Angi: Q1 Earnings Snapshot

DENVER (AP) — DENVER (AP) — Angi Inc. (ANGI) on Tuesday reported first-quarter net income of $15.1 million, after reporting a loss in the same period a year earlier.
On a per-share basis, the Denver-based company said it had profit of 30 cents.
The provider of a digital marketplace for home services posted revenue of $245.9 million in the period.
Angi shares have dropped 32% since the beginning of the year. In the final minutes of trading on Tuesday, shares hit $11.25, a fall of 56% in the last 12 months.
_____

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Miami Herald

31 minutes ago

• Miami Herald

Popular HomeGoods rival shuttering dozens of locations

Retail businesses are shutting down at a rate so alarmingly fast in 2025, you may feel like you could blink and realize another has vanished. Perhaps the saddest story of a brand that called it quits in 2025 so far is Joann, a craft and fabric store beloved by its loyal customers. Joann was founded in 1943, so after 82 years of business, it was a shame to watch it close its doors. Don't miss the move: Subscribe to TheStreet's free daily newsletter Another chain that was incredibly strange to see go was Party City. After 40 years in business, the retailer announced in December 2024 that it would file for bankruptcy and cease operations. Related: Major retailer scores huge benefit from Joann bankruptcy At Home is the most recent major retail chain to file for bankruptcy, announcing it would close 26 underperforming stores by September 30. However, the business hasn't winked out of existence yet, as it's just entered into a Restructuring Support Agreement (RSA) with lenders holding more than 95% of its debt to eliminate the nearly $2 billion in funded debt and provide financing of $200 million that aims to support the retailer through its restructuring process. Now another longtime home goods store is making drastic moves to keep itself afloat in a challenging economic climate. Kirkland's (KIRK) , a Tennessee-based home good retailer that was founded in 1966 by Carl Kirkland and Robert Kirkland, has announced it will close at least two dozen of its 313 store locations. Kirkland's has not yet confirmed which locations will close. TheStreet has reached out to request more information. The closings are part of a rebranding process Kirkland's confirmed on June 17, where the company says it will change its name to The Brand House Collective. This move comes after Beyond Inc., parent company of both Bed, Bath & Beyond and Overstock, acquired Kirkland's IP in a $5 million acquisition. Related: IKEA suddenly closing more stores amid concerning customer trend While store closings typically sound like a bad thing, in this case they seem to be more of a strategic move in step with the company's other brands. Beyond plans to open the first of six Bed, Bath & Beyond Home stores in August 2025, with the first being in Brentwood, Tennessee. Some existing Kirkland stores will also be converted into Bed, Bath & Beyond Home stores, although the specific locations were not named. Kirkland's name will formally change after shareholder approval during its next annual meeting in July, which will also change its ticker from KIRK to TBHC. As consumers navigate an uncertain climate with the threat of tariffs looming, many have pulled back on nonessential purchases this year across many sectors, from food to clothing. Retail sales fell sharply in May, with sales at retail stores and restaurants dropping 0.9%, the Commerce Department reported. However, a few retailers are still seeing shoppers come their way. One is discount home retailer HomeGoods, which reported during its Q1 earnings call in May that comparable sales were up 4% year over year. "Bucking a trend in the home industry now is our home business, especially HomeGoods. We're quite proud the way they're beginning Q2 as well," TJX CEO Ernie Herrman told investors during the call. Related: Beloved local Mexican chain closes locations without warning The Arena Media Brands, LLC THESTREET is a registered trademark of TheStreet, Inc.

Newsweek

an hour ago

• Newsweek

US Home Prices Hit Record High

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. House prices in the United States have hit a record high, according to real estate company Redfin. Why It Matters Home prices skyrocketed across the country during the COVID-19 pandemic, when relatively low mortgage rates and the rise of remote work spurred a surge in demand. While the pace of their growth has since slowed, home prices remain historically high and are still rising at the national level. New homes are shown Wednesday, May 27, 2009, in Happy Valley, Ore. New homes are shown Wednesday, May 27, 2009, in Happy Valley, Ore. Rick Bowmer/AP What To Know The median U.S. home-sale price reached a new record of $396,500 during the four weeks ending June 15, according to a report from real estate brokerage Redfin. This is a 1 percent increase compared to the same time last year, even though overall activity in the housing market remains low. Although prices are at an all-time high, they are rising much more slowly than earlier this year, when yearly growth was about 5 percent. The current 1 percent increase shows the pace of price growth is cooling down, reflecting ongoing problems between how many homes are available and how many people want to buy. Home-sale prices usually peak in June or July, but this year's market is much less competitive than in recent years, Redfin says. At the same time, buyers are gaining more power to negotiate, despite still facing high prices. The median sale price is now about $26,000, or 6 percent, less than the median asking price of $422,238. This is a big change from 2021 and 2022, when bidding wars pushed sale prices well above asking prices. Redfin says this shift is because there are more sellers than buyers right now. The total number of homes for sale has increased 14.5 percent from a year ago, and new listings are up 4.4 percent. However, demand is falling: pending sales are down 1.5 percent compared to last year, and mortgage-purchase applications dropped 3 percent just last week. Meanwhile, the median monthly housing payment is close to record levels, only $53 less than its highest ever, showing that many buyers still face big challenges affording a home. What People Are Saying Kelly Connally, a Redfin Premier agent, said: "I'm explaining to sellers more and more that we need to be strategic in our pricing strategy because homes that are overpriced, even slightly, are likely to sit on the market and invite buyers to negotiate. "Pricing is most important, but with fewer buyers than usual out there, sellers should also make sure their home is in excellent condition and be ready to make repairs upon inspection. There are a few exceptions: Homes in desirable locations that are in perfect condition are still hot and typically sell at or above asking price." What Happens Next With soft demand and rising inventory, Redfin forecasts that home-sale prices could begin to decline nationally before the end of the year.

