Pope Leo flags AI's impact on children's intellectual and spiritual development
History's first American pope sent a message to a conference of AI and ethics, part of which was taking place in the Vatican in a sign of the Holy See's concern for the new technologies and what they mean for humanity.
In the message, Leo said any further development of AI must be evaluated according to the 'superior ethical criterion' of the need to safeguard the dignity of each human being, while respecting the diversity of the world's population.
He warned specifically that new generations are most at risk, given they have never had such quick access to information.
'All of us, I am sure, are concerned for children and young people and the possible consequences of the use of AI on their intellectual and neurological development,' he said in the message.
'Society's wellbeing depends upon their being given the ability to develop their God-given gifts and capabilities' and not allow them to confuse mere access to data with intelligence.
'In the end, authentic wisdom has more to do with recognising the true meaning of life, than with the availability of data,' he said.
Leo, who was elected in May after the death of Pope Francis, has identified AI as one of the most critical matters facing humanity, saying it poses challenges to defending human dignity, justice and labour.
He has explained his concern for AI by invoking his namesake, Pope Leo XIII. That Leo was pope during the dawn of the Industrial Revolution and made the plight of workers, and the need to guarantee their rights and dignity, a key priority.
Towards the end of his pontificate, Francis became increasingly vocal about the threats to humanity posed by AI and called for an international treaty to regulate it.
Francis said politicians must take the lead in making sure AI remains human-centric, so that decisions about when to use weapons or even less-lethal tools always remain made by humans and not machines.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
18 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Bishop appointed by Pope Leo calls for ICE to stop deportations
A bishop appointed by Pope Leo descended on a California court today with a dozen other priests and faith leaders in an attempt to persuade ICE against deporting migrants. Newly-appointed Bishop of the Catholic Diocese of San Diego, Michael Pham made an appeal on June 11, asking fellow men of the cloth to join migrants at hearings at the federal courthouse on June 20, International Refugee Day. Friday, he was among 16 who went to the Southern California federal courthouse to support the migrants in the US legally who were pleading their cases. In his appeal, Pham said the migrants were in a 'difficult predicament' of being hauled before judges. 'We know that migrants and refugees find themselves in the difficult predicament of being called to appear, which is what the government asks of them, and then being given orders for expedited removal from our country. 'It has been experienced that the presence of faith leaders makes a difference in how the migrants are treated. 'Unfortunately, it will most likely not change the outcome,' he said. A spokesman for the Diocese of San Diego told Daily Mail the religious delegation who sat in court on Friday were not there to confront anyone and had informed judges of their presence ahead of time. It's unclear what impact they had. Dramatic and emotional scenes have played out in courts across the country where migrants who went from legal to illegal in seconds are taken away. In situations where a parent will be deported, their American kids can either be removed from the US along with them or stay behind with family in the US. The migrants most at risk for being caught up in this legal catch-22 are those who have arrived in country in the last two years. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) has jurisdiction of new cases for two years. When those migrants are arriving in court, Trump federal prosecutors will inform the judge that they want to dismiss the case. However, that doesn't mean the legal claim can forward. Instead, it means the case is out of the hands of the court and ICE now has jurisdiction to make an arrest. Priests and churches across the country have spoken out against Trump's deportation policies. In Los Angeles, priests stood shoulder to shoulder with anti-ICE protestors as riots exploded earlier this month. When Trump first won re-election, the United Methodist Church issued a blistering rebuke of the president-elect two days after his victory. 'The lessons of teach us the dangers of silence in the face of threats to human rights,' the Council of Bishops wrote on Nov. 7. 'We therefore reject rhetoric, policies, and actions that demean or discriminate against any of God's children and will be vigilant in defending the rights of the vulnerable and speaking out against oppression.'
