The Guardian view on assisted dying: a momentous bill that needs further attention

The central issue before MPs, as they decide how to vote on the latest version of Kim Leadbeater's assisted dying bill, is how to value individual autonomy relative to collective responsibility for vulnerable members of society when making regulations around the end of life. Should terminally ill people be allowed to end their lives with medical help? If so, under what safeguards? The question remains ethically, medically and legally complex.
Technological and social changes enabling people to live much longer have created challenges around the resourcing of care and experiences of ageing and dying. There are profound questions about how we manage the final stages of life – and what we owe to those living through them.
Ms Leadbeater, a Labour backbencher, has taken on the challenge of steering this bill through parliament with principle and empathy. The past nine months have seen an impassioned debate that has, rightly, filtered beyond parliament and the news media into everyday life. From the start, as this newspaper noted, public opinion has sided with the bill's backers.
Yet even such public backing is tempered by serious concerns. Earlier this week, Gordon Brown cited a poll commissioned by Care Not Killing in which two-thirds of respondents agreed that the government should 'sort out palliative and social care first'. That concern is not misplaced. Too many people do not receive adequate end-of-life care. There is a danger that assisted dying, if introduced without sufficient protections or investment, could feel less like a choice and more like a pressure.
Legalising assisted dying wouldn't open the door to something entirely new – it would bring into the open a phenomenon that already exists in the shadows. In Britain today, life and death decisions hinge on opaque prosecutorial discretion. Those who help a loved one die, often with kindness, face prosecution for murder or manslaughter. Or they may not. The Crown Prosecution Service decides, after a police investigation that can be traumatic: homes treated as crime scenes, phones seized, grieving families interrogated. For many, it's not the act that scars, it's the ordeal that follows.
For the bill's advocates, the goal is simple: to spare people needless suffering. Some have watched loved ones endure drawn-out deaths; others, like the TV presenter Esther Rantzen, want control over their own. Some doctors see assisted dying as a humane choice. Many supporters of the bill are motivated by compassion, but questions remain as to whether the necessary safeguards and public investment have been seriously addressed.
While many believe that a choice about dying is their right, it is essential to reflect carefully on the implications of such a momentous change on people with less agency and fewer resources. For a parliament less than a year old, this is a moment of political maturity and a test of its ability to handle one of the most emotionally charged questions of our time.
MPs may pass the bill on Friday, but there is no doubt that the legislation will need further refinement in the Lords and government assurance to ensure that compassion is not compromised by cost-cutting, that vulnerable people are not left exposed to subtle forms of coercion, and that the values of care and dignity are central to how we support those at the end of life.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

The Independent

29 minutes ago

• The Independent

Keir Starmer must end the injustice of indefinite sentences today

It is scarcely believable that there are still 2,614 people in prison in Britain serving indefinite sentences under legislation that was repealed 13 years ago – at a time when other prisoners are being released early because the jails are full. The government is now being given the chance to end this monstrous injustice – and to ease prison overcrowding – by adopting a plan drawn up by Lord Thomas, the former lord chief justice. Indeterminate sentences were brought in under the last Labour government as an exceptional measure for prisoners considered too dangerous to release without special safeguards. But Labour peer David Blunkett, who introduced the legislation, said that many more such sentences were handed out than he had intended, and the policy was the ' biggest regret ' of his career. The sentence was abolished by the coalition government, but existing prisoners continued to be subject to the stringent rules, not knowing whether they would ever be released and, if they were, being recalled to prison for minor offences. Thus, there have been a succession of terrible cases reported by The Independent, including those of Leroy Douglas, who has served almost 20 years for stealing a mobile phone, and Abdullahi Suleman, who is still inside 19 years after he was jailed for stealing a laptop. Plainly, there is more to their stories than this, and the Parole Board does need to be sure that those who are released are unlikely to be a danger to the public. But it cannot be right that, had they committed their crime a day after indeterminate sentences were abolished, they would have long been freed. What makes it worse is that other prisoners, some of whom pose a greater risk to the public than they do, are being let out early to free up prison places. As we report today, Lord Thomas has led a panel of experts in drawing up proposals to give every prisoner serving an imprisonment for public protection (IPP) sentence a release date within two years, and to recall them only as a last resort. James Timpson, the prisons minister and Labour peer, should accept this workable and detailed plan and seek to close this shameful chapter in the history of British criminal justice. Presumably, the only reason that he has not acted to end this scandal already is that Shabana Mahmood, the justice secretary, is reluctant. Having been forced to order the early release of prisoners to avoid the police having to let criminals go because there is nowhere to put them, she does not want to hand further ammunition to ignorant critics who accuse her of being soft on crime. She has shown courage in taking the difficult measures forced on her by the irresponsibility of Conservative ministers, who allowed prisons to reach crisis point. She should show some more bravery in doing the right thing, which can even be sold, in part, as another emergency measure to free up prison places. If she will not do it, Sir Keir Starmer should instruct her to. He is the law and order prime minister, the former director of public prosecutions, who understands the criminal justice system better than any minister. He cannot allow this injustice to continue and must act on Lord Thomas's recommendations. We understand that the prime minister has taken to asking officials with increasing frequency, as he gets to grips with the frustrations of trying to deliver change: 'Why not today?' Why, we should ask him, not put an end to this scandal today?