Yahoo

4 hours ago

• Yahoo

‘I just want finality': GOP greets newest TikTok extension with resignation

President Donald Trump's latest move to keep TikTok alive is yet again frustrating congressional Republicans, many of whom object to China's continued involvement in the popular app but just want to be done with the whole drama. 'Not my favorite thing,' Sen. Josh Hawley (R-Mo.), along-time proponent of the ban, deadpanned, when asked about the president's plan to issue another extension. He spoke a day before the White House confirmed Trump signed a 90-day suspension of enforcement of the law requiring TikTok to divest from ByteDance, its China-based parent company, throwing another lifeline to the short-form video app. By Friday, some House lawmakers registered a note of resigned irritation. The extension — Trump's third since the law went into effect on Jan. 19 — is a unilateral decision not envisioned in the bipartisan law passed by Congress and upheld last year by the Supreme Court. Rep. Darin LaHood (R-Ill.), a member of the House Intelligence and China committees, told POLITICO. 'The national security concerns and vulnerabilities are still there, and they have not gone away. I would argue they've almost become more enhanced in many ways." But Trump's extension of the TikTok law largely boxed out Republicans in both chambers who have shown little inclination — beyond stern words — to prevent him from making these postponements almost routine. Many GOP lawmakers saw themselves as granting the president space to cut a promised deal while the White House deals with urgent priorities, like trade negotiations and the Israel-Iran conflict. 'In light of everything going on, I think he did the right thing,' Sen. John Kennedy (R-La.), a China hawk who voted for the ban, told POLITICO of Trump. 'I have concerns about all kinds of things — that [the extension] is on the list — but it's not at the top of the list.' Though Trump has promised his TikTok negotiations areclosely tied to trade talks with China, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent testified last week to a Senate panel that TikTok's sale wasnot currently a part of the negotiations with China, raising a further potential obstacle to Trump inking a deal in the near future. Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.), a close ally of the president and longtime national-security hawk said earlier in the week: 'The sooner we get that issue solved, the better,' without offering any ideas for further enforcement. 'I just want finality,' Senate Judiciary Chair Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) told POLITICO. 'I want some certainty and just know that the Congress isn't being played when we make a decision [that the app] be sold.' Another member of the House China Committee, Rep. Zach Nunn (R-Iowa), told POLITICO, 'No more extensions. It's time to follow through.' Rep. Dan Newhouse (R-Wash.), also a member of the China panel, noted in a post on X Thursday the law only allows one extension of the compliance deadline, adding, 'I was proud to support the ban of TikTok and believe the law should be implemented as written.' With their comments, the lawmakers echoed House China Chair John Moolenaar (R-Mich.), who in early June called for the U.S. to 'let [TikTok] go dark' to bring China to the table to negotiate. He reiterated that stance on Friday. 'Delays only embolden the Chinese Communist Party,' Moolenaar said in a statement to POLITICO. 'I urge the administration to enforce the law as written and protect the American people from this growing national security threat." Still, observers say Republicans are not exercising their leverage to demand the White House enforce the law they helped write, for example by withholding funding or congressional oversight hearings. "I keep reading that Republicans are 'frustrated' and 'impatient' about their TikTok law being ignored, but they should stop complaining to reporters and take it up with Trump,' said Adam Kovacevich, founder and CEO of the pro-tech Chamber of Progress. Among the Republicans being undercut by the president is his own secretary of state. Marco Rubio — who as senator was one of the loudest critics of TikTok's ties to China, and a huge backer of the app's ban — has been conspicuously silent as Trump has repeatedly granted more time to strike a deal for its sale. 'You have to decide what's more important, our national security and the threat that it poses to our national security,' Rubio told POLITICO in March 2023, as Congress was considering a ban. 'You have to weigh that against what you might think the electoral consequences of it are. For me, it's an easy balancing act. I mean, there is no balance. I'm always going to be for our national security.' A spokesperson for Rubio at the State Department did not respond to a request for comment. Democrats — even those who support keeping TikTok online — say Trump's approach is the wrong one. 'These endless extensions are not only illegal, but they also put TikTok's fate in the hands of risk-averse corporate shareholders,' Sen. Ed Markey (D-Mass.) told POLITICO in a statement. 'This is deeply unfair to TikTok's creators and users. I'm prepared to work towards a solution, but Trump isn't coming to the table.'