Equally at sea: The US Federal Reserve has no more clarity than we do

The most powerful institution in global finance is as completely and utterly confused as the rest of us.
At its monetary policy decision on Wednesday, the US Federal Reserve's rate-setting committee held rates at 4.25%-4.5%, but Chair Jerome Powell and his colleagues essentially acknowledged that they had no idea what would come next.
They couldn't precisely project where US President Donald Trump's tariff rates would end up, much less how they would impact consumer inflation and the labour market. Nor could they confidently handicap jarring changes to immigration and fiscal policies and the evolving war between Israel and Iran. The big risk, of course, is that the uncertainty and indecision will make the Fed late to arrest a potential increase in unemployment.
Also Read: The US-China trade truce doesn't solve the Fed's headache
In the Summary of Economic Projections, the median member of the Federal Open Market Committee pencilled in two rate cuts this year. But that 'base case' constitutes a massive oversimplification of the outlook, and some investors may be underestimating just how fat the tails are in the distribution of potential outcomes, even over just the next three or four months.
Of the 19 respondents, 14 policymakers thought the risks to their inflation forecasts were weighted to the upside—the same number that thought as much about the risks to their unemployment projections. In a nutshell, they don't pretend to know what's coming, but Chair Powell thinks we may find out relatively soon.
Here's Powell at his post-decision press conference (emphasis mine):
'We feel like we're going to learn a great deal more over the summer on tariffs. We hadn't expected them to show up much by now, and they haven't. And we will see the extent to which they do over the coming months. And I think that's going to inform our thinking for one thing. In addition, we'll see how the labour market progresses."
Also Read: The Fed's 'Mission Impossible' is now 'Mission Accomplished'
Given all of the uncertainty, Powell is right to stay in wait-and-see mode, but he can't linger there too long once the data breaks.
Meanwhile, those of us on the sidelines should prepare for the policy outlook to shift quite quickly, potentially as soon as the Fed's 16-17 September meeting. Maybe we really will get two rate cuts this year, but it's also perfectly plausible that we'll get 150 basis points worth—or none. It's a great environment for high-stakes gamblers—but not so much for American households.
As Powell alluded to, it's largely trade policy that has put us all in this bind. In recent months, the disinflationary trends in housing and non-housing services have the core personal consumption expenditures deflator—the Fed's preferred inflation gauge—up around 2.6% in May from a year earlier (this is based on a Bloomberg Economics estimate from the consumer and producer price data).
That's not at all terrible, and it would probably be poised to converge on the Fed's 2% target if not for Trump's extremely ill-timed and pointless trade wars. Without tariffs, the Fed would probably be cutting right now, providing ballast to a wobbly labour market and a housing market that's already seeing year-over-year price drops in some parts of the country.
Unfortunately, the central bank has to play the hand it's dealt. In the immediate term, we still don't know if companies will pass on higher prices to consumers, accept narrower margins or manage their way to stable prices by laying off parts of their workforce—and maybe it will be a combination of all three.
Also Read: Barry Eichengreen: Is the US Federal Reserve's independence at threat?
The risks to both the Fed's stable prices and maximum employment mandates are substantial, and that's causing paralysis among policymakers—a weird 'calm before the storm" effect both at the Fed and in financial markets.
But at some point before autumn, we are very likely to see something shatter that calm. An alarming jump in initial jobless claims could lead to rate cuts above and beyond any policymaker's base case. A jarring CPI report or two could keep the Fed on hold for longer and prompt a selloff in bonds. And a jump in realized inflation coupled with signs of unanchored inflation expectations could even put hikes back on the table.
If they're late to mitigate the damage, Fed policymakers can take cover in blaming Trump's self-sabotaging trade policy. But they must prepare to act immediately and convincingly once the signals break in a particular direction. ©Bloomberg
The author is a columnist focused on US markets and economics.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Business Standard

39 minutes ago

• Business Standard

What Happens if Trump Decides to Strike Iran or Assassinate Its Leader?

