Hollywood seeded Iran war narrative for years
Screenwriters in Hollywood who 'say they are Jewish' have been planting pro-war narratives about Iran in mainstream entertainment for more than a decade, Wikileaks has claimed.
Israel launched airstrikes on Iran earlier this month, claiming Tehran was close to creating a nuclear weapon. Over the weekend, the US also directly joined the conflict by bombing Iranian nuclear facilities.
In a post on X on Sunday, Wikileaks stated that Hollywood writers 'who say they are Jewish' have been 'planting the mental seeds for war with Iran for years,' citing productions such as Top Gun: Maverick, Homeland, 24, and The Fifth Estate.
The group shared a clip of Wikileaks founder Julian Assange's speech at Oxford Union from 2013. In the video, he discussed The Fifth Estate – a biographical drama about Wikileaks – which opens with a side plot about a fictional Iranian nuclear bomb project.
Assange recalled that the opening scene depicts Iranian scientists in Tehran assembling a bomb, with one character stating that the device could be operational within six months.
'How is it that such a lie got into a script about Wikileaks?' Assange asked, noting that at the time, 16 US intelligence agencies had already found that Tehran did not have a nuclear weapons program.
Hollywood script writers who say they are 'Jewish' have been planting the mental seeds for war with Iran for years, including in Top Gun Maverick, Homeland, 24, and in the DreamWorks film on Julian Assange 'The Fifth Estate'. Excerpt from Oxford Union speech, 30 January 2013.… pic.twitter.com/mVfsTQKW5e
'It is an attack against Iran,' Assange said, claiming that the scene 'fans the flames to start a war with Iran' and served the interests of the 'people in the system that want the war.'
Prior to Israel's latest strikes, both the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) and US intelligence agencies stated there was no evidence of an Iranian nuclear weapons program.
Nevertheless, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has continued to insist that Tehran was on the brink of creating a bomb – a claim he has repeated for decades. At the UN General Assembly in 2012, he infamously used a cartoon bomb illustration to warn that Iran was 'months away' from a nuclear weapon, and made comparable statements throughout the 1990s and 2000s.
Israel's attack has drawn international condemnation, including from Russia, which has said the strikes were illegal. Russian President Vladimir Putin has called the operation 'an unprovoked aggression.'
US involvement in Israel's campaign has also drawn criticism, with Moscow comparing it to the lead-up to the 2003 Iraq War, which was started over false claims of Iraqi weapons of mass destruction.
US President Donald Trump's decision to strike Iran has also met pushback from inside the White House. According to Reuters, Vice President J.D. Vance – an Iraq War veteran – opposed joining the Israeli offensive and warned during internal discussions that Israel was dragging the US into another war.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Russia Today
29 minutes ago
- Russia Today
Trump urges petroleum producers to ‘keep oil prices down'
US President Donald Trump has warned oil producers against pushing prices higher, amid rising market volatility following American strikes on Iran's nuclear sites and Tehran's threat to close the Strait of Hormuz – a key shipping lane for global crude exports. US forces targeted nuclear facilities in Fordow, Isfahan, and Natanz on Saturday, just a day after Trump said he would decide 'within the next two weeks' whether to act. The strikes surprised investors, briefly sending crude prices to five-month highs before easing. 'EVERYONE, KEEP OIL PRICES DOWN. I'M WATCHING! YOU'RE PLAYING RIGHT INTO THE HANDS OF THE ENEMY. DON'T DO IT!' Trump wrote Monday on his Truth Social platform. In a separate post, he called for an immediate increase in domestic production: 'To the Department of Energy: DRILL, BABY, DRILL!!! And I mean NOW!!!' Crude prices have climbed roughly 10% since Israel's surprise strike on Iran ten days ago, amid growing fears of a broader regional conflict and potential supply disruptions. Traders are now closely watching for possible retaliation from Iran, which could target energy infrastructure across the Middle East. Tehran, which controls the Strait of Hormuz – a route for about 20% of the world's oil – has threatened to shut the waterway in response to the US strikes. Its parliament approved the move on Sunday, though the final decision rests with the country's national security council. While Iran has issued similar threats in the past, analysts say fully closing the strait would be difficult, as Tehran also relies on the channel to export oil to China and other key buyers. US Secretary of State Marco Rubio on Sunday urged China to pressure Iran not to carry out the threat, arguing that, as Iran's top oil customer, Beijing has significant leverage. The US Energy Information Administration has called the Strait of Hormuz the 'world's most important oil transit chokepoint.' Analysts warn that any disruption to traffic through the strait or to Iranian oil exports could drive prices higher and weigh on global economic growth. 'The main economic risk is a rise in energy prices,' wrote Goldman Sachs chief economist Jan Hatzius in a note seen by CNBC. Hatzius projected that a prolonged closure could reduce global GDP by more than 0.3 percentage points and push inflation higher. S&P Global also warned that natural gas flows could be 'severely impacted.' As of Monday, Brent crude was trading around $72 a barrel. US benchmark WTI briefly surged 4.6% to $78 before slipping back to around $70. Analysts say Brent could climb as high as $110 a barrel if the strait is blocked.
