation between the two countries, but also sends a clear message to the international community: a call to de-escalate tensions and safeguard regional peace. According to the official Chinese view expressed by Global Times editorial on Friday, as a major power with special influence over Israel, the US has not played a constructive role. Instead, it has continued to fan the flames, even signalling a willingness to 'get directly involved,' which seriously undermines the international community's expectations for a soft landing to the crisis. With the conflict now reaching a point where 'nothing can be ruled out,' the window of opportunity is extremely narrow. As the GT sees it, the 'four-point proposal' is highly targeted and addresses the core of the current issues. For example, it calls on the parties involved in the conflict, especially Israel, to halt military operations as soon as possible, to avoid harming innocent civilians, to firmly support a political solution to the Iranian nuclear issue, and urges the international community, especially major countries that have a special influence on parties to the conflict, to make efforts to cool down the situation. These are all key points where significant changes could occur under the current circumstances. China's position assumes importance as China has the technology to help Iran with high tech radar system and air defence mechanism to combat the Israeli missiles. According to the military experts, Iran has so far launched more than 400 missiles at Israel, but half, about 200, were launched in the initial retaliatory barrages last Friday. Since Monday the size of its missile barrages has reduced to a maximum of 15 to 20 (including 15 on Thursday afternoon), compared with up to 40 during the weekend, according to a count compiled by a US thinktank, the Institute for the Study of War. Iran's ability to manufacture new weapons is also likely to be limited, estimated by the US to be 50 a month before the hostilities broke out. This vulnerability of Iran can be taken care of if China comes with assistance for beleaguered Iranian military. This is the latest talk in defence circles globally which is worrying Trump. Less than four months ago, the noted economist and public intellectual Jeffrey Sachs made a prophetic statement at the European Parliament in February 2025 while assessing the relationship between the Europe and the USA in the context of the Ukraine war. He was suggesting an independent foreign policy for Europe taking into account the moves of the President Donald Trump in his second term. Sachs said in that address 'Netanyahu's greatest dream in life is the war between the United States and Iran. And he's not given up. It's not impossible that a US-Iran War will also come. Yet Europe could stop it – if Europe has its own foreign policy. I'm hoping that Trump will end Netanyahu's grip on American politics. Even if not, the EU can work with the rest of the world to bring peace to the Middle East.' Within four months of this address, on June 13, Israel attacked Iran with its fiercest missiles and damaged the power plants, oil producing equipment and the site for nuclear power. Iran retaliated and now on the eighth day of war on June 20 the position is that the war has spread into more areas with Iran refusing to respond to Trump's call for surrender and the religious leader Ayatollah Ali Khomeini declaring that the US will face irreparable consequences if Trump joins the war. Simultaneously with China and Russia strongly taking a position against Israel, Trump has been compelled to delay his decision. Next few days will show whether Netanyahu can achieve his objective on his own or with Trump stepping back, Israel is forced to agree to negotiate under global pressure. (IPA Service)
Arabian Post
8 hours ago
- Arabian Post
Junta Claims Full Control Over Somair Uranium Operations
Niger's military-led government announced on 19 June 2025 that it is nationalising the Somair uranium joint venture, formerly dominated by French nuclear fuel company Orano. The announcement, aired on national television, declared that the State will now hold full ownership and management of the mine, citing inappropriate and inequitable conduct by Orano. Authorities assert that the 63 per cent stake held by Orano—alongside the remaining 37 per cent via state firm Sopamin—has been improperly leveraged. The accord underpinning Somair's operations expired in December 2023, and the government accuses the French entity of exceeding its share entitlement and engaging in misconduct, though specific details remain undisclosed. Operational control of the mine was already transferred to Nigerien authorities following the 2023 coup, and Orano was stripped of its permit for the Imouraren site, which contains an estimated 200,000 tonnes of uranium reserves. The company responded by launching arbitration and legal proceedings and by filing a domestic lawsuit after its director disappeared and its offices were raided in May. ADVERTISEMENT Orano, 90 per cent owned by the French government and operating in Niger for more than five decades, has been exploring options to divest its stakes—potentially to Russian or Chinese entities—as Franco–Nigerien relations deteriorate. The firm reported substantial financial losses and warned that governmental interference has undermined the mine's viability. Niger produces about 5 per cent of the world's uranium, supplying approximately 20–26 per cent of France's demand—critical for a nation generating around 70 per cent of its electricity from nuclear power. With Somair's output at risk and Imouraren's permit revoked, Nigerien uranium exports may fall sharply in 2025, potentially triggering supply shortages across Europe. The move reflects Niger's broader shift towards resource sovereignty, embedding itself among Sahel countries like Mali and Burkina Faso that are revising mining contracts and exerting stronger state control over critical commodities. These regimes are renegotiating higher revenue shares and demanding local stakeholder benefits. However, their tactics—raids, executive detentions, unilateral expropriations—have prompted concern and legal challenges from affected companies. Analysts warn that Niger's action may energise global uranium market volatility, as utilities, notably in Europe, scramble to secure alternative sources. Kazakhstan and Canada stand out as potential beneficiaries, though ramping up supply will take time and investment. Orano has indicated plans to diversify, including pursuing projects in Mongolia and Namibia to offset Niger's production decline. Nonetheless, its dispute with Niger will proceed through international arbitration via ICSID, and possibly domestic courts, with the outcome likely to span months or years.
