Strengthen Defenses Off Hokkaido Against Russia's Intimidation

Even as it continues its invasion of Ukraine, Russia is also stepping up its military activities around the Northern Territories. The group of islands is located off the northeast coast of Hokkaido.
On April 16, Russia issued a navigation warning announcing that it would suspend the right of innocent passage for ships from various countries in waters east of Hokkaido, which includes the Northern Territories, until the end of April.
Russia later announced that its military would be conducting live fire exercises in roughly the same area from April 17 to April 24.
Both acts constituted lawless behavior that violated Japan's sovereignty, as the Northern Territories are inherently part of Japanese territory. It was only natural that Chief Cabinet Secretary Yoshimasa Hayashi protested, "Russia's military buildup in the Northern Territories is contrary to our country's position and is unacceptable."
The area designated by Russia for the live fire exercises is just a stone's throw from Hokkaido. It encompasses the waters surrounding three of the four islands of the Northern Territories, namely Kunashiri, Shikotan, and the Habomai islets.
A defense ministry official says, "We haven't seen such a wide-ranging exercise announced in such close proximity to Japan in recent years."
Russia has not published details about the live fire exercises. However, on April 19, Fuji TV aired footage showing a large ship that appeared to be a Ropucha -class large landing ship capable of landing tanks, anchored in front of Kunashiri.
Meanwhile, Vladimir Putin's regime also redeployed ground forces that had been stationed in the Northern Territories to fight in Ukraine. Experts believe that Russia intends to use the current exercises to demonstrate that its naval power is still strong. The Northern Territories
On April 17, Russia protested the missile launch drills scheduled to be conducted by the Japan Self-Defense Forces in Hokkaido in June 2025, labeling them a "provocative military plan." The Kremlin appears to be using the JSDF training exercise as a pretext for holding its own live-fire drills — without any legitimate justification.
The UN Convention on the Law of the Sea recognizes the right of innocent passage through the territorial waters of other countries, provided it does not threaten the security of the coastal state through armed attack or intimidation. While a coastal state may temporarily suspend innocent passage if deemed essential to its national security, this does not apply in Russia's case.
Russia's suspension of innocent passage is therefore unjustified. Its intent is to conduct live-fire exercises in territory that inherently belongs to Japan but has been illegally occupied by Russia.
Russia also conducted live-fire exercises for about a month in the waters off Shikotan Island, starting in January 2025. Additionally, it held military drills in the Northern Territories during a memorial service at sea for former residents of the Habomai Islands in September 2024. Similar exercises were also conducted during the US presidential election in November 2024.
Furthermore, Russia has carried out a series of joint naval and air exercises with China in the vicinity of Japan.
May 9 marks the 80th anniversary of the defeat of Nazi Germany. There is concern that Russia may use that occasion to join with China to attempt military intimidation of Japan.
Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba and other Japanese leaders must step up their vigilance and strengthen Japan's northern defenses.
(Read the editorial in Japanese .)
Author: Editorial Board, The Sankei Shimbun