NBC News
43 minutes ago
- NBC News
Iran not sure it can trust America after Israeli attack, Iran's foreign minister tells NBC News
Iran is uncertain if it can trust the United States in diplomatic talks after Israel launched an aerial attack on Iran only days before scheduled negotiations with American officials, Tehran's foreign minister, Abbas Araghchi, said Friday in an exclusive interview with NBC News. Asked by NBC News' Andrea Mitchell if a deal could be reached with the United States within the two-week time frame recently given by President Donald Trump, Araghchi said it was up to the Trump administration 'to show their determination for going for a negotiated solution.' But he suggested Washington was perhaps not genuinely interested in diplomacy and had merely used talks as a 'cover' for Israel's air attack on Iran. White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt had at a press briefing on Thursday delivered what she said was a message from Trump: 'based on the fact that there's a substantial chance of negotiations that may or may not take place with Iran in the near future, I will make my decision whether or not to go within the next two weeks.' (Promising some action or decision in 'two weeks' is a frequent thing for Trump — he has done so over a dozen times just in the last two months — and he does not always make good on it.) Israel, a staunch U.S. ally, last week launched air strikes two days before a sixth round of negotiations between U.S. and Iranian officials along with intermediaries from Oman had been scheduled to take place. U.S. officials said the administration was not involved in the Israeli military operation. 'So they had perhaps this plan in their mind, and they just needed negotiations perhaps to cover it up,' Araghchi said. 'We don't know how we can trust them anymore. What they did was in fact a betrayal to diplomacy.' During the interview, which was conducted in Geneva after he held talks with European top diplomats, the Iranian foreign minister said his government was ready to negotiate but that Israel first had to halt its aerial attacks on Iran. 'We're not prepared to negotiate with them anymore, as long as the aggression continues,' he said. Araghchi said Iran would not give up uranium enrichment entirely, as Trump has demanded, saying 'zero enrichment is impossible.' 'This is an achievement of of our own scientists. It is question of national pride,' he said, adding that it was a right of every country under international law. The foreign minister also said that Israeli bombing of Iran's nuclear facilities could not destroy the technical 'knowledge' that Iran has developed in its nuclear program. Araghchi is an experienced diplomat who was one of the top negotiators of the 2015 nuclear deal between Tehran and world powers. That agreement imposed limits on Iran's nuclear work in return for an easing of U.S. and international sanctions. In his first term, Trump withdrew the United States from the accord.
NBC News
an hour ago
- NBC News
Judge again blocks Trump administration from halting Harvard's enrolling international students
A federal judge in Massachusetts on Friday again blocked the government's attempt to revoke Harvard's ability to enroll international students. U.S. District Judge Allison D. Burroughs issued the preliminary injunction, after granting a temporary restraining order against the administration. In her decision, Burroughs directed the Trump administration to 'immediately' prepare guidance to alert officials to disregard original notice and to restore 'every visa holder and applicant to the position that individual would have been absent such Revocation Notice.' She asked for that to be done in next 72 hours. Because of this injunction, the Trump administration is also blocked from altering or terminating Harvard's Student and Exchange Visitor Program certification. The Trump administration is likely to appeal this ruling to the First Circuit Court of Appeals. The decision comes after the Trump administration in May attempted to terminate Harvard's Student and Exchange Visitor Program certification, which allows the school to enroll international students on the F-1 and M-1 student visas. The school sued the government the next day, and was granted a temporary restraining order by Burroughs shortly afterward. In a separate proclamation released earlier this month, Donald Trump said he would deny visas to foreign students who were looking to come to the U.S. with the purpose of attending the Ivy League university. The school hit back, amending its May lawsuit and asking the court to halt the proclamation's enforcement, which Burroughs swiftly granted. During a hearing on the injunction, Ian Heath Gershenger, an attorney for the university, accused the administration of 'using international students as pawns,' and singling out Harvard. Department of Justice attorneys focused on the administration's national security concerns, saying they did not trust Harvard to vet thousands of international students. An attorney for the Trump administration previously said that it does not have the same concerns in regards to other schools, but that could change. For months, the government has been entrenched in a tug-of-war with the Ivy League university. In April, the administration's Joint Task Force to Combat Anti-Semitism announced that they would be cutting more than $2 billion in grants after the school rejected its demands, which included restricting the acceptance of international students who are 'hostile to the American values and institutions.' Harvard quickly sued the administration and accused it of seeking 'unprecedented and improper' control of the school. As tensions escalated, the administration weeks later further asked all federal agencies to end their contracts with Harvard — an amount totaling $100 million. The administration's targeting of the prestigious university has drawn backlash from critics and free speech advocates, and support for the school from fellow institutions. Earlier this month, two dozen universities filed an amicus brief in support of the school, arguing that the funding freeze would impact more than just Harvard, due to the interconnectedness of scientific research, and would ultimately hinder American innovation and economic growth. And a group of 12,041 Harvard alumni, including prominent names like Conan O'Brien and author Margaret E. Atwood, filed a separate brief describing the withholding of funds as a 'reckless and unlawful' attempt to assert control over the school and other higher education institutions.