Sky News

an hour ago

• Sky News

Latest polling says if an election was held tomorrow Reform UK would win a majority

Since the local elections Reform UK has had no shortage of good polls. But a new one suggests Nigel Farage's party has a chance not only of winning the next election, but of claiming a decent Commons majority, too. In February, Reform topped a Sky News/YouGov poll for the first time, with Nigel Farage's party edging in front on 25%, Labour pushed into second on 24%, with the Tories on 21%. But a fresh one from Ipsos puts Reform on 34%, nine points ahead of Labour on 25%, with the Conservatives a distant third on 15%. 16:03 While the other parties are flatlining, Reform appears to be pushing boundaries. Were these figures to be replicated across the country at a general election, with every constituency behaving the same way, then Reform could win as many as 340 seats, giving it a majority of 30, Sky News analysis suggests. Labour could be reduced to 176 seats, down 236 on last year's election, while the Tories would hit a record low of 12 seats. But polling should always be taken with a pinch of salt and with the firm acknowledgement that there is not an election coming any time soon. Conservative backbenchers might also tell you publicly that opinion polls are notoriously difficult to translate into seat numbers because voting percentages in individual constituencies can vary hugely from the overall average. But the truth is that the symbolism of Reform UK topping another poll is likely to be noticed by MPs from all parties, especially backbench Conservatives who have actively been hoping their leader, Kemi Badenoch, can help them climb the polls and bring the party back into public favour. Politics is a brutal game and when it comes to toppling underwhelming party leaders, the Tories are more ruthless than most. One wonders how many of these polls Mrs Badenoch's party will allow her to endure. 3:25 This poll is also a warning to Labour. As the party approaches a year since its major victory, it will not have much to celebrate if these numbers are anything to go by. According to this survey, only 19% are satisfied with the job Sir Keir Starmer is doing as prime minister, with 73% dissatisfied. And the figure of 25% of voters intending to vote Labour is a level not seen since October 2019. While abstract to much of the public, polling can often shape not only the chatter inside Westminster but how and when plots by MPs begin. For Reform UK, this is a much-needed morale boost after a surprise resignation by their former Chairman Zia Yusuf, and then an almost immediate U-turn back into the party. And Kemi Badenoch - who said during her leadership campaign that the Conservatives needed to go back to first principles and that this would take time - will be wondering, seven-and-a-half months after winning the leadership, how much time she really has left.

Wales Online

an hour ago

• Wales Online

Senedd denied veto over whether assisted dying becomes legal in Wales

Senedd denied veto over whether assisted dying becomes legal in Wales The new bill would allow those aged over 18 and with less than six months to live to receive medical assistance to die Assisted dying bill protestors gather outside the House of Commons (Image: Ian Vogler / Daily Mirror ) MPs in the House of Commons have denied Welsh Parliament a potential veto over whether assisted dying will become legal in Wales. A change made to the bill at an earlier stage, which would have given members of the Senedd the power to decide when the law comes into force, has now been reversed. It means that now, both the UK Government and the Senedd will have the power to pass the regulations on assisted dying services in Wales. A significant decision remains for the Senedd, in a vote set to take place in Autumn, on whether to give consent to the legislation. Never miss a Cardiff story by signing up to our daily newsletter here . On Friday, MPs voted on whether the bill proceeds for House of Lords consideration. Whilst criminal justice is controlled by the UK Government, health in Wales is handled by the Senedd. It is unclear what would happen in Wales did not come on board. The assisted dying legislation was drawn up by MP Kim Leadbeater. But amendments were made to remove commencement powers for the Senedd, added at an earlier stage by Liberal Democrat MP Sarah Olney. The amendments of the Senedd's powers were passed with 274 votes and 224 against, and "reflected that criminal law is not the Senedd's responsibility". Article continues below Under current law, encouraging or assisting suicide is illegal in England and Wales, with a maximum jail sentence of 14 years. The new bill would allow those aged over 18 and with less than six months to live to receive medical assistance to die. During the historic vote in November last year, Alex Barros-Curtis, Anna McMorrin, and Jo Stevens, the MPs for Cardiff West, Cardiff North, and Cardiff East respectively all voted in favour. Meanwhile, Stephen Doughty, the MP for Cardiff South and Penarth, voted against. In Swansea, Torsten Bell, representing Swansea West, voted in favour, while Carolyn Harris, the MP for Neath and Swansea East, did not record a vote. In Newport, Ruth Jones, the MP for Newport West and Islwyn, and Jessica Morden, the MP for Newport East, both voted against the Bill. Article continues below Bridgend MP Chris Emore voted in favour, as did Ceredigion Preseli MP Ben Lake. Caerfyrddin's Ann Davies voted against. And in north Wales, Wrexham's Andrew Ranger, Bangor Aberconwy's Claire Hughes, and Alyn and Deeside's Mark Tami all voted in favour.