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Japan Forward

4 hours ago

• Japan Forward

Comfort Women Revisited: Law, Politics, and Academic Freedom

At a recent seminar hosted by the Heterodox Academy East Asia, the comfort women issue took center stage as scholars from across disciplines engaged in a candid debate. Founded in 2015, Heterodox Academy is an American non-profit organization dedicated to promoting academic freedom and greater political diversity in higher education. Its East Asia Chapter, of which I'm a founding member, was created in late 2021. Since its inception, we have tackled some of the region's most polarizing and sensitive issues. Legal historian Marie Kim opened the discussion by examining the South Korean judiciary's growing role in adjudicating historical grievances. She cited the 2021 ruling in which a South Korean court awarded damages to 12 former comfort women who had sued the Japanese government, despite Tokyo's invocation of state immunity. A comparable ruling followed in 2023, when the Seoul High Court overturned a lower court's dismissal of a similar case. The High Court stated that state immunity did not apply, as the comfort women system constituted "an egregious human rights violation." Kim argued that rulings by domestic courts, which are often not entirely free from political influence, tend to complicate disputes between sovereign states. "Courts are not well-equipped to find out what really happened many, many years ago," she said. "Judicialization of the past is often dangerous because courts tend to favor moralization of history in the name of justice." Further complicating matters, Kim noted, is the inconsistency in how South Korean courts have approached colonial-era cases. In comfort women rulings, for instance, South Korean courts have asserted that the Japanese military violated both international law and penal codes enforced on the Korean Peninsula at the time. Yet in a separate wartime labor dispute, the Supreme Court in 2018 took a markedly different approach. It ruled that Japan's entire colonial legal framework was unlawful on the grounds that the 1910 annexation of Korea was itself "invalid." Attorneys for South Korean plaintiffs responding to reporters' interviews before the first meeting of the public-private council to resolve the wartime labor issue on July 4, 2022, in front of the South Korean Ministry of Foreign Affairs (©Tatsuya Tokiyoshi) Kim, who is also a jurist, suggested that both positions cannot be held simultaneously. Either colonial-era laws were valid and enforceable, or they were invalid and void. "Some scholars argue that colonial law had no force because the people of Korea lived under foreign occupation. This sort of argument is rather kind of embarrassing," Kim said. "It's like saying that people without national sovereignty, like Korea at that time, are not capable of entering into any contractual relationship." Professor Chizuko Allen of the University of Hawaii offered a broader international context. She pointed out that the Korean Council, South Korea's largest comfort women advocacy group, was not formed in response to victim testimony, but rather emerged as part of a wider international feminist movement. Notably, the first comfort woman victim in South Korea stepped forward in August 1991, nine months after the organization was established. Before the Council's formation in November 1990, Allen said, South Korean intellectuals worked closely with North Korea and Japan's Socialist Party, organizing joint women's conferences in Seoul, Pyongyang, and Tokyo. Former Korean Council head Yoon Mee Hyang (center) with comfort women Lee Yong Soo (right) and Moon Phil Gi. Taken in 2002 at Pyongyang's Juche Tower in North Korea. (© Yoon Mee Hyang/ Facebook post) Around that time, North Korea was engaged in diplomatic normalization talks with Japan, starting in January 1991. But after failing to secure economic assistance, Pyongyang publicly alleged that hundreds of thousands of Korean women had been forced into sexual slavery under the guise of the Women's Volunteer Corps during Japanese colonial rule, Allen said. In many ways, the conflation of the Women's Volunteer Corps with the comfort women system reflects a broader lack of historical understanding. The Japanese government established the Corps in 1944 to conscript unmarried women into industrial labor roles amid acute wartime labor shortages. Yet this misunderstanding was not limited to Pyongyang. The Korean Council, too, frequently blurred the distinction, even incorporating the term Volunteer Corps into its original name. In 2018, the organization abruptly rebranded itself to Justice for the Comfort Women. North Korea, of course, is not the only nation exploiting the comfort women issue as a diplomatic tool against Japan. China is also increasingly doing so. Since Xi Jinping's rise to power in 2014, Allen explained, China has moved from indifference to proactive engagement in the comfort women issue. Cities like Shanghai and Nanjing opened museums dedicated to claimed victims, while Beijing actively pushed to include their testimonies in UNESCO's World Heritage registry. In 2024, families of 18 former Chinese comfort women filed a lawsuit seeking compensation from Japan. Chinese President Xi Jinping (©Kyodo) "[China would do] anything to isolate Japan internationally….and to weaken the US-Japan-South Korea security partnership," Allen said. Beyond geopolitics, the professor also noted a mental dimension. "It's kind of like psychological warfare," Allen said. "They want to attack Japanese self-esteem, especially among the young people, so that they will lower their guard." Wrapping up the seminar, Harvard Law professor J Mark Ramseyer provided a critical perspective on the origins of the comfort women narrative. "This [Comfort women issue] isn't something where the answer is sort of a little of this and a little bit of that," he said. "This whole thing is a fraud." According to Ramseyer, the modern controversy originated with Seiji Yoshida, a former Imperial Japanese soldier who published fabricated memoirs in the 1980s claiming he had been involved in "hunting down" Korean women for sexual slavery. Yoshida later admitted that his account was falsified. "If you go back and look at Korean and Japanese newspapers from 1945 to 1983, there's virtually nothing about comfort women," Ramseyer argued. The turning point, he said, was the dissemination of Yoshida's memoir in Japan in 1983 and its Korean translation in 1989. Alongside this, The Asahi Shimbun amplified the claims through its nationwide readership. Ramseyer also addressed his academic work that ignited controversy. In 2021, he published a brief paper arguing that the comfort women system operated under contractual terms, with women receiving upfront payments and the possibility of shortened service periods based on performance incentives. The backlash was immediate and intense. Faculty and students at Harvard and beyond launched petitions calling for the journal to retract his paper and demanding an apology. "The notion that in 2021, people would attack me for talking about the contract structure just had me completely blown away," Ramseyer said. Professor J Mark Ramseyer of Harvard University gives a keynote speech at a trilateral symposium on the comfort women issue in Nagatacho, Tokyo, on July 10. (©Sankei by Takao Harakawa) When asked by Joseph Yi, the moderator, whether he was politicizing his scholarship by engaging with right-leaning groups and political parties in Japan, Ramseyer responded: "If Hillary Clinton wanted to talk to me, I'd be happy to talk to her too. I'm not picky." "I've never heard of any colleague of mine being criticized for speaking to a left-wing group," he added. While our chapter has extended invitations to academics from the other side of the aisle, very few have been willing to participate in the seminar and openly challenge opposing views. Author: Kenji Yoshida