If President Trump decides to send American bombers to help Israel destroy an underground uranium enrichment facility in Iran, it will likely kick off a more dangerous phase in the war. And if the United States assassinates Iran's supreme leader, as Trump hinted was possible, there are no guarantees he will be replaced by a friendlier leader. Iran's autocratic clerical leadership, which has ruled for nearly half a century since the Islamic Revolution of 1979, has proved its staying power, even in the face of multiple domestic uprisings. Demolishing Fordo, the enrichment site buried deep in a mountain, may not obliterate Iran's nuclear program and could lead the country to broaden the war or accelerate that program. Here are some ways it could play out if the United States enters the war. Iran could negotiate Before Israel launched a surprise attack on Iran's nuclear program and other targets last week, Iran and the United States were discussing limits on Iran's uranium enrichment program. It was rapidly producing fuel close to the levels needed for nuclear weapons, and in exchange for new limits on the program, Iran would win relief from economic sanctions. The two sides were nowhere near a final agreement, but signs of a possible compromise had emerged by early June. When Israel attacked Iran, the negotiations collapsed. Yet Iran has signaled that it remains willing to talk, and even a strike on Fordo would not necessarily wipe out prospects of a return to the negotiating table. If the Trump administration follows an attack on Iran with an enticing offer, such as large-scale sanctions relief or peace guarantees, there is still a chance that Iran would consider making concessions, said Vali Nasr, an Iran expert and a professor at the Johns Hopkins School of Advanced International Studies. 'Is there an offer on the table that the Iranian people in this moment can actually rally around?' he said. 'If it's only a stick, then they're going to fight.' So far, Trump has not extended many carrots. He called in a social media post on Tuesday for Iran's 'UNCONDITIONAL SURRENDER.' Iran may lean into nuclear activity All eyes are on Fordo. But it is possible that Iran has secret nuclear sites aimed at producing weapons that the United States and Israel do not know about, though no public evidence has emerged of such places. If they do exist, Iran could use whatever it has left to try to accelerate its nuclear program in the wake an American attack. With the damage Israeli airstrikes have done to nuclear facilities and the killings of top nuclear scientists, Iran probably lacks the capacity to build a nuclear weapon quickly, analysts said. Still, it could move in that direction and would have fresh incentive to do so. 'You would begin to see that broader escalation that they've held back on,' said Sanam Vakil, the director of the Middle East and North Africa Program at Chatham House. After all, Iran would have few other options left for deterring future attacks, she added. Iran's Parliament has publicly discussed a withdrawal from the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty. The treaty, of which Israel is not a signatory, currently requires Iran to submit to oversight by the International Atomic Energy Agency and other transparency obligations and to commit to not building a nuclear bomb. So far, the government has reiterated its longstanding insistence that Iran's nuclear program is solely for peaceful purposes. But Iran has firmly refused to capitulate to a central American demand that it give up uranium enrichment, saying it has the right to a civilian nuclear program. The war could get bigger and messier Over the past week, Iran has avoided striking American troops or other targets that could pull the United States into the war. Its leaders may still be hoping to make a deal with the Trump administration to end the conflict and wary of taking on the US military on top of Israel's. Though Iran has responded to Israeli attacks with missiles and threats of its own, it has refrained from hitting American troops or bases in the Middle East. It has also not struck Arab countries allied with the United States, such as Saudi Arabia or the United Arab Emirates. Nor has it sent global oil prices soaring by sealing off or harassing traffic in the Strait of Hormuz, a vital oil shipping channel to Iran's south. But at least one Iranian official has warned that Iran could do so if the United States enters the war. And Iran's allied militias in the region, including the Houthis in Yemen, Hezbollah in Lebanon and armed groups in Iraq, have not joined the fight. Many of them have been seriously weakened over the past two years. But those Iranian allies could still join the fray if the Trump administration decides to strike. If the United States tries to force Iran to capitulate, 'Iran will keep hitting until the end of the missile capabilities,' said Ellie Geranmayeh, an Iran expert at the European Council on Foreign Relations. Talk of regime change Trump said on social media this week that the United States is weighing whether to kill Iran's supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, but had decided 'not for now.' Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu of Israel said in a Fox News interview this week that changing Iran's regime 'could certainly be the result' of this war. Even if the United States assassinates Khamenei, however, the religious-military establishment that has tightly held power in Iran for nearly five decades may not fall. With a war raging, the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, the most powerful branch of Iran's military, could seize control of the country, said Nasr, the professor. They might put in place a more Western-friendly government, or, more likely, replace Khamenei with a more extreme figure who would dig in for a long fight, Nasr added. If the military does not assert itself quickly, some analysts fear that Iran could plunge into chaos or civil war as different factions struggle for control. But they see little chance for Iran's liberal opposition, which has been weakened and brutally repressed by the regime, to prevail. Iran's people could rise up again Netanyahu encouraged the Iranian people last week to capitalize on Israel's attacks on their government and 'rise up' against their 'evil and oppressive regime.' Iranians have staged mass protests against clerical rule several times in recent history, most recently with the 'Women, Life, Freedom' demonstrations of late 2022. Each time, the opposition has faced a harsh crackdown by government security forces. Some Iranians so despise the clerical leaders that they have at times looked to Israel as an ally and openly hoped for the United States to install new leadership. Some Iranian opponents of the regime cheered Israel's initial attacks on Iran, which they saw as more evidence of their government's incompetence and mismanagement. But the growing death toll, the attacks on civilian infrastructure and the panic gripping Iranian cities are hardening many in the country against Israel. Iranian social media platforms have been full of patriotic posts in recent days, expressing unity against foreign intervention, if not exactly support for the regime.

India Today

39 minutes ago

• India Today

China holds first trilateral meeting with Pakistan and Bangladesh

China, Bangladesh and Pakistan held their first trilateral meeting at the official level in China's Kunming. The meeting took place on Thursday and was attended by key representatives from all three Vice Foreign Minister Sun Weidong, Bangladeshi Acting Foreign Secretary Ruhul Alam Siddique and Additional Foreign Secretary of Pakistan Imran Ahmed Siddiqui participated in the meeting in person. Pakistani Foreign Secretary Amna Baloch joined the first phase of the discussions via video her remarks, Foreign Secretary Amna Baloch appreciated China for organising the inaugural meeting of the trilateral mechanism. She said, 'The Chinese side has done well in convening the inaugural meeting of the trilateral mechanism.' Noting the shared goals of the three nations, she said, 'There are common aspirations of the three sides for people-centric development.' She added that Pakistan seeks 'deeper engagement between China and South Asian countries'.Baloch also noted the positive momentum in Pakistan-China bilateral relations and said Islamabad was ready to boost cooperation with Islamabad and Dhaka in multiple further said Pakistan was ready to work with China and Bangladesh to enhance ties in trade and investment, agriculture and digital Watch IN THIS STORY#Pakistan#Bangladesh

Time of India

an hour ago

• Time of India

Gold at a crossroads: Will fed's hawkish pause and Iran conflict spark a $3,400 breakout?

Gold prices are currently under pressure due to the US Federal Reserve's stance on interest rates. This has strengthened the US Dollar. Geopolitical tensions and trade worries offer some support to gold. Spot gold is trading near $3,387. Technical levels to watch include support at $3,322 and resistance at $3,374. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Why is gold falling today? The Fed now expects only one rate cut of 25 bps in both 2026 and 2027. This 'hawkish' view supports the US Dollar and pressures gold. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Geopolitics and trade tensions still support gold US Senate Intel Chair said Trump wants to give Iran a last chance to end its nuclear program. Trump is reportedly delaying any strikes for about two weeks. Gold price now and key levels to watch Spot gold trades just below $3,350, after falling earlier in the day. Earlier this week, gold touched a nearly 2-month high close to $3,452. The US Dollar pulled back after a recent peak, giving gold slight support. Technical view: Can gold stay above key support? Immediate support: $3,323–$3,322 Next support: $3,300 Key resistance: $3,374–$3,375 Next hurdle: $3,400 Upside target if breakout happens: $3,434–$3,435, then $3,451–$3,452 Major breakout point: $3,500 (psychological level, also near top of ascending channel) What traders should watch next If gold drops below $3,322, it may fall further to $3,300 or even lower. If gold breaks above $3,400, it could aim for $3,435 and even $3,452. A clear move above $3,500 could open the door to test $3,550 or $3,600. RSI is weakening but close to key levels; a move back above 60 would signal strength. Today's focus: Geopolitics and the Fed outlook US–Iran tensions: US officials reportedly preparing strike options; Trump says, 'I may do it. I may not.' Fed signals fewer rate cuts in future years, boosting the Dollar and limiting gold upside. Gold prices are facing selling pressure even though there are some factors that could help support them. The Federal Reserve's tough stance on interest rates is helping the US Dollar and putting pressure on worries and increasing geopolitical tensions may support gold as a safe-haven asset. Gold prices have dropped to their lowest in over a week, trading just below a key level in early European trading. This comes after the Fed recently lowered its forecast for future rate cuts, which boosts the US Dollar and reduces demand for gold, since it doesn't pay is under pressure again even though some factors could support it. Prices are hovering just under $3,350 after falling earlier in the day. Traders are watching global risks and the US Federal Reserve's recent interest rate US Federal Reserve kept interest rates the same but said it now plans fewer rate cuts in 2026 and 2027. This made the US Dollar stronger and reduced demand for gold, which doesn't give any top of that, European stock markets are doing well, which is reducing safe-haven demand for with the pressure, gold still has some support. Rising tensions in the Middle East are worrying investors. The fight between Iran and Israel has now gone on for eight days. There's also speculation that the US may get the same time, US–China trade worries are growing again. Trump has warned of new tariffs on the pharma sector, and more could come before the July 9 'liberation day' tariff kind of uncertainty usually supports gold as a safe has dropped below the 100-period SMA and is testing the lower edge of an ascending channel. Momentum indicators are losing strength, especially on hourly now, gold is trading between $3,322 and $3,400. A clear breakout from this range could set the direction for the coming weeks.