Russia Today
33 minutes ago
- Russia Today
Trump is not ‘dumb' like past US leaders
US Vice President J.D. Vance has pushed back against comparisons between his country's airstrikes on Iran and previous American wars in the Middle East, claiming that this time Washington's actions are truly limited and rooted in national security objectives – not a drive for regime change. In an interview with NBC's Meet the Press on Sunday, Vance emphasized that 'we're not at war with Iran – we're at war with Iran's nuclear program,' describing the overnight strike as 'a very precise, very surgical' operation that allegedly dismantled Tehran's nuclear capabilities. Responding to concerns that the United States could be drawn into another prolonged conflict, Vance said the difference lies in leadership. 'I certainly empathize with Americans who are exhausted after 25 years of foreign entanglements in the Middle East,' he said. But the difference is that back then we had dumb presidents, and now we have a president who actually knows how to accomplish America's national security objectives. 'We have no interest in a protracted conflict. We have no interest in boots on the ground,' he added. Vance further insisted that the United States is not seeking to topple the Iranian government. 'Our view has been very clear that we don't want a regime change,' he said. 'We do not want to protract this or build this out any more than it's already been built out.' However, President Trump appeared to leave the door open to regime change in Tehran in a post on Truth Social later in the day. 'It's not politically correct to use the term, 'Regime Change,' but if the current Iranian regime is unable to MAKE IRAN GREAT AGAIN, why wouldn't there be a regime change??? MIGA!!!' he wrote. Vance also echoed Trump's repeated warnings to Tehran against retaliation in any form, calling it 'the stupidest thing in the world,' and reaffirming that the US would respond with 'overwhelming force' if American personnel were targeted. Trump has faced criticism from lawmakers over the lack of congressional authorization, but Vance defended the legality of the strike, arguing that the president has the authority to prevent the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction. Moscow has criticized the Iranian WMD claim, drawing comparisons to the justification used by then-US Secretary of State Colin Powell in the lead-up to the 2003 Iraq invasion. 'Many today feel a strong sense of déjà vu,' Russian Ambassador Vassily Nebenzia told the UN Security Council on Sunday. 'The current situation is essentially no different: we are once again being urged to believe in fairy tales in order to once again bring suffering to millions of people living in the Middle East.'
Russia Today
an hour ago
- Russia Today
Trump hits back at Medvedev
US President Donald Trump has cautioned the deputy chairman of Russia's Security Council against 'casually' talking about nuclear weapons. The comment came after the former Russian president suggested that several unnamed countries were prepared to provide Iran with weapons of mass destruction. On June 22, the US bombed Iran's nuclear facilities in Fordow, Natanz, and Isfahan and claimed that its warplanes had severely degraded the Islamic Republic's nuclear program. The attack was preceded by massive air raids against Iran by Israel. In a post on his Truth Social platform on Monday, Trump wrote: 'Did I hear Former President Medvedev, from Russia, casually throwing around the 'N word' (Nuclear!), and saying that he and other Countries would supply Nuclear Warheads to Iran?' The US head of state asked for immediate confirmation or rebuttal, insisting that 'the 'N word' should not be treated so casually.' Trump went on to boast about America's superior military capabilities, both air- and sea-borne, citing the weekend bombardment of Iran as proof. DETAILS TO FOLLOW