Winnipeg Free Press

5 hours ago

• Winnipeg Free Press

Okinawa marks 80 years since end of one of harshest WWII battles with pledge to share tragic history

TOKYO (AP) — Okinawa marked the 80th anniversary of the end of one of the harshest battles of World War II fought on the southern island. With global tensions escalating, its governor said on Monday it is the Okinawan 'mission' to keep telling the tragic history and its impact today. The Battle of Okinawa killed a quarter of the island's population, leading to a 27-year U.S. occupation and a heavy American troop presence to date. Monday's memorial comes one day after U.S. attacks on Iranian nuclear facilities, adding to a sense of uncertainty on the island about the heavy American military presence and in its remote islands, already worried about getting embroiled in a potential conflict in Taiwan. Gov. Denny Tamaki, noting the escalating global conflicts and nuclear threats, made a resolve to contribute to global peace studies, disarmament and the preservation of war remains. 'It is our mission, as those living in the present, to preserve and pass on the reality and lessons to future generations.' Fierce battle and civilian deaths U.S. troops landed on the main Okinawa island on April 1, 1945, beginning a battle in their push toward mainland Japan. The Battle of Okinawa lasted nearly three months, killing some 200,000 people — about 12,000 Americans and more than 188,000 Japanese, half of them Okinawan civilians including students and victims forced into mass suicides by Japan's military. Okinawa was sacrificed by Japan's Imperial Army to defend the mainland, historians say. The island group remained under U.S. occupation until its reversion in 1972, two decades longer than most of Japan. Monday's memorial was held at the Mabuni Hill in Itoman City, where the remains of most of the war dead reside. Remembering the tragedy Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba was in a hot seat when he attended Monday's ceremony. Weeks earlier, one of his ruling party lawmakers Shoji Nishida, known for whitewashing Japan's wartime atrocities, denounced an inscription on a famous cenotaph dedicated to students as 'rewriting history' by portraying the Japanese army as having caused their deaths, while Americans liberated Okinawa. Nishida also called Okinawa's history education 'a mess.' His remark triggered an uproar in Okinawa, forcing Ishiba days later to apologize to the island's governor, who had criticized the remark as outrageous and distorting history. The Himeyuri Cenotaph commemorates student nurses who were abandoned near the end of the battle and killed, some in group suicides with teachers. Japan's wartime military told the people never to surrender to the enemy, or die. Nishida's remarks add to concerns about the whitewashing of Japan's embarrassing wartime past as memories of the tragedy fade and ignorance about the suffering grows. Ishiba, at Monday's memorial, said Japan's peace and prosperity is built on the sacrifices of Okinawa's history of hardship and that it is the government's responsibility to 'devote ourselves to achieve a peaceful and prosperous Okinawa.' Postwar years and growing fear Okinawa remained under U.S. occupation from 1945 until the 1972 reversion to Japan. The U.S. military maintains a heavy presence there due to Okinawa's strategic importance for security in the Pacific. Their presence serves not only to help defend Japan but also for missions elsewhere, including in the South China Sea and the Middle East. Private properties were confiscated to build U.S. bases, and the base-dependent economy has hampered the growth of local industry. Fear of a Taiwan conflict rekindles bitter memories of the Battle of Okinawa. Historians and many residents say Okinawa was used as a pawn to save mainland Japan. There are also ancient tensions between Okinawa and the Japanese mainland, which annexed the islands, formerly the independent kingdom of the Ryukus, in 1879. Burden of history Okinawa remains home to the majority of about 50,000 U.S. troops stationed in Japan under a bilateral security pact. The island, which accounts for only 0.6% of Japanese land, hosts 70% of U.S. military facilities. Even 53 years after its reversion to Japan, Okinawa is burdened with the heavy U.S. presence and faces noise, pollution, aircraft accidents and crime related to American troops, the governor said. Nearly 2,000 tons of unexploded U.S. bombs remain in Okinawa, with some regularly dug up. A recent explosion at a storage site at a U.S. military base caused minor injuries to four Japanese soldiers. Remains of hundreds of war dead are still unrecovered on Okinawa, as the government's search and identification effort is slow to make progress.

Ottawa Citizen

17 hours ago

• Ottawa Citizen

Air India bombing should be etched in Canadian history: ambassador

Article content AHAKISTA, Ireland — Since the day that Air India Flight 182 exploded off the coast of Ireland 40 years ago, it has not been fully recognized as a Canadian tragedy, Ambassador Bob Rae said in an interview here. Article content Rae, Canada's ambassador to the United Nations, was tasked with reviewing the Air India terrorism case 20 years ago after two suspects were acquitted of all charges in twin bombings on June 23, 1985. Article content Article content Less than an hour before a B.C.-made suitcase bomb detonated on Flight 182, killing all 329 aboard, two Japanese baggage handlers died when a Vancouver suitcase tagged for another Air India plane exploded at Tokyo's Narita Airport. Article content Article content 'That was one of the main things that I said in my report that I feel very strongly is that from the very beginning of the event, it was seen as somebody else's problem,' Rae said Sunday, after visiting the memorial in this quiet village on the west coast of Ireland. Article content 'It really was seen as sort of an event affecting the Indian community, ignoring the fact that the vast majority of the people on the flight were Canadians.' Article content Rae said that 'there had been a real failure to recognize the level of extremism' that led to the unprecedented act of terrorism. Article content Article content 'It was Canadians who built the bomb, Canadians who planned it,' he said. 'There was a huge degree of denial in the community that this was true. Many other theories were floated.' Article content Article content His report in November 2005 called for a public inquiry into the intelligence failures and investigative problems both before and after bombings. After Conservative Stephen Harper was elected prime minister months later, he appointed retired Supreme Court of Canada Justice John Major to head a broader judicial inquiry instead. Article content Rae said his Air India work led to the construction of public memorials in Canada, as well as the declaration of June 23 as a day of remembrance of victims of terrorism. Article content Article content While both measures increased recognition of Canada's worst mass murder, 'the narrative of what took place is still not embedded in the country,' Rae said. Article content 'We still have a lot of work to do make sure it's taught in schools and people understand this was the worst civil aviation disaster, proportionately every bit as important as 9/11